Tag Archive for Wall Street

Wall Street Investing Like It’s 1999

Wall Street Investing Like It’s 1999 The New York Times reports that banks are pouring money into technology funds, wealthy clients and institutions are clamoring to get pieces of start-ups, expectations of stock market debuts building. As the Wall Street machinery kicks into second gear, some investors with memories of the Internet bust a decade earlier are wondering whether this sudden burst of activity spells danger for the industry once again.

With all this exuberance, valuations are soaring. Investments in Facebook and Zynga have more than quintupled the implied worth of each company in the last two years. The social shopping site Groupon is considering an initial public offering that would value the company at $25 billion. Less than a year ago, the company was valued at $1.4 billion.

I worry that investors think every social company will be as good as Facebook,” said Roger McNamee, a managing director of Elevation Partners and an investor in Facebook, who co-founded the private equity fund Silver Lake Partners in 1999 at the height of the boom. “You have an attractive set of companies right now, but it would be surprising if the next wave of social companies had as much impact as the first.

WebvanThe NYT points out the example of the online grocer, Webvan. WebVan was one of the most highly anticipated I.P.O.s of the dot-com era. The business had raised nearly $1 billion in start-up capital from institutions like Softbank of Japan, Sequoia Capital, and Goldman Sachs. Goldman, its lead underwriter, invested about $100 million. On its first day, investors cheered as Webvan’s market value soared, rising 65 percent to about $8 billion at the close. Less than two years later, Webvan was bankrupt.

Thomas Weisel, the founder of an investment bank called the Thomas Weisel Partners Group that prospered in the first Internet boom, says he is “astounded” by the amount of money now flooding the markets. “I think it’s much greater today,” he told the NYT. “The pools of capital that are looking at these Internet companies are far greater today than what you had in 2000.”

Yet there are notable differences between the turn-of-the-century dot-com boom and now. For one, the tech start-ups that have attracted so much interest from investors have real businesses — not just eyeballs and clicks. Companies like Facebook have fast-growing revenue. Groupon, which has been profitable since June 2009, is on track to take in billions in revenue this year reports the paper. And since 1999, when 248 million people were online (less than 5 percent of the world’s population), broadband Internet and personal computing have become mainstream. About one in three people are online, or roughly two billion users, according to data from Internet World Stats, a Web site that compiles such numbers.

Today, the collective amount of money that Wall Street banks are pumping into Internet start-ups, on top of the surging cash piles from venture capital groups, hedge funds, and private equity, is a major concern for some investors.

Over the last five months, the NYT says many venture capital players have raised giant amounts of capital. One Facebook investor, Accel Partners, is about to raise $2 billion for investments in China and the United States, while Bessemer Venture Partners will be closing in on $1.5 billion for a new fund. Greylock Partners, Sequoia Capital, Andreessen Horowitz, and Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers have collectively raised more than $3 billion in the last six months.

rb-

I can do my job without the social networker, I think the infographic above show that the VCs are no better than Wall Street, moving in a herd to Facebook. At least in 1999, the VCs were all over the place now they have settled on 5 firms.

They certainly have not made it easy for any other new ideas to get funded. The VC community has also concentrated its risk on these firms. All of these firms may be sexy on the coasts, but the only one that is relevant to me in Detroit is LinkedIn.

What do you think?

Is it 1999 again?

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

80% of US Job Seekers Wont Get Jobs Soon

80% of US Job Seekers Wont Get Jobs SoonThe U.S. Labor Department recently reported that the unemployment rate held steady at 9.5%. The analysts at Chart of the Day crunched some numbers and it looks like the U.S. is not out of the economic woods yet. According to Chart of the Day, assuming that the depression, economic uncertainty, recession ended in June 2009, the current unemployment rate is exactly where it was at the end of the recession (9.5%). They offer some perspective on the current state of the job market, their chart illustrates the amount of time it took for the unemployment rate to ultimately dip below (and stay below) its recession-end level for each recession since the late 1940s.

For example, at the end of the recession that ended in November 1982, the unemployment rate stood at 10.8%. As the chart illustrates, it took two months for the unemployment rate to drop below (and stay below) the recession-end level of 10.8%.

The Economic Policy Institute (EPI) pointed out last March that to absorb the nearly 15 million officially unemployed workers in this country, plus the roughly 2.6 million “marginally attached” workers (jobless workers who want a job but have given up actively seeking work and are not counted as officially unemployed), job openings and hiring must rebound dramatically.

The latest EPI numbers say that for every job filled, there are still 5 people who cannot find a job. In this environment of constant right-sizing, resource actions, mass-hiring, firms are stockpiling cash and not making things. The cash stock-piles are huge. The BusinessInsider has this graphic which says it all in my opinion.

Bloomberg reported in February that a  majority of companies in the Standard & Poor’s 500 stock index increased cash to a combined $1.18 trillion while simultaneously reducing spending, keeping a jobs recovery on hold. Bloomberg reports that firms such as:

  • Caterpillar Inc.
  • Eaton Corp.
  • Walgreen Co.
  • General Electric Co.

are among 256 companies that ended last quarter with billions more cash than a year earlier after cutting capital spending by 43 percent. Bloomberg economists say the dearth of investment is keeping the jobless rate at about 10 percent.

According to a Washington Post article,  non-financial companies are sitting on $1.8 trillion in cash, roughly one-quarter more than at the beginning of the recession. The Post sites a survey of more than 1,000 chief financial officers by Duke University and CFO magazine showed that nearly 60 percent of those executives don’t expect to bring their employment back to pre-recession levels until 2012 or later — even though they’re projecting a 12 percent rise in earnings and a 9 percent boost in capital spending over the next year.

It is noteworthy that, over the past two decades, it has taken much longer (on average) for the unemployment rate to drop below its recession-end level. The reasons for this increased time for the unemployment rate to turn around varies. One explanation that Chart of the Day offers is that following World War II, the US found itself in a strong/dominant economic position. It took time, but eventually many of the remaining world economies began to recover and we are now witnessing increased competition as a result of the rise of the rest.

If it is globalization or corporate greed, the lack of jobs in the U.S. means 80% of job seeks are out of luck. “The 5-to-1 ratio means that there is literally only one job opening for every five unemployed workers. That is, for every four out of five unemployed workers there simply are no jobs” explains EPI economist Heidi Shierholz.

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

Wall Street Up Jobs Down

Wall Street Up Jobs Down

The Economic Policy Institute (EPI) recently pointed out that while Wall Street has already made up all the profits lost in the depression, recession, economic slump, the job market remains stalled. The country’s labor market still has far fewer jobs than it did at the start of the recession in December 2007.

Corporate profits have recovered, but job market still depressed

The chart from EPI shows trends in both corporate profits (both privately and publicly owned) and employment since the start of the recession. The chart indexes both to 100 at the start of the recession so the lines show how far profits and employment have recovered. Although corporate profits suffered in the early part of the recession, they have been steadily growing for more than a year and are now 5.7% greater than they were at the start of the recession.

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

2010 Not Any Better – Maybe

2010 Not Any Better - Maybe it spendingGartner says that IT spending experienced its worst year ever in 2009. The Stamford, CT research firm says the enterprise space saw a spending decline of 6.9%. ChannelInsider reports that the industry won’t reach 2008’s spending levels again until 2012. In the meantime, there will be some growth in 2010. Gartner sees a 3.3% increase over 2009 levels to $3.3 trillion.

IT spending prediction

2010 is about balancing the focus on cost, risk, and growth,” says Peter Sondergaard, senior vice president at Gartner and global head of research, in a prepared statement. “For more than 50% of CIOs the IT budget will be 0% or less in growth terms. It will only slowly improve in 2011.” On the other hand, Forrester has a rosier picture. In their report released 10-08-09 “US and Global IT Outlook: Q3 2009,” Forrester analyst Andrew Bartels, says the global IT market will see an upturn, starting Q3 2009 in an article on Campus Technology.

Hardware is hard hit

According to Gartner, things have been toughest on the hardware side of the computer market. Gartner says that worldwide computer hardware spending will total just $317 billion this year, a 16.5% decline, and in 2010 hardware spending will remain flat. Forrester says computer equipment sales will increase by 8.3% in 2010. Worldwide telecom spending is on pace to decline 4% this year and is forecast to grow by 3.2% in 2010 according to Gartner. Forrester claims communications equipment sales will show a bump at 3.6%.

Professional services is up

Additionally, Gartner forecasts IT services spending to total $781 billion in 2009 and to grow 4.5% in 2010.  In their report, Forrester predicts IT consulting services will increase by 11.7% in 2010 Software spending will decline 2.1% in 2009 but is expected to grow by 4.8% in 2010. Forrester says software purchases will be up by 9.3% in 2010.

Three big trends will shape the IT spending and operational infrastructure in 2010, according to Gartner—a shift in IT budgets to more opex from capex, the ramifications of an older infrastructure made up of older IT hardware, and the need for IT to create business cases for spending.

Spending trends

Gartner says the shift from capital expenditure to operational expenditure in IT budgets will be accelerated by emerging cloud services and will make IT costs more scalable and elastic. The second trend comes from delays in computer hardware upgrades. As the business has delayed buying servers, PCs, and printers, and is expected to continue to keep wallets closed in 2010, they need to look at the impact of increased equipment failure rates. “Approximately 1 million servers have had their replacement delayed by a year. That is 3% of the global installed base. In 2010 it will be at least 2 million,” Gartner says.

If replacement cycles do not change, almost 10 percent of the server installed base will be beyond scheduled replacement by 2011,” Sondergaard says. “That will impact enterprise risk. CFOs need to understand this dynamic, and it’s the responsibility of the CIO to convey this in a way the CFO understands.”

Third, Gartner says that IT needs to build compelling business cases, “2010 marks the year in which IT needs to demonstrate a true line of sight to business objectives for every investment decision. IT leaders can no longer look at IT as a percentage of revenue. CIOs must benchmark IT according to business impact.”

rb-

From where I stand, the Gartner predictions seem more rational than Forrester’s. Forrester seems to base their optimism on two fleeting factors, Obama-money and Microsoft. The only real beneficiaries of Obama-money has been Wall Street, not the rest of America, so stimulus spending is irrelevant to most American business. Forrester seems to believe that Windows 7 will save IT spending, another large leap of faith that businesses are going to jump on the bandwagon, but none of my clients seem ready to leap yet.

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.