Tag Archive for Business

Tech Giant Lobbying

Tech Giant LobbyingIn honor of election day, here is some unsettling info from IDG. The research firm reports that 2013 was a record year for computer and internet company spending on lobbying in the U.S., and 2014 is looking set to continue that trend. They presented an infographic that tracks information technology firms’ money spent buying, corrupting, lobbying politicians.

record year for computer and internet company spending on lobbying in the U.S.The article says that advertising, privacy, cybersecurity, patents & IP, tax, immigration, energy, drones, and mobile payments are all issues the tech industry wants to control, dominate influence on Capitol Hill. IDG’s research says that Google was the biggest spender; the search giant spent $3.94M in Q3, an increase from this time last year.

IDG reports that many well-known tech firms have increased their political spending when compared to last year. They report that social networking giant Facebook (FB) has already surpassed its lobbying spend compared to all of last year. Other tech mega-firms that have increased their attempts to buy political power lobbying include:

tech mega-firms have increased their lobbyingMicrosoft (MSFT), historically one of the biggest spenders in this area, was one of the few companies to actually decrease its spending from this time last year, down by a quarter to $1.66M according to the report. It seems a lot of the other legacy enterprise companies are also cutting back. Other companies reducing lobbying spend compared to this time last year are:

Don’t worry about the fat-cats, IDG says there are plenty of other companies also lining politicians pockets spending +/- $1M each on lobbying including the likes of:

2014 Tecch Lobby Spending - IDG

rb-

No wonder Washington is broken, how much of this money goes into the stupid TV ads you can’t escape. Maybe if these firms paid their proper taxes they would not have so much cash to spend buying congress. Oh right – IBM is a person who has rights.

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

4 Tips for Dealing with IT Sales People

Tips for Dealing with IT Sales PeopleJonathan Feldman penned an article for InformationWeek which provided some tips on how to deal with vendor sales people. The Ashville NC, CIO writes that most IT pros think doing calls and meetings with vendors are a waste of time. However, he states that IT vendor salespeople have a place in the IT ecosystem. The author argues salespeople can be a benefit;

… if you stick your head in the sand, stick your head in the sanddon’t be surprised when you fail to move forward … We all know the bad side of sales. But the good side, at the correct time and in the correct dosage, can usher in business technology innovation.

The article explains it’s all about sound vendor management. Mr. Feldman describes four things he does to ensure that time with the vendor is as productive as possible for him.

Establish guidelines for sales people

TEstablish guidelineshere should be a process for vendor meetings. Mr. Feldman says that staff should know what to do when faced with a vendor on the phone, or worse yet (which I’ve seen) at the front desk.

  1. Should they take the call immediately?
  2. Pass it to someone else? If so, to whom?
  3. If it’s decided not to engage the vendor at all, based on what criteria?

Any way you slice it, staff need guidance so that they don’t go overboard one way or another.

Set expectations

Set expectationsProvide vendors a mechanism for contacting you. CIO Feldman suggests the website should clearly state where product and service calls should go. He also suggests that voice mail announcements spell out a number that vendors should call if they want assistance.

This is an early test of vendors if they can follow your directions. If they can’t properly get in touch at the beginning, how are they going to behave at crunch time? rb- I use the same logic at RFP time, vendors certainly raise a flag if they don’t read the directions and respond in the requested format.

Direct the call

Limit cold callsIt is your time, do you want to spend it on a cold call? I have found that cold calls are rarely useful. Mr. Feldman suggests you limit cold calls to five minutes, tops. He makes the vendor get right to the elevator pitch to quickly check whether to hear more at another time. To cut through the chaff, he recommends a question like, “What’s the value in what you’re selling, in 30 seconds or less?” Hang up on people who say they’re not selling anything.

Control timing

If the salesperson has followed the process and made an appointment and showed up (rb- a problem for first time calls or small accounts) keep the meeting short. The author says these early meetings should be less than 30 minutes to hear and evaluate their message. These calls are to evaluate the elevator pitch, not to discuss strategy. Control the timing; don’t let it control you.

Evaluate the elevator pitchMr. Feldman concludes that ignoring sales calls isn’t an option unless you want to join the legions of the uninformed. He recommends that IT Pros sift through the sales noise to decide which pitches merit action to benefit your business.

rb-

I have managed the vendor pitch process by having quarterly pitch Fridays where new vendors could get 30 minutes to pitch their business. This allowed us to schedule the meetings around our customer’s work. And it made it easy for the admin staff to schedule, here is your time like or lump it. And it pushed the meeting out enough to test sales commitment.

Related articles

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

Top Patent Troll Reloads

Top Patent Troll ReloadsIt’s been a good year for patent trolls, and now the biggest patent troll of them all wants to keep the party going. Jeff John Roberts at GigaOM reports that Intellectual Ventures (IV) has acquired more than 200 new patents. The acquisitions will help IV extend its legal tentacles in fields like wireless infrastructure and cloud computing.

Patent troll aquires more patentsGigaOM explains that IV’s peculiar brand of innovation involves acquiring old patents and using them to arm thousands of shell companies, whose sole business is to extract licensing fees from productive businesses.

News of IV’s restocked war chest, which Reuters says is partially funded by Microsoft (MSFT) and Sony (SNE) comes after earlier reports that initial investors, including Apple (AAPL) and Intel (INTC) declined to take part in IV’s newest trolling fund. According to the report, by the law firm Richardson Oliver and spotted by IAM, the fund is on track since IV purchased 16 percent of all available patent packages in the first half of 2014. A chart by the firm suggests it paid $1-$2 million in most cases; here’s a partial look:

The chart shows six patents related to the cloud computing industry, which has so far escaped the rampant patent trolling that has plagued mobile phone and app developers. The author speculates cloud computing could now be prime picking for IV in the coming year.

IV is well-positioned to exploit the patents thanks to Senate Democrats, who in May killed a bipartisan Patent reform bill that would have undercut many of the economic incentives for patent trolling according to Mr. Roberts. IV has also been active on the lobbying front, filing to start a PAC this year and donating sums of money to Senator Dick Durbin (D-Il), who is closely allied to the trial lawyer lobby that reportedly helped to derail reform.

corrupt politicansGigaOM believes darker clouds could be looming for IV. They cite growing public skepticism towards patent trolls, who now account for 67 percent of all new lawsuits. The trolls have received harsh treatment from the likes of NPR and the New York Times, while the Supreme Court’s repeated criticism of slip-shod patents may finally be making it harder for companies to abuse them.

Meanwhile, respected tech figures like Marco Arment have lashed out at IV’s business model as “cowardly” while inventors like Tesla’s Elon Musk have questioned the value of patents to begin with.

rb-
Uh oh, the world’s biggest patent troll has restocked its weapons chest — and it looks like their next target will be cloud computing.

Related articles

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

Wearable Tech Takes Off

Wearable Tech Takes OffWith the recent release of the Google (GOOGGlass, interest in wearable technology has been on the rise. The impending Apple (AAPLiWatch counter offering will inevitably drive the hype-cycle for wearable technology into hyper-drive. FierceMobileIT cites forecasts from several vendors that predict the wearable tech market will explode.

Wearable enthusiasm

Google GlassesVisiongain believes that over the next five years, the wearable technology market will reach $4.6 billion, with “explosive growth and high adoption rates.”  The wearable technology market includes smartwatches, tech clothing, augmented reality glasses, mobile health devices, and fitness/well-being monitors. Visiongain says:

Due to these devices becoming increasingly cheap to manufacture OEMs are now devising ways to apply this technology to target the consumer market. With virtually limitless applications to a number of verticals, the wearable technology market represents a huge value proposition to all ecosystem members, from manufacturers to app developers and service providers.

Vital jacketIHS Research and Juniper Research share Visiongain’s optimism about wearable technology. IHS predicts that between 2012 and 2017 10 million smart glasses will ship, with a majority of units shipped in 2016. IHS optimistically predicts that shipments of smart glasses will increase by 250% per year.

Juniper Research predicts that wearable devices would be increasingly used in the enterprise. Enterprise wearables include terminal devices, scanners, display devices, and tracking devices. They can also be used for logistics, factory management, and production houses. Juniper projects that overall sales of mobile, wearable devices, and smart glasses will reach 70 million units by 2017.

Wearables will cut into tablets

IDC says wearable computing will cut into tablet sales. They believe wearable devices like Google Glass and smartwatches could hamper tablet sales. Shoppers may choose to spend their money on wearable technology instead of tablets.

Business Insider - Wearable shipment estimates

rb-

Smartwatches augmented reality glasses and even smart contact lenses will save time and increase productivity. These technologies will hit the bottom line of enterprises that choose to embrace this new technology.

Once widespread consumer adoption takes place, the enterprise is never far behind – whether it’s ready or not. Remember how quickly Blackberry’s were tossed aside in favor of more consumer-friendly smartphones? BYOD is evidence that staff members will take technology into their own hands if their employer isn’t providing what they want. 

Companies need to start thinking about policies on existing wearable technology. For instance, many companies who have regulations on using cellphones while driving can expand these to include wearable technology, which will come in handy since wearables could prove distracting.

Related articles

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

Hidden costs of BYOD

Hidden costs of BYODFierceMobileIT points out research from Visage Mobile has identified even more hidden costs in an informative infographic based on data collected between January and April 2013 from 180 companies.

These hidden costs include high roaming charges, as well as downloads of premium text services and sexting apps by employees. Employees download $13,640 worth of unapproved apps, ringtones, and premium services every month. As a result, 15 percent of a company’s phone bill has nothing to do with business, according to the research.

rb-

Ummm – Acceptable use policy? A deduct from their phone stipend?

Hidden costs of BYOD

Related articles

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.