Archive for wi-fi

Super-Size My Wi-Fi

wifi McDonald’s Corp. will soon start offering free wireless Internet access at its U.S. restaurants  according to a recent report in the Wall Street Journal. Starting in mid-January, McDonald’s will lift it’s $2.95 fee that it had charged customers for two hours of wireless Internet access, available at about 11,000 of its 14,000 domestic locations, McDonald’s USA Chief Information Officer David Grooms said in an interview.

mcdonalds-logoThe free access is a partnership with at&t Inc., which provides McDonald’s stores with wireless Internet. Free Wi-Fi is part of the fast-food chain’s transformation from its hamburger roots into a hang-out destination. Over at Mashable.com they speculate that McDonald’s plans to start selling frappes and smoothies mid-2010 as another part of the transformation.

Masattlogohable.com writes that at&t purchased the Texas-based Wi-Fi hotspot operator Wayport in 2008 for $275 million in cash. The privately held company administered over 80,000 Wi-Fi hotspots all over the world for airports and large organizations like Wyndham, Four Seasons and McDonald’s restaurants nationwide. Stacey Higgenbotham over at GigaOm wrote in 2008 that at&t made this deal to off-load the mobile data network,  “allows at&t to provide its customers with more places to do their bandwidth-sucking applications. Already, AT&T is willing to let iPhone and BlackBerry users access its Wi-Fi hotspots free at Starbucks. It also means AT&T can hold out a bit longer before deploying its 4G LTE network, which is designed for data.”

This is nothing but a holding-action so at&t can launch more rich-content phones like Apple’s iPhone and the Blackberry Bold and keep thier old network in-place. At&t already requires iPhone users to use their Wi-Fi connection to download files from iTunes and prohibits bandwidth-intensive applications such as P2P sharing. According to GigOM, part of the reason for this is the limitations of its HSPA network. While fast, it isn’t designed to handle the continuous streams of data a song download or video upload requires. 3G is still designed for voice traffic, which is intermittent and much less bandwidth intensive. The network has a data overlay, but that, too, is designed for bursts of data rather than continuous streams. If too many people that require continuous streams of data get on, it clogs the network, leaving other subscribers unable to access it.

This move will allow at&t to delay deploying its 4G LTE network, and charge heavy users more.  Ralph de la Vega, president and chief executive for mobility and consumer markets at at&t said “We’re going to try to focus on making sure we give incentives to those small percentages to either reduce or modify their usage, so they don’t crowd out the customers on those same cell sites,” he said. The company might consider a “pricing scheme that addresses the usage,” Mr. de la Vega said in the New York Times.

Rb-
There are questions that this partnership between McDonald’s and at&t raises:

  • Will the service be  ’gated’ via some kind of time code on your receipt, or will be truly free?
  • Will usage be monitored?
  • What does the idea of people hanging out at McD’s to troll Facebook do to the idea  of a “fast food” restaurant?

Remember, you get what you pay for.

802.11n Ratified -Yawn

wifiReuters is reporting that today (09-11-09) the IEEE Standards Board has ratified the IEEE 802.11n™-2009 amendment. This vote ends a seven year effort to, “enable rollout of significantly more scalable WLANs that deliver 10-fold-greater data rates than previously defined while ensuring co-existence with legacy systems and security implementations” according the the IEEE. The 560-page document is scheduled to be published in mid-October 2009. Bruce Kraemer, Chair of the IEEE Wireless LAN Working Group said in a press release “The performance improvements achieved via IEEE 802.11n stand to transform the WLANieee_logo user experience, and ratification of the amendment sets the stage for a new wave of application innovation and creation of new market opportunities.”

Kelly Davis-Felner, marketing director of the Wi-Fi Alliance (WFA), told Network World that “The core interoperability is totally preserved with the [existing] draft certification program.”  Ms. Davis-Felner says,  ”Existing draft-11n products should work seamlessly with future products based on the final standard. No existing products will have to be retested in the updated certification program.”

Today’s ratification marks the high-point for other 802.11 wireless products. This approval will green-light the development and deployment of 11n products in the enterprise. There is no longer a reason for firms deploying greenfield WLAN’s to roll put anything but  802.11n.   The WFA expects  11n shipments to rise to 45% of all 802.11 shipments in 2009, and 60% in 2012 based on data from market researcher ABI Research, according to Davis-Felner. But how long will 802.11n last?

wigigNetworkWorld is reporting that Microsoft, Intel and other manufacturers have formed the  Gigabit Wireless Alliance (WiGig) to create anew wireless specification with a data speed of up to 6Gbps. WiGig is also actively involved with the IEEE’s 802.11ad task group. And if WiGig is to slow, James Buckwalter, a professor at the University of California San Diego has developed s a silicon-based amplifier that transmits 10Gbps wireless in 100 GHz frequency bands  according to NetworkWorld. Coverage could also be over a kilometer, which beats traditional WiFi’s 100 meters.

rb-WiFi abgn logo

The formal ratification of the IEEE 802.11n standard is a good thing. However we have been recommending that clients seriously consider this technology in greenfield installs with Wi-Fi approved 802.11n since the beginning of the year.

WPA Gone in 60 Seconds

securityJapanese researchers have identified a WPA hack which could give hackers a way to read encrypted Wi-Fi traffic  in less than 1 minute. Toshihiro Ohigashi (Hiroshima University) and Masakatu Morii (Kobe University) presented a way to break the WPA (Wi-Fi Protected Access) encryption system at the Joint Workshop on Information Security.  The researchers outlined their work in paper called “A Practical Message Falsi cation Attack on WPA“  on August 7, 2009.

wifiThe new attack builds on 2008 research from Darmstadt University of Technology graduate sstudents Martin Beck and Erik Tews who proved that WPA Temporal Key Integrity Protocol (TKIP) could be attacked. The Beck-Tews attack only worked on short packets in a WPA implementations that supported 802.11 quality of service (QOS) features and took between 12 and 15 minutes to work.

The new threat utilizes a “man in the middle” (MITM) attacks on WPA TKIP systems. The MITM attack  uses the the “chopchop” attack on a short packet (like ARP broadcasts), deciphers its 64-bit Message Integrity Code (MIC), and can then craft whatever packet it wants. The new packet is coded with the proper checksums and passed along to the access point, which should accept it as genuine. Dragos Ruiu, organizer of the PacSec security conference where the first WPA hack was demonstrated told IDGNews, “They took this stuff which was fairly theoretical and they’ve made it much more practical.”

Both attacks work only on WPA systems that use the  TKIP  algorithm.   The new attack does not work on newer WPA2 devices or on WPA systems that use the stronger Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) algorithm. Kelly Davis-Felner, marketing director with the Wi-Fi Alliance, said that people should now use WPA2. She told IDGNews,  WPA with TKIP “was developed as kind of an interim encryption method as Wi-Fi security was evolving several years ago.”

Enterprise Wi-Fi networks typically include security software that would detect the type of man-in-the-middle attack described by the Japanese researchers, Robert Graham, CEO of Errata Security t0ld ars technica. He continues, the development of the first really practical attack against WPA should give people a reason to dump WPA with TKIP, he said. “It’s not as bad as WEP, but it’s also certainly bad.”

rb-

This is only an issue of the WLAN is secured at all.  Motorola published a report in April 2009  that says 64% of companies are neglecting WLAN security. The report claims that only 47% of companies are using Wired Equivalent Privacy (WEP) or Wi-Fi Protected Access (WPA) encryption on their wireless networks.

These attacks highlight the weaknesses of TKIP-based WLAN encryption. WPA TKIP was developed to fix the worst of the security holes in the first Wi-Fi encryption protocol, WEP. Wi-Fi-certified products have had to support WPA2 since March 2006 . Users should move to AES-CCMP which requires WPA2 Personal for home and small office networks or WPA2 Enterprise for larger networks. Using AES-CCMP may requires that some network equipment installed before 2003 be reviewed as AES supports key lengths up to 256 bits, which may not be compatible with older hardware. Any remaining equipment of this vintage may need to be  be upgraded to newer Wi-Fi adapters, switched to Ethernet only, or retired. WPA2 has not shown any vulnerabilities to date. There is no real good reason to try to secure your WLAN with WPA-TKIP anymore.

Wi-Fi Settlement to Cost Billions

CSIRO logo

Australia’s national science agency, the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization  (CSIRO) confirmed (4-22-09) that the patent cases being heard in the Eastern District Court of Texas over CSIRO’s claim to inventing the technology behind Wireless Local Area Networks (WLANs) has concluded “successfully.” CSIRO claims to have patented core elements of the technology used in 802.11a and 802.11g wireless devices.

“CSIRO has negotiated settlement with each of the 14 companies involved in four concurrent litigation cases,” the agency said in a statement. “The commercial terms of the settlements with these companies will remain confidential.”

The CSIRO first applied for the US patent in 1993 and was awarded US patent number 5,487,069,  entitled “Wireless LAN”, on 23 January 1996, and is for a “peer-to-peer wireless LAN” that can operate in the kind of multi-path environment created by radio echoes in typical office buildings. The patent describes three ways to get high speed transmission despite the hostile conditions in an office environment by transmitting over a relatively large number of parallel sub-channels within the available bandwidth so that each channel has a low bit rate; transmitting data in small packets with forward error correction (FEC); and using interleaving. These concepts are all featured in descriptions of the 802.11 physical layer. claims to have patented core elements of the technology used in 802.11a, 802.11g and 802.11n wireless devices.

CSIRO has previously said that its patent allowed speed increases up to a factor of five over previous WLANs by a factor of five, and that it had “offered licences on reasonable and non-discriminatory terms to major suppliers as soon as they started selling devices which used the CSIRO technology.”

However, troubles began following Cisco Systems’ acquisition of Radiata from Macquarie University, which it had carried out for the purpose of commercializing CSIRO’s technology, which forms a key component of commonly used Wi-Fi products

The CSIRO filed patent infringement suits against 3Com, Accton, Asus, Belkin, D-Link, Fujitsu, Marvell (manufacturers of Apple‘s iPod), Nintendo, SMC and Toshiba. Several large technology vendors bit back – with  Apple, Dell, HP, Intel, Microsoft and Netgear bringing cases against CSIRO in an attempt to have the patent invalidated.

In June 2007, the CSIRO won a case in the US Federal Court against Japanese manufacturer Buffalo Technologies, the basis of which the firm has used to demand royalties from a broader set of manufacturers that market Wi-Fi equipment.

As the case has played out in the last few weeks in and out of the Texas court, CSIRO struck individual deals with its adversary’s including; Dell, Fujitisu, HP, Intel, and Microsoft

HP Logo

HP was the first to settle on 04-02-09. CSIRO spokesperson Huw Morga  said “CSIRO can confirm that a settlement has been reached with Hewlett-Packard Company (HP) in relation to the wireless patent case,” Morgan continued  in the Sydney Morning Herald, “There will be no further comment at this time due to confidentiality and on-going litigation.”

Fujitsu Logo

Fujitsu Computer Systems Corp. was dismissed by the Court with prejudice the claims and counterclaims between CSIRO and Fujitsu in the first  court-approved settlement to emerge in the case on April 8 with terms  of the settlement to remain  confidential.

Microsoft Logo

PC manufacturer Asus and Microsoft separately settled their lawsuits with the CSIRO on 04-14-09 terms of the settlement were not disclosed. CSIRO had accused Microsoft of wrongfully using its patent, while Microsoft was seeking a ruling of non-infringement for its networking wireless technology that includes an adapter for the Xbox video-game system.

Intel and Dell, also settled on 04-19-09 for undisclosed and confidential terms.

Accton Technology Corp., SMC Networks, Belkin Corp. and Belkin International, Inc., D-Link Systems, Inc., Netgear, Inc., Nintendo of America, Inc., Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc., and 3Com Corp., announced on 4-20-09 that they had reached a settlement with CSIRO.

Cisco and its Linksys division aren’t on CSIRO’s  list because Cisco agreed to patent terms when it acquired an Australian network authentication firm a few years ago. Apple dropped out in December 2006.

Dr. Alex Zelinsky, director of the CSIRO ICT Center confirmed that all of CSIRO opponents had chosen to settle the wireless case rather than go ahead with another trial.  CSIRO deputy chief of operations Mike Whelan said that the terms of the settlement would remain strictly confidential. Dr Zelinsky speculated to ITNews , however, that the pay off could be worth upwards from $100 million up to a billion dollars and keep royalty payment flowing into the agency for up to a decade.

Timeline

  • November 1993: CSIRO lodges US patent for the invention of a wireless LAN.
  • January 1996: US patent 5,487,069 is issued to CSIRO.
  • 1997: CSIRO and Macquarie University form Radiata, a company established for the purposes of commercializing the patent.
  • 2001: Cisco Systems acquires Radiata for US$295 million.
  • 2003: CSIRO engages in patent licensing discussions with several manufacturers, none of which agree to pay licensing fees.
  • February 2005: CSIRO lodges a suit against Buffalo Technology for alleged patent violation in the Eastern District of Texas Court as a test case for its patent.
  • May 2005: Two groups of industry heavyweights — including Dell and Intel, and Microsoft, HP and Netgear, lodge lawsuits against CSIRO seeking to overturn its patent.
  • November 2006: CSIRO has its patent upheld by the Eastern District of Texas Court in its case against Buffalo Technology.
  • September 2006: CSIRO counter-sues the industry parties attempting to overturn its patent, claiming these companies infringe on its patents.
  • September 2007: CSIRO refuses to offer any amnesty to IEEE members that infringe on its patent.
  • April 02, 2009 HP settles suit.
  • April 13, 2009 Microsoft settles suit
  • April 20, 2009 all other firms settle suit.

rb-

If your installation includes Aruba, Meru or Trapeze, you can hope that CISRO goes back to developing  Wearable Instrument Shirts or Airhockey Over a Distance, rather than squeezing more revenue for the tax payers of Australia out of this initial victory by going after all of the other Wi-Fi vendors.  If upheld, CSIRO will collect what it has frequently described as a small royalty on all devices containing Wi-Fi.

The cases are:

  • Intel Corp. v. Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, 06cv551
  • Microsoft Corp. v. Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, 06cv549, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Texas (Tyler)

HDTV over Wi-Fi

TelephonyOnline has an article speculating that wireless high definition television will be available this summer. Celeno Communications, an Israeli start-up backed by Cisco, manufactures the semiconductors which make WiFi networks robust enough to deliver multiple high-definition television (HDTV) streams to PC’s,  TV’s or other consumer electronics devices. Celeno’s technology would make deliver on a significant portion of the anywhere, anytime video promise.

Celeno’s OptimizAIR technology will work with existing receivers such as set-top boxes, uses 5 GHz spectrum. OptimizAIR uses standard PHY and MAC layers but adds proprietary algorithms that the company says can double the throughput of standard 802.11 WiFi and increase the range of the signals as much as eight times. Celeno’s technology additions include Spatial Channel Awareness and Beam-Forming MIMO (multiple inputs, multiple outputs). The company said it can stream HD video 120 feet, through four brick walls and more than three floors.

Switch to our mobile site