Tag Archive for Jeep

Slam the Door on Hackers

Slam the Door on HackersLast year two white-hat hackers Charlie Miller and Chris Valasek, remotely compromised a Jeep Cherokee. The cybersecurity researchers used  existing functionality in the car to take control.  They were able to disable the car’s transmission and brakes, while the vehicle was in reverse, and take over the steering wheel.

Karamba SecurityThe Verge reports the researchers are back and have compromised their Jeep Cherokee, fooling the car into doing dangerous things. Things like turning the steering wheel or activating the parking brake at highway speeds. This year’s attack requires physical access to the car.

Hackers use the diagnostic port

The team used a laptop connected to the OBD II engine diagnostic port to control even more vehicle systems. The Verge says the researchers were able to update the electronic control unit. This allowed them to take control of the steering at any time. They could turn the steering wheel at any speed, activate the parking brake, or adjust the cruise control settings.

Electronic control unit

Most operations in a car have their own designated electronic control unit (ECU) controller. Some ECU’s manage things like a car’s navigation and entertainment systems. Others manage more critical systems like braking and fuel injection.

Radio are a gateway for attackersA connected car’s ECUs all operate on one network, self-contained within the vehicle. Tel Aviv start-up Karamba co-founder David Barzilai, warns. “If hackers gain access to just one of these controllers, they can get to all of them.

Harden ECU

The Israeli company hopes to sell Carwall Detroit automakers. Carwall is a tool that installs anti-hacking technology into chip-bearing auto parts before they hit the assembly line. Rgis could prevent hackers from crashing your new connected car. Mr. Barzilai told TechCrunch the startup’s technology can head off hackers at the pass. Carwall “hardens” the controllers, or small computers, within a vehicle that are externally connected.

Carwell, a tool that installs anti-hacking technologyKaramba’s Carwall is installed on the controllers, either as a retrofit or before the controllers are built into new cars. The software locks in the factory settings, and prevents any foreign code or banned behaviors from running on them. This essentially blocks a hackers ability to reach into a car’s CAN Bus, and mess with the car’s critical functions.

If indeed we are successful – if all hacks are blocked – then [you] don’t have to worry,” said Karamba’s Barzilai. “A hack that crashes your software is bad enough. A hack that crashes your car takes it to a whole new level.

Karamba’s technology is designed to monitor every bit of code that tries to run on the ECUs and to make sure it comes from legitimate sources. “We are the gatekeepers,” Mr. Barzilai told MiTechNews.

Out of stealth mode

monitor every bit of code that tries to runTechCrunch says Karamba has not yet scored a contract with top automotive suppliers that make ECU’s. They are targeting firms like Continental, Robert Bosch, Delphi Automotive, or Panasonic. But it has only just emerged from stealth and begun to shop its security software around.

YL Ventures has invested $2.5 million to fund Karamba’s growth, MiTechNews reported. Compared with the funding that some Silicon Valley security companies pick up, that’s not a huge amount. But it’s enough to move CEO Ami Dotan to Ann Arbor, where he’ll start making sales calls.

Karamba isn’t alone in attacking car security. Symantec (SYMC), the old school antivirus firm is working on auto security within its “internet of things” unit. Symantec recently released a  white paper “Building Comprehensive Security into Cars,” (PDF) detailing the many electronics and sensors that have to be protected.

rb-

Chrysler is doing a small part to reduce connected car hacking. They recently launched a bug bounty program with Bugcrowd that will pay out as much as $1,500 per bug found. On the other hand, Apple is offering a bug bounty of up to $200,000 for bugs that won’t kill you.

Related articles

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

How Safe Is Your Connected Car?

How Safe Is Your Connected Car?There will be 250 million wirelessly connected cars on the road by 2020 according to Gartner (IT). The technical prognosticators believe that 60% – 75% of them will be capable of consuming, creating, and sharing Web-based data. In light of predictions like these and highly publicized car network attack demonstrations car need more security. Intel (INTC) has established the Automotive Security Review Board (ASRB) to help mitigate cyber-security risks associated with connected automobiles.

Intel logoAn Intel presser says ASRB researchers will do ongoing security tests and audits. They will codify best practices and design recommendations for advanced cyber-security solutions and products. Intel will publish automotive cyber-security best practices white papers, which the company will update based on ASRB findings. Chris Young, senior vice president, and general manager of Intel Security said in the presser.

We can, and must, raise the bar against cyberattacks in automobiles … Few things are more personal than our safety while on the road, making the ASRB the right idea at the right time.

Secure car networks

It is the right time to secure the networks in cars. A study released by Atlanta-based PT&C|LWG Forensic Consulting Services looked at what made cars vulnerable to attacks.
Robert Gragg, a forensic analyst with PT&C|LWG told CSO cars with the highest risk of cyber threat tended to have the most features networked together, especially where radio or Wi-Fi networks are connected to physical components of vehicles.

radio or Wi-Fi networks are connected to physical components of vehiclesToday’s modern automobile uses between 20 and 70 computers, each with its own specialized use. The article explains that engine control units oversee a wide array of electronic sensors and actuators that regulate the engine and maintain optimal performance. Vehicle manufacturers use the generic term “electronic control units” (ECUs) to describe the myriad of computers that manage various vehicle functions.

For example, the author says ECUs control vehicle safety functions, such as antilock brakes and proximity alerts. The ECU which governs climate control systems receives temperature data from sensors inside the cabin and uses that to adjust airflow, heating, and cooling.

modern automobile uses between 20 and 70 computers

What is a controller area network

Typically, all of a vehicle’s computer systems can be accessed over a vehicle’s controller area network (CAN) via the radio head unit, a computerized system that runs a car’s or truck’s communications and entertainment system.

firmware can be used to compromise the vehicleMany of today’s modern vehicles can be accessed via cellular, Bluetooth, or even WiFi connectivity. While no easy task, the CSO article says, once a hacker gains access to the vehicle’s head unit, its firmware can be used to compromise the vehicle’s CAN, which speaks to all the ECUs. Then it’s just a matter of discovering which CAN messages can control various vehicle functions.

Car attacks

These attacks can happen at a distance. PT&C|LWG study estimated minimum distances from which a vehicle could be hacked according to the wireless communication protocol it is using. For example, a passive anti-theft system could be access from 10 meters, a radio data system (or radio head unit) could be hacked from 100 meters, a Bluetooth system could be accessed from 10 meters, a smart key from five to 20 meters, and a vehicle equipped with Wi-Fi… well, it could be hacked from anywhere there’s Internet access (rb- I wrote about this vulnerability in 2011).

That may be a problem. Increasingly, carmakers are coming out with vehicles that include Wi-Fi routers for Internet connectivity. PT&C|LWG’s Gragg said.

In more advanced vehicles — the ones that have infotainment systems — wireless security and wireless access points are all connected into the navigation system. So those are more susceptible to hacking because there are just more wireless access points … Anything open to wireless capabilities is susceptible to the hacking.

rb-

In May, both General Motors (of ignition switch cover-up infamy) and the Auto Alliance, the car maker’s lobbyist, testified against a proposed exemption in copyright law that would allow third-party researchers to get access to vehicle software. A decision in that matter could come any day from the U.S. Copyright Office.

Ralph NaderThe Auto Alliance has also threatened to run to Congress should the Copyright Office rule in favor of the researchers to cover up threats to the consumer, like Volkswagen and GM. The lobbying group calls legitimate researchers attackers in a letter to a Congressional subcommittee investigating the auto industry’s ability to thwart cyber attackers; “Automakers are facing pressure from the organized efforts of technology pirates and anti-copyright groups to allow the circumvention of protected onboard networks, and to give hackers with the right to attack vehicles carte blanche under the auspices of research”.

This would set a dangerous precedent for devices connected to the Internet of Things (IoT) to be unregulated. If the automakers are successful in their DMCA claims, it would be deadly for everyone on the road too. 

Who remembers “Unsafe At Any Speed“?

 PT&C|LWG infographicRelated articles

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

Cars Collaborate to Reduce Risks

Cars Collaborate to Reduce RisksAccording to InScience scientists and engineers from the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) tested an innovative technological system in the Detroit area in April 2009. The study will ultimately help protect cars and drivers from being surprised by black ice, fog, and other hazardous weather conditions.

The prototype system is designed to gather detailed information about weather and road conditions from moving cars. NCAR’s road weather system is part of IntelliDrive. IntelliDrive is a national initiative overseen by the Department of Transportation (DOT) to use new technologies to make driving safer and improve mobility.

The project included collecting information from 11 specially equipped cars in the Detroit area. Test drivers in Jeep Cherokee’sFord (F) Edge’s, and a Nissan Altima were on the prowl for adverse conditions. They sought out heavy rain and snow to collect, store and transmit data. The test vehicles used sensors to collect data about weather conditions such as temperature, pressure, and humidity.

on-board digital memory device recorded that informationAn on-board digital memory device recorded that information, along with indirect signs of road conditions. They recorded events like the cars windshield wipers being switched on or activation of the anti-lock braking system. The information was transmitted to a central database. There the information was integrated with other local weather data and traffic observations, as well as details about road material and alignment. The processed data will then be used to update motorists in the area when hazards are present and, when appropriate, suggest alternate routes. Engineers analyzed the reliability of the system by comparing data from the cars with other observations from radars and weather satellites.

Sheldon Drobot, the NCAR program manager in charge of the project told Inscience, “The system will tell drivers what they can expect to run into in the next few seconds and minutes, giving them a critical chance to slow down or take other action.”

Not only will the system provide motorist warnings/ It will alert emergency managers to hazardous driving conditions. The alerts would help state highway departments efficiently keep roads clear of snow. It can also help meteorologists refine their forecasts by providing them with continual updates about local weather conditions.

The tests helped the NCAR team refine its software to accurately process data from motor vehicles. “The results look very encouraging,” Drobot says. “The tests show that cars can indeed communicate critical information about weather conditions and road hazards.”

One of the biggest challenges for NCAR is how to process the enormous amounts of data that could be generated by about 300 million motor vehicles. “It’s not enough to process the information almost instantaneously,” says William Mahoney, who oversees the system’s development for NCAR. “It needs to be cleaned up, sent through a quality control process, blended with traditional weather data, and eventually delivered back to drivers who are counting on the system to accurately guide them through potentially dangerous conditions.

Related articles

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.