Featured Posts

<< >>

Master Email for Business Efficiency

Discover how mastering email communication can boost business efficiency, avoid common pitfalls, and ensure secure, respectful online interactions.

Turkey Revenge

The turkeys are pissed this Thanksgiving they are seeking revenge.

Germs Infest 60% of Americas Phones

60% of Americans sleep with their phones, harboring germs. Cleaning regularly with UV sanitizer or alcohol wipes can help keep your phone and bed germ-free.

Smartphone Sanitizing: A Practical Guide

Securely erase personal data from your old smartphone before recycling. Protect your identity from hackers—easy steps to follow.

Why Soft Skills Matter in Today’s Job Market

Boost your career with essential soft skills like communication, teamwork, and emotional intelligence. Learn why they’re crucial for workplace success.

The Computer That Took Man To The Moon

The Computer That Took Man To The Moon 50 Years ago50 years ago Man first stepped on the Moon. When NASA’s Apollo 11 touched down in the Sea of Tranquility on July 20, 1969, it was a triumph of the human spirit. The Moon landing was also a technological triumph. The technological triumph was lead by the Apollo Guidance Computer (AGC).

Apollo moon mission guidance computer

The AGC helped the Apollo astronauts safely travel from Earth to the Moon and back. David Szondy at New Atlas explains that Apollo needed computers to navigate to the Moon. On Earth, navigation is about finding one’s way from one fixed point on the globe to another. For a trip to the Moon, navigation is more complex. He likened the planning to standing with a rifle on a turntable that’s spinning at the center of a much larger turntable. Then there is a third turntable sitting on the rim. And, all the tables are spinning at different and varying speeds. Now you have to hit the target by aiming at where it will be three days from now.

In order to hit the target of the Moon, the AGC provided spacecraft guidance, navigation, and control. The AGC was used in all of NASA’s Apollo Moon missions. The AGC was designed by Dr. Charles Stark Draper at the MIT Instrumentation Lab with the support of the AC Spark Plug Division of General Motors (GM), Kollsman Instrument Corporation. The AGC was built by Raytheon. It used approximately 4,000 integrated circuits from Fairchild Semiconductor.

The Apollo Guidance Computer was not much to look at. Mr. Szondy writes it looked like a brass suitcase. It was made of 30,000 components hand-built on two gold metal trays.  One tray was for memory. The second was for logic circuits. The AGC measured 24in × 12.5in × 6.5in and weighed in at 70 lb. Inside, it isn’t even very impressive by modern computer standards. It had about as much oomph as a Commodore 64 with a total of about 74 KB ROM and 4 KB RAM memory and a 12-microsecond clock speed. Gizmodo estimated it would cost $3000 to build an AGC —using 1960s-like components. Each AFC cost NASA around $200,000 (equivalent to $1.5 million today).

Three computers for each trip to the Moon

The AGC was carried aboard both the Command Service Module (CSM) and the Lunar Excursion Module (LEM). The computer flew on 15 manned missions, including nine Moon flights, six lunar landings, three Skylab missions, and the Apollo-Soyuz Test Mission in 1975.

Three computers were required for each mission. One on the CSM and two on the LEM. The CSM’s computer would handle the translunar and transearth navigation and the LEM’s would provide for autonomous landing, ascent, and rendezvous guidance. The second LEM computer was a backup designed to get the LEM back to the CSM in the event of a failure of the primary LEM AGS computer.

Margaret HamiltonThe scientist in charge of the software development program for the Apollo Guidance Computer was Margaret Hamilton, Director at the MIT Instrumentation Laboratory. AGC programs had to be written in low-level assembly language because high-level programming languages such as C for system programming had not yet been invented. The AGC programs were hard-wired into coils so it couldn’t crash.

DrDobbs explained the AGC used a unique form of Read-Only Memory (ROM) known as “rope core memory” to store its operating program. This technology used tiny rings of iron that had wires running through them. When a wire ran through the center of the ring, it represented the binary number 1. When it ran outside, it was 0. The result was an indestructible memory that could not be erased, altered, or corrupted.

rope core memory

NASA Apollo Rope core memory with a Quarter for scale

To program these rope memories, MIT used what they dubbed the LOL method, for “little old ladies.” This was because the programming was done by ex-textile workers who skillfully sent wire-carrying needles through the iron rings. They were aided by an automated system that showed them which hole in the workpiece to insert the needle into, but it was still a highly-skilled job that required concentration and patience.

Multitasking operating system

Apollo 11 LEM EagleThe Apollo Guidance Computer ran a multitasking operating system called EXEC, capable of executing eight jobs simultaneously. The two major lunar flight programs were called COLOSSUS and LUMINARY. The former was chosen because it began with “C” like the CSM, and the latter because it began with “L” like the LEM. Although these programs had many similarities, COLOSSUS and LUMINARY were the only ones capable of navigating a flight to the moon.

NASA also had to develop the discipline of software engineering for software validation and verification were developed, making extensive use of hardware and software simulators. By 1968, over 1,400 man-years of software engineering effort had been expended, with a peak manpower level of 350 engineers.

The AGC user interface, the DSKY (DiSplay&KeYboard) was mounted in both the Command Module and the Lunar Module. The astronauts had to enter commands and data for the AGC with large buttons the astronauts could operate with their spacesuit gloves on. The keyboard also gave them feedback beyond the other million lights and indicators in the cockpits.

Mainframe computerMr. Szondy put the scale of the AGC development in some context. The AGS was being developed at a time when computer technology and the entire electronics industry was undergoing a revolution. When the Apollo program began, computers were still gigantic machines that took up whole rooms. (rb– check out EMERAC in the 1957 movie Desk Set). There was only a handful of big iron in the entire world and they required a priesthood of attendants to care for and feed the monoliths. The engineers at NASA spent 2,000 man-years of engineering down-sizing main-frame technology to fit inside the Apollo spaceships.

And it wasn’t just computing technologies that were advancing. In 1958 the integrated circuit (IC) was introduced. The IC threw the whole question of who was designing and who was supplying computers into flux.

An early user of integrated circuits

ACG was one of the first computers to use integrated circuits. Integrated circuits of the time were rudimentary and very expensiveTexas Instruments (TXN) was selling ICs to the military for about $1,000 each. In 1963 the Apollo program consumed 60 percent of the integrated circuit production in the United States. By 1964, over 100,000 IC’s had been used in the Apollo program. when Philco-Ford was chosen to supply the ICs, the price had dropped to $25 each.

Mr. Szondy writes that the Apollo Guidance Computer is one of the unsung successes of the Space Race because it was so phenomenally successful, having had very few in-flight problems. The Apollo Guidance Computer led the way with an impressive list of firsts, The AGC was the first:

  • Most advanced fly-by-wire and inertial guidance system,
  • Digital flight computer,
  • Real-time embedded computing system to collect data automatically and provide mission-critical calculations,
  • Computer to use silicon chips, and
  • Onboard computer where the lives of crew depended on it functioning as advertised.

The AGC was the most advanced miniature computer to date.

rb-

In 1969 Scooby-Doo, Frosty the Snowman, and The Brady Bunch debut on TV. But what most people of a certain age remember is when 650 million people worldwide watched Neil Armstrong’s “one small step for man, one giant leap for mankind” to became a defining moment in the hearts and minds across the globe.

Related Posts

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

Walkman is 40

Updated 09/14/2019 – Sony is releasing a new Walkman. CNN says the 40th anniversary Walkman NW-A100TPS commemorative version is powered by Android. It has a USB-C port and up to 26 hours of battery life. That is more playing time than most smartphones can provide. It comes with a bunch of audiophile features including; S-Master HX digital amplifier, a DSEE HX processor, even a vinyl processor to give digital tracks the character of vinyl.

There will be a standard version, the Walkman NW-A105 for us mere mortals who can’t or won’t pay the commemorative. Price. cost and release date haven’t officially been announced.

Walkman is 4040 years ago Sony (SNE), not Apple, revolutionized the way we listen to music. The blue and silver Sony Walkman TPS-L2 was introduced in Japan on July 1, 1979. The original Walkman sold for around ¥33,000 ($150). For the first time, the Walkman let us take our music with us without bothering our neighbors. It replaced boomboxes and portable radios.

Walkman TPS-L2The Walkman wasn’t the first. It was the first affordable and manageable portable music player. German inventor Andreas Pavel’s Stereobelt was too clunky and expensive, so they never took off. Sony sold more than 50,000 in the first two monthsCNN reports that in its heyday, the Walkman was as synonymous with portable music players as Kleenex became to tissue and Xerox was to copy machines.

The Walkman came to the US in 1980

The Walkman was introduced to the U.S. in 1980 and continued to sell well even through the CD era. Innovation kept Sony on top of the market. The 1981 Walkman II was barely bigger than a cassette tape. 1984’s Discman helped Sony stay on top of the portable music world. Sony sold 385 million units between 1979 and 2009 Walkmans.

 WM-F5 Sports Walkman

My Walkman in college

Some argue that the Walkman finished off vinyl records. By the time the Walkman made its U.S. debut in 1980, the cassette was well on its way to overtaking vinyl. By 1983, cassettes were officially the best-selling format. at the Verge writes the Walkman was originally ridiculed for lacking the ability to record tapes. It was designed to play music. You could make a mixtape for your high-school sweetheart and listen to it together. The Walkman offered two 3.5mm headphone jacks (the same hardware that, until recently, found on the iPhone) in lieu of a speaker.

Apple iPod

The Verge notes that the Walkman’s popularity began to fade with the arrival of CDs. Its popularity was further eroded in 2001 after the introduction of the Apple iPod and digital downloads began to dominate. Tech historian Stewart Wolpin told USA Today that Sony could have dethroned Apple iPod and iTunes. He explained that Sony’s boss Sir Howard Stringer had completely siloed the company’s divisions so that the electronics business was kept separate from Sony’s recording and film divisions.

This kept Sony from building an iTunes/iPod-like integrated music player/music store solution … Sony would have been the only potential competitor to Apple had the Sony hardware and Sony content people been able to talk to each other.

 

rb-

The 40th anniversary of the Walkman is not about nostalgia. The Walkman is important because before there was the Internet to change what people expected from life, there was the Walkman.

Music that was too daring for commercial radio or my parents in the early ‘80s made its way to me via cassettes made by other kids. Without the Walkman, I probably would never have learned of the B-52’s Rock Lobster, Black Sabbath’s War Pigs, or Iggy Pop and the StoogesRaw Power. The rise of the Walkman is the first loss of control that the recording industry still complains about.

Vintage Bang & Olufsen audio system.The Walkman also inhibited our social skills. It predicted the rise of iPhone culture, a world where eye contact is as obsolete as a Bang & Olufsen audio system.

Related Posts

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

Fourth of July

Celebrate your independence any way you can ...
Fourth of July 2019

Jaimie Berg, who also goes by her stage name Ms. B Hooping Allure, hula-hoops to live music at the 2017 Haggen Fourth of July festivities.

 

H/T Bellingham Herald

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

Groovy Grillin’

Groovy Grillin'SUMR HITS 5000 may be the name of the mixtape you made for your high school sweetheart – it not. Just in time for the July 4th marketing run-up spice company, McCormick introduced SUMR HITS 5000. The SUMR HITS 5000 is a gas grill with an integrated DJ station. Now you can dance with your Delmonico or rumba with your ribs.

McCormick Unveils First-of-its-Kind Grill The SUMR HITS 5000 grill augments your everyday cook-out with custom hardware and machine learning. The custom-made grill technology allows the griller to decide when and what sounds are added to their music track. You can “create custom music tracks” on the grill. The tunes change as food is placed on the grill and which spices and sauces are used.

SUMR HITS 5000 grill creds

In order to give the SUMR HITS 5000 grill some cred, McCormick signed up some talent. They signed up award-winning Pitmaster Myron Mixon and hip-hop legend DJ Jazzy Jeff to sell the product. McCormick Creative and Digital Marketing Director at Alia Kemet said in a presser,

McCormick wanted to explore innovative ways our fans could spice up and enhance their summer grilling, Music plays an important role in enjoying food, flavor and the overall experience. The SUMR HITS 5000 creates the intersection of expressing one’s passion for flavor through original song, and we think it’s the perfect blend of mixing taste and art

Engadget says the SUMR HITS 5000 grill uses a mix of technologies. The grill uses capacitive touch sensors, (the same thing as your phone) computer vision (that drives autonomous vehicle), and machine learning :

  • The grill grate has capacitive touch sensors. Move a burger from one spot to another, and that triggers a sound. Remove a condiment from its assigned spot, and you’ll hear another.
  • The grill uses computer vision algorithms, powered by a standard webcam that could detect human poses. Shake some spice over your food, and you’ll literally hear what sounds like a powder shaking.
  • The knobs and condiment holders are lit with neon blue LEDs.
  • The grill uses a 3.5mm audio jack to plugin for sound, with no built-in speakers (the one Apple got rid of).

rb-

CheeseburgerI like to grill – even in the snow – but this is a bit much. Maybe if Will Smith ran the grill, and they added a beer tap – that would be a party!

The SUMR HITS 5000 is a concept grill, so you can’t run out and buy your own in time for your Independence Day festivities. But you can see it in action here!

Related articles

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

Presidential Wannabe’s Don’t Use Email Security

Most Presidential Wannabe's Don't Use Basic Email SecurityWe are in the run-up to the 2020 silly U.S. Presidential election season. Not much has changed in the three years after Trump operatives Russian hackers targeted and breached the email accounts of Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign. Email security firm Agari reports that nearly all 2020 presidential candidates have learned nothing. They have not implemented email security. They are not protected against email attacks, fraud, and data breaches typically run by nation-states.

During the 2016 presidential campaign, the chairman of Hilary Clinton’s campaign, John Podesta, was the victim of a spear-phishing attack. That attack led to the now-infamous WikiLeaks email publication. The WikiLeaks release derailed the campaign and influenced the result of the election. Agari’s CMO, Armen Najarian, explained the importance of DMARC email protection;

DMARC is more important than ever because if it had been implemented with the correct policy on the domain used to spearphish John Podesta, then he would have never received the targeted email attack from Russian operatives.

Which campaign practices email security

ClownsData released by the California-based firm found that just one presidential hopeful uses DMARC for email security. Democratic candidate Elizabeth Warren’s campaign is the only one that uses DMARC for email security. The Warren campaign has completely secured its campaign against the types of email threats that took down Clinton and harmed her campaign staff, potential donors, and the public.

Agari suggested in a blog post that the remaining 11 candidates it checked do not use DMARC. This includes Bernie Sanders, Joe Biden, and presidential incumbent Donald Trump. All do not use DMARC on their campaign domains to secure their email accounts. The company warned that the candidates risk their campaigns being impersonated in spam campaigns and phishing attacks.

Agari also analyzed advanced email security controls of the campaigns. They found that 10 of 12 have no additional protection beyond basic security included in Microsoft Office 365 or Google Suite.

Email alphabet soup

DMARC is not an email authentication protocol. It sits on top of the authentication standards SPF (Sender Policy Framework) and DKIM (Domain Keys Identified Mail). With SPF and DKIM, DMARC supplements SMTP, the basic protocol used to send email, because SMTP does not include any mechanisms for email authentication.

A properly configured DMARC policy can tell a receiving server whether or not to accept an email from a particular sender. DMARC records are published alongside DNS records, including:

  • SPFemail security
  • A-record
  • CNAME
  • DKIM

Matt Moorehead at Return Path explains that DMARC is the latest advance in email authentication. DMARC ensures that legitimate email properly authenticates against established SPF and DKIM standards and that fraudulent activity appearing from domains under the organization’s control is blocked. Two key values of DMARC are domain alignment and reporting.

DMARC’s alignment feature prevents spoofing of the email “header from” address. To pass DMARC, a message must pass SPF authentication and SPF alignment and/or DKIM authentication and DKIM alignment. A message will fail DMARC if the message fails both (1) SPF or SPF alignment and (2) DKIM or DKIM alignment.

DMARC flowrb-

Using email authentication to prove that an email comes from the person it says it is is important because nearly 30% of advanced email attacks (PDF) come from hijacked accounts. Without email, authentication accounts are vulnerable to email security-initiated breaches – attacks typically run by nation-states. The 2018 Verizon DBIR found that nation-state groups accounted for at least 23% of the attacks in successful breaches by an outsider.

DMARC is a widely deployed technology that can make the “header from” address (what users see in their email clients) trustworthy. DMARC helps protect customers and brands; it discourages cybercriminals, who are less likely to target a brand with a DMARC record.

Related articles

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.