Tag Archive for Green

What is eWaste?

What is eWaste?Electronic waste (eWaste) is classified as hazardous waste if it has components that are toxic (poisonous), ignitable/combustible, corrosive, or reactive. Most electronic devices contain heavy metals, such as lead. The BBC reports that the typical personal computer has many valuable, dangerous or valuable and dangerous materials.

Among the hazardous wastes included in the typical PC eWaste are according to the BBC are:

  1. Lead in cathode ray tube and solder.
  2. Arsenic in older cathode ray tubes.
  3. Selenium in circuit boards as power supply rectifier.
  4. Polybrominated flame retardants in plastic casings, cables and circuit boards.
  5. Antimony trioxide as flame retardant.
  6. Cadmium in circuit boards and semiconductors.
  7. Chromium in steel as corrosion protection.
  8. Cobalt in steel for structure and magnetism.
  9. Mercury in switches and housing.

eWaste risks

An article at CIO.com says that a firms major source of potential eWaste disposal liability comes from the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA), aka the Superfund law. Under Superfund, the U.S. Department of Environmental Protection (EPA) identifies contaminated sites, arranges for cleanup, identifies responsible parties and seeks compensation for the cleanup costs. Many of these sites are landfills where a firm would typically send trash, including obsolete computer equipment.

Once the EPA targets a firm, they can pay the fine or fight the EPA in federal court. The court proceeding could be a costly and time-consuming investigation in to the environmental impact of the firm. Firms can be on the hook all clean-up costs, unless they can prove they never deposited so much as a printer cartridge at that site. The Superfund law states that all contributors to a contaminated site are jointly and severally liable for the entire cost of the cleanup.

Michigan eWaste rules

Enhancing the Superfund threats are state laws and regulations that affect the disposal of eWaste. For example in Michigan, Governor Granholm signed Senate Bill No. 897 into law in Dec. 2008. The law imposes a new annual registration tax of $2,000 to $3,000 on manufacturers of computers and related equipment sold in Michigan to fund a take-back program. Producers must pay for the collection, transportation and recycling.

The program is available for small businesses (10 employees or fewer) purchasing new computers and televisions. The take-back program is good for up to 7 units per day which may recycle covered electronic devices for free. Covered devices include  computers, peripherals, facsimile machines, DVD players, video cassette recorders, and video display devices. Printers will be added in 2011. Program collection must start by April 1, 2010. The Michigan Department of Natural Resources and Environment (DNRQ) is responsible for enforcing these eWaste laws. Larger firms are on their own and there is no current ban on disposal of e-waste. Firms with locations in New York or California faces much tougher requirements.

Many firms take the opposite approach to dumping eWaste into the landfill. Many firms are retaining their out of date IT assets. In 2007, the EPA estimated the number of desktop computers, monitors and notebooks in storage totaled over 110 million units. Despite the declining cost of office spare, storing obsolete equipment is a waste of money. Storing obsolete equipment creates data loss risks and any residual value in the equipment will disappear. There are steps a firm can take to deal with e-waste.

Disposal plan

CIO.com suggests the first step in disposing of eWaste is a well-thought-out technology disposal plan. The plan should start with an attorney or an environmental consultant to get a fuller understanding of the risks and opportunities. CIO.com says the eWaste plan should address:

  • A way to track regulatory changes.
  • Develop methods for achieving your business goals in an environmentally and legally sound way.
  • Determine the point at which your waste volume puts you in a more restrictive class of regulation.
  • Evaluate tax liabilities and incentives.
  • Preserve the confidentiality of legal and business-critical information.

The environmental consultant should be able to find alternative options for reusing and recycling out of date equipment. They should be able to identify a network of local computer resale shops, nonprofit groups, and government agencies where businesses can donate, upgrade or recycle used computer equipment. The consultant can develop agreements that shift the burden and financial risks to others who are better situated to manage the issue according to the CIO.com article. One way to defer the eWaste risk is to lease computer equipment rather than buying it. This was the manufacturer is responsible for disposal at the end of the term.

rb-

We have developed eWaste programs and PC life-cycle programs for clients. We try to bring home the problems of storing out of use IT assets including:

  • Wasted money for floor space to store equipment and the loss of residual value. especially with high-end equipment which could be re-sold on eBay.
  • Data protection regulatory and theft risks. After all. who checks on the old servers once they get stashed in the warehouse?
  • Environmental regulatory risks. If a firm stashes away enough obsolete systems and your storage area can change the firms EPA status to a hazardous waste generator.

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him at LinkedInFacebook and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

How To Chose An eCycler

How To Chose An eCyclerThe U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) recently held a webinar on how to avoid the pitfalls of e-waste recycling. The online meeting, hosted by Chris Newman from EPA Region 5, laid out some best practices to chose An eCycler to recycle eWaste (eCycling). The reasons for eCycling are simple: to protect your data, and your customers’ data, electronics should be disposed of in a traceable and secure way. According to the EPA, eCycling doesn’t necessarily mean shredding machines that are no longer in use; responsible recyclers can wipe computers clean and reuse some parts.

EPA logoAccording to the EPA, the key to finding the best eWaste recycler for the firm and the environment is to “Trust, but verify.”  The responsible firm should verify the claims their eCyclers make. The EPA reports that some unscrupulous eCyclers will use an “EPA ID #” as proof of certification when it’s actually just an accounting tool. Mr. Newman says that the EPA doesn’t certify recyclers but there are several groups that do certify recyclers’ practices.

Chose an eCycler

The Responsible Recycling Coalition (R2) is one of two certifications in the U.S. The EPA started R2 in 2008 with industry partners and initial support of environmental groups. In July 2009, the American National Standards Institute-American Society of Quality National Accreditation Board (ANAB) announced that it will start accrediting companies that will certify recyclers of electronic equipment under the R2 practices. R2 focuses on reducing the human and environmental impacts of recycling electronics. Waste Management recently became the first company to formally adopt these practices.

E-Stewards InitiativeThe other certifying body is the E-Stewards Initiative, which was formed in 2008 by environmental groups that abandoned the R2 partnership when the R2 principals refused to rule out exporting e-waste, incinerating waste electronics, and using prison labor to recycle electronics. In July 2009, the American National Standards Institute-American Society of Quality National Accreditation Board (ANAB) announced that it will start accrediting companies that will certify recyclers of electronic equipment under the E-Stewards Initiative.

rb-

When we talk to clients about their technology life-cycle projects, most of the time, their disposal processes are very weak. Owners need to understand the risks they are incurring by tossing equipment in the dumpster or stock-piling them in the closet.

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

Wi-Fi Harvester

Wi-Fi Harvester Computerworld reports that RCA demonstrated a prototype device that converts Wi-Fi radio signals into DC power to charge wireless devices. The W-iFi Hotspot Power Harvester, also known as Airnergy, was shown at the 2010 Consumer Electronics Show. RCA’s device was able to charge a BlackBerry Bold with about 30 percent power in 90 minutes using Wi-Fi access points located nearby, according to an RCA official recorded on video by Geeky-Gadgets.com. The amount of charging time depends on a user’s proximity to the Wi-Fi hot spot.

The Airnergy unit stores the charge in an internal lithium battery, so you don’t necessarily have to be in a Wi-Fi hot spot to recharge your device. The device is about 2 in. by 3 in. in size and will sell for $39 to $49 this summer. RCA said it is developing a smaller version that would replace a battery inside a hand-held device and sell for about $60. That smaller version could ship in 2011.

Other wireless chargers

Demonstrations of wireless chargers have been a staple of CES for several years, and some products promised in 2008 have not materialized. Some products, such as the Dell Latitude Z laptop, allow charging by placing the laptop directly on a wireless charging stand. Fulton Innovation LLC, (I wrote about here) showed products and prototypes at CES. One Fulton technology concept powers a 12-watt light bulb from a transmitter placed 35 inches away. Powermat USA showed new wireless charging mats for handheld computers at prices ranging from $39 to $149, and the company’s CEO said Powermat has sold 750,000 devices since the company launched two months ago.

There is much skepticism over this product. The inverse-square law roughly says in this case that the signal would decrease in intensity inversely proportional to the square of the distance. Double the distance and signal strength drops by a fourth and so on. Thus at the distance at which most people find themselves from access points, the amount of energy available is minute.

Here is an article from SensorMag.com that describes how RF energy harvesting works.

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

Smart Grid needs IPv6

Smart Grid needs IPv6Cisco Systems is looking at IPv6 as a critical component in securing the next-generation electricity distribution system. IPv6 is attractive to the Smart Grid initiative for two reasons, the first being an abundance of IP addresses available in the expanded 128-bit address space for all the gizmos they hope to sell in a market that Cisco pegs at $20 billion a year. “IPv6 is an interesting discussion and one that occupies a lot of bandwidth at Cisco,” Marie Hattar, Cisco’s vice president of network systems and security solutions marketing, told InternetNews.com. “Some people say that for smaller deployments, we could get away with IPv4, but the smart grid has a number of parts.

The second benefit to the Smart Grid is the security features in IPv6 which will add a layer of protection to the vulnerable electric grid management systems. Security is also now top of mind as the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is now investigating a report into potential threats to the West Coast power grid. Earlier this year, widely circulated reports noted that foreign entities—presumably from China—infiltrated the U.S. power grid on several occasions and have the ability to disrupt power distribution.

China infiltrated the U.S. power grid

At the 2009 Black Hat security conference, a security researcher detailed security vulnerabilities in smart grid meters. “If you think about hacking into a smart meter, it’s like hacking into your TV’s remote control — you still get your TV,” Ms. Hattar said. “The meters are a reporting mechanism but it’s not going to affect the electrical system.” Still, Cisco’s Hattar added that smart meter vendors are concerned about security and Cisco will work with them. “A key part is to build out an end-to-end framework that is secure. A lot has to do with isolation and not exposing the grid to points of entry that are hackable.

As utilities are looking to build out smart grid, it’s more effective to agree on a common protocol across the board as opposed to trying intermix different ones,”  Hatter says. “In many ways, this is like the early days of the Internet where we ultimately settled on IP. We see IP as the scalable protocol for smart grid and we’re working with a variety of vendors to advocate this and make this the key protocol of choice.

Cisco is among the numerous IT vendors with initiatives for improving the power grid. IBM is working with several of its partners on power grid issues through its Smart Planet program.

There’s likely to be subsidiary benefits to the smart grid, like furthering the cause of IPv6  since tens of millions of users and new devices around the world will require connectivity. For example, with utilities adopting IP-enabled metering for thousands of homes connected to the network, there could be an issue with addressing over IPv4. On IPv6, thanks to its plentiful address availability, there are no addressing issues.

rb-

Not only is this a technological issue, but it is an energy policy issue. An electrical grid that can support Smart meters, will allow energy producers to better control the flow of electricity, which will increase the efficiency of the electrical grid, which will, in turn, decrease our dependence on fossil fuels. America needs to get off of electrical generation by fossil fuels and this technology can speed the process before it is too late and gasoline reaches $7.00 a gallon making the current recession seem like a walk in the park.

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

Malware Goes Green

Malware Goes GreenZDNet reports that malware writers have come up with a new social engineering angle. The bad guys have started mashing up two issues Green and Security to help spread their malware. CA has been tracking the emergence of new scareware called Green-AV Premier Edition 3.0.

Green malware social engineering attack

E-Waste RecyclingThe malware claims to be the “World’s First Antivirus Which Cares About the Environment” and “costs” $99.99, This attack plays on Green sympathies by promising to donate $2 from every purchase for saving the “Amazonian green forests.”

CA says that the effects of an attack from this malware are similar to those caused by most rogue security software.

Recommendations:

  • Keep your security software up to date
  • Never click on a link you did not ask for
  • Never purchase this type of security software since you could be giving your credit card information to fraudsters and making yourself a target of identity theft

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.