Archive for Malware

40 Years of Malware – Part 3

2011 marks the 40th anniversary of the computer virus. Help Net Security notes that over the last four decades, malware instances have grown from 1,300 in 1990, to 50,000 in 2000, to over 200 million in 2010. Fortinet (FTNT) marks this dubious milestone with an article which counts down some of the malware evolution low-lights. The Sunnyvale,CA network security firm says that viruses evolved from an academic proof of concepts, to geek pranks which have evolved into cybercriminal tools. By 2005, the virus scene had been monetized, and almost all viruses developed for the sole purpose of making money via more or less complex business models. According to FortiGuard Labs, the most significant computer viruses over the last 40 years are:

- See Part 1 Here - See Part 2 Here – See Part 3 Here  - See Part 4 Here

Code Red Worm2001 - E-mail and the Internet become primary transmission vectors for malware by 2001 as scripts automatically load viruses from infected Websites. The Code Red worm targeted Web servers and not users. By exploiting a vulnerability in Microsoft IIS servers Code Red automatically spread to nearly 400,000 servers in less than one week. The Code red worm replaced the the homepage of the compromised websites with a “Hacked By Chinese!” page.  Code Red had a distinguishing feature designed to flood the White House Website with traffic (from the infected servers), probably making it the first case of documented ‘hacktivism’ on a large-scale.

Shortly after the September 11 attacks the Nimda worm (admin spelled backwards) infected hundreds of thousands of computers worldwide. Nimda is one of the most complicated viruses, having many different methods of infecting computers systems and duplicating itself.

Microsoft2003 – Widespread Internet attacks emerge as SQL Slammer (or Sapphire) infects the memory in servers worldwide, clogging networks and causing shutdowns. on January 25, 2003 Slammer first appeared as a single-packet, 376-byte worm that generated random IP addresses and sent itself to those IP addresses. If the IP address was a computer running an unpatched copy of Microsoft’s (MSFT) SQL Server Desktop Engine, that computer would immediately begin firing the virus off to random IP addresses. .Slammer was remarkably effective at spreading, it infected 75,000 computers in 10 minutes. The explosion of traffic overloaded routers across the globe, which created higher demands on other routers, which shut them down, and so on.

The summer of 2003 saw the release of both the Blaster and Sobig worms. Blaster (aka Lovsan or MSBlast) was the first to hit. The worm was detected on August 11 and spread rapidly, peaking in just two days. Transmitted via network and Internet traffic, this worm exploited a vulnerability in Windows 2000 and Windows XP, and when activated, presented the PC user with a menacing dialog box indicating that a system shutdown was imminent.

The Sobig worm hit right on the heels of Blaster. The most destructive variant was Sobig.F, which generated over 1 million copies of itself in its first 24 hours. The worm infected host computers via e-mail attachments such as application.pif and thank_you.pif. When activated, the worm transmitted itself to e-mail addresses discovered on a host of local file types. The result was massive amounts of Internet traffic. Microsoft has announced a $250,000 bounty for anyone who identifies Sobig.F’s author, but to date, the perpetrator has not been caught.

Sasser shutdown2004 – The Sasser worm built on the autonomous nature of Code Red and spread without anyone’s help by exploiting a vulnerability in Microsoft Windows XP and Windows 2000 operating systems called the Local Security Authority Subsystem Service, or LSASS into spread. Microsoft Security Bulletin MS04-011 here. This is the first wide-spread Windows malware, made even more annoying by a bug in the worm’s code, that turned infected systems off every couple of minutes.

This is the first time that systems whose function isn’t normally related to the Internet (and that mostly existed before the Internet) were severely affected. Sasser infected more than one million systems. The damage amount is thought to be more than $18 billion.

Bagle was first detected in 2004, it infected users through an email attachment, and used email to spread itself. Unlike earlier mass-mailing viruses, Bagle did not rely on the MS Outlook contact list rather it harvested email addresses from various document files stored in the infected computer to attack. Bagle opened a backdoor where a hacker could gain access and control of the infected computer. Through the backdoor, he attacker could download more components to either spy and steal information from the user or launch DDoS attacks.

MyDoom is another mass-mailing worm discovered in 2004. It spread primarily through email but it also it also attacked computers by infecting programs stored in the shared folder of the Peer-to-Peer software KaZaA. MyDoom slowed down global Internet access by ten percent, and caused some website access to be reduced by 50 percent. It is estimated that during the first few days, one out of ten email messages sent contained the virus.

2005 – In 2005 Sony BMG introduced secret DRM software to report music copying; Other rootkits appear, providing hidden access to systems.

MyTob appeared in 2005 and was one of first worms to combine the a botnet and a mass-mailer. MyTob marks the emergence of cybercrime. The cyber criminals developed business models to “monetize” botnets that installed spyware, sent spam, hosted illegal content and intercepted banking credentials, etc. The revenue generated from these new botnets quickly reached billions of dollars per year today.

rb-

By 2005 cybercriminals are starting to put all the parts together, Slammer proves that Microsoft systems can be used to spread attacks, Blaster and SoBig improved the infection rate, Bagel began to mine the targets for data and install backdoors so the attackers could continue to re-use the victims’ systems. MyDoom stated to use the first social networks, the P2P networks for attacks. Sony proved that rootkits could be widely distributed and MyTob was the first of the modern botnet, leading the world into today’s monetized cybercrime age, described in part 4.

 

Heidi Klum Most Dangerous Celeb in Cyberspace

MalwareGerman-born super-model and hottie Heidi Klum is now the most dangerous celebrity on the Web according to anti-malware firm McAfee‘s fifth annual Most Dangerous Celebrities study. Heidi Klum replaced Cameron Diaz as the number one riskiest celebrity to search for on the web.

Heidi KlumMcAfee research found that searching for the latest Heidi Klum pictures and downloads almost a 1 in 10 chance of landing on a website that has tested positive for online threats, such as spyware, adware, spam, phishing, viruses and other malware.

Paula Greve director of Web security research at McAfee, said:

Consumers should be particularly aware of malicious content hiding in ‘tiny’ places like shortened URLs that can spread virally in social networking sites, or through e-mails and text messages from friends.

Mila KunisMcAfee says that cyber-criminals often use the names of popular celebrities to lure people to sites that are actually laden with malicious software. Anyone looking for the latest videos or pictures could end up with a malware-ridden computer instead of just trendy content.

Top 10 list

1 – Heidi Klum, The former Victoria’s Secret model and current producer of “Project Runway” moved up from No. 10 in 2010 to No. 1 for 2011. Searching for Ms. Klum results in nearly a one in ten chance of landing on a risky site.

2 – Cameron Diaz, 2010’s Most Dangerous Celebrity fell to second place, with searches resulting in slightly fewer risky sites this year.

3 – Piers Morgan is a new addition to the top ten list, Morgan is also the most dangerous male celebrity.

4 – Jessica Biel, 2009’s Most Dangerous Celebrity fell to fourth place this year with searches resulting in fewer risky sites.

5 – Katherine Heigl, the former “Grey’s Anatomy” star is new to the top ten in 2011.

6 – Mila Kunis, the former star of “That 70s Show” is also new to the top ten, bolstered by starring in “Friends with Benefits.”

7 – Anna Paquin, the “True Blood” star is as dangerous on the Web as she is on the screen. She moved up from No. 10 last year to No. 7 this year.

8 – Adriana Lima who is best known for being a Victoria’s Secret Angel since 2000 she has became slightly safer, moving her from No. 6 last year, to No. 8 this year.

9 – Scarlett Johansson, the 2010 GQ MagazineBabe of The Year” is new to the list this year.

10 – Brad Pitt, Emma Stone and Rachel McAdams, Mr. Pitt has been on the list for the past four years. Ms. Stone and Ms. McAdams are new to the top ten.

Juiia Roberts Gisele Bündchen, Tom Cruise, Penelope Cruz, Jennifer Love Hewitt, Nicole Kidman and Julia Roberts have all dropped out of this year’s top ten list. Noticeably missing from this years list is Charlie Sheen who made made headlines with his highly public departure from “Two and a Half Men

rb-

But BitDefender called Jay Leno, the most dangerous celeb in cyberspace.its good to see Intel McAfee wisely spending its marketing dollars on info like this when Microsoft (MSFT) is going to kill the anti-virus market by baking AV into Windows 8. Maybe I will get more hits after putting these pop names in here.

Adobe Still Full of Holes

MalwareI wrote about Adobe’s (ADBE) problem with writing secure software back in 2010. The problems still exists according to an article in Help Net Security The article lays out claims by Google (GOOG) researcher Tavis Ormandy that he notified Adobe of some 400 holes he found in its Flash Player. In its latest release of Flash, Adobe only patched 13 fixed holes in the application, failed to document other holes and did not give credit to those that found the bugs according to Help Net Security.

Adobe FlashThe Google researchers used a technique called fuzzing to reveal the bugs. “The initial run of the ongoing effort resulted in about 400 unique crash signatures, which were logged as 106 individual security bugs” the Google researchers wrote on their blog. “… each crash was treated as though it were potentially exploitable and addressed by Adobe. In the final analysis, the Flash Player update Adobe shipped earlier this week contained about 80 code changes to fix these bugs.”

Adobe software bugsHelp Net Security notes that after an initial silence on the matter, Adobe told Computerworld, that Mr. Ormandy had reported some 80 bugs in Flash Player, but defended their decision of not list all the vulnerabilities in the released security bulletins by saying that it usually doesn’t reveal or mention vulnerabilities found internally – by them or their partners. Also, the question is whether all those 80 flaws would lead to an exploitable hole. It seems that Adobe believes that only holes get a CVE number.

What do you think?

Is Flash still worth it?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Malware in Text

MalwareA team of security researchers have engineered a way of hiding malware in sentences that read like English language spam. The research led by Dr Josh Mason of Johns Hopkins University along with Dr Sam Small of Johns Hopkins, Dr Fabian Monrose of the University of North Carolina, and Greg MacManus of iSIGHT Partners outlined the threat in a paper English Shellcode (PDF) presented at the 2009 ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security. According to the UK’s Computing the paper shows hackers could evade anti-virus protection by hiding malicious code in sentences that read like English language spam

ThText on screene article says that attackers could develop a tool that would be the next step in the hacking and virus arms race. Hackers could hide alphanumeric shellcode in valid files which would activate the malicious payload of a code-injection attack, This attack vector could give attackers control of system resources, applications, and data on a compromised computer.

The researchers report they can generate English shellcode in less than one hour on standard PC hardware. The text in bold is the instruction set and the plain text is skipped.“There is a major center of economic activity, such as Star Trek, including The Ed Sullivan Show. The former Soviet Union. International organization participation.”

The good news, Dr. Mason said that the widespread use of this attack vector is limited because the alphanumeric character set is much smaller than the set of characters available in Unicode and UTF-8 encodings. This means that the set of instructions available for composing alphanumeric shellcode is relatively small.  “There was really not a lot to suggest it could be done because of the restricted instruction set,” said Dr. Mason. Long strings of mostly capital letters, for example would be very suspicious.

Computing claims the work is a breakthrough. Current network security techniques work on the assumption that the code used in code-injection attacks, where it is delivered and run on victims’ computers, has a different structure to non-executable plain data, such as English prose. If an attacker challenge’s the assumption that executable code structure is different than non-executable data malware would be almost impossible to detect  Dr Nicolas T Courtois, an expert in security and cryptology at University College London, said malware deployed in this way would be “hard, if not impossible, to detect reliably.” The research is a proof of concept, but Dr. Mason doubts any hackers are using the technique to disguise their code. “I’d be astounded if anyone is using this method in the real world owing to the amount of engineering it took to pull off,” he said. “A lot of people didn’t think it could be done.”

Professor John Walker, managing director of forensics consultancy Secure-Bastion, argued the research highlights the flaws in the anti-virus community’s approach to security exploits. “There is no doubt in my mind that anti-virus software as we know it today has gone well past its sell by date,” he said.

rb-

Carly Fiorina

Did Carly Fiorina lock up mid-thought due to this?

If this technology gets out in the wild, most experts believe that the current signature based anti-malware products will miss the attack and leave us all defenseless. Sounds like a something the chip makers should be working on. Is this why Intel bought McAfee?

What do you think?

Can the anti-malware industry adapt to new threats from attachers?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...


 

10 Security Reasons to Quit Facebook

Social Media Joan Goodchild, wrote an article for CSO Online that said Baby Boomers quit Facebook faster than they join based on information from Inside Facebook. The data indicates that after a huge growth in Facebook membership among the over-55 age group that same demographic began to defect in large numbers, just months after signing up. The CSO Online article quotes Scott Wright, a security consultant based in Canada and runs the site streetwise-security-zone.com says Boomers leave Facebook because they have discretion.

Here are 10 ways that Facebook does not allow for discretion, driving Boomer permanently off of Facebook.

Facebook1. Your Privacy is History Mr. Wright recalled an academic claim that the notion of privacy differs widely among generations. “The 20-something view of privacy is basically that their parents not see what they are doing. That’s about it,” he said. Apparently Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg agrees. He claims that openly sharing information with many people is today’s social norm. He went on to say “We view it as our role in the system to constantly be innovating and be updating what our system is to reflect what the current social norms are.” Many have translated this to mean Facebook doesn’t think its users want much privacy, and the policies of the site reflect that view. “If you can’t maintain privacy online and off, then you can’t speak freely,” said Bethan Tuttle, an Washington-based independent consultant and privacy advocate. Tuttle says in the article that the massive and quick growth Facebook has experienced, coupled with a lack of privacy-centric leadership has left end-user privacy as casualty.

2. They don’t have your best interests in mind Tom Eston, creator of the web site socialmediasecurity.com points out, the business models of Facebook and  Twitter, is to make user information as public as possible to generate new ways to make money. Mr. Eston said in the article

They are really startups if you think about it. They don’t have a true business model … Their philosophy is the more you share, the more information they have to make money with. With that in mind, can you really count on them to protect you?

And do you know just how much information you are sharing that can be used not only by Facebook, but by the application developers that create those fun quizzes and games? Wright says most people don’t. (I wrote about this problem here).

3. Frequent redesigns affect privacy settings Mr. Wright in the CSO Online article said,

Just when people figure out the privacy settings on Facebook, they go and change them again … It always seems like it is being done in everyone’s best interest, but if you really examine it, they have never done anything other than to try to get people to share more information.

Facebook redesigns often makes public, and searchable, certain user information that was previously private and many of the features you can make private are left public unless you go in and adjust your privacy settings. This is no small task, according to Ms. Tuttle, “I am really good online but it took me several tries to get my Facebook privacy settings where I needed them to be.”

4. Social engineering attacks are getting more targeted Most Facebook users have received messages on their wall asking “Have you seen this video?” or “Is this you in this photo?” By clicking on the link, the user runs the risk of being infected by malware. These are known as social engineering attacks, and they are becoming more sophisticated said Mr. Wright. “They are becoming very targeted. Even seasoned security professionals are falling for them,” he said. The more information you share, coupled with a decrease in privacy, only means it is even easier for cyber criminals to get information about you that can be used to trick you into clicking on a bad link.

5. You can’t trust the ads Most web users think advertisements are  harmless, unfortunately some contain malicious links. One common scenario involves a pop-up from the ad that claims your computer is infected and prompts you to download software to fix it. Instead of helpful software, you end up downloading something nasty. This is now commonly known in the security community as “scareware,” and it’s still a very effective way to snare unsuspecting users.

6. Spam Spam claiming to be from Facebook has increased according to the article. “I think it’s a security concern,” said Mr. Eston. “Mostly because spammers can use that vulnerability to make you think the message is coming from Facebook when it is not. Many users simply wonder “Why is Facebook sending me this?” and instinctively open the message and log in to what turns out to be a fake screen that steals credentials.

7. You don’t really know your friends The author cites a report from security firm Cloudmark which concluded that close to 40 percent of new Facebook profiles are fakes.  Having lots of friends is dangerous because it opens you up to additional security risks. Mr. Wright said those who get targeted for hacking are the users who have lots of friends (here is an example). The more friends you have, the more reach a criminal will have when he breaks into your profile and sends out a bad link to everyone.

8. You can’t help yourself from being dumb The attention around the site pleaserobme.com brought to light the safety concerns around social networking. Pleaserobme aggregates the Twitter feeds of people who play Foursquare, a location-sharing application. The problem is while playing the game, many users are also publicly broadcasting that their home is likely unattended and a good “opportunity” (as the site terms it) for thieves. As Ms. Tuttle put it, you need to think about what you are doing and many people are not. You’re putting yourself out there in potentially dangerous ways, particularly if you don’t know all of your “friends” that well.

9. The great unknown CSO Online says there is a lot of speculation about a Facebook IPO and future business strategy. What does this mean for users? Mr. Wright said some fear it means an increase loss of privacy as the social networking site inevitably looks for ways to make money by offering up valuable user information to advertisers and developers. Mr. Wright said,

One of the things I find most interesting is that there are still many people who are scared to death of social networking sites. These are usually the people who don’t see value in them. In the end, they may be the wisest of us all.

Bill Clinton

Listen Zuckerberg - Stop changing the settings or I'll tell Hillary

10. Ex’s, creeps and parents Facebook is making it possible for people to be cyber stalked, even if they aren’t friends anymore, said Mr. Eston. Although the physical and virtual connections are broken , having mutual friends makes it easier for your ex to keep tabs on you. The same goes for any creepy guy or girl you are trying to avoid. Or you may get a friend request from a parent, which Mr. Wright claims many 20-something users consider the worst thing that could ever happen in the history of social networking. “That is big driver for quitting,” he said. “Once the parent friends some of these people they immediately think ‘I’ve got to get out of this!’”

What do you think?

Are you concerned about your privacy on Facebook?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Switch to our mobile site