Tag Archive for T

Too Late for Cisco to Take on Apple?

Too Late for Cisco to Take on Apple?Chronically under-performing Cisco is finally getting into the iPad tablet market. Cisco (CSCO) will be releasing Cius in July. Technology Review reports that Cisco’s Cius, is bulkier than the iPad, and has a smaller screen (7-inches wide, compared to the iPad’s 9.7). But it packs a number of tricks designed to woo business users.

Cisco logoTested.com says the Cius can connect to a Cisco phone network to port calls from a desk number to the tablet in order to make a user’s desk number mobile. This will enable a person to make and receive voice and video calls anywhere. The tablet features HD quality cameras front and back and can be used with a Bluetooth headset for more private calling.

The tablet can also be used as a desktop videoconferencing device when docked on a special desktop phone, and can smoothly switch between a WiFi a cellular network connection. The Cius can be docked to serve as a videoconferencing device. The dock supports a keyboard and mouse, so the Cius really can serve as a little computer, “It can replace my desktop operating system,” says Tom Puorro, senior director for Cisco’s collaboration technologies told Technology Review.

Tested.com says the tablet runs Google‘s (GOOG) Android 2.2 Froyo on an Intel (INTC) Z650 1.6GHz Atom chip and weighs 1.5 pounds despite its small 7” screen. Tested.com speculates that Cisco has heavily modified the open-source Android to support business-centric features like multi-person videoconferencing and virtual desktop software.

Engadget has a video demo of the product here.

The fully skinned Android tablet seems like a relic of 2010 thanks to the arrival of Honeycomb, a version of Android actually built for tablets–which the Cius isn’t running. Tested.com says Cisco plans to upgrade the tablet to Android Ice Cream Sandwich eventually, but for now, it’s slumming around with version 2.2 (Froyo). Cisco probably spent too much time developing its custom skin and software to upgrade to Android version 2.3 (Gingerbread) or version 3.0 (Honeycomb).

Cisu runs on AndroidCisco has also created its own app store, AppHQ, that has only apps deemed stable and secure by Cisco and segregated it from the Android app market. This gives the IT department greater control over what a Cius user can do. IT managers can shut down access to the Android app market to protect a company from malicious apps according to Technology Review. Companies can even create their own app store within AppHQ and limit employees to certain applications, or apps built in-house.

Cisco has demonstrated a Cius virtual desktop that runs in the cloud and makes use of a dedicated chip in the tablet that encrypts all its data says Technology Review

A Wi-Fi-only version of the tablet will be available worldwide from July 31 at an estimated price of $750. Cisco will sell it along with related services and infrastructure, so the cost to businesses will vary, and could be as low as $650. AT&T and Verizon will each offer versions for their 3G and 4G networks this fall.

rb-

I wrote about the Cius here and don’t think it is an Apple Killer. Cisco will give its big partners a deal, but Cius also depends on an existing Cisco telephony infrastructure. I don’t see the Cius fitting in the Cisco product line-up since they jettisoned the Flip and are reportedly shopping Linksys and WebEx. The built-in virtual desktop looks pretty cool, though.

What do you think?

Can the Cisco Cius knock off the Apple iPad?

Does the Cius make sense in the non-consumer Cisco?

Related articles

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

AT&T 3G Network Magically Upgraded to 4G

AT&T 3G Network Magically Upgraded to 4GNow that the ITU has caved to the marketers at big telecom, miracles happen. AT&T (T), America’s second-largest wireless carrier, found that its 3G HSPA+ network had automagically evolved all by itself into a fourth-generation (4G) wireless network. Proponents of 4G promise that 4G mobile internet speeds are considerably faster than current wireless networks providing faster download, super-fast video streaming, and more billing opportunities.

Since the ITU downgraded the definition of 4G to catch up with the marketers and declared, “4G …  may also be applied … to the initial third generation systems now deployed” there is no consensus of what exact speed is a 4G network, so companies are free to claim what they want and hopefully the market will sort it out.

AT&T is betting that its customers are too dumb to care. TechEYE cites a Reuters report that AT&T’s chief exec Ralph de la Vega believes that consumers won’t notice the difference between HSPA+ and the forthcoming LTE network stating that “The whole industry has come to equate more speed with 4G.” TechEYE points out that AT&T saw a similar miracle in September 2010 when the marketers found that its HSPA+ network became “the nation’s fastest mobile broadband network.

rb-

The Business Insider has proof consumers don’t care about 4G. They report on Nielsen on findings that only 54% really knew what it meant (super-fast wireless). 27% of the people polled think it’s the latest version of the iPhone. Only 29% of the people polled said they were planning on buying a 4G phone in the next year.

proof consumers don't care about 4G.

 

Related articles

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

Wireless Spends Big Bucks Lobbying Congress

Wireless Spends Big Bucks Lobbying CongressCTIA, the Wireless Association, CTIA is the wireless industry’s largest trade group spent $2.4 million in the third quarter of 2010 to lobby federal officials. Bloomberg cites a quarterly disclosure report filed with the U.S House of Representatives.  This marks a new high in CTIA lobbying spending. CTIA spent $2 million spent in the second quarter and $1.3 million that it spent on lobbying in the third quarter of last year, reports Bloomberg. Bloomberg says the trade association lobbied Washington on:

  • MCTIA, the Wireless Associationore radio spectrum for wireless Internet services.
  • The FCC’s recently adopted “network neutrality” rules, which prohibit broadband providers from interfering with Internet traffic traveling over their systems.
  • The FCC’s legal framework for regulating broadband.
  • “Bill shock” rules, which would require wireless companies to alert subscribers before they run out of minutes, hit data usage or text messaging caps, or start racking up international roaming charges.
  • The CTIA which represents wireless carriers, like AT&T, Verizon Wireless, Sprint Nextel, and T-Mobile, says it now generates annual revenues of $155.8 billion.

rb-

Not only is the wireless industry lobbying group, CTIA spending millions every year to buy influence legislation, but the wireless companies are also the leaders in lobbying spending. I wrote about AT&T and Verizon (VZ) both spending over $3 million on lobbying in 2010 here. I wrote about AT&T’s (T) long tradition of spreading its money around to buy influence legislation here. The rational business use of this money says that these firms are getting more benefit by lobbying lawmakers than investing it in their networks, paying a dividend, or putting the money in the bank, but are the best decisions for the rest of us?

Who do you think the politicians are really looking out for?

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

Big Tech Increases Lobbying

Big Tech Increases LobbyingThe Business Insider has a great post that lays out the lobbying spending by most of the techs stalwarts. Arik Hesseldahl at All Things D compiled the data. The data says that the telecom’s spent the most on lobbying last year. The biggest spender was Verizon (VZ) which spent $3.83 million, an increase of nearly $1 million over last year. AT&T (T) spent $3.47 million on lobbying.

Hewlett-Packard (HPQ) spent $1.6 million on lobbying in 2010, which is nearly double what it spent last year. Microsoft (MSFT), Oracle (ORCL), Google (GOOG), IBM (IBM), and Yahoo (YHOO) also increased the dollars spent on lobbying from 2009 to 2010. Only Intel (INTC) decreased its lobbying spending in 2010.

Tech Spending on Lobbying 2010

The Business Insider points out that despite their incredible influence in the world of tech, Apple (AAPL) and Facebook are hardly spending anything on lobbying. The post speculates that while Apple is influential, it doesn’t dominate anything other than mp3 players, so the government has had little reason to mess with it. (Apple rules the tablet world, but that’s an 8-month-old market.) Also, Apple doesn’t do big blockbuster acquisitions that the government looks at.

Facebook spent the least of anyone with just $120,000. The author expects this will change soon as the company’s power is growing quickly, drawing the eye of regulators.

rb-

The telecom monoliths spent $7.3 million on lobbying, which is more than HP, MSFT, Google and IBM combined what are they up to? I wrote about AT&T’s activities previously, clearly, these firms expect something back from the politicians they bribe donate to. History has proven that the politicians on the receiving end of the bribes donations generate results for their largest contributors and not the SMB or end-user.

What do you think? What are these tech stalwarts getting for their money in Washington DC?

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

ATT the Leader in Lobbying

ATT the Leader in LobbyingWith the political silly season upon us. The good folks over at ars-technica points us to The Open Secrets database. According to them, AT&T (T) easily qualifies as the top all-time donor to political campaigns. From 1990 through 2010, the carrier in its various ownership forms spent over $45,461,879 lobbying politicians, outspending the next two corporate lobbying contenders, the National Association of Realtors ($36,749,493) and Goldman Sachs ($32,660,452).

Open Secrets logoThe money AT&T spends on lobbying politicians comes from every monthly customer bill paid for dial-tone, iPhone, U-Verse, DSL, etc. service.  Ars-technica says that tracking where AT&T spends its money is easy. Figuring out the corporation’s politics is harder. OpenSecrets.org’s list of contributions shows that Republicans and Democrats share equally in AT&T’s gift-giving.  Here are the leading recipients.

  • Reid, Harry (D-NV) $30,000
  • Crist, Charlie (I-FL) $22,100
  • Blunt, Roy (R-MO) $11,500
  • Guthrie, Steven Brett (R-KY) $11,500
  • Jenkins, Lynn (R-KS) $11,500

In Michigan, the same mixed pattern continues. AT&T contributed equal amounts of cash to Democratic and Republican House members:

  • John Dingell (D-MI) $10,000
  • Mark Schauer (D-MI) $10,000
  • Fred Upton (R-MI) $10,000

ATT logoIn 2008, for example, the carrier spent $14,736,518 on lobbying federal and state office-seekers. But the company spread the loot around in a fairly bipartisan manner. although during the 2008 presidential election, Barack Obama was clearly the telco’s favorite. Obama (D-IL) received $264,411 from AT&T which surpassed his Republican challenger John McCain (R-AZ) who received $201,438 in AT&T money according to the article from Ars Ars also noted that the carrier spent roughly the same amount on solid liberal Jay Rockefeller (D-WV) as it did on no-holds-barred libertarian Ron Paul (R-TX).

Lobbying ensure AT&T always has friends

Democratic Party logoArs technica speculates that Republican Party logoAT&T’s political donation strategy is to spread the money evenly so that no matter what happens, AT&T has friends on Capitol Hill and in the White House. The beneficiaries of the AT&T gift-giving however, tend to be fairly established candidates, mostly incumbents.

Undoubtedly AT&T expects help from the politicians it contributes to. In the second quarter of this year, the company spent over $3,086,786.27 for lobbying activities on Capitol Hill (PDF). Much of their time and energy went to a variety of telecom-related bills pending in the House or Senate. These included:

  • HR 1319—The Informed P2P User Act. The bill would require P2P software providers to offer “clear and conspicuous” notice about the kinds of files the program can share. And no sneaky extra installs please, and the software can’t block consumers from deleting it. The proposed law has passed the House (PDF) and is awaiting committee action in the Senate.
  • HR 3458—Internet Freedom Preservation Act of 2009. Edward Markey’s (D-MA) legislation would write the FCC’s Open Internet policy statement into the Communications Act, barring ISPs from being allowed to “block, interfere with, discriminate against, impair, or degrade” access to any lawful content from any lawful application or device. It is currently sitting in the House Committee on Energy and Commerce (PDF), where it will doubtless stay until the Federal Communications Commission gives some sign about what it wants to do with its latest net neutrality proposals.
  • HR 1019—The State Video Tax Fairness Act of 2009 would prohibit states from taxing pay-TV services, including IP video services like AT&T’s U-Verse. AT&T is probably in favor of this one.
  • S 773—The Cybersecurity Act of 2009. The scariest part of this bill would have given the president the power to shut down the Internet in the event of a major cyber attack. That provision has been removed. Now the proposed law focuses on reorganizing the balkanized mess which is the federal government’s cybersecurity defense infrastructure.

RB-

Lobbying by ATT wins the carrier a degree of influence that goes way beyond its social benefitOver the last two decades, AT&T has spent hundreds of millions of dollars on political races, lobbying, and philanthropic giving. And because the telco is careful to spread those resources over a broad political and social landscape, they win the carrier a degree of influence that goes way beyond the numerical figures cited by ars-technica.

Think about that as you vote on Tuesday.

Here is a link from the League of Women Voters to find your local polling place.

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedIn, Facebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.