Tag Archive for Hardware

Why CTRL + ALT + DELETE

Why CTRL + ALT + DELETEEvery PC user has given their computer the three-finger salute as it locked up – frequently at the most inopportune time. But why CTRL + ALT + DELETE? Turns out the three-finger salute was a 10-minute hack to make programmers life easier. The CTRL + ALT + DELETE was born at IBM (IBM) in the early 1980s.

IBM PCProject Acorn was the code name for the rush project to build IBM’s new personal computer – because Apple (AAPL) and RadioShack were already selling small stand-alone computers. David Bradley was part of the team working from the IBM offices in Boca Raton, FL on the IBM PC.

Mental Floss reports that the programmers’ working on the IBM PC had to manually restart the entire system whenever the computer encountered a coding glitch. This was a waste of time. Mr. Bradley told Mental Floss,  “Some days, you’d be rebooting every five minutes as you searched for the problem … The tedious tests made the coders want to pull their hair out.

IBM logoMr. Bradley worked on everything from writing input/output programs to troubleshooting wire-wrap boards on Project Acorn. In order to placate the programmers, Mr. Bradley created a hack. His hack was a keyboard shortcut that triggered a system reset without memory tests.

To Mr. Bradley CTRL + ALT + DELETE, was just another item to tick off his to-do list. He says. “It was five minutes, 10 minutes of activity, and then I moved on to the next of the 100 things that needed to get done.

The engineer chose the keys by location—with the DEL key across the keyboard from the other two, it seemed unlikely that all three would be accidentally pressed at the same time. Mr. Bradley never intended to make the shortcut available to customers, nor did he expect it to become a cultural icon. It was meant for his fellow coders, for whom every second counted.

Thank IBM for CTRL + ALT + DELETE

The IBM team managed to finish Acorn on schedule. In the fall of 1981, the IBM PC hit the market. It was a dull gray box beneath a green screen monitor. Marketers predicted that the company would sell less than 50,000 units a year. IBM execs thought that estimate was too optimistic. They were all wrong. Computing would never be the same.

Statista Percent of US households with a computer 1984 - 2016

As PC sales took off – few users were aware of Mr. Bradley’s shortcut hidden in their machines. That changed in the early 1990s when Microsoft’s (MSFT) Windows 3 took off. Now Microsoft’s Windows PCs were crashing and the infamous “blue screen of death” plagued Windows users. A quick fix to the BSOD spread by word of mouth (this was before the WWW) – CTRL + ALT + DELETE. Suddenly, Mr. Bradley’s quick hack was a big deal.

At an event celebrating the 20th anniversary of the IBM PC industry big-wigs gathered for a panel discussion. Mental Floss says that the first question to the panel bypassed Microsoft chairman Bill Gates and was for David Bradley. Mr. Bradley, who has always been surprised by how popular his CTRL + ALT + DELETE hack made him, was quick to deflect the glory. The programmer joked;

I have to share the credit, I may have invented it, but I think Bill made it famous.

rb-

Bill Gates has publicly admitted that CTRL + ALT + DELETE was a mistake – but the company he founded continues to use Mr. Bradley’s hack. In Windows 10  the keyboard combination starts Windows Security, which lets you lock the computer, switch to a different user, log off, start Task Manager, or shut down/reboot the computer.

Stay safe out there!

Related article

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

Son of Facebook Phone

Son of Facebook PhoneThe tech world never learns from its mistakes. Rumors are that data-leaker Facebook is combining two bad ideas, software from Windows NT with FB hardware. The Verge reports that Facebook is developing its own operating system. Facebook’s effort is being led by Mark Lucovsky, who co-authored the Windows NT operating system.

Could the FB OS be the greatest thing since?The reports say the FB OS could be used on Facebook’s hardware products. Oculus, Portal, and forthcoming augmented reality glasses, code-named “Orion,” currently run on a modified version of Google’s Android. FB wants to reduce or remove entirely the control GOOG has over its hardware.

Ficus Kirkpatrick, who heads Facebook’s AR and VR group hedges his bets, he told The Verge “it’s possible” that future FB hardware won’t rely on Google’s software. Facebook’s head of hardware, Andrew Bosworth is more definitive, “… we’re gonna do it ourselves.

Facebook phone crashed and burned almost immediately.The Verge points out that Facebook’s last attempt at producing its own OS did not go so well. The Facebook phone, or, more precisely, the Facebook phone mobile operating system, crashed and burned almost immediately. Unveiled in 2013, Mark Zuckerberg promised the $99 device would “turn your Android phone into a great social device.

It didn’t exactly work out that way. Instead, shortly after the Facebook phone went on sale, the price dropped to 99 cents. The operating system was called out as mediocre, and early adopters complained that it was counter-intuitive and hard to — of all things — place a phone call. By 2014, the New York Times reported that Facebook had disbanded the mobile OS engineering team.

The FB mobile OS attempt resulted in a forked version of Android that ran on an HTC produced phone back in 2013. Flooding a phone with Facebook’s social feed was wildly unpopular even back before Facebook’s brand was tarnished with numerous privacy scandals. Facebook will have an uphill battle on its hands if it wants people to give its software another shot.

For those with short memories FB has leaked nearly 1 billion personal data records that we know about since 2018:

The idea of another FB OS gets even scarier when you add the legacy of Windows NT on top of FB’s lack of respect for its user privacy. The for uninitiated, Windows NT was released in 1993. It was Microsoft’s first foray into a network operating system (NOS). WinNT had a number of issues that made the Blue Screen of Death (BSOD) a household phrase.

Blue Screen of DeathA blue screen occurs when Windows encounters a “STOP Error.” This critical failure causes Windows to crash and stop working. The only thing Windows can do at that point is to restart the PC. This can lead to data loss, as programs don’t have a chance to save their open data. FB has put Mark Lucovsky, who co-authored the Windows NT operating system in charge of writing the FB OS. Some of the more notable problems with WinNT included,

  • Allowing the default user to run at admin/root privilege without a password.
  • Noted cryptographer Bruce Schneier, noted that part of Windows NT 4.0 is so broken it can’t be fixed with patches. Schneier said, “Last time they released a fix, it broke so many other parts of Windows NT.”
  • WinNT did not support USB.
  • NTVDM (also known as Windows on Windows, or WOW) that blocked access to the hardware so that legacy applications would run as though on a DOS computer, except without access to protected areas of memory. This resulted in a substantial number of applications simply did not work.

rb-

People back then perhaps thought better of letting Facebook on their phones. Toward the end of the decade, it seems we’ve come full circle

The rumor mill also says Facebook is working on a brain control interface for its devices, which could allow users to control them with their thoughts. But of course, that also means that FB could have access to the user’s brain – and sell their thoughts and then your brain will throw a BSOD, and will you have to reboot your brain to recover.- I’m just saying……

Related article

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

PC Market Show Signs of Life

PC Market Show Signs of LifeAfter 7 years of consistent declines – PC sales finally stopped their slide. Market researchers Gartner and IDC reported that PC sales grew during the fourth quarter of 2019, boosting all of 2019 into the positive. For the entire year, global PC shipments were up 2.7%, according to the IDC. That makes 2019 the “first full year of PC growth” since 2011.

Sick computerPCWorld reports that 2019 new PC numbers from Gartner and IDC and are remarkably similar. Gartner reported that PC sales grew 2.3% in 2019 Q4 to 70.6 million units and 261 million units for the year. Rival analyst firm IDC largely agreed, estimating that PC unit sales grew 4.8%, to 71.8 million units. IDC said that worldwide PC sales grew 2.7% for 2019 as a whole.

Among the results:

  • The top three global PC vendors—Lenovo, HP, and Dell—all consolidated their market share, reaching 65% of the PC market.
  • Lenovo logoIDC and Gartner concur that Lenovo (LNVGY) is the world’s top PC vendor for 2019. IDC reports Lenovo had a 24.8% global market share and Gartner said it had a  24.1%.
  • Globally HP (HPQ) ranked #2 with 23.9% by IDC and 22.2% by Gartner.
  • Dell was ranked #3 worldwide with 17.4% by IDC and 16.8% by Gartner. Dell’s unit sales climbing by nearly 11%, according to IDC’s estimates.

In the U.S. market the ‘Q4-19 rankings differed:

  • HP logoHP is #1 with a 31.2% market share and a modest 4.4% bump in U.S PC sales for the quarter.
  • Dell ranked #2 with a 26.8% market share and a gain of 15.9% for the period.
  • Lenovo came in #3 with a 14.9% share and 11.2% increase in share.

The tech prognosticators attributed the surge in sales to firms swapping their hardware to Windows ahead of MSFT”s Windows 7 end of support, giving new PC sales a one-time shot in the arm. Ryan Reith, program vice president with IDC’s Worldwide Mobile Device Trackers, said in a statement.

The market will still have its challenges ahead, but this year was a clear sign that PC demand is still there despite the continued insurgence of emerging form factors and the demand for mobile computing.

Ranjit Atwal, a research senior director at Gartner, in a statement to PCWorld, cast doubt on future growth. He says,

The PC market’s future is unpredictable because there will not be a Windows 11. Instead, Windows 10 will be upgraded systematically through regular updates …As a result, peaks in PC hardware upgrade cycles driven by an entire Windows OS upgrade will end.

rb-

Don’t do your happy dance just yet.

Gartner and IDC both predict global sales to steadily decline again over 2020 as MSFT’s drives to a subscription-based model. Other threats to the PC market include:

China – The Chinese government has ordered all PC hardware and operating systems imported from foreign countries to be replaced in the next three years.

HP- Xerox – I have covered Xerox’s maneuvers to take over HP. The possible disruption to HP by a Xerox hostile takeover could rattle the entire sector. Especially if Acer or Asus cannot scale up fast enough.

History – Data from Statista says that annual PC sales have dropped nearly 1/3 from their peak in 2011.

Year# of PC's Change YoY
2011364.0-
2012349.3-14.7
2013315.1-34.2
2014308.3-6.8
2015275.8-32.5
2016260.2-15.6
2017259.6-0.6
2018258.5-1.1
2019261.02.5
2020 *254.3-6.7
Data from Statista YoY = Year over Year in millions of units

Related article

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

Quantum Supremacy

Quantum SupremacyThere are reports are that Google (GOOG) has demonstrated quantum supremacy. In quantum computing, quantum supremacy means that a quantum computer is able to perform a calculation that is practically impossible for a classical computer. Before we fear and weep for the western dream, ScienceAlert explains that we can’t be sure of the claim.

Shortly after the research article was uploaded to the NASA site it was withdrawn for unknown reasons. The news was originally broken by the paywalled Financial Times, which reported both seeing the paper and also that it was subsequently taken down. Now there are only copies of the original paper available online. Further, Google has not officially explained to anybody what’s going on, sparking no end of speculation online about what has or hasn’t happened.

Assuming the briefly released paper, is real – why is this important? Wired explains that the Google researchers used a quantum processor called Sycamore, with 54 qubits. It tackled a random sampling problem – that is, checking that a set of numbers has a truly random distribution. ScienceAlert says the experimental quantum processor took about 200 seconds to solve a particular computational problem.

As part of the experiment, they set a version of the same challenge to some powerful Google server clusters, as well as to the current world’s fastest supercomputer, the IBM-built Summit supercomputer at Oak Ridge National Lab. The state-of-the-art supercomputer would require approximately 10,000 years to perform the same task.

According to copies (PDF) of the vanished report,

This dramatic speedup relative to all known classical algorithms provides an experimental realization of quantum supremacy on a computational task and heralds the advent of a much-anticipated computing paradigm

Summit SupercomputerIn the Wired article, John Preskill, the Caltech professor who coined the term “quantum supremacy,” calls the breakthrough, if accurate, ”truly impressive achievement in experimental physics.” But he and other experts, and even Google’s own paper, caution that the result doesn’t mean quantum computers are ready for practical work. Professor Preskill explains, “The problem their machine solves with astounding speed has been very carefully chosen just for the purpose of demonstrating the quantum computer’s superiority.

Professor Preskill told Wired,  it’s unclear how long it will take quantum computers to become commercially useful; breaking encryption—a theorized use for the technology—remains a distant hope. “That’s still many years out,” says Jonathan Dowling, a professor at Louisiana State University and New Scientist said although that is impressive, there is no practical use for it.

Will Oliver, a quantum specialist at MIT, told Technology Review, the computing milestone is similar to the first flight of the Wright brothers at Kitty Hawk in aviation. He said it would give added impetus to research in the field, which should help quantum machines achieve their promise more quickly.

1904 Wright Flyer

New Scientist says there are plenty of hurdles left to overcome before quantum computing hits the big time. The author cites a number of steps:

For a start, the processors need to be more powerful. Google’s Sycamore quantum computer, consisted of only 54 qubits. For quantum computers to really come into their own, they will probably need thousands. Scaling up the number of qubits won’t be easy. Qubits must be isolated from vibrations as they can be easily disturbed.

Next quantum computers need error-correcting codes. Classical computers have mechanisms to make sure that when little mistakes happen they are automatically rectified.

The same will be needed for quantum computers, especially considering the delicate nature of qubits. The challenge now is to build a quantum computer that has quantum supremacy, as well as error-correcting codes.

The final, biggest step is to actually do something useful. Google’s quantum computer tackled a task specifically tailored  to prove quantum supremacy, not do anything useful.

New Scientist called the achievement impressive, there is no practical use for it. Ciarán Gilligan-Lee at University College London said, “We shouldn’t get too carried away with this … but there’s still a long way to go.

rb-

This bench-marking task is a proof of concept. SkyNet is not coming –  yet.

Combining quantum with machine learning and AI may be a different story. But for a year or so we are probably safe. Unless of course, some TLA that is already using quantum computing made the paper disappear.

Related articles

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

What’s Superposition and Entanglement?

What's Superposition and Entanglement?Quantum computers can achieve performance orders of magnitude faster than even today’s largest super computersQuantum computers can outperform classical computers by exploiting the quantum mechanical principles of superposition and entanglement.

It’s only when you look at the tiniest quantum particles – atoms, electrons, photons and the like – that you’ve seen these befuddling phenomena. They are perplexing because we don’t experience superposition and entanglement, in our day-to-day lives. They even challenged some of the greatest minds of the 20th century. Nobel prize-winning physicist Richard Feynman said, “Nobody understands quantum mechanics.” Einstein described quantum entanglement as “spooky action at a distance.

Superposition and entanglement allow quantum computers to perform unprecedented amounts of parallelism. They do not need the multiple replication of hardware  required in a classical computer to do the same work.

Quantum superposition

Quantum superpositionQuantum superposition is the phenomenon where a qubit can exist in multiple states or places at the exact same time. Something can be “here” and “there,” or “up” and “down” at the same time. The quantum superposition “up” and “down” is lost after a measurement. We are left with a particle in one known state. This doesn’t make intuitive sense but it’s one of the weird realities of quantum physics.

Quantum entanglement

Quantum entanglementQuantum entanglement is an extremely strong correlation between quantum particles. It is so strong that actions performed on one affect the other, even if placed at opposite ends of the universe. This seemingly impossible connection inspired Einstein to describe entanglement as “spooky action at a distance.

The transfer of state between quantum particles takes place at a speed of at least 10,000 times the speed of light, possibly even instantaneously, regardless of distance.

Live Science Quantum entanglement infographic
Source:LiveScience

Related articles

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him at LinkedInFacebook and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.