Tag Archive for Tax

Tech Titans Talk Tax Cuts with POTUS

Tech Titans Talk Tax Cuts with POTUSFortune is reporting that a group of tech, pharmaceutical, and energy giants are lobbying for a tax cut that would allow them to bring home the estimated $1 trillion they’ve got parked overseas at a steeply discounted rate. Fortune’s sources say that Apple (AAPL), Cisco (CSCO), and Oracle (ORCL)  are among the major players looking to win a one-year tax amnesty on their foreign earnings, allowing them to repatriate that money at a tax rate of about 5%, instead of the 35% they face now.

Multinationals prevailed on Congress to approve a one-year tax holiday once before, as part of a jobs package in 2004. Back then, the companies argued the relief would help them boost economic growth because they’d plow their repatriated money into research, investment, and hiring. And while plenty of outfits benefited from the break – 843 corporations made use of the holiday, bringing back a total of $362 billion, according to the IRS — the broader economic benefits were dubious.

The Treasury Department wrote rules trying to make sure that the recovered cash was in fact invested back into the companies. But money is fungible. Although the rules expressly prohibited using the funds for dividend payments or stock buybacks, later analysis has shown participants sent most of it to shareholders anyway. One study cited by Fortune from the National Bureau of Economic Research found that for every dollar of repatriated cash, companies bumped up shareholder payouts between 60 and 92 cents.

A tax holiday would bring a substantial amount of cashback to the United States and paying that out to shareholders is good for the economy,” said study co-author Kristin Forbes, an economics professor at MIT’s Sloan School of Management and a member of then-President George W. Bush‘s council of economic advisers told Fortune. “But if you’re a politician claiming this will create a lot of jobs or new investment, it isn’t supported by the data.”

In order to sell the deal, Cisco CEO John Chambers and Oracle president Safra Catz argued in an October editorial in the Wall Street Journal that a second holiday would help put Americans back to work. But they don’t promise that companies would drive all of their repatriated money directly into job-creating investments. They acknowledge that companies might pass the money along to shareholders again. But Mr. Chambers and Ms. Catz argue on top of direct investments, the tax cut holiday would spur a new stimulus by boosting markets, thereby increasing consumer confidence. And they say the tax revenue itself could fund $50 billion worth of credits to encourage new hiring — a sum only possible in the unlikely event companies decide to bring home the entirety of their overseas reserves.

President Obama’s recent dinner with Silicon Valley’s tech titans was a star-studded event according to TechCrunch.

Obama tech- dinner toast

Invitee included Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg, Apple CEO Steve Jobs, Yahoo (YHOO) CEO Carol Bartz, Cisco’s CEO John Chambers, Twitter CEO Dick Costolo, Oracle CEO Larry Ellison, Netflix (NFLX) CEO Reed Hastings, Genentech Chairman Art Levinson; Google (GOOG) CEO Eric Schmidt; former state controller and venture capitalist Steve Westly Doerr, and Stanford University President John Hennessy. The event was held at Kleiner Perkins partner John Doerr’s home.

After the dinner, White House press secretary Jay Carney said the group talked about ways to invest in innovation and how to increase jobs in the private sector. He said Mr. Obama also discussed proposals to invest in research and development and his goal of doubling exports in five years.

rb-

I don’t think it’s unreasonable to assume that what POTUS calls, “increase jobs in the private sector” would mean a “tax cut holiday” for the tech titans.

It should be no surprise that the Tech Titans who supped with POTUS were big political contributors and supporters of the tax cut holiday. What happened to “Yes We Can”?

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

Taxman Still Coming

Updated 04-13-2010 It is being reported that the U.S. House has scheduled for April 15th consideration of the Taxpayer Assistance Act of 2010. The bill’s major provision would remove cell phones and similar telecommunications devices as listed property, effective for tax years beginning after 2009.

Ways and Mean member John Lewis (D-GA) was expected to introduce the bill. It would include several individual taxpayer assistance measures. As offsets to the bill’s cost of $411 million, it would expand the bad-check penalty to electronic payments and increase information return penalties.

Taxman Still ComingBy 2013 mobile phones will overtake PCs as the most common Web access device worldwide according to Gartner forecasts. The IT research firm says the total number of PCs in use will reach 1.78 billion in 2013. By 2013, the combined installed base of smartphones and browser-equipped enhanced phones will exceed 1.82 billion units. These devices will be greater than the installed base for PCs afterward.

Gartner logoDespite these projections, the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (IRS) continues to treat mobile phones as a luxury.  According to an article on Mobile Enterprise,  since 1989 IRS tax regulations have identified the cellphone as “listed property.” A listed property is an item obtained for use in a business but designated by the tax code as lending themselves easily to personal use.

Tax policy

According to the IRS, “unless the employer has a policy requiring employees to keep records, or the employee does not keep records, the value of the use of the phone will be income to the employee.” The IRS goes on to say, “At a minimum, the employee should keep a record of each call and its business purpose. If calls are itemized on a monthly statement, they should be identified as personal or business and the employee should retain any supporting evidence of the business calls. This information should be submitted to the employer, who must maintain these records to support the exclusion of the phone use from the employee’s wages.

On the other hand, if the phone is employee-owned there are different tax rules. The IRS says “the listed property requirements do not apply. Any amounts the employer reimburses the employee for business use of the employee’s own phone may be excludable from wages if the employee accounts for the expense under the accountable plan rules.”

In June 2009 the IRS proposed to tax up to one-quarter of an employee’s use of a work cellphone. However, the IRS has since decided to let Congress handle the matter. IRS Commissioner Doug Shulman announced on January 8, 2010,  the IRS is now taking a “wait-and-see” attitude. The policy leaves its current regulations in place until Congress passes new legislation. Shulman said on the C-Span’s “Newsmaker” program: “We’re quite hopeful Congress is going to act on this. In the meantime, we’re not doing anything special or moving forward with any initiatives. Our hope is that there will be legislation to clean this up.

Senator John Kerry (D-MA) sponsored the Modernize Our Bookkeeping In the Law for Employees – Mobile Cell Phone Act of 2009, (S. 144/H.R. 690). The bill would remove mobile devices from the listed property rule to exempt them from the tax. The House approved the bill during the last Congress but is still in committee in the current session.

CTIA response

The Cellular Telecommunications & Internet Association (CTIA) trade association welcomed the news. In a Jan. 11, 2010, prepared statement CTIA President Steve Largent said, “The existing rule is an anachronism and it can’t be saved simply by giving it a facelift. That’s why we are focused on continuing to secure congressional support for the Mobile Cell Phone Act, which enjoys broad bipartisan support on both sides of the Capitol. It is our hope that Congress act soon to help employers and employees alike by repealing this absurd, outdated rule.” According to CTIA, employees are still required to maintain logs detailing their business use on a mobile device. The IRS expects individuals to record the following items, according to the CTIA:

  1. the amount of such expense or other items,
  2. the time and place of the use of the property,
  3. the business purpose of the expense, and
  4. the business relationship to the taxpayer of the persons using the property.

The results of the stalled legislation have been predictable. The article cites the example of Rocky Mount, VA, which stopped issuing cellphones to employees. Town employees whose job requires 24×7 availability via cell phone are required to buy their own phone. They will be given a flat stipend for using the phone for work purposes. If employees do not keep careful records, despite paying for their own cellphones for business purposes they may not be able to claim the service as a business deduction. The article notes that “For a for-profit business, the designation of an item as ‘listed property’ has implications for depreciation deductions taken by the business and the computation of net income.”

How to comply with existing tax rules

To comply with existing tax rules, Thompson’s Employer’s Guide to Fringe Benefits Rules says employers must satisfy the onerous substantiation requirements. They do this by requiring annotated monthly statements from employees to support deductions and employee income exclusions. Or firms must treat the value of the benefits as wages for Federal employment tax purposes and report this value as wages on Forms W-2.

For practical reasons, Thompson says, some employers opt to reimburse employees for cell phone purchases on an after-tax basis. This would negate the employer’s ownership of the phones and the requisite fixed asset tracking that follows. Employers should also provide reimbursements of service and usage fees on an after-tax basis unless they collect annotated documentation from employees to substantiate the reimbursements. Employers should either collect all monthly statements from employees. Otherwise, they should require employees to maintain those records to effectively respond if the IRS inquires into the claims.

What should a firm do if they provide employees with cellphones?

  1. Assess your existing policies for corporate-issued smartphones, and require employees to keep records of each call and its business purpose.
  2. Regularly audit smartphone records and require employees to reimburse the company for all personal use.
  3. Consider whether an individual-liable model for the cellphone users in your enterprise would work.
  4. Get involved and contact your Senator or Representative and tell them to update the IRS code.

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.