Archive for February 27, 2020

Ink Profits Driving HP-Xerox Tussle

Ink Profits Driving HP-Xerox TussleWith all of the drama about Xerox trying to take over HP, I got to thinking why? Both firms are dinosaurs with a history of innovation but why are they in a $35 billion tug-o-war now? – Printer Ink. Go to any big-box office supply store – the cost of the ink should shock you. It can be cheaper to buy a new printer than to buy ink for the current printer.

gallon of printer ink can cost you $12,000Bloomberg reports that current ink cartilages are stuffed with foam sponges that hold a fraction of an ounce of cyan, magenta, and yellow dyes that make up the printed image. The printers then spray the contents of the cartridge at 36,000 drops per second on to your paper. Typically the ink needs to be refilled after 165 pages.

The Business Insider calculates that a gallon of printer ink can cost you $12,000. When in cartridge form, ink is more expensive than vintage Champagne and even human blood. When I first wrote about the high cost of printer ink in 2013, ink was estimated to cost 105 times the cost of a latte.

HP DeskJet inkjet printerBI explains that inkjet printers were first developed in the 1960s, and early computer inks were made from food dye and water. Because of this, they would fade after a few months, so companies scrambled to develop a permanent photographic quality dye. In 1988, Hewlett-Packard achieved just that, with the HP DeskJet, the first mass-market inkjet printer, which sold for about $1,000.

BI recently interviewed David Connett. He’s the former editor of The Recycler and activist lobbying for change in the printer-ink industry. Mr. Connett says the reason ink is so expensive is simple: greed – and an outdated razor-and-blades model.

you're trapped in a cyclePrinter manufacturers sell their printers cheaply. They sell the consumables at a very expensive price. And basically, it’s a formula: The cheaper the printer, the more expensive the consumables. BI says that once you’ve bought a printer that uses cartridges you’re trapped in a cycle. You have no choice but to buy their ink cartridges or throw away your printer.

Since a printer is usually a long-term purchase, companies don’t mind selling them at a loss and making the money back through cartridge sales. BI cites the HP Envy 4520 all-in-one printer as an example. It sells for $70 but is estimated to cost $120 to manufacture. The loss HP takes on printers means they need to sell ink cartridges to make a profit, and this model has led to a battleground between printer manufacturers and third-party ink suppliers.

firmware updates to prevent the use of third-party inkThe companies do everything they can to keep you buying official ink cartridges. Manufacturers install microchips into their cartridges and frequently issue firmware updates to prevent the use of third-party ink, which can be more affordable.

Tech firms won’t keep their devices up to date – unless there is a profit in it. Mr. Connett noted that last year, almost 900 firmware upgrades were issued by just nine printer manufacturers, so that’s almost three a day. He speculates there are a couple of reasons for that many updates, “either absolute incompetence, ’cause you’ve got to do it so much, or it is a definite stealth tactic to control the market.

The materials they use, however, cost very little. Mr. Connett says the manufacturing cost of ink is between $70 and $140 a gallon. The printer companies told BI the high costs of ink are due to the research and development that goes into perfecting printer ink. In addition to begin expensive, a lot of the ink you buy never even gets used for printing.

According to 2018 tests by Consumer Reports, more than half the ink you buy could end up lost in maintenance cycles for cleaning the print heads. And printers that use multiple-color ink cartridges also stop working as soon as one color runs out, even if the other colors are still full.

you're getting even less for your moneyBI reports that today you’re getting even less for your money. While the cartridges themselves are the same size and price, they often contain far less ink. The ink in many manufacturers’ cartridges has shrunk from 20 mils to around 5 mils over the past few years, without any reduction in price. The original-size 20 mil cartridges are often still on sale but sold as extra-large cartridges for even more money. And some new cartridges can have only 3 milliliters of ink inside

Mr. Connett concluded,

This product .. can be better engineered … ultimately, this is bad for the consumer, because it’s overpriced and expensive, and it’s bad for the environment because it doesn’t need to be made that way.

BI reached out to HP for comment. HP replied with this statement:

Original HP ink and toner cartridges deliver the best possible printing experience for customers. We make significant investments in R&D each year to provide the highest levels of print quality, safety, and environmental sustainability…

supreme court ruling

Despite a 2017 supreme court ruling, Impression Products, Inc. v. Lexmark International, Inc. in favor of third-party ink, printer manufacturers remain relentless in their drive to eliminate cheaper ink alternatives. They have turned to everything from stealth firmware updates disguised as security patches, to questionable takedown notices on eBay to keep their users hooked on high cost ink.

rb-

In the three decades following HP’s introduction of the desktop laser printer, in 1984, the print division brought in over a half-trillion dollars of revenue.

To further protect their half-trillion dollars of revenue, HP has started an ink subscription program, which will deactivate your cartridges remotely if you print more than your allocated pages.

Related articles

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

Tesla Teams with Hot Wheels for RC Toy Cybertruck

Tesla Teams with Hot Wheels for RC Toy CybertruckTesla’s electric pickup – Cybertruck will cost you nearly $40,000 when it goes on sale. Thankfully, Hot Wheels has teamed with Tesla to make a radio-controlled Cybertruck for the rest of us. The Mattel (MAT) versions include a deluxe and a smaller HotWheels version.

Tesla CybertruckThe deluxe Cybertruck version is a limited-edition 1:10 scale model. This model features, functioning headlights and taillights, a tonneau cover, and a telescopic tailgate that fold out as a loading ramp. It has a pistol-style remote to control the all-wheel drive with “Chill” or “Sport” driving modes that can get up to 250 mph scale speed.

Deluxe Cybertruck

The 1:10 model even comes with a reusable “cracked window vinyl sticker” that mocks the fail at the launch event. It also includes a plastic body that can be removed to see the model’s interior, the battery, and the drivetrain. The large truck has a 9.9-v, 3300-mAh rechargeable battery, and the run-to-charge time is 1:1. The deluxe Mattel version is 1/100th of the cost of the full-sized Telsa version at $400.

Mattel logoThe traditional scale HotWheels version of the Tesla Cybertruck fits on the classic orange Hot track. The 1/64th scale RC car has a gaming-style remote control, two-wheel drive but has Chill or Sport driving modes. Hot Wheels says the 1:64 car can get up to 500 mph scale speed. This version will cost you $20.

How to order a Cybertruck

Hot Wheels already offers the Tesla Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, and Roadster as traditional Hot Wheels, so it no surprise that they added the CyberTruck to the stable. Just like real Tesla’s, the time between order and actually taking delivery of the purchased product is extremely long. Mattel says not to expect deliveries until mid-December 2020. The 1/10 version can be pre-ordered here and the 1/64 version can be per-ordered here.

Related article

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

The Future for Avaya is Cloudy

The Future for Avaya is CloudyBack in 2017 former telephony giant Avaya (AVYA) declared bankruptcy. Since then there has been a number of attempts to break up the firm. Extreme bought the Avaya network division in 2017. In 2019 there were rumors that Mitel was going to attempt a leveraged buyout of Avaya.

RingCentral will pay Avaya $500MEventually, Avaya made a deal with Unified Communications as a Service (UCaaS) vendor RingCentral (RNG) to save its bacon. With the deal, RingCentral will pay Avaya $500M and will be Avaya’s exclusive provider of UCaaS solutions. The two firms announced the “strategic partnership” in October 2019.

It’s February 2020 and the Avaya – RingCentral collaboration will start to show some results – next quarter. The beleaguered vendor announced at its Avaya Engage love-fest that beginning March 31, that in the U.S. the unimaginatively named Avaya Cloud Office by RingCentral (ACO) will be identical in features to the product RingCentral sells today. The rest of the world will have to wait – because RingCentral UCaaS is only available in seven countries.

additional Avaya features will creep into the offering through 2020It is reported that a few additional Avaya features will creep into the offering through 2020. The first two are targeted for release this summer are bridged appearance, and call park and page. Bridged appearance lets two desk phones maintain separate and shared lines, a feature typically used between assistants and their bosses. With call park and page, when a person places a call on hold, the system will automatically send a page to another department or user to pick up the call. The feature is particularly useful to retailers.

Towards the end of 2020 or later, the vendor expects to deliver features that include line appearance, call appearance, hotdesking, and support for the venerable Avaya Audix voicemail service.

Initially, Avaya Cloud Office by RingCentral will only work with three models of Avaya’s J series desk phones: 139, 169, and 179. Avaya will work with RingCentral to certify B series conference room phones, L series headsets and the CU360 video conferencing system. However, most IP Office customers are likely using older devices, given that Avaya launched the J series only one year ago.

Avaya is also developing software to automate the process of migrating settings and users from its legacy gear to the cloud, although that tool won’t be available until later in 2020.

rb-

No Jitter points out that faced with the threat of its large installed base that goes back to legacy Nortel platforms, dumping Avaya – Avaya needed to do something.

To me this looks more like a win for RingCentral. For a relatively small investment ($500M on a market capitalization of $10.5B), RingCentral becomes the preferred UCaaS provider for the large Avaya installed base (100M+ seats) likely planning on a move to the cloud. Meanwhile, Avaya picks up a fully developed UCaaS to sell – if it can execute. Which has been its problem all along.

Can Avaya hold on long enough to develop the promised automation tools move complicated things like CMS to a cloud interface? – we will see.

Related article

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

RSA Sold

RSA SoldThe rumor mill was again right. During the holidays I wrote about Dell Technologies selling its RSA cybersecurity business. The encryption pioneer is being purchased by private equity firm Symphony Technology Group Partners (STG). The STG consortium includes the Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan Board and AlpInvest Partners.

private equity firmSTG is based in Palo Alto, CA, and was founded in 2002. According to its website, the VC firm focuses on data, software, and analytics. STG entered the cybersecurity arena in April 2019 when they bought RedSeal, a cyber risk modeling firm in a $70M deal.

RSA Sold for $2B

The deal is expected to close in the next six to nine months. Financial terms were not disclosed, but multiple sources peg the all-cash deal at $2.08 billion.

In a prepared statement about the deal, William Chisholm, managing partner at Symphony Technology Group, said:

We are excited and fully committed to maximizing the power of RSA’s talent, expertise, and tremendous growth potential and continuing RSA’s strategy to serve customers with a holistic approach to managing their digital risk.

Rohit Ghai, president of RSA wrote:

Symphony Technology Group … independent configuration, we expect to be in an even better position to accelerate innovation, ensure customer success with our portfolio…

Dell Technology’s chief operating officer and vice chairman Jeff Clarke wrote in the post announcing the deal:

The strategies of RSA and Dell Technologies have evolved … different go-to-market models. The sale of RSA gives us greater flexibility to focus on integrated innovation across Dell Technologies.

rb-

CRN notes that the purchase price for the STG deal is nearly identical to the $2.1B EMC paid to buy RSA back in 2006. RSA then moved to Dell Technologies in 2016 when Dell purchased EMC for $60B. But why did Dell sell RSA?

  • Dell seems to be sinking a lot of money into Secureworks.
  • 2 billion dollarsDell’s VMware just bought CarbonBlack, why not RSA?
  • RSA was founded “way back in 1982.” And being a “legacy security firm” RAS may be seen at VMware as being part of VMware CEO Pat Gelsinger’s “Security is broken” talking point. Can companies face age discrimination too?
  • Maybe Dell just needs the cash.

Related article

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

Blackberry is Dead – Long Live Blackberry

Blackberry is Dead - Long Live BlackberryLast week BlackBerry (BB) tweeted that they were letting their agreement with the Chinese electronics group TCL Communication lapse at the end of August 2020. This most likely is the end of the BlackBerry smartphone. TCL had been manufacturing BlackBerry smartphones since the Canadian company stopped making its name-sake phones in 2016 amid an attempt to re-shape itself into a cyber-security company.

BlackBerry’s preceded the iPhone and Android in important ways. How did the Blackberry phone go from world domination to last week’s announcement?

Blackberry history

March 1984: Research in Motion (RIM) was founded in Canada.

October 1997: RIM went public with an IPO on the Toronto Stock Exchange which raised $115 million.

July 1998: The RIM 850 the initial BlackBerry device offered something all its competitors couldn’t touch at the time – access to emails on the go (no voice).

1999: RIM joined NASDAQ as RIMM.

November 2001: Patent holding company NTP sued RIM for patent infringement RIM lost and was forced to settle for $612.5M in 2006.

March 2002: BlackBerry 5810 released, with both voice and data support. It ran on a 2G network and came with a color screen. It became the device of choice in corporate America due to its enterprise-level security.

BlackBerry Messenger2005:  RIM launched a proprietary mobile instant-messaging application BlackBerry Messenger. BBM came at a time when other mobile messaging options — like SMS messages — were subpar.

March 2007: The company “restated” $250M earnings relating to a “backdating” stock options scandal. RIM executives changed the date of stock sales to a low share price date to make money on their stock options. The scandal cost RIM’s co-CEOs Balsillie and Lazaridis and others their jobs at RIM and a total of C$77M in fines.

January 2007: Apple launched its first iPhone, opening the market to full touch screen phones.

January 2007 Apple launched its first iPhone,June 2007: BlackBerry had some 8 million customers.

October 2008: First Android-powered smartphone is released.

November 2008: BlackBerry launched the ill-fated Storm, its first full touch phone in reaction to iPhone.

September 2009: BlackBerry hits 20.7% worldwide smartphone market share in Q3. iPhone is at 17.1% and Android at 3.5%.

April 2010: Apple released the original iPad.

April 2011: RIM released the PlayBook tablet as a knee-jerk reaction to the success of the Apple iPad. Contributing to the PlayBook’s poor sales was the dumb decision to not offer email services without a BlackBerry smartphone.

July 2011: 10% of RIM workforce (2,000 workers) laid off.

October 2011: RIM had a global failure of its infrastructure – users are left without service for four days (Oct 10-13).

June 2012 RIM announces 5,000 layoffsJune 2012: RIM announced 5,000 layoffs.

January 2013: The company changed its name from Research in Motion to Blackberry and goes from RIMM to BBRY on the NASDAQ.

September 2013: BlackBerry peaked with 79 million global users and 4,500 employees are laid-off (40% of staff).

November 2013: John Chen becomes CEO and starts to pivot BBRY from a phone maker to a security firm.

September 2015: BlackBerry launched the Priv, the first Android-powered BlackBerry smartphone. BlackBerry acquired mobile security provider Good Technology for $425M and integrated it into the BlackBerry Enterprise Mobility Suite, for its enterprise customers.

September 2016: Blackberry becomes Blackberry Limited and stops making smartphones and outsource all hardware development and manufacturing.

BlackBerry users plummets to 11 million.May 2017: The number of BlackBerry users plummets from 80 million to 11 million.

October 2017: BlackBerry Ltd moved from NASDAQ as BBRY to BB on the NYSE.

November 2018: BlackBerry Limited purchased security firm Cylance for $1.4B.

May 2019: BBM for consumers is shut down.

The Blackberry Limited tweet marks the end of a line of devices that revolutionized mobile productivity for the enterprise. For the uninitiated (those under 30) in its heyday, Blackberry set the bar for mobile innovation. BlackBerry smartphones or “crackberries” as many referred to them helped set the stage for many of the mobile features we rely on today.

Blackberry Curve_8320The company made its own hardware which included a QWERTY keyboard. Qwerty keyboards that made it easier to fire off emails and instant messages. BlackBerry smartphones were the best way to stay connected without a laptop.

BlackBerry Mobile Services provided business users with quick encrypted end-to-end email over a low bandwidth connection. BMS also provided users access to not only their contacts, calendar, and email, but connected enterprise apps and data.

Back in the day when I was sharing technical services we even stood up a Blackberry Enterprise Server (BES) for our customers to link their BBeries to Exchange. BES was sold as a highly secure BES platform that ensured the content was always encrypted and uncrackable.

Holger Mueller, the principal analyst at Constellation Research, pointed out to TargetTech the irony of BlackBerry’s fall.

That’s the irony — users and CIOs got rid of [their] BlackBerrys despite email volume being up … Business users went from being productive on the go to [becoming] lurkers and [doing] email at night.

Tuong Nguyen, a senior principal analyst at Gartner, told TargetTech the BlackBerry smartphone relevance disappeared well before this week’s announcement.

By the time the company stopped making its own phones, its global smartphone market share was well under 1% .. In fact, they had started dipping under the 1% threshold [around] 2013-2014.

rb-

I think the market has space for a productivity-oriented company that respects its users. But to unseat Apple, that firm would have to excel at something else, like folding screens, projection, AR/VR.

Why Blackberry phones are deadThe original BlackBerry company — BlackBerry Limited — now focuses on security software. This is ironic since the Snowden papers revealed that the NSA has access to user data on BlackBerry devices.

In the end BlackBerry, just like Nokia, Palm and Microsoft underestimated the challenge from Apple  Perhaps BlackBerry needs to be done with phones.

Related article

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.