Tag Archive for EPA

What is eWaste?

What is eWaste?Electronic waste (eWaste) is classified as hazardous waste if it has components that are toxic (poisonous), ignitable/combustible, corrosive, or reactive. Most electronic devices contain heavy metals, such as lead. The BBC reports that the typical personal computer has many valuable, dangerous or valuable and dangerous materials.

Among the hazardous wastes included in the typical PC eWaste are according to the BBC are:

  1. Lead in cathode ray tube and solder.
  2. Arsenic in older cathode ray tubes.
  3. Selenium in circuit boards as power supply rectifier.
  4. Polybrominated flame retardants in plastic casings, cables and circuit boards.
  5. Antimony trioxide as flame retardant.
  6. Cadmium in circuit boards and semiconductors.
  7. Chromium in steel as corrosion protection.
  8. Cobalt in steel for structure and magnetism.
  9. Mercury in switches and housing.

eWaste risks

An article at CIO.com says that a firms major source of potential eWaste disposal liability comes from the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA), aka the Superfund law. Under Superfund, the U.S. Department of Environmental Protection (EPA) identifies contaminated sites, arranges for cleanup, identifies responsible parties and seeks compensation for the cleanup costs. Many of these sites are landfills where a firm would typically send trash, including obsolete computer equipment.

Once the EPA targets a firm, they can pay the fine or fight the EPA in federal court. The court proceeding could be a costly and time-consuming investigation in to the environmental impact of the firm. Firms can be on the hook all clean-up costs, unless they can prove they never deposited so much as a printer cartridge at that site. The Superfund law states that all contributors to a contaminated site are jointly and severally liable for the entire cost of the cleanup.

Michigan eWaste rules

Enhancing the Superfund threats are state laws and regulations that affect the disposal of eWaste. For example in Michigan, Governor Granholm signed Senate Bill No. 897 into law in Dec. 2008. The law imposes a new annual registration tax of $2,000 to $3,000 on manufacturers of computers and related equipment sold in Michigan to fund a take-back program. Producers must pay for the collection, transportation and recycling.

The program is available for small businesses (10 employees or fewer) purchasing new computers and televisions. The take-back program is good for up to 7 units per day which may recycle covered electronic devices for free. Covered devices include  computers, peripherals, facsimile machines, DVD players, video cassette recorders, and video display devices. Printers will be added in 2011. Program collection must start by April 1, 2010. The Michigan Department of Natural Resources and Environment (DNRQ) is responsible for enforcing these eWaste laws. Larger firms are on their own and there is no current ban on disposal of e-waste. Firms with locations in New York or California faces much tougher requirements.

Many firms take the opposite approach to dumping eWaste into the landfill. Many firms are retaining their out of date IT assets. In 2007, the EPA estimated the number of desktop computers, monitors and notebooks in storage totaled over 110 million units. Despite the declining cost of office spare, storing obsolete equipment is a waste of money. Storing obsolete equipment creates data loss risks and any residual value in the equipment will disappear. There are steps a firm can take to deal with e-waste.

Disposal plan

CIO.com suggests the first step in disposing of eWaste is a well-thought-out technology disposal plan. The plan should start with an attorney or an environmental consultant to get a fuller understanding of the risks and opportunities. CIO.com says the eWaste plan should address:

  • A way to track regulatory changes.
  • Develop methods for achieving your business goals in an environmentally and legally sound way.
  • Determine the point at which your waste volume puts you in a more restrictive class of regulation.
  • Evaluate tax liabilities and incentives.
  • Preserve the confidentiality of legal and business-critical information.

The environmental consultant should be able to find alternative options for reusing and recycling out of date equipment. They should be able to identify a network of local computer resale shops, nonprofit groups, and government agencies where businesses can donate, upgrade or recycle used computer equipment. The consultant can develop agreements that shift the burden and financial risks to others who are better situated to manage the issue according to the CIO.com article. One way to defer the eWaste risk is to lease computer equipment rather than buying it. This was the manufacturer is responsible for disposal at the end of the term.

rb-

We have developed eWaste programs and PC life-cycle programs for clients. We try to bring home the problems of storing out of use IT assets including:

  • Wasted money for floor space to store equipment and the loss of residual value. especially with high-end equipment which could be re-sold on eBay.
  • Data protection regulatory and theft risks. After all. who checks on the old servers once they get stashed in the warehouse?
  • Environmental regulatory risks. If a firm stashes away enough obsolete systems and your storage area can change the firms EPA status to a hazardous waste generator.

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him at LinkedInFacebook and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

How To Chose An eCycler

How To Chose An eCyclerThe U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) recently held a webinar on how to avoid the pitfalls of e-waste recycling. The online meeting, hosted by Chris Newman from EPA Region 5, laid out some best practices to chose An eCycler to recycle eWaste (eCycling). The reasons for eCycling are simple: to protect your data, and your customers’ data, electronics should be disposed of in a traceable and secure way. According to the EPA, eCycling doesn’t necessarily mean shredding machines that are no longer in use; responsible recyclers can wipe computers clean and reuse some parts.

EPA logoAccording to the EPA, the key to finding the best eWaste recycler for the firm and the environment is to “Trust, but verify.”  The responsible firm should verify the claims their eCyclers make. The EPA reports that some unscrupulous eCyclers will use an “EPA ID #” as proof of certification when it’s actually just an accounting tool. Mr. Newman says that the EPA doesn’t certify recyclers but there are several groups that do certify recyclers’ practices.

Chose an eCycler

The Responsible Recycling Coalition (R2) is one of two certifications in the U.S. The EPA started R2 in 2008 with industry partners and initial support of environmental groups. In July 2009, the American National Standards Institute-American Society of Quality National Accreditation Board (ANAB) announced that it will start accrediting companies that will certify recyclers of electronic equipment under the R2 practices. R2 focuses on reducing the human and environmental impacts of recycling electronics. Waste Management recently became the first company to formally adopt these practices.

E-Stewards InitiativeThe other certifying body is the E-Stewards Initiative, which was formed in 2008 by environmental groups that abandoned the R2 partnership when the R2 principals refused to rule out exporting e-waste, incinerating waste electronics, and using prison labor to recycle electronics. In July 2009, the American National Standards Institute-American Society of Quality National Accreditation Board (ANAB) announced that it will start accrediting companies that will certify recyclers of electronic equipment under the E-Stewards Initiative.

rb-

When we talk to clients about their technology life-cycle projects, most of the time, their disposal processes are very weak. Owners need to understand the risks they are incurring by tossing equipment in the dumpster or stock-piling them in the closet.

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

Energy Star for Servers Released

Energy Star for Servers ReleasedThe U.S. Environmental Protection Agency released an Energy Star specification for computer servers on May 15, 2009. This new specification covers standalone servers with one to four processor sockets is in part a reaction to estimates that by 2011, IT equipment is expected to account for 3 percent of all U.S. electricity consumption, according to the EPA.

EPA logoAndrew Fanara of the Energy Star product development team helped spearhead the process of getting a spec for servers told DataCenter News. “EPA believes this new server spec is an important first step to help attract attention to the need and opportunity to cut cost and save energy in federal data center facilities, especially during a time of tight budgets,” Fanara told GCN.

The new specification includes:

  • Power supply efficiency requirements which should increase efficiency and reduce waste heat
  • Power consumption limits for when the server is idle
  • Single-socket server are limited to 60 watts
  • 2-3 socket servers are limited to 151-221 watts
  • Allowances for additional installed components
  • Power and performance data sheet  detailing power consumption  in a common format
  • Ability to report energy-related statistics to data center management software.

Vendors Respond to Energy Star for Servers

HP logoMajor server manufacturers are already submitting their products for Energy Star approval. HP says that two of its most popular servers, the DL360 and DL380 G6 are now Energy Star compliant with more servers added to the list soon.

IBM‘s next-generation Power6 processor has power management abilities that let it drop down to a 100-watt level.

IBM logoJay Dietrich, program manager at IBM’s corporate environmental affairs group told GCN,“Overall, we think that there has been good progress on the server requirements, and we think EPA has done some good work in getting that specification focused on the issues.”

NDell logoot to be left out, Dell launched an energy-efficient server line in December. Dell touts it’s PowerEdge Energy Smart 1950 III and 2950 III servers as the Dell green alternatives.

Sun Microsystems has touted the energy efficiency of its UltraSparc T1 “Niagara”-based servers for a while . The Niagara CPU typically uses 72 watts of power at 1.4 GHz.

Criticism of Energy Star for Servers

Sun logoThe new Energy Star criteria has its critics. The biggest complaint is that a qualifying server need only show energy efficiency when it’s in idle, powered on but doing no work. This is like comparing the mile per gallon of a Hummer and a Prius sitting at a stop light. Both use a similar amount of fuel idling, not going anywhere. Many argue that the amount of energy spent idling is less important than how many miles per gallon the vehicle gets while driving, doing its work.

However, firms are becoming increasingly aware of this issue and are addressing it. Organizations are deploying virtualization to cut underutilized servers to get as much performance per watt as possible from their hardware. In most IT organizations there are underutilized servers which spend a great deal of time idling, so idle server power consumption is relevant but not the whole story. Servers are not like desktop or laptop computers because they are not meant to be idle. Instead, they are designed to be highly utilized and available. “A heavily utilized server is much more energy effective than a small server running at very low utilization rates,” Albert Esser, vice president of data center infrastructure at Dell told GCN.

Subodh Bapat, a distinguished engineer at Sun explained to Data Center News another drawback to the program: It doesn’t take into account how many cores per processor a machine has. “The fact is, when you go from a server that has four processors with two cores each to two processors with four cores each, you save energy. That’s not recognized by the spec,” he said. “If you’re shipping a server with one processor, it doesn’t matter if you have one core or two cores or four or eight. You still get the same idle power allowance. There’s no benefit for the fact that you can do, say, eight times work with a fewer number of watts.”

“This is a great first step, but it’s not a complete spec,” says Bapat. “It’s a good start toward finding out which servers are better than others on an energy basis.” Bapat wasn’t entirely critical about the Energy Star program for servers. For example, a compliant server must be capable of measuring real-time environmental data . “Transparency is always a good thing. Energy Star requires the ability to report power consumption data pretty much across the range of utilization and at all times that the server is on. If you want to know how much [power is being consumed], you should be able to ask it and it should tell you. That’s a very useful feature.”

EPA Responds

Energy Star logoThe Tier 2 Energy Star specification will cover servers with more than four processor sockets, blade servers and fault-tolerant machines is expected in October 2010. The Tier 2 spec will also define a metric that compares server performance with energy consumption. EPA’s Fanara speculates that finding the magic numbers,  could take a while. The EPA is developing an Energy Star spec for data center facilities and is collecting data from volunteering data centers now. Mr. Fanara said his group also hope to have a framework document for an Energy Star for data storage equipment out in June 2009.

EPA introduced Energy Star in 1992 as a voluntary program to reduce greenhouse gas emissions through energy efficiency. The Energy Star label can be found on more than 50 kinds of products, new homes and commercial and industrial buildings. Energy Star is the EPA labeling program designed to help consumers pick out energy-efficient products. If a manufacturer qualifies its product, it can place an Energy Star label on it, and the product information can also be displayed on the manufacturer’s and the Energy Star Website.

rb-

I agree with Sun’s Bapat that the current version of the Energy Star requirements for servers is a good first step. Just like any 1.0 version release, there is still a lot of work to be done.

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him at LinkedInFacebook and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

eWaste Update

eWaste Update220 million tons of eWaste, old computers are discarded in the U.S. each year (US EPA).

  • 632,000 pounds of mercury is expected to be generated by e-waste by 2007 (Basal Action Network/Silicon Valley Toxic Coalition).
  • 500 million computers that will be obsolete by 2007 (Basal Action Network/Silicon Valley Toxic Coalition).

(The Numbers, CIOInsight, April 2005)

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.