Tag Archive for Virus

40 Years of Malware – Part 3

40 Years of Malware - Part 32011 marks the 40th anniversary of the computer virus. Help Net Security notes that over the last four decades, malware instances have grown from 1,300 in 1990, to 50,000 in 2000, to over 200 million in 2010. Fortinet (FTNT) marks this dubious milestone with an article that counts down some of the malware evolution low-lights.

The Sunnyvale, CA network security firm says that viruses evolved from academic proof of concepts to geek pranks which have evolved into cybercriminal tools. By 2005, the virus scene had been monetized, and almost all viruses developed for the sole purpose of making money via more or less complex business models. According to FortiGuard Labs, the most significant computer viruses over the last 40 years are:

See Part 1 HereSee Part 2 Here – See Part 3 Here  – See Part 4 Here

Code Red Worm2001 – E-mail and the Internet become primary transmission vectors for malware by 2001 as scripts automatically load viruses from infected Websites. The Code Red worm targeted Web servers and not users. By exploiting a vulnerability in Microsoft IIS servers Code Red automatically spread to nearly 400,000 servers in less than one week. The Code red worm replaced the homepage of the compromised websites with a “Hacked By Chinese!” page.  Code Red had a distinguishing feature designed to flood the White House Website with traffic (from the infected servers), probably making it the first case of documented ‘hacktivism’ on a large scale.

Shortly after the September 11 attacks, the Nimda worm (admin spelled backward) infected hundreds of thousands of computers worldwide. Nimda is one of the most complicated viruses, having many different methods of infecting computers systems and duplicating itself.

Microsoft SQL Server2003 – Widespread Internet attacks emerge as SQL Slammer (or Sapphire) infects the memory in servers worldwide, clogging networks and causing shutdowns. on January 25, 2003, Slammer first appeared as a single-packet, 376-byte worm that generated random IP addresses and sent itself to those IP addresses. If the IP address was a computer running an unpatched copy of Microsoft’s (MSFT) SQL Server Desktop Engine, that computer would immediately begin firing the virus off to random IP addresses. Slammer was remarkably effective at spreading, it infected 75,000 computers in 10 minutes. The explosion of traffic overloaded routers across the globe, which created higher demands on other routers, which shut them down, and so on.

The summer of 2003 saw the release of both the Blaster and Sobig worms. Blaster (aka Lovsan or MSBlast) was the first to hit. The worm was detected on August 11 and spread rapidly, peaking in just two days. Transmitted via network and Internet traffic, this worm exploited a vulnerability in Windows 2000 and Windows XP, and when activated, presented the PC user with a menacing dialog box indicating that a system shutdown was imminent.

The Sobig worm hit right on the heels of Blaster. The most destructive variant was Sobig.F, which generated over 1 million copies of itself in its first 24 hours. The worm infected host computers via e-mail attachments such as application.pif and thank_you.pif. When activated, the worm transmitted itself to e-mail addresses discovered on a host of local file types. The result was massive amounts of Internet traffic. Microsoft has announced a $250,000 bounty for anyone who identifies Sobig.F’s author, but to date, the perpetrator has not been caught.

Sasser shutdown2004 – The Sasser worm built on the autonomous nature of Code Red. It spread without anyone’s help by exploiting a vulnerability in Microsoft Windows XP and Windows 2000 operating systems called the Local Security Authority Subsystem Service or LSASS. Microsoft Security Bulletin MS04-011 here. This is the first widespread Windows malware, made even more annoying by a bug in the worm’s code, that turned infected systems off every couple of minutes.

This is the first time that systems whose function isn’t normally related to the Internet (and that mostly existed before the Internet) were severely affected. Sasser infected more than one million systems. The damage amount is thought to be more than $18 billion.

Bagle was first detected in 2004, it infected users through an email attachment, and used email to spread itself. Unlike earlier mass-mailing viruses, Bagle did not rely on the MS Outlook contact list rather it harvested email addresses from various document files stored in the infected computer to attack. Bagle opened a backdoor where a hacker could gain access and control of the infected computer. Through the backdoor, the attacker could download more components to either spy and steal information from the user or launch DDoS attacks.

MyDoom is another mass-mailing worm discovered in 2004. It spread primarily through email but it also attacked computers by infecting programs stored in the shared folder of the Peer-to-Peer software KaZaA. MyDoom slowed down global Internet access by ten percent and caused some website access to be reduced by 50 percent. It is estimated that during the first few days, one out of ten email messages sent contained the virus.

2005 – In 2005 Sony BMG introduced secret DRM software to report music copying; Other rootkits appear, providing hidden access to systems.

MyTob appeared in 2005 and was one of the first worms to combine a botnet and a mass-mailer. MyTob marks the emergence of cybercrime. The cybercriminals developed business models to “monetize” botnets that installed spyware, sent spam, hosted illegal content, and intercepted banking credentials, etc. The revenue generated from these new botnets quickly reached billions of dollars per year today.

rb-

By 2005 cybercriminals are starting to put all the parts together, Slammer proves that Microsoft systems can be used to spread attacks, Blaster and SoBig improved the infection rate, Bagel began to mine the targets for data and install backdoors so the attackers could continue to re-use the victims’ systems. MyDoom stated to use the first social network, the P2P networks for attacks. Sony proved that rootkits could be widely distributed and MyTob was the first of the modern botnet, leading the world into today’s monetized cybercrime age, described in part 4.

Related articles

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

Malware in Text

A team of security researchers has engineered a way of hiding malware in sentences that read like English language spam. The research led by Dr. Josh Mason of Johns Hopkins University along with Dr. Sam Small of Johns Hopkins, Dr. Fabian Monrose of the University of North Carolina, and Greg MacManus of iSIGHT Partners outlined the threat in a paper English Shellcode (PDF) presented at the 2009 ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security. According to the UK’s Computing, the paper shows hackers could evade anti-virus protection by hiding malicious code in sentences that read like English language spam

alphanumeric shellcodeThe article says that attackers could develop a tool that would be the next step in the hacking and virus arms race. Hackers could hide alphanumeric shellcode in valid files which would activate the malicious payload of a code-injection attack. This attack vector could give attackers control of system resources, applications, and data on a compromised computer.

The researchers report they can generate English shellcode in less than one hour on standard PC hardware. The text in bold is the instruction set and the plain text is skipped. “There is a major center of economic activity, such as Star Trek, including The Ed Sullivan Show. The former Soviet Union. International organization participation.”

The good news, Dr. Mason said that the widespread use of this attack vector is limited because the alphanumeric character set is much smaller than the set of characters available in Unicode and UTF-8 encodings. This means that the set of instructions available for composing alphanumeric shellcode is relatively small. “There was really not a lot to suggest it could be done because of the restricted instruction set,” said Dr. Mason. Long strings of mostly capital letters, for example, would be very suspicious.

Computing claims the work is a breakthrough. Current network security techniques work on the assumption that the code used in code-injection attacks, where it is delivered and run on victims’ computers, has a different structure to non-executable plain data, such as English prose. If an attacker challenge’s the assumption that executable code structure is different from non-executable data malware would be almost impossible to detect.

Dr. Nicolas T Courtois, an expert in security and cryptology at University College London, said malware deployed in this way would be “hard, if not impossible, to detect reliably.” The research is a proof of concept, but Dr. Mason doubts any hackers are using the technique to disguise their code. “I’d be astounded if anyone is using this method in the real world owing to the amount of engineering it took to pull off,” he said. “A lot of people didn’t think it could be done.

Professor John Walker, managing director of forensics consultancy Secure-Bastion, argued the research highlights the flaws in the anti-virus community’s approach to security exploits. “There is no doubt in my mind that anti-virus software as we know it today has gone well past its sell-by date,” he said.

Related articles

rb-

Carly Fiorina

If this technology gets out in the wild, most experts believe that the current signature-based anti-malware products will miss the attack and leave us all defenseless. Sounds like something the chip makers should be working on. Is this why Intel bought McAfee?

What do you think?

Can the anti-malware industry adapt to new threats from attachers?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

40 Years of Malware – Part 2

40 Years of Malware - Part 22011 marks the 40th anniversary of the computer virus. Help Net Security notes that over the last four decades, malware instances have grown from 1,300 in 1990, to 50,000 in 2000, to over 200 million in 2010. Fortinet (FTNT) marks this dubious milestone with an article that counts down some of the malware evolution low-lights.

The Sunnyvale, CA network security firm says that viruses evolved from academic proof of concepts to geek pranks which have evolved into cybercriminal tools. By 2005, monetization of the virus scene was underway and almost all viruses developed for the sole purpose of making money via more or less complex business models. According to FortiGuard Labs, the most significant computer viruses over the last 40 years are:

See Part 1 Here – See Part 2 Here  – See Part 3 Here  – See Part 4 Here

1945 – A Bug is Born –  Grace Murray Hopper, a researcher at Harvard, notes a system failure and finds a moth trapped in relay panels.

1949 – Self-replicating programsJohn von Newman a researcher from Hungary published the theoretical base for computers that store information in their “memory”.

1962 – A group of Bell Telephone Labs researchers invents a game that destroys software programs.

1971 – The Creeper Virus appears on ARPANET, the forerunner of the Internet. It replicates itself and displays a message: “I’m the Creeper: Catch Me if You Can.”

1974 – The Wabbit – was a self-replicating program, that made multiple copies of itself on a computer until it bogs down the system to such an extent that system performance is reduced to zero and the computer eventually crashes. This virus was named wabbit because of the speed at which it was able to replicate.

Apple IIe1981 – Elk Cloner – the first widespread virus on the Apple (AAPL) II platform, spreads by the floppy disk and infects boot sectors, generating messages and impairing performance.

1983 –  The term “computer virus” comes into vogue after Professor Len Adleman at Lehigh University demonstrates the concept at a seminar.

1986 – The Brain is the first global epidemic on the PC platform and shows businesses and consumers are clueless about protection.

1987 – Jerusalem virus – On any Black Friday (Friday the 13th), it would delete any programs that were run, instead of infecting them, so it simply couldn’t be ignored,” Roger Thompson told News.com, Australia. “You couldn’t throw away your hard drive, and reformatting it didn’t remove the virus,” the chief research officer for AVG said.

BSD Daemon1988 – The Morris worm – created by Robert Tappan Morris, infects DEC VAX and Sun machines running BSD UNIX connected to the Internet and becomes the first worm to spread extensively “in the wild”, and one of the first well-known programs exploiting buffer overrun vulnerabilities.

1990 – Chameleon– the first documented polymorphic virus, malware that adapts and changes to avoid detection.

1992 – Michelangelo – was expected to create a digital apocalypse on March 6, with millions of computers having their information wiped according to mass media hysteria surrounding the virus.  Later assessments of the damage showed the aftermath to be minimal.

1995 –  Concept – the first Macro virus attacked Microsoft (MSFT) Word documents.

1996 – Laroux – the first Microsoft (MSFT) Excel virus, appears in the wild.

1999 – The Happy99 worm – invisibly attached itself to emails and would display fireworks to hide the changes being made then wished the user a happy New Year. It modified system files related to Microsoft (MSFT) Outlook Express and Internet Explorer (IE) on Windows 95 and Windows 98.

1999 – The Melissa worm targeted Microsoft (MSFT) Word and Outlook-based systems, and created considerable network traffic.

rb-

Back in the day, I had to deal with both Happy99 and Melissa, as well as the occasional Stoned. Melissa was the easiest to deal with since I was running a GroupWise shop at the time, once the news spread, we just pulled the Cat5 from the GWIA and we saw minimal blowback. Let’s hear it for technological diversity.

Related articles

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

40 Years of Malware – Part 1

40 Years of Malware - Part 1Twenty-five years ago, two brothers in Pakistan came up with one of the greatest annoyances in the modern world. Basit and Amjad Farooq Alvi developed the first major personal computer malware “Brain” in 1986 at their Lahore, Pakistan computer shop. Brain spread eventually spread across the world,  one infected floppy disk at a time.

– See Part 1 Here – See Part 2 HereSee Part 3 HereSee Part 4 Here

Floppy diskBrain was the first of what became known as “stealth viruses.” Because most 1980s computers only had tiny internal hard drives or none at all, everything had to be run from floppy disks. Brain would bury itself in the part of the disk necessary for running programs and infect any computer it ran into. It would then sit in the computer’s memory and infect new disks inserted into that machine as well. While Brain was relatively harmless, it was the mother of all viruses, which spawned a host of malicious malware.

Robert Slade, a senior instructor at the International Information System Security Certification Consortium (ISC2) told News.Com, Australia:

… the virus itself spreads far and wide without any reference to the original media and programs they were selling … Because this was a boot sector infector, it just spread on to any floppy disk that had been put into an infected machine.

There has been a great deal of speculation about why the brothers created the virus. So on the 25th anniversary, F-Secure (FSC1V) researcher Mikko Hypponen, who was among the first to analyze Brain, decided to track down the Farooq brothers and ask them about their groundbreaking work. Mr. Hypponen originally reverse-engineered the virus and discovered a short block of text with the phone number and address of the place where it was created buried within Brain’s code.  Amazingly enough, the brothers are still working at their company, Brain Telecommunications, which is still headquartered at the same Pakistan address near Lahore Railway Station listed in the virus code.

During the interview, the brothers explained how and why they created Brain, adding that they wrote the code primarily as an experiment to see how far it could spread via floppy disk. The brothers, who are now successful businessmen in Lahore, were quick to point out that Brain wasn’t destructive, and explicitly distanced themselves from the more malicious viruses that have sprung up in the past quarter of a century. To the Farooqs, today’s malware is rooted in pure criminality — something they denounce, but don’t feel entirely responsible for spawning. As they pointed out, if they hadn’t created the world’s first PC virus, someone else surely would have.

 

Related articles

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

Microsoft Security Report

Microsoft Security ReportMicrosoft (NASDAQ MSFT) released the latest Microsoft Security Intelligence Report (SIRv8) on April 26, 2010. Data for SIRv8  came from 500 million PCs across the globe between July and December 2009 and for the first time separates enterprise user and consumer user malware trend data. The data included in the 250-page report says that enterprises and consumers each suffer from different types of malware threats.

Microsft security goog news

Microsoft logoThe good Microsoft security news from the SIR 8 report is that newer operating systems and up-to-date applications are the most secure. Windows 7 and Vista Service Pack 2 have the lowest infection rates per 1,000 executions of the Microsoft Malicious Software Removal Tool (MSRT) in the second half of last year. (pg. 85). Microsoft runs the Malicious Software Removal Tool before installing Windows updates.

Windows OSPC's cleaned/1,000 MSRT
XP SP121.7
XP SP214.5
Win 7 32-bit2.8
Vista SP2 32-bit2.2
Vista SP2 64-bit1.4
Win 7 64-bit1.4

The report shows that the more recent versions of Microsoft Windows are less vulnerable to attack. Cliff Evans, Microsoft UK’s head of security and privacy says only about 5% of the vulnerabilities are in Microsoft software. This has led to a shift in emphasis to targeting third-party programs and utilities. In XP, around 45% of attacks exploited third-party (i.e. non-Microsoft) code, with Vista and Windows 7 it’s around 75% according to an article in the Guardian.

Application attacks continue to increase. Running updated software decreases the attack surface and increases Microsoft security robustness. The report shows that attackers target Internet Explorer 6 (IE 6) up to four times more often than the newer version IE 7 (pg.33). Matt Thomlinson, general manager of product security in Microsoft’s Trustworthy Computing group told DarkReading, “With Internet Explorer, IE 6 is four times more targeted in drive-by attacks.” Thomlinson says SIR 8 provides the first real results to illustrate this.

Browser attacks

The Microsoft security report says that nearly 75% of the browser-based exploits encountered in 2H09, were third-party applications, including Adobe Reader, RealPlayer, Apple QuickTime, and AOL software (pg.26). This means Windows Update is not enough to protect users, who must also install updates from Adobe, Apple, and other software suppliers.

Attacks against Microsoft Office make use of older vulnerabilities that have mostly been fixed and can easily be avoided by keeping the software suite up to date. The majority of Office file format attacks can be avoided by applying service packs (pg. 43). For example, 75.8% of the attacks on Microsoft Office files exploited a single vulnerability (CVE-2006-2492, the Malformed Object Pointer Vulnerability in Microsoft Office Word), which was found in 2006.

The report found that enterprise users contract more worms, “In the enterprise, worms are more of a problem, which is not a surprise in that you have networks with trusted file shares and USB devices, and they are more susceptible to those transmission mechanisms,” Thomlinson told DarkReading. “This is the first time we’ve had data allowing us to separate [enterprise and consumer machines] and show differences [in malware prevalence.]” Worms were found in 32 percent of enterprise PCs.

ThreatPresent %
Worms32
Miscellaneous Trojans18
Unwanted software16
Trojan down-loaders and droppers13
Password-stealers and monitoring tools7
Backdoor programs 5
Viruses 4
Exploits 3
Adware3
Spyware1

Rogue anti-virus attacks

Windows in both the enterprise and the consumer markets were hit hard by rogue anti-virus attacks last year. Rogue security software was found on 7.8 million up 46% from 5.3 million in the second half of last year. The most detected rogue security software family, Win32/FakeXPA, was also the third-most prevalent overall threat detected by Microsoft worldwide in 2H09. Three other rouge software families were also widely detected:

  • Win32/Yektel,
  • Win32/ FakeSpypro, and
  • Win32/Winwebsec.

MSFT claims that attacks are now motivated by financial gain, with a “black economy” of malware authors, botnet herders, and other criminals working together to exploit vulnerabilities in Windows PCs. “We’re seeing that the criminals are more professional and organized,” Thomlinson says. “This is really about criminals in shirts and ties, not with tattoos.” Criminals are becoming more specialized in different aspects of cybercrime. They are then coordinating with criminals with other specialties. He says. “Threats are being packaged together and sold as commodities and kits,” he says. “It struck us as we looked at botnets that this is an early version of cloud computing: There is computing available for whatever use they have in mind, and they are taking advantage of many machines to do that. This is the ‘black cloud’ of computing.

rb-
The next report will be interesting as attackers focus their attention on Win7 as it becomes wider deployed. The takeaway from the report is:
  • Keep your installed software patched to current levels.
  • Running old versions of operating systems, browsers, and application software exposes companies to additional unnecessary risks (Ask Google).
  • Invest into initiatives that get systems upgraded to the newest technology available.

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.