Tag Archive for Computer security

What No One Tells You About Detroit Jobs

What No One Tells You About Detroit JobsA new survey released in June 2018 by Robert Half Technology shows 76 percent of Detroit tech hiring managers said they are expanding their teams.

Some 83 percent of polled tech hiring managers said they are seeing more tech workers moving to Detroit to take open tech jobs.

The survey shows the top skills in demand in Detroit include:

Nationally, 60 percent of IT hiring decision-makers plan to expand the size of their teams between now and the end of the year.

Top cities where companies plan to staff up their tech teams:

  1. Miami
  2. Detroit
  3. Los Angeles
  4. Phoenix
  5. Charlotte

When asked to describe their top concerns, respondents cited keeping IT systems and company information safe ranked first, followed by investing in new technologies, upgrading business systems for efficiency, and innovation.

Tech leaders in 21 of the 26 major metropolitan areas included in the study listed security as their biggest priority, after recruitment.

Robert Half logoJeff Weber, executive director of Robert Half Technology said in the presser, “Business needs surrounding security, cloud and digital transformation are outpacing the supply of talent, and technology leaders are facing difficulties staffing open roles.

To address the tech shortage, Mr. Weber suggests employers stop hunting for purple squirrels, “Employers should be discerning about what skills are must-haves versus what can be trained for on the job and move quickly with offers when they meet strong candidates.

Robert Half The State of Tech Hiring in Detroit

 

 

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

Millennials Riskiest With Your Data

Around half of the workforce will be millennials by 2020, but today they represent a bigger threat to your data. A recent report by endpoint security and management products producer Absolute Software (ABT) concludes that millennials take the most risks with your data. The report says they pose a greater risk to corporate data security than other user demographics.

Boomer vs. millennialThe findings between generational mobile security behaviors are likely to be counter-intuitive to many who assume younger generations to be more knowledgeable and more aware of security threats in mobile tech use than older generations according to FierceBigDataStephen Midgley, VP of Global Marketing at Absolute Software said;

We conducted this survey with the intention of helping enterprises better understand the current attitudes that employees have towards data security and privacy.

The presser from Absolute Software says that:

  • 64% of millennials use their employer-owned device for personal use, as opposed to 37% of baby boomers
  • Shrug it off50% of respondents believe that security is not their responsibility
  • 35% of millennials change their default settings, compared to 8% of baby boomers
  • 27% of millennials access “Not Safe For Work content, compared with only 5% of baby boomers
  • 25% of millennials believe they compromise IT security, compared with only 5% of baby boomers

rb-

The author concludes that these findings underscore why data trumps instinct or gut feeling given its counter-intuitive results. Corporate hiring and training programs and policies often focus on wComing soon to your workplacehat companies think of different worker demographics rather than on how those workers actually work. Armed with useful data such as this, hiring and training practices can be better aligned with the realities.

Related articles

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

What Triggers a Data Breach?

What Triggers a Data Breach?Cyber-insurer Ace Group recently published data they say predicts a data breach. Based on their data (and the need to sell premiums) the insurer claims that all firms are at risk for a data breach. Matthew Prevost, vice president, ACE Professional Risk recently claimed data breaches are inevitable.

When it comes to cyber risk, it is not a question of if or when, but how – how can an organization proactively prepare for and then quickly respond to cyber-related breaches and interruptions?

data breaches are inevitableACE has a unique position to speculate, according to ClaimsJournal ACE has over 15 years of experience with cyber-risk. The firm has cataloged a considerable amount of lost data. They recently shared several key insights from their proprietary dataFierceITSecurity explains that based on cyber insurance provider ACE data, the top triggers for data breaches are:

  1. top triggers for data breaches Network security attacks – 25%
  2. Lost or stolen devices – 20%
  3. Human error -16%
  4. Rogue employees – 15%
  5. Faulty policies – 9%
  6. Use of paper – 6%
  7. Software error – 3%

The firm’s data says that lost and stolen devices that led to data breaches are:

  1. Laptops – 70%
  2. Memory devices – 28%
  3. Smartphones – 2%

stolen devicesFormer employees accounted for 25 percent of insider attacks, and financial incentive was the motive in 72 percent of insider attacks, according to ACE.

rb-

I have written about the cyber insurance market here and here. The most surprising factoid to me is that lost or stolen smartphones lead to data breaches 2% of the time. Perhaps the ACE data is old, or the security marketers have spread FUD and hubbub about the need for MDM, EMM, and remote wipes just to make a buck.

Do you agree with ACE’s stats? 

Related articles
  • Why small businesses should consider cyber liability insurance (hiscoxsmallbizblog.com)

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

25 Years of the Firewall

25 Years of the FirewallThe firewall has turned 25 years old this year. In commemoration, McAfee created a timeline of the events that shaped the development of the device most of us rely on the protect ourselves from each other. The infographic shows how the firewall’s evolution coincided with high-profile security events:

These security breaches triggered security developers to react with more advanced firewall technology:

  • 1998: Evasions researched
  • 2009: Native clustering for high availability and performance introduced
  • 2012: Software enabled security introduced, making blade technology obsolete.

The first generation firewalls were called Packet Filters. Packet Filter firewalls look at network addresses and ports of the packet and determine if that packet should be allowed or blocked based on rules programmed by humans. If a packet does not match the packet filter’s ruleset, the packet filter will drop or reject the packet, breaking the connection.

The second generation firewalls do stateful packet inspection. According to Wikipedia, second generation firewalls record all connections passing through it and determines whether a packet is the start of a new connection, a part of an existing connection, or not part of any connection. Though static rules are still used, these rules can now contain a connection state as one of their test criteria.

Third-generation firewalls use application layer filtering which can “understand” certain applications and protocols (such as File Transfer Protocol (FTP), Domain Name System (DNS), or Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP)). This is useful as it is able to detect if an unwanted protocol is attempting to bypass the firewall on an allowed port or detect if a protocol is being abused in any harmful way.

Next Generation FirewallPat Calhoun, SVP at McAfee, explained in a Help Net Info article that it was not until 2009 when the fourth generation firewall we know and love began to evolve. In 2009 Gartner published its definition and a paper on “Defining the Next-Generation Firewall. (PDF)” According to its definition, NGFWs are:

…deep-packet inspection firewalls that move beyond port/protocol inspection and blocking to add application-level inspection, intrusion prevention, and bringing intelligence from outside the firewall.

In its paper, the Gartner authors explain that “Firewalls need to evolve to be more proactive in blocking new threats, such as botnets and targeted attacks.” Mcafee’s Calhoun points out that NGFW discussions started in 2003 but the technology really didn’t get on the right track until Gartner defined it in 2009.

 

Intel 25th Anniversary of the Firewall infographic

rb-

Future NGFW development efforts need to integrate application control, IPS, and evasion prevention into a single, purpose-built box with enterprise-scale availability and manageability solution.

Back in the day, 2000, I managed a Checkpoint firewall IPSO ver 3.0 on a Nokia appliance (IP300?). The thing was the network had been up and running for 3 years and included over 3,000 devices before the Checkpoint was put in. Can’t get away with that now,  a naked PC on the Innertubes will be compromised within minutes to hours, according to those who know that kind of stuff. 

The most vivid recollection of setting the thing up was just randomly mashing on the keys to create the first key. Other network guys were amazed because apparently, this was the first firewall many had seen with a GUI to configure the rules.

I also remember learning the hard way that Deny All goes at the bottom of the list, not the top. 

Related articles
  • Enterprise Firewall Market: Global Forecast to 2019 by Professional Services (mynewsdesk.com)

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

Can Former Staff Still Access Secure Info?

Can Former Staff Still Access Secure Info?InfoSecurity Magazine recently published an article that blames cavalier attitudes about password management for a new era of data breaches. The article says that a fundamental lack of IT security awareness in enterprises, particularly in the arena of controlling privileged logins, is potentially paving the way for a further wave of data breaches.

The author cites a survey from Lieberman Software of IT security professionals. In the survey, 13% of IT security pro’s interviewed at the RSA Conference 2014 in San Francisco admit to being able to access previous employers’ systems using their old credentials.

access previous employers’ systems using their old credentialPerhaps even more alarming is that of those able to get access to previous employers’ systems nearly 23% can get into their previous two employers’ systems using old credentials. And, shockingly, more than 16% admit to still having access to systems at all previous employers Lieberman reports. Philip Lieberman, CEO and president of the company, told InfoSecurity in an interview that he blames executives who are satisfied with only meeting minimum security requirements.

Investments in security for technology, people, and processes have been meager, at best, in most organizations for many years … many C-level executives have been strongly discouraged from implementing anything other than the minimum security required by law.

don't have, a policy to make sure that former employers can no longer access systemsThe survey also showed a communications breakdown between the IT Pros and management. Nearly one in five respondents admit that they do not have, or don’t know if they have, a policy to make sure that former employers and contractors can no longer access systems after leaving the organization according to the article.

The survey also found that current employees are also a concern. The InfoSecurity article says that almost 25% of employees surveyed said that they work in organizations that do not change their service and process account passwords within the 90-day time frame commonly cited as best practice by most regulatory compliance mandates. Lieberman pointed out that users who run with elevated privileges can introduce all sorts of IT headaches by downloading and installing applications, and changing their system configuration settings. CEO Lieberman warned that an organization would be wise to strictly control and monitor the privileged actions of its users by:

  1. Get control over privileged accounts. Start by generating unique and complex passwords for every individual account on the network – and changing these passwords often (no more shared or static passwords).
  2. Make sure you’re securely storing current passwords and making them available only to delegated staff, for audited use, for a limited time (no more anonymous and unlimited privileged access – for anyone).
  3. Automate the entire process with an enterprise-level privileged identity management approach. Mr. Lieberman argues, “when users exhibit poor behavior while logged into their powerful privileged accounts, you can be immediately alerted and respond to the threat.

half-life mentality of opening the pocketbook for security investments immediately after a data breachMr. Lieberman told InfoSecurity that In the wake of the Edward Snowden / NSA scandal and the Target breach, one would think that corporations would feel that minimizing the insider threat and the attempts of sophisticated criminal hackers to groom those with privileged accounts would be of tantamount importance. But, Lieberman cited a “half-life mentality of opening the pocketbook for security investments immediately after a data breach occurs, but then diminishing back to basic security after a few months.

rb-

When an employee leaves the company, it’s imperative to ensure that he or she is not taking the password secrets that can gain access to highly sensitive systems.

To back this up, Verizon’s 2013 annual Data Breach Investigations Report says that more than three-quarters (76%) of network intrusions relied on weak or stolen credentials – a risk that Verizon describes as “easily preventable”.

Creating Privileged Accounts:

  • Never issue direct access to Administrator or Root, create a unique alias.
  • Require password complexity, history and expiration.

Disabling Privileged Accounts:

  • Get the termination notice in writing from someone up the food chain before acting, then disable the account ASAP.
  • Disable the account, Lock the account, Change the password.
  • Don’t change the user name or delete the account until you are sure. Prematurely removing an Admin Account could break some applications or connectors.
  • Don’t forget about other accounts, email, VPN, wipe mobile devices, access control PINs.
Related articles
  • Protecting Against the Insider Threat (duosecurity.com)

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.