Tag Archive for Recycling

Why e-Cycling?

Electronic waste (e-waste) is classified as hazardous waste if it has components that are toxic (poisonous), ignitable/combustible, corrosive, or reactive. Most electronic devices contain heavy metals, such as lead. The BBC reports that the typical personal computer has many valuable materials, dangerous materials or valuable and dangerous materials. The BBC article, says that among the hazardous wastes included in the typical PC e-waste are:

Image credit: BBC

Hazardous Waste

  1. Lead in cathode ray tube and solder
  2. Arsenic in older cathode ray tubes
  3. Selenium in circuit boards as power supply rectifier
  4. Polybrominated flame retardants in plastic casings, cables and circuit boards
  5. Antimony trioxide as flame retardant
  6. Cadmium in circuit boards and semiconductors
  7. Chromium in steel as corrosion protection
  8. Cobalt in steel for structure and magnetism
  9. Mercury in switches and housing

An article at  CIO.com says that a firms major source of potential e-waste disposal liability comes from the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA), aka the Superfund law. Under Superfund, the U.S. Department of Environmental Protection (EPA) identifies contaminated sites, arranges for cleanup, identifies responsible parties and seeks compensation for the cleanup costs. Many of these sites are landfills where a firm would typically send trash, including obsolete computer equipment.  Once the EPA targets a firm, they can pay the fine or fight the EPA in federal court. The court proceeding could be a costly and time-consuming investigation in to the environmental impact of the firm. Unless the firm can prove they never deposited so much as a printer cartridge at that site, the firm could be on the hook for the entire cost of the clean-up. The Superfund law states that all contributors to a contaminated site are jointly and severally liable for the entire cost of the cleanup.

Enhancing the Superfund threats are state laws and regulations that affect the disposal of e-waste. For example in Michigan, Governor Granholm signed Senate Bill No. 897 into law in Dec. 2008. The law imposes a new annual registration tax of $2,000 to $3,000 on manufacturers of computers,  related equipment and video display devices sold in Michigan to fund a take-back program. Producers must pay for the collection, transportation and recycling.The program is available for small businesses (those employing 10 employees or fewer) purchasing new computers and televisions. The take-back program is good  for up to 7 units per day which  may recycle covered electronic devices  for free. Covered devices include  computers, peripherals, facsimile machines, DVD players, video cassette recorders, and video display devices. Printers will be added in 2011.  Program collection must start by April 1, 2010.   The Michigan Department of Natural Resources and Environment (DNRQ) is responsible for enforcing these laws. Larger firms are on their own and there is no current ban on disposal of e-waste. Firms with locations in New York or California faces much tougher requirements.

Many firms take the opposite approach to dumping e-waste into the landfill. Many firms are retaining their out of date IT assets. In 2007, the EPA estimated in 2007, the estimated number of desktop computers, monitors and notebooks in storage totaled over 110 million units.  Despite the declining cost of office spare, storing obsolete equipment is a waste of money and creates data loss risks and any residual value in the equipment will disappear. There are steps a firm can take to deal with e-waste.

CIO.com suggests the first step in disposing of e-waste is a well-thought-out technology disposal plan. The plan should start with an attorney or an environmental consultant to get a fuller understanding of the risks and opportunities. CIO.com says the w-waste plan should address:

  • A way to track regulatory changes;
  • Develop methods for achieving your business goals in an environmentally and legally sound manner;
  • Determine the point at which your waste volume puts you in a more restrictive category of regulation;
  • Evaluate tax liabilities and incentives;
  • Preserve the confidentiality of legal and business-critical information.

The environmental consultant should be able to find alternative options for reusing and recycling out of date  equipment.  A good consultant should be able to identify a network of local computer repair and resale shops, nonprofit groups, computer retailers and government agencies where businesses and residents can donate, upgrade or recycle used computer equipment. Finally, such a professional can develop agreements that shift the burden and financial risk up or down the supply chain to others who are better situated to manage the issue according to the CIPo.com article. One way to defer the e-waste risk is to lease computer equipment rather than buying it so that the manufacturer is responsible for disposal at the end of the term.

rb-

We have developed e-cycling programs and PC life-cycle programs for clients. We try to bring home the problems of storing out of use IT assets including:

  • Wasted money for floor space to store equipment and the loss of residual value. especially with high-end equipment which could be re-sold on eBay.
  • Data protection regulatory and theft risks, after al. who checks on th e old servers once they get stashed in the warehouse?
  • Environmental regulatory risks if as firm stashes away enough out-of commission computer systems and your storage area may end up changing the firms EPA status to a hazardous waste generator.

How To Chose An eCycler

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) recently held a webinar on how to avoid the pitfalls of e-waste recycling.  The online meeting, hosted by Chris Newman from EPA Region 5, laid out some best practices for selecting the right recycler for eWaste (eCycling). The reasons for eCycling are simple: to protect your data, and your customers’ data, electronics should be disposed of in a traceable and secure way. According to the EPA, eCycling doesn’t necessarily mean shredding  machines that are no longer in use; responsible recyclers can wipe computers clean and reuse some parts.

EPAAccording to the EPA, the key to finding the best eWaste recycler for the firm and the environment is to “Trust, but verify.”  The responsible firm should verify the claims their eCyclers make. The EPA reports that some unscrupulous eCyclers will use will use an “EPA ID #” as proof of certification, when it’s actually just an accounting tool.  Mr. Newman says that the EPA doesn’t certify recyclers but there are  several groups that do certify recyclers’ practices.

The Responsible Recycling Coalition (R2) is one of two certifications in the U.S. The EPA started R2 in 2008 with industry partners, and initial support of environmental groups. In July 2009, the American National Standards Institute-American Society of Quality National Accreditation Board (ANAB) announced that it will start accrediting companies that will certify recyclers of electronic equipment under the R2 practices. R2 focuses on reducing the human and environmental impacts of recycling electronics. Waste Management recently became the first company to formally adopt these practices.

w-StewardsThe other certifying body is the E-Stewards Initiative, which was formed in 2008 by environmental groups that abandoned the R2 partnership when the R2 principals refused to rule out exporting e-waste, incinerating waste electronics, and using prison labor to recycle electronics. In July 2009, the American National Standards Institute-American Society of Quality National Accreditation Board (ANAB) announced that it will start accrediting companies that will certify recyclers of electronic equipment under the E-Stewards Initiative.

EPA’s Chris Newman has posted the full presentation here [PDF].

rb-

When we talk to clients about their technology life-cycle projects, most of the time, their disposal processes are very weak.  Owners need to understand the risks they are incurring by tossing equipment in the dumpster or stock-piling them in the closet.

Researchers Recycle LCDs into Meds

greentagFastCompany reports that researchers at the University of York have discovered that waste from old LCD TVs can be recycled for medical purposes.

The researchers believe that polyvinyl-alcohol (PVA), one of the materials used in polarizing films on the front and back of LCD displays, can be transformed into pills, dressings, and even a substance used in tissue scaffolds to help body parts regenerate. PVA isn’t normally used in these applications, but the researchers have figured out that it doesn’t provoke an immune system response, so it could be used in any number of medical settings.

The process for recycling PVA is simple according to the article. The process for creating “expanded PVA” suitable for medical use, invloves dousing the material in water, microwaving it, and then washing it in ethanol.

The research “Expanding the potential for waste polyvinyl-alcohol” can be found on the Green Chemistry website. is by five academics in the University’s Department of Chemistry. Professor James Clark, director of the York Green Chemistry Centre of Excellence and one of the author’s of the research, told EurekaAlert “It is important that we find ways of recycling as many elements of LCDs as possible so we don’t simply have to resort to burying and burning them.”

Only 3% of Mobile Phones Recycled

A survey released by Nokia has found some interesting factoids about recycling mobile phones:

  • On average consumers have owned around five phones.
  • Only 3% of people recycle their mobile phones.
  • Three out of every four people indicated that they don’t even think about recycling their devices
  • Nearly half of the respondents were unaware that it is even possible to recycle their mobile phones.
  • The majority of retired phones, 44%, are kept at homes never used again.
  • One quarter of users are passing on their old phones to friends or family
  • Sixteen percent of people are selling their used devices particularly in emerging markets.
  • Remarkably only 4%, of retired mobile devices are being thrown into landfill.

The survey revealed that one of the main reasons why so few people recycle their mobile phones is because they simply don’t know that it is possible to do so. Even if they were aware that a device could be recycled, did not know how to go about doing this.

  • Two thirds said they did not know how to recycle an unwanted device
  • A majority (71%) were unaware of where to recycle an unwanted device.
  • Globally, half of those surveyed didn’t know phones could be recycled, with awareness lowest in India at 17% and Indonesia at 29%, and highest in the UK at 80% and 66% in Finland and Sweden.

Markus Terho, Director of Environmental Affairs, Markets, at Nokia said, “If each of the three billion people globally owning mobiles brought back just one unused device we could save 240,000 tons of raw materials and reduce greenhouse gases to the same effect as taking 4 million cars off the road.”

Up to 80% of any Nokia device is recyclable and precious materials within it can be reused to help make new products. Mr. Terho said, “Using the best recycling technology nothing is wasted. Between 65 – 80 per cent of a Nokia device can be recycled. Plastics that can’t be recycled are burnt to provide energy for the recycling process, and other materials are ground up into chips and used as construction materials or for building roads. In this way nothing has to go to landfill.”

Nokia has collection points for unwanted mobile devices in 85 countries around the world, the largest voluntary scheme in the mobile industry. People can drop off their old devices at Nokia stores and almost 5,000 Nokia Care Centers. To find their nearest take back point people can visit http://www.nokia.com/werecyle.

E-Waste Update

  • 220 million tons of old computes discarded in the U.S. each year (US EPA)
  • 632,000 pounds of mercury expected to be generated by e-waste by 2007 (Basal Action Network/Silicon Valley Toxic Coalition)
  • 500 million computers that will be obsolete by 2007 (Basal Action Network/Silicon Valley Toxic Coalition)
  • (The Numbers, CIOInsight, April 2005)

Switch to our mobile site