Tag Archive for Marvell

Click At Your Own Risk – Risky Celebrity Report

Click At Your Own Risk - Risky Celebrity ReportWith the recent changes at McAfee, they are no longer doing their annual risky celebrity online report. Not to worry, Surfshark has stepped up to tell what pop culture icon is riskiest celebrities to search for on the innerwebs. Surfshark, based in the Netherlands, describes themselves as a cybersecurity company focused on developing humanized privacy and security solutions. Surfshark and Nord Security merged in 2022 to form the current company.

SurfsharkThey searched the web with for pop culture terms with different qualifiers, like “Torrent,” “Download,” “Stream,” or “MP3.” They then collected URLs from the first five pages Google of search results and ran them through a malware detector (https://sitecheck.sucuri.net/). The “% of URLs with potential malware” metric reflects the % of URLs that were flagged as “medium risk” or above by this tool.

2022 Risky Celebrity #1 Robert De Niro

MIDNIGHT RUN US 1988 ROBERT DE NIRO A UNIVERSAL FILM Date 1988, , Photo by: Mary Evans/Ronald Grant/Everett CollectionThe riskiest celebrity to search for in 2022 was Robert De Niro. This is the first time the Academy Award winner topped the riskiest celebrity list. Mr. De Niro has earned two Academy Awards, one for Best Supporting Actor for his role as Vito Corleone in Francis Ford Coppola‘s The Godfather Part II (1974) and the other for Best Actor portraying Jake LaMotta in Raging Bull (1980). Other notable roles include Midnight Run (1988), Goodfellas (1990), Joker (2019), and Meet the Parents (2000). According to Surfshark a Google search for Mr. De Niro can result in a malware link over half the time (54.1%).

Jake Gyllenhall is the second most riskiest celebrity to search for on the intertubes. The actor who is most famous for his roles in Brokeback Mountain (2005), and Spider-Man: Far From Home (2019), in which he portrayed Quentin Beck / Mysterio. 53.6% of searches for Mr. Gyllenhall on the web result in a malware attack according to Surfshark.

Anthony Hopkins as Hannibal Lecter in Silence of the LambsSir Philip Anthony Hopkins the British stage and screen actor was knighted by Queen Elizabeth II in 1993. He has won two Academy Awards, and two Emmy Awards. Now he ranks #3 on the 2022 Surfshark riskiest celebrities online. He received an Academy Award for Best Actor for The Silence of the Lambs (1991). Mr. Hopkins also had a re-occurring role in the MCU Thor franchise (2011–2017). His 2021 Academy Award winning role in The Father (2020) undoubtedly increased his attractiveness as a hacker lure. Over half (53.6%) of the online searches for Sir Hopkins can result in a malware attack on your system.

2022’s Riskiest Female Celebrity

Kate Winslet is the riskiest woman to search for in 2022 according to Surfshark. 52.6% of the searches for the Titanic (1997) star can include results that link to malware. Her role in the 2022 Avatar: The Way of Water, a sequel to James Cameron’s Avatar (2009), earned over $1.7 billion to rank as the seventh highest-grossing film of all time made her excellent bait for hackers to spring on unsuspecting web surfers.

Margot Robbie as Harley QuinnAussie Actress Margot Robbie takes #5 on Surfshark’s list. Her roles as Harley Quinn in the DC Suicide Squad films. 52% of the searches for the Once Upon a Time in Hollywood (2019) actress can return malware.

Brad Pitt ranked 9th on Surfshark’s 2022 list. Mr. Pitt has appeared in the the riskiest celebrity role more than most pop culture creatures. He previously appeared on the top ten list of riskiest celebs in 2009, 2010 and 2011. In 2022 he starred with risky celeb #5 Margot Robbie in Babylon.

Risky movies target kids

Many of the most dangerous films to search for have younger audiences. Younger users are more likely to click on links containing malicious software. Of the 8 most dangerous movies to search for, half were released by Disney

Toy Story 3 produced by Pixar Animation Studios for Walt Disney Pictures#1 Finding Dory has a 46.7% risk of including malware
#2 Beauty and the Beast 44.9% risk of including malware
#5 Toy Story 3 40.4% risk of including malware
#8 The Lion King 40% risk of including malware

Hollywood is not only attackers can spread malware. Surfshark found the searches for sports teams can also be risky

#1 New Orleans Pelicans 43.1% risk of including malware
#2 Miami Heat 43.0% risk of including malware
#3 Boston Celtics 41.8% risk of including malware
#4 Texas Rangers 41.7% risk of including malware
#5 Miami Marlins 40.7% risk of including malware

Missing from the top ten is perennial hacker favorite and Academy Award winner Sandra Bullock. Searches for Ms. Bullock were slightly less than half (49%) likely to contain malware in 2022. who ranked in the top 10 in 2010, 2013 and 2015. Another favorite, Julia Roberts scored 36.2%. She ranked in the top 10 in 2010 and 2020 risky celebrity lists.

 

How you can help Ukraine!

Related article

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

A Close Look at 802.11ac Wi-Fi

TA Close Look at 802.11ac Wi-Fiech pundits argue that the new Wi-Fi standard 802.11ac will replace wired gigabit Ethernet networking. 802.11ac is a supercharged version of 802.11n, offering link speeds ranging from 433 Mbps, up to multiple gigabits per second.

Wi-FiTo make 802.11ac dozens of times faster than 802.11n, the new standard works exclusively in the 5GHz band uses a huge chunk of bandwidth (80 or 160MHz), operates in up to eight spatial streams (MIMO), and a technology called beamforming.

At its core, 802.11ac is essentially an updated version of 802.11n, according to Sebastian Anthony the author of an ExtremeTech article “What is 802.11ac WiFi, and how much faster than 802.11n is it?” 802.11n was a huge performance increase over 802.11a and g. 802.11n introduced some key technologies that brought massive speed boosts. Where 802.11n had support for four spatial streams (4×4 MIMO) and a channel width of 40MHz, 802.11ac can use eight spatial streams and has channels up to 80MHz wide, which can be combined to make 160MHz channels. This means that 802.11ac has 8 x 160MHz of spectral bandwidth to play with, versus 4 x 40MHz – a huge difference that allows 802.11ac to send vast amounts of data across the airwaves.

Beamforming

What is new in Wi-Fi

802.11ac also introduces 256-QAM modulation (up from 64-QAM in 802.11n), which sends 256 different signals over the same frequency by shifting each signal to a slightly different phase. In theory, this quadruples the spectral efficiency of 802.11ac over 802.11n. Spectral efficiency is a measure of how well a given wireless protocol/modulation/multiplexing technique uses the bandwidth available to it.

802.11ac also introduces standardized beamforming Matthew Gast, Director of Product Management at AeroHive Networks published an article, “Investing in Beamforming: Is it worth it?” that explains beamforming.

Aerohive logoRather than transmitting a radio signal in all directions, beamforming figures out where the receiver is, and focus the energy towards the receiver. Instead of spraying radio energy all over the place, send packets as a “rifle shot” directly to the receiver’s antenna Mr.Gast explains.

Beamforming is a two-step process: First, figure out how to “aim” the transmission at the receiver, and second, send the transmission. With beamforming, a transmitter is betting that by paying the cost of the channel measurement process, the data transmission that follows will speed up enough to pay off the cost.

802.11n Beamforming was non-standardized, in 802.11ac, there is only one method of beamforming, called the Null Data Packet (NDP). (rb- Read the AeroHive article for a full description of NDP)

Aerohive’s Gast concludes that by steering the energy towards a receiver, beamforming enables you to take a step up to a higher data rate. Mr. Gast estimates that 802.11-based beamforming gives you a 3-5 dB gain.

802.11ac is speedyIn theory, at the 5GHz band with beamforming, 802.11ac should have the same or better range than 802.11n  However, Mr. Anthony says the 5GHz band, has less penetration power so it doesn’t have the same range as 2.4GHz (802.11b/g). The ExtremeTech article concludes that’s an acceptable trade-off: there simply isn’t enough spectral bandwidth in the cluttered 2.4GHz band to allow for 802.11ac’s gigabit-level speeds.

ExtremeTech‘s Anthony calculates there are two answers to how fast is Wi-Fi 802.11ac, the theoretical max speed, and the practical max speed that mere mortals will get surrounded by lots of signal-attenuating obstacles.

He calculates the theoretical max speed of 802.11ac is eight 160MHz 256-QAM channels, each of which is capable of 866.7Mbps – a grand total of 6,933Mbps, or just shy of 7Gbps. That’s a transfer rate of 900 megabytes per second. Compare this with 802.11n’s max theoretical speed, which was 600Mbps. He then says in practice, the current max speed of 802.11ac devices is 1.7Gbps.

ExtremeTech points out there will be a second wave of 802.11ac devices – due in 2014 after the standard is finalized – before 160MHz channels and multi-gigabit speeds become a reality. The max speed over an 80MHz channel is 433.3Mbps, and there aren’t any 802.11ac chipsets that support up to eight streams.

Broadcom logoKevin Fitchard at GigaOM reports that recently the Wi-Fi Alliance kicked off its 802.11ac certification program. First to get the official Wi-Fi stamp of approval was the Samsung Mega 6.3, followed by two other Samsung models.

As with the 802.11n certification process, the Wi-Fi equipment makers are moving faster than the standards bodies. The IEEE is actually still putting the finishing touches on the 802.11ac standard, which is not due until 2014.

Wi-Fi certifiedThe Wi-Fi Alliance expects the first batch of ac devices will support speeds of 433 Mbps and progress into more advanced levels of the standard. The Alliance has pre-certified systems from companies like Broadcom (BRCM), Qualcomm (QCOM), Realtek, and Marvell (MRVL). Cisco (CSCO) was one of the first vendors to get an access point certified.

“AC is going into mobile and portable devices first…,” Wi-Fi Alliance Marketing and Program Management Director Kelly Davis-Felner said. ABI Research estimates that 40 percent of all ac devices shipped in 2013 will be handsets.

rb-

Wi-Fi will replace wired Ethernet networkingWhile tech pundits argue that the new 802.11ac Wi-Fi will replace wired gigabit Ethernet networking at home and in the office. While the consumerization of IT and BYOD are strong forces, the life-cycle of cabling infrastructure is 25 years, a cost not lightly abandoned in the walls. it is more likely to happen at home first. Who wants all the crappy wires running all over the house?

Related articles

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

802.11ac Wi-Fi Clears the Way for Collaboration

802.11ac Wi-Fi Clears the Way for CollaborationThe emerging gigabit 802.11ac, Wi-Fi standard is the current darling of the hype machine. The standard will be finalized in February 2014. However, that has not stopped manufacturers from shipping 802.11ac routers, access points, and mobile devices. Shortel (SHOR) recently provided their opinion on what this means for your business.

IEEE 802.11acThe article points out that more people are using mobile apps and devices. Shortel calculates that a typical worker may have three IP addresses, while digital natives may have up to six IP addresses. These stats suggest that mobility has become a must-have and the author claims that 802.11ac can meet the needs of increasing mobility because 802.11ac is faster, more reliable, and delivers more Wi-Fi capacity. 802.11ac is:

  • Faster – 802.11ac is three times faster than 802.11n Wi-Fi. 802.11ac will deliver up to 1.3 Gbps, which is about three times faster than 802.11n. This capacity will be ideal for real-time applications, such as IP voice and streaming video. Faster data throughput means better battery life for mobile devices, too.
  • More reliable – 802.11ac is more reliable with less interference. 802.11ac operates at 5 GHz, which is far less crowded than the 2.4 GHz band that by 802.11b/g/n access points — as well as cordless phones, automatic garage door openers, and other home appliances. That means that there’s less interference from other Wi-Fi-enabled devices, which will result in a better user experience.
  • Improved throughput. 802.11ac uses multiple antennas for transmitting and receiving RF signals, and that means better data throughput. More specifically, MIMO, or Multiple-Input and Multiple-Output, is key to providing wireless performance that is more switch-like, compared to the shared media nature of 802.11n.

W-Fi Alliance logoShortel believes that Gigabit Wi-Fi can be a real asset for unified communications, streaming media, and other bandwidth-hungry apps. They plan to use the greater capacity of 802.11ac to support more devices and more apps. In the workplace, teams want to engage and share without hassle using modern collaboration tools with the devices of their choice creating the need for BYOD.

The newest generation of workers are digital natives, who are more inclined to use videoconferencing for quick chats or to share ideas. In addition, many people use tablets to stream media, and more organizations are turning to streaming media over Wi-Fi for digital signage, training, company meetings, and customer support. And those bandwidth-hungry applications will love the new gigabit Wi-Fi.

Wave 1 802.11ac only offers incremental benefits over 802.11nShoretel reassures those that have deployed an 802.11n WLAN recently, you don’t need to be in a hurry to move to 802.11ac. You can be confident in the investment that you made, as the first-generation 802.11ac will offer only incremental benefits over 802.11n. But if you are replacing old Wi-Fi or expanding your wireless LAN or looking to downsize your wired network in favor of wireless, you should weigh the options between 802.11n and the new 802.11ac.

rb-

802.11ac will only get faster, the theoretical max speed of 802.11ac is just shy of 7Gbps, which you will never see in the wild, but don’t be surprised to see link speeds of 2Gbps or more in the next few years. At 2Gbps, you’ll get a transfer rate of 256MB/sec.

To reach such Wi-Fi speeds, chipset and device makers will have to figure out how to make second-generation chipsets with four or more 802.11ac streams in software and hardware. The engineers at Broadcom (BRCM), Qualcomm (QCOM), Marvell (MRVL), and Intel (INTC) are already working on ways to implementing four and eight-stream 802.11ac solutions. A lot of work will need to be done by the chipset and device makers to make sure that advanced features, such as beamforming, comply with the standard and are interoperable with other 802.11ac devices.

In general, then, you can certainly expect some impressive speeds from 802.11ac in situations where you don’t need the performance and reliability of wired GigE. But I do not believe that 802.11ac will replace a wired Gigabit Ethernet network just yet.

What do you think?

Related article

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.