Tag Archive for IPv6

IPv6 Growing Despite Economy

IPv6 Growing Despite EconomyThe American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN) reports that demands for IPv6 address space is growing. According to the 10/19/2009 article, Next-generation Internet defies recession on NetworkWorld, during the first nine months of 2009, ARIN  received 300 requests from carriers for blocks of IPv6 address space. This compares to 250 requests received in all of 2008 and 2007.

“We’re seeing an uptick in IPv6 address space requests; it’s a very significant growth rate,” says John Curran, president, and CEO of ARIN. “We’ve seen a slight slowdown in IPv4 address space requests…It’s probably dropped off 10% or 20% year over year.

Curran says ARIN is beginning to see ISPs such as Comcast and Verizon Wireless put a great deal of effort into migrating from IPv4-based networks to those built using IPv6. “ISPs are asking for IPv6 addresses so they can make their networks IPv6-enabled so they are ready [for the future],” Curran says. “We give each ISP enough IPv6 addresses to support 4 billion networks, and each network can contain trillions and trillions of hosts.

ARIN’s Curran says the recession is not hampering carriers’ interest in IPv6. “IPv6 solves a problem that hasn’t happened yet. So seeing any demand is surprising, and it means that organizations are planning ahead,” he says. “The current weakness in the economy…is not dampening down IPv6 demand significantly because IPv6 is right around the corner for ISPs. We may be two years away from the IPv4 free pool of addresses running out, but two years, if you’re an ISP, is enough time to get one network deployed. Two years is within everyone’s planning horizon.”

ARIN plans several policy changes to push carriers towards IPv6 adoption. These include:

  • Allowing ARIN to reduce the size of IPv4 address space allocations to carriers as the industry gets closer to IPv4 address depletion.
  • Increasing access to IPv6 address space by removing the requirement for carriers to first demonstrate that they have hundreds of customers.
  • Allowing carriers to run multiple, discrete IPv6 networks that don’t have to be connected to each other, such as community networks.
  • Reconsideration of a current policy that requires the regional registries including ARIN to evenly divide up any IPv4 space they are able to recover.

This gadget has been developed by Takashi Arano, Intec NetCore

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

Smart Grid needs IPv6

Smart Grid needs IPv6Cisco Systems is looking at IPv6 as a critical component in securing the next-generation electricity distribution system. IPv6 is attractive to the Smart Grid initiative for two reasons, the first being an abundance of IP addresses available in the expanded 128-bit address space for all the gizmos they hope to sell in a market that Cisco pegs at $20 billion a year. “IPv6 is an interesting discussion and one that occupies a lot of bandwidth at Cisco,” Marie Hattar, Cisco’s vice president of network systems and security solutions marketing, told InternetNews.com. “Some people say that for smaller deployments, we could get away with IPv4, but the smart grid has a number of parts.

The second benefit to the Smart Grid is the security features in IPv6 which will add a layer of protection to the vulnerable electric grid management systems. Security is also now top of mind as the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is now investigating a report into potential threats to the West Coast power grid. Earlier this year, widely circulated reports noted that foreign entities—presumably from China—infiltrated the U.S. power grid on several occasions and have the ability to disrupt power distribution.

China infiltrated the U.S. power grid

At the 2009 Black Hat security conference, a security researcher detailed security vulnerabilities in smart grid meters. “If you think about hacking into a smart meter, it’s like hacking into your TV’s remote control — you still get your TV,” Ms. Hattar said. “The meters are a reporting mechanism but it’s not going to affect the electrical system.” Still, Cisco’s Hattar added that smart meter vendors are concerned about security and Cisco will work with them. “A key part is to build out an end-to-end framework that is secure. A lot has to do with isolation and not exposing the grid to points of entry that are hackable.

As utilities are looking to build out smart grid, it’s more effective to agree on a common protocol across the board as opposed to trying intermix different ones,”  Hatter says. “In many ways, this is like the early days of the Internet where we ultimately settled on IP. We see IP as the scalable protocol for smart grid and we’re working with a variety of vendors to advocate this and make this the key protocol of choice.

Cisco is among the numerous IT vendors with initiatives for improving the power grid. IBM is working with several of its partners on power grid issues through its Smart Planet program.

There’s likely to be subsidiary benefits to the smart grid, like furthering the cause of IPv6  since tens of millions of users and new devices around the world will require connectivity. For example, with utilities adopting IP-enabled metering for thousands of homes connected to the network, there could be an issue with addressing over IPv4. On IPv6, thanks to its plentiful address availability, there are no addressing issues.

rb-

Not only is this a technological issue, but it is an energy policy issue. An electrical grid that can support Smart meters, will allow energy producers to better control the flow of electricity, which will increase the efficiency of the electrical grid, which will, in turn, decrease our dependence on fossil fuels. America needs to get off of electrical generation by fossil fuels and this technology can speed the process before it is too late and gasoline reaches $7.00 a gallon making the current recession seem like a walk in the park.

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

Feds to Test IPv6

Feds to Test IPv6NetworkWord is reporting that the U.S. government has reportedly launched a comprehensive product testing program for IPv6. The new program, USGv6 Test Program, will be run by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) will require all network hardware and software vendors to pass IPv6 compliance and interoperability tests before they can sell their products to the U.S. federal government market.

NIST logo

The NIST IPv6 test plan covers basic IPv6 functionality as well as related standards such as IP Security (IPsec), Internet Key Exchange (IKEv2 ), Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCPv6), Open Shortest Path First (OSPFv3), Border Gateway Protocol (BGP4+) and multicast requirements in MLDv2.

The USGv6 program will allow vendors to run IPv6 compliance tests in their own labs as long as it is accredited by NIST, but they must run IPv6 interoperability testing in someone else’s lab. Erica Johnson, Director of the University of New Hampshire InterOperability Laboratory told NetworkWorld, “The way that the NIST profile is going to work is that conformance testing can be done in an accredited first-party [vendor], second-party [buyer] or third-party [independent] lab…But the interoperability testing must be done in a second-party or third-party lab.”

The time frame for the USGv6 Test Program is tight. NIST is expected to publish this week [July 31] the final version of its IPv6 test specifications aka Special Publication 500-273 and to finalize its test plan in November 2009. Testing labs are to be accredited before the end of the calendar year. Network vendors will have six months to get their routers, operating systems, firewalls and other security systems through IPv6 testing before the federal government’s July 2010 acquisition deadline.

By July 2010, federal agencies will be required to buy only hosts, routers, and network security systems that have been tested for IPv6 compliance. Vendors must issue a “Suppliers’ Declaration of Conformity” that states host and router products have been tested for IPv6 compliance and interoperability, while security products must undergo functional IPv6 testing. All of the testings must be done in NIST-accredited labs.

rb-

It’s about time – I have included IPv6 requirements in RFP’s for over 6 years. It is amazing to watch the vendors tap-dance around what IPv6 compatibility means. Only some of these products from Cisco or Foundry Brocade are IPv6 compatible depending on the image you buy. I guess the real trick will be to get a “Suppliers’ Declaration of Conformity” if you are not a Fed.

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

IPv6 Has a Business Case

According to a Network World article business incentives are completely lacking today for upgrading to IPv6. The next-generation Internet protocol does not have a reason to be, according to a survey of network operators conducted by the Internet Society (ISOC).

In the report, ISOC says that ISPs, enterprises, and network equipment vendors report that there are “no concrete business drivers for IPv6.” However, survey respondents said customer demand for IPv6 is on the rise. They are planning or deploying IPv6 because they feel it is the next major development in the evolution of the Internet. All of the ISOC survey respondents said they are planning for IPv6, and most have begun deployment.

IPv6 deployment remains spotty, even for organizations committed to the technology, the survey found. When asked how they were deploying IPv6, a little over half said they were deploying IPv6 on parts of their network rather than their whole network. Several respondents said they envision parts of their networks never operating with IPv6.

What’s driving network operators to IPv6 is demand from customers rather than IPv4 address depletion. The survey found almost half of the respondents report customer pressure to migrate to IPv6. Fewer respondents indicated a need for additional address space or the desire for simpler addressing or less complexity on their networks.

According to the survey, 77% of the respondents are using dual-stack, running IPv4 and IPv6 side-by-side. 45% of respondents used some kind of tunneling to implement IPv6 on top of their existing IPv4 networks. However, tunneling was largely viewed as a temporary measure that either had been phased out or would be phased out in the near future. Tunneling will be turned off when their upstream networking provider offered native IPv6 service. 45% of respondents stated that they had part of their network running a native IPv6 deployment.

More than half of the survey respondents said that additional address space is the primary motivator for IPv6. Network operators put less weight on the auto-configuration, built-in security, and mobility features that are found in IPv6.

rb-

The Network World article misses the point. The article does note that ISOC contracted 90 members and only twenty-two organizations responded for a response rate of less than 25%. Not the best body of work to declare there is no business reason to deploy IPv6.

Experts predict IPv4 addresses will be gone by 2012. At that point, all ISPs, government agencies, and corporations will need to support IPv6 on their backbone networks.  IP addresses are like crude oil, there is only so much of it around. Scarce resources cost more as the resource pool decreases.

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

IPv4 Addresses Drying Up In China

IPv4 Addresses Drying Up In ChinaOver at ChinaTechNews, they are reporting that China may soon run out of IP addresses. According to the China Internet Network Information Center (CNIC), under the current allocation speed, China’s IPv4 address resources can only meet the demand of 830 more days, which means about January 01, 2011. Li Kai, director in charge of the IP business for CNNIC’s international department, says that new IPv6 network addresses are only used among educational networks in China.

RB-

So apparently, China isn’t much further along with IPv6 deployment than Europe (GEANT) and North America (Internet2), where the research/educational community primarily has large IPv6 networks

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.