Tag Archive for Information technology

73% of Admins Still Want to Quit Due to Stress

Most IT Admins Still Want to Quit Due to StressThe number of IT professionals considering leaving their job due to workplace stress has jumped from 69% last year to 73% according to a recent survey by  GFI Software. The article in Help Net Security underlining the increasingly challenging business landscape in the UK and the growing emphasis being placed on IT to help businesses grow, thrive, and compete.  Phil Bousfield, GM IT Operations at GFI Software says that IT staffers are under pressure. “Companies are more reliant than ever on IT innovation, uptime, and speed of deployment, and thus, IT staff are under extreme pressure to deliver for the benefit of the whole business.

GFI SoftwareOne-third of those surveyed by GFI Software cited dealing with managers as their most stressful job requirement, particularly for IT staff in larger organizations, while handling end-user support requests, budget squeeze, and tight deadlines were also singled out as the main causes of workplace stress for IT managers.

IT jobs impact personal life

The blog list other key findings from the survey:

  • 68% of all IT administrators surveyed consider their job stressful.
  • 49% are working six or more hours overtime a week.
  • 35% of respondents have missed social functions due to work issues.
  • 30% of those surveyed have missed out on planned family time because of work demands.
  • 28% of IT admins point to a lack of budget and staff needed to get the job done as their primary reasons for job stress.

sources of stressThe top sources of stress for IT admins are:

  • Management (35%)
  • Tight deadlines (19%)
  • Lack of budget (17%)
  • Users (16%).

To drive up IT admin’s stress, the most common user issues reported in the article were complaints of hardware not working, only for IT to find the device was either not switched on or not plugged in, and users spilling tea, coffee, and other beverages over their computer or keyboard and then denying they had done it. Some of the most ridiculous things that respondents said they had seen an end-user do include:

  • complaints of hardware not workingComplaining their mouse wasn’t working when they were trying to use a foam stress squeezer.
  • Thinking there was a ghost in her PC when IT support staff remoted into it to deliver support.
  • Reporting the Windows version as being “Patio Doors.”
  • Folding up a 5.25inch floppy disc to fit it into a 3.5inch disc drive.

A total of 80% of participants told GFI that their job had negatively affected their personal life in some way. The author states that the impact that work stress is having on health and relationships is a great concern.  Mr. Bousfield said, “We all know that a happy workforce is a productive workforce, so it is concerning that so many of our survey respondents are stressed to the point that they are actively considering leaving their current role in order to achieve a better work/life balance.”

The survey discovered some significant personal impacts the IT career has had on the personal lives of IT workers:

  • 28% have lost sleep due to work
  • 26% have had to cancel commitments to family and friends due to work.
  • 19% do not feel great physically as a result of stress
  • 18% have suffered stress-related health issues due to their work
  • Another 18% also revealed they had experienced a strained or failed relationship due to work stress.

rb-

The IT business can be a grinder, not only because it’s hard, but everybody is an expert because they can use their iPhone. I have covered the health impact of the IT business here and here.

GFI’s Bousfield concludes that the research is a stark reminder that IT staff need to be supported and given the right resources – staff, budget, and technology – to do their jobs well. Management needs to be an enabler, not an obstacle for IT progress.

Related articles

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

Are Users the Future of CyberSecurity?

Are Users the Future of CyberSecurity?Gartner is shopping the idea that the people using IT systems and corporate data are perhaps the best ones to guard them. They are calling the People Centric Security (PCS). According to a ZDNet article, People Centric Security loosens IT controls and relies on end-users to assume responsibilities for protecting IT systems and data.

Gartner logoTom Scholtz at Gartner (IT) presented the idea at the recent Gartner Identity and Access Management conference. They explained it this way, empower users with responsibility for systems and data important to their work, sprinkle in consequences for breaching that responsibility, and users will do the right things to secure their environment.

Gartner argues that the convergence of social, mobile, cloud and big data are eroding corporate boundaries and controls in many areas long thought to be state-of-the-art defenses. “The current approach in developing policies and controls doesn’t scale to current realities,” Mr. Schotlz said.

users will do the right thingMr. Scholtz argues current information security policies and tools grind on productivity. He says the relationship between IT, the business, and workers has transformed and necessitates a change in regard to information security. “In this brave new world, what we do as security people is viewed as negative. We are the people who slow things down.

However, Gartner is not advocating losing all controls and policies only loosening them. Mr. Schotlz argues that taking away controls on data and replacing them with new user-based responsibilities, principles, and rights may just improve end-user focus and produce a more managed and secure environment.  “We cannot forget about the bad guys outside our enterprise; we do not get rid of all our defenses,” he said.

We treat them like childrenOne of the realities in the current approach to information security is we treat the 95% of people that want to do the right thing, we treat them like the bad people in order to protect against the bad things done by the 5% of people who have bad intentions,” said Scholtz. “We treat them like children, and if you treat people like children, they will act like children.

The PCS goal is to implement a “trust space.” ZDNet explains that concepts surrounding “mutual trust” are not new, they have been used in traffic planning, Europe’s Schengen Agreement, open source, and even cloud computing, where companies trust that large providers will protect their data as part and parcel of protecting their own valuable brands.

Gartners People Centric Security Principles

Such an environment “makes it easier to monitor for exceptions, the good people are not trying to circumvent the controls,” says Scholtz.

Protect your dataGartner’s Scholtz knows PCS is not for everyone and that implementation requires cultural and educational challenges. “Maybe we could develop a situation where we have a set of underlying principles that underpin how people use data and how they access systems, and we link those with specific individual responsibilities,” he said. “Maybe we get a more collaborative and social environment.

There are specific requirements if PCS is to prosper according to the article, the process has to be top-down and there have to be effective punishments for those that abuse their rights. Scholtz admits his concepts are in the embryonic stage, but that they will evolve in the coming months as he works with select enterprises. He noted that a European bank and a U.S.-based agricultural business are already adopting PCS concepts.

 rb-

How crazy do you think the PCS concept is? Can it work? Remember that just a couple of years ago, Gartner called BYOD, which I covered here in 2010.

Are your users the future of cybersecurity?

Related articles

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

Who supported the ITRs at WCIT-12

Who supported the ITRs at WCIT-12Byron Holland, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Canadian Internet Registration Authority (CIRA) speculated what the results of WCIT-12 mean for the Internet in the article, “Observations on WCIT-12.” Mr. Holland says the results of WCIT-12 will lead to a two-tiered Internet.

One tier consisting of the countries that supported the new ITRs and ratified the resulting agreement. He believes that these governments will use the United Nations agreement to limit and watch, if not censor, Internet traffic transiting across its borders.

censor, Internet traffic transiting across its bordersThe CIRA CEO states that governments that did not support the new ITR’s and the resulting treaty will continue to have access to the free and open Internet and all of its benefits. The governments that rejected the WCIT power grab are primarily in the developed world.  The rest of the world, primarily those that live in the developing world, will have access to some lesser version of the Internet.

There is a clear correlation between a state’s ranking in the Democracy Index and how their place on the International Telecommunication Regulations (ITR) at the International Telecommunication Union‘s (ITU) World Conference on Information Technology (WCIT-12) according to the article. The following chart compares those countries that supported the ITRs with those that did not or deferred their vote until after consulting with their home country.

The author concludes that some of the larger content producers are simply just not going to bother offering content or services to much of the world. This could very well mean that a content producer will be subject to the ITRs if it is available in those countries. Mr. Holland explains that Internet traffic doesn’t travel point-to-point. The traffic is broken into many packets of information which individually take the most efficient route possible. What if that route transits through a country that has signed on to the new ITRs?

content producerThe CIRA CEO urges everyone to think about how the Internet works against the backdrop of the above info-graphic. It is primarily countries in the developing world that supported the new ITRs. This means that it will be the developing world that will not have access to the same information, free and open democracies, like Canada, do.

The article concludes that the result of Dubai is that the free and open Internet – the Internet that has allowed free speech, democracy, and economic development to flourish – will only be available to the citizens of the developed world. The citizens of the developing world – the people who could most benefit from the free and open Internet, from the free flow of information, and from access to global markets for their products and services – will be deprived of these benefits.

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

Best Companies to Work For In Michigan – 2011

Best Companies to Work For In Michigan - 2011FORTUNE Magazine recently published the 100 Best Companies to Work For 2011. The magazine named three Michigan-based firms as some of the best companies to work for. They are:.

26. Plante & Moran
29. Quicken Loans
68. Stryker

Michiganrb-

So please note that none of these high-performing companies are car companies. I wrote about Michigan leading that nation in new tech jobs here.

Related articles

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.