Tag Archive for VPN

Why Don’t Users Protect Themselves

Why Don't Users Protect ThemselvesA new report (PDF) from recently swallowed and swallowed again Webroot, says that American technology users overestimate their levels of cyber hygiene. Cyber hygiene is a cybersecurity risk mitigation technique introduced by Vinton Cerf in 2000 where you train yourself to think proactively about your cybersecurity. The goal is to resist cyber threats and online security issues to protect and maintain IT systems and devices and implement cybersecurity best practices, just as you do with your daily personal hygiene.

Webroot logoThe report says U.S. users do not know how to protect themselves from cyber threats. Americans are overconfident in the perceived protection they have. The endpoint security and threat intelligence provider found that 88% of interviewed Americans believe they are taking the appropriate steps to protect themselves from cyber-attacks.

Their confidence is misplaced. Instead, Americans have only a surface-level understanding of the most common types of cyber threats according to Webroot. We can recognize some of the names of the most common cyber-attacks such as malware (79%) or phishing (70%), but for most, that’s where their knowledge ends. Very few (less than 1 in 3) actually know what these common cyber-attacks are or what they do.

While Americans claim to have heard of some of the most common cyber-attack terms when prompted, very few actually understand what those cyber-attacks are. When asked about critical cyber-hygiene issues like malware, backups passwords, and identity theft surveyed Americans reported:

20% update their AV software regularlyMalware – 79% have heard of malware, but only 28% can confidently explain what it is. 82% are using some sort of AV software on their personal devices. 62% of those who use AV software use a free product. Only 20% update their AV software each time they are prompted.

Backups – are another weakness. 78% of respondents report backing up their data. However, 57% are still leaving themselves susceptible to risk by only backing up using one method, rather than backing up online (cloud) and offline.

  • 22% rarely or never backup their data.34% Automatically backup to the cloud
  • 27% Backup to an external hard drive
  • 24% Backup to a USB stick
  • 22$ backup locally on My Computer
  • 17% backup manually to the cloud
  • 22% rarely or never back up their data.

Among those who are backing up their information by uploading it to the cloud, only 43% are taking the extra step in ensuring that it’s stored in an encrypted format.

33% of Americans admit to sharing their passwordsPasswords – Followers of Bach Seat know that passwords suck and the Webroot report confirms it. 33% of Americans admit to sharing their passwords with others. To make matters worse, 63% are reusing passwords across multiple accounts. The research found that Americans have on average 9 passwords for 17 accounts.

Mobile – While on the go, 67% of Americans use public Wi-Fi, but only 35% take the extra step to protect themselves by using a VPN. Additionally, 34% use a work device as their primary personal device at home.

Identity theft 74% of Americans believe their identity stolen has never been stolen.

According to the Webroot whitepaper, the 5 most cyber risky U.S. states are:

  1. Mississippi most cyber risky stateMississippi
  2. Louisiana
  3. California
  4. Alaska
  5. Connecticut

The 5 least risky U.S. states are

  1. New Hampshire least cyber risky stateNew Hampshire
  2. North Dakota
  3. Ohio
  4. Idaho
  5. Kentucky

rb-

According to the research conducted by Wakefield for Webroot, Michigan ranked 31 among the 50 states. Overall, the average home user scored a 60% for cyber-hygiene. The researchers also found that those who they classified as “Superstars” tended to be:

  • A Boomer
  • Married or in a relationship
  • Suburbanite
  • Not a parent.

Related article

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

Are Your VPNs – Virtual Pwnd Networks

Updated October 21, 2019 – The U.S. and U.K. spy agencies have issued separate cybersecurity advisories on 10/21/2019 urging users to patch and mitigate the VPN holes discussed below. The NSA advisory (PDF) warns that “multiple nation-states advanced persistent threat (APT) actors have weaponized” the flaws. The U.K.’s National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC) advisory is here.

Updated September 29, 2019 – SafeBreach Labs discovered a vulnerability in Forcepoint’s VPN client software. The flaw will give attackers unfettered access to its users’ Windows computers.

In its article detailing the bug, Forcepoint explained The flaw enables an attacker to insert their own executable which will run with administrative privileges, giving the attackers administrative access to the system. Forcepoint gave the bug a CVE number of 2019-6145 and a base severity score of 6.7. According to a  Forcepoint knowledge base article, the flaw is patched in version 6.6.1 of the Forcepoint VPN Client for Windows.

Updated September 10, 2019 –  ZDNet is reporting that the Chinese state-sponsored hacker group APT5 is targeting enterprise VPN servers from Fortinet and Pulse Secure since the security flaws discussed below became public knowledge last month. FireEye reports (PDF) that APT5 has been active since 2007 and has targeted multiple industries.

APT5 was reportedly one of the first to start scanning the internet and then later attempt to exploit vulnerabilities in the Fortinet and Pulse Secure VPN servers. The attackers sought to steal files storing password information or VPN session data from the affected products. These files would have allowed attackers to take over vulnerable devices.

Are Your VPNs - Virtual Pwnd NetworksEverybody loves their virtual private networks. SSL VPNs provide a convenient way for business users to connect to corporate networks while out of the office. A recent study by FlexJobs found 30% of workers have left a job because it did not offer flexible work options like remote work. Further, the report said, that 80% of staff would be more loyal to their employers if they had flexible work options and 52% of workers have tried to negotiate flexible work arrangements with their employer.

Great firewall of ChinaHackers love VPNs too

Last month VPNpro found that the majority of VPN services have close ties to China. CSO Online points out that if you are running a VPN that is developed and owned in China, then there is a serious chance that your information is not as private as you think. Every technology company that operates within China, including ISPs, are required to comply with any Chinese governmental request for data. That includes your data. The Chinese government has a long and well-documented history of hacking, favoring, and helping local businesses at the expense of foreign companies.

VPNpro also found that some Chinese firms own different VPNs split among different subsidiaries. For example, the Chinese company Innovative Connecting owns three separate businesses that produce VPN apps: Autumn Breeze 2018, Lemon Cove, and All Connected. In total, Innovative Connecting produces 10 seemingly unconnected VPN products, the study shows.

VPN attacksChina is not the only concern

VPNpro also found that seven of the top VPN services are owned by Gaditek, based in Pakistan. This means the Pakistani government can legally access any data without a warrant and data can also be freely handed over to foreign institutions, according to VPNpro.

VPNpro identified a further four companies: Super VPN & Free Proxy, Giga Studios, Sarah Hawken, and Fifa VPN, which together own 10 VPN services – where the parent company, and therefore the company of origin, is completely hidden.

If that is not scary enough – There are new reports that attackers are now targeting the devices used to attach VPNs to the network. Help Net Security reports that attackers are exploiting known flaws in Pulse Connect Secure SSL VPN and Fortigate SSL VPN installations.

Flaws VPN installations

These attacks could allow attackers to steal passwords and gain full, remote access to an organization’s networks. Attackers have been targeting two vulnerabilities:

  • CVE-2019-11510, an arbitrary file reading vulnerability in Pulse Connect Secure
  • CVE-2018-13379, a path traversal flaw in the FortiOS SSL VPN web portal.

Researchers Meh Chang and Orange Tsai at Taipei City, Taiwan-based consultancy Devcore reported the flaws to Fortinet on Dec. 11, 2018, and to Pulse Secure on March 22, 2019.

In an August 9, 2019 blog post the Devcore researchers recapped their Black Hat 2019 demonstration. Tsai told TechCrunch in an email, “The SSL VPN is the most convenient way to connect to corporate networks … it’s also the shortest path to compromise their intranet.

Pulse Secure VPNs

Pulse Secure logoPrivately held California-based Pulse Secure released an update on April 24, 2019, to address these flaws and urged customers to upgrade all affected products “as soon as possible.” The vendor warned that aside from patching, no workaround would protect systems, “Multiple vulnerabilities were discovered and have been resolved in Pulse Connect Secure (PCS) and Pulse Policy Secure (PPS).

Cyber threat intelligence firm Bad Packets has warned about activity aimed at vulnerable Pulse Connect Secure endpoints. So far they have found nearly 15,000 Pulse Secure VPN endpoints vulnerable to CVE-2019-11510 across all sectors of the U.S. This includes:

  • U.S. military networks,
  • Hospitals,
  • Electric utilities,
  • Financial institutions, and
  • Fortune 500 companies.

Fortinet VPNs

Fortinet logo

Fortinet (FTNT) released a security advisory on May 24, 2019, to address these flaws and urged customers to update their firmware to safeguard themselves. In a blog post, the Devcore researchers wrote about the flaws they’d found in Fortinet devices, “In the login page, we found a special parameter called magic. Once the parameter meets a hardcoded string, we can modify any user’s password.”

Independent British security researcher Kevin Beaumont told BankInfoSecurity he was tracking attacks against Fortigate servers. Beaumont reported seeing “the Fortigate SSL VPN backdoor being used in the wild” against one of his honeypots.

ZDNet claims the number of vulnerable FortiGate VPNs is believed to be in the hundreds of thousands, although we don’t have an exact stat about the number of unpatched systems that are still vulnerable to attacks.

rb-

This isn’t the first time that serious flaws have been found and patched in enterprise-grade networking gear. In 2016 researchers found a vulnerability in Fortinet’s FortiGate OS – that functioned as an SSH backdoor and researchers found an authentication bypass flaw in Juniper Networks (JNPR) ScreenOS firmware.

Patch your systemsIn April 2019, U.S. Homeland Security issued a warning about vulnerabilities in many major corporate VPN applications. The VPN apps from — Cisco (CSCO), Palo Alto Networks (PANW), Pulse Secure, and F5 Networks (FFIV)— improperly store authentication tokens and session cookies on a user’s computer.

Obviously, there is no time to waste: firms should update their vulnerable Pulse Connect Secure SSL VPN and Fortigate SSL VPN installations as soon as possible.

Security researcher Kevin Beaumont told BankInfoSecurity:

Lots of companies have the basics around patching Windows and Linux down, as they have vulnerability management platforms and agents … Those don’t extend to FortiOS and Pulse Secure. So they just don’t patch as they never see [vulnerabilities].

Maybe firms should get their VPN devices on a regular update schedule before they become Virtual Pwnd Networks.

Related Posts

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

DIY Ransomware

DIY RansomwareSophos has recently uncovered a new trend of cyber DIY’ers who are breaking into computers one at a time and manually running ransomware on them. Apparently, these purveyors of bespoke malware are tired of the mass distribution channels employed by WannaCry and NotPetya.

cybercriminalWhy bother using stolen NSA exploits or sending millions of booby-trapped email attachments when you can do it yourself. For whatever reason, some cyber-criminals have decided that if you want something doing properly, you have to do it yourself.

The Naked Security blog points out that many companies, notably small businesses, outsource their IT to, or pay for lots of help from, outside contractors. These contractors might live in another part of town, or elsewhere in the country, or even on the other side of the world. To let remote sysadmins look after your Windows networks, the most widely used tool is Microsoft‘s (MSFT) own Remote Desktop Protocol or RDP for short.

Microsoft Remote Desktop ProtocolFor those who haven’t used it, the author describes RDP as a tool that allows remote use even of fully graphical applications that can’t be scripted or operated via a command prompt. They can work like being right on-site.  That means that the RDP password you’ve chosen for your remote sysadmin (or that you’ve let them choose for themselves) is essentially the key to your office – a weak password is like a server room door that’s propped open, inviting any passing snooper to take a look inside.

brute force attackSo, if the crooks using a network search engine such as Shodan, notice that you’ve got RDP open to the internet, they’ll take a poke around. Sophos security experts who’ve investigated a number of recent RDP attacks have often found evidence that a tool called NLBrute was used to try a whole range of RDP passwords – a so-called brute force attack – in the hope of sneaking in.

Once they’ve got your RDP password – whether they use NLBrute, or simply look you up on Facebook to find your birthday and your pet’s name – they’ll log on and immediately create various brand new administrative accounts. That way, even if you get rid of the crooks and change your own admin password, they’ve already got backup accounts they can use to sneak back in later.

Here’s what you can expect to happen next, based on what Sophos has seen in the attacks they have investigated:

Female hacker - teachprivacy.comStep 1: The crooks download and install low-level system tweaking software, such as the popular Process Hacker tool. Tools of this sort are regularly used by legitimate sysadmins for troubleshooting and emergency recovery. The bad guys can also use it for no good. They can modify the operating system, kill off processes, delete files, and change configuration settings that are usually locked down.

Step 2: The cybercriminals turn off or reconfigure anti-malware software, using the newly installed tweaking tools.

Step 3: The bad guys go after the passwords of administrator accounts. If they can’t get an admin password, they may try logging in as a regular user and running hacking tools that try to exploit unpatched vulnerabilities to get what’s called EoP, or elevation of privilege.

EoP means that already logged-on users can sneakily promote themselves to more powerful accounts to boost their powers. Sophos has seen EoP tools left on attacked systems that tried to abuse vulnerabilities dubbed CVE-2017-0213 patched by Microsoft in May 2017 and CVE-2016-0099, patched by Microsoft back in March 2016.

database servers

Step 4: The crooks turn off database services (e.g. SQL) so that vital database files can be attacked by malware. Files such as SQL databases are usually locked while the database server software is active, as a precaution against corruption that could be caused by concurrent access by another program. The side-effect of this is that malware can’t get direct access to database files either, and therefore can’t scramble them to hold them to ransom.

Step 5: The crooks turn off Volume Shadow Copy (the Windows live backup service) and delete any existing backup files.  Shadow copies act as real-time, online backups that can make recovery from ransomware a quick and easy process. That’s why crooks often go looking for shadow copies first to remove them.

Step 6: The crooks upload and run ransomware of their choice. Because these DIY criminals have used their illegitimate sysadmin powers to rig the system to be as insecure as they can, they can often use older versions of ransomware, perhaps even variants that other crooks have given up on and that are now floating around the internet “for free”.

These bespoke hacks mean the crooks don’t have to worry about using the latest and greatest malware, or setting up a command-and-control server, or running a hit-and-hope spam campaign.

In one attack, Sophos saw a folder on the desktop containing four different types of ransomware. The crooks ran each in turn until one of them worked.

Many ransomware attacks are distributed indiscriminately, and therefore rely on a “pay page” – a Dark Web server set up specially to tell victims how much to pay, and how to pay it.

But the author notes these RDP crooks are already personally involved to the extent of logging into your network themselves, so there’s often what you might call a “personal touch”.

Pay ransomware in bitcoinRather than automatically squeezing you via a website, the blog says you’ll probably see a pop-up telling you to make contact via email to “negotiate” the release of your data. At the time of writing the Bitcoin address used by that attacker contained BTC 9.62, with 1 bitcoin valued at $11,388.33 (11-28-2017) currently worth almost $110,000.

The Sophos investigators found that the victims of this kind of attack are almost always small-to-medium companies: the largest business in our investigation had 120 staff, but most had 30 or fewer. With small-scale comes a dependence on external IT suppliers or “jack-of-all-trades” IT generalists trying to manage cybersecurity along with many other responsibilities.

In one case a victim was attacked repeatedly, because of a weak password used by a third-party application that demanded 24-hour administrator access for its support staff.

Sophos recommends these steps to cut your risk of becoming a victim of DIY Ransomware:

  1. If you don’t need RDP, make sure it’s turned off on every computer on the network: RDP can be used to connect to servers, desktops, and laptops.
  2. Consider using a Virtual Private Network (VPN) for connections from outside your network. A VPN requires outsiders to authenticate with the firewall first and to connect from there to internal services. This means software such as RDP never needs to be exposed directly to the internet.
  3. Use two-factor authentication (2FA) wherever you can. To log on with 2FA you need a one-time logon code every time. If crooks steal or guess your password, it’s no use on its own.
  4. Patch early, patch often. This prevents crooks from exploiting vulnerabilities against your network reducing your exposure to danger.
  5. After an attack, check to see what the crooks have changed. Don’t just remove the malware or apply the missed patches and be done with it. Especially check for added applications, altered security settings, and newly created user accounts.
  6. Set a lockout policy to limit password guessing attacks. With three guesses at a time followed by a five-minute lockout, a crook can only try out 12 × 3 = 36 passwords an hour, which makes a brute force attack impractical.
  7. If you’re using a third-party IT company and they haven’t already suggested the precautions Sophos listed above, why not ask them why, and ask yourself if they’re the right people to be looking after your network?

Related article

  • Hackers have cashed out on $143,000 of bitcoin from the massive WannaCry ransomware attack (CNBC)

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

Another Hole in Internet Armor

Another Hole in Internet ArmorAnother hole in our Internet armor has been discovered. The hole is in the Diffie-Hellman key exchange, a popular cryptographic algorithm that allows Internet protocols to agree on a shared key and negotiate a secure connection. It is fundamental to many protocols including HTTPS, SSH, IPsec, SMTPS, and protocols that rely on TLS.

Diffie-Hellman key exchangeResearchers from the University of Michigan, Inria, Microsoft Research, Johns Hopkins University, and the University of Pennsylvania have uncovered several weaknesses in how Diffie-Hellman key exchange has been deployed. In what they are calling the Logjam attack the DF flaw allows a man-in-the-middle attacker to downgrade vulnerable TLS connections to 512-bit export-grade cryptography. This allows the attacker to read and change any data passed over the connection.

The problem, according to the researchers, is that millions of HTTPS, SSH, and VPN servers all use the same prime numbers for Diffie-Hellman key exchange. Practitioners believed this was safe as long as new key exchange messages were generated for every connection. However, the first step in the number field sieve—the most efficient algorithm for breaking a Diffie-Hellman connection—is dependent only on this prime. After this first step, an attacker can quickly break individual connections.

prime numberTo prove this hypothesis, the researchers carried out this computation against the most common 512-bit prime number used for TLS and demonstrated that the Logjam attack can be used to downgrade connections to 80% of TLS servers supporting DHEEXPORT.

They also estimated that an academic team can break a 768-bit prime and that a nation-state can break a 1024-bit prime. Breaking the single, most common 1024-bit prime used by web servers would allow passive eavesdropping on connections to 18% of the Top 1 Million HTTPS domains. A second prime would allow passive decryption of connections to 66% of VPN servers and 26% of SSH servers.

VPN attackThere is speculation that this “flaw” was being exploited by nation-state bad actors. A close reading of published NSA leaks shows that the agency’s attacks on VPNs are consistent with having created, exploited, harnessed the Logjam vulnerability.

What should you do?

1 – Go to the researcher’s website https://weakdh.org/ to see if your browser is secure from the Logjam flaw. (It reported that Google Chrome Version 43.0.2357.81 (64-bit) on OSX 10.10.3 was not secure}

2 – Microsoft (MSFT) patched the Logjam flaw on May 12 with security bulletin MS15-055. A Microsoft spokesperson told eWEEK;

Customers who apply the update, or have automatic updates enabled, will be protected. We encourage all customers to apply the update to help stay protected.

3 – Google (GOOG) fixed the issue with the Chrome 42 update, which debuted on April 15. Google engineer Adam Langley wrote;

We disabled TLS False-Start with Diffie-Hellman (DHE) in Chrome 42, which has been the stable version for many weeks now.

patch for Firefox4 – Mozilla’s patch for Firefox isn’t out yet, but “we expect it to be published in the next few days,” Richard Barnes, cryptographic engineering manager at Mozilla, told eWEEK.

5 – DarkReading reports that on the server-side, organizations such as Apache, Oracle (ORCL), IBM (IBM), Cisco (CSCO), and various hosting providers have been informed of the issue. There has been no response from these tech titans.

The researchers have also provided guidance:

  1. If you have a web or mail server, they recommend  – disable support for export cipher suites and generate a unique 2048-bit Diffie-Hellman group. They have published a Guide to Deploying Diffie-Hellman for TLS with step-by-step instructions.
  2. If you use SSH, you should upgrade both your server and client installations to the most recent version of OpenSSH, which prefers the Elliptic-Curve Diffie-Hellman Key Exchange.
  3. If you’re a sysadmin or developer, make sure any TLS libraries you use are up-to-date, that servers you support use 2048-bit or larger primes, and that clients you maintain reject Diffie-Hellman primes smaller than 1024-bit.

rb-

Finally, get involved. Write someone, your representative, senator, your favorite bureaucrat, the president, your candidate, and tell them to get out of the way. 

Ars Technica notes that Logjam is partly caused by export restrictions put in place by the US government in the 1990s, to allow government agencies the ability to break the encryption used in other countries. “Logjam shows us once again why it’s a terrible idea to deliberately weaken cryptography, as the FBI and some in law enforcement are now calling for,” said Michigan’s J. Alex Halderman to the report. “Today that backdoor is wide open.”

 

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

Network Security Layering

Network Security LayeringMost companies are prepared for threats to their networks from the outside world. However, security breaches from within the corporation often pose the biggest concern. In this post-Enron world of increased corporate governance, IT managers must deal with both technical and human challenges to meet their companies’ security requirements. New legislative mandates, such as the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, and the Graham-Leach-Bliley Act, also exist.

When considering securing a network, it’s essential to take a holistic approach, from the physical layer to the application layer. Thorough security policies, appropriate authentication mechanisms, and effective user education must complement the technologies implemented within the network.

The security-layering concept allows for variable-depth security. Variable-depth security occurs when each security level builds upon the capabilities of the layer below, resulting in more stringent security moving up through the layers. This can help protect organizations from security breaches that may come from within, as layering provides multiple measures of security controls.

The first security layer: VLANs

At the first layer, essential network compartmentalization and segmentation can be provided by virtual LANs. This allows various business functions to be contained and segmented into private LANs. Traffic from other VLAN segments is strictly controlled or prohibited. Several benefits may be derived from deploying VLANs for small to midsize businesses across the company’s multiple sites. These include the use of VLAN “tags.” VLAN tags allow traffic segregation into specific groups, such as finance, human resources, and engineering. It also prevents the separation of data without “leakage” between VLANs as a required element for security.

The second layer: Firewalls

The second layer of security can be achieved with perimeter defense and distributed firewall-filtering capabilities at strategic points within the network. The firewall layer allows the network to be further segmented into smaller areas, monitors it, and protects against harmful traffic from the public network. In addition, an authentication capability for incoming or outgoing users can be provided. The use of firewalls provides an extra layer of protection that’s useful for access control. The application of policy-based access allows the customization of access based on business needs. Using a distributed firewall approach affords the added benefit of scalability as enterprise needs evolve.

The third security layer: VPNs

Virtual private networks, which offer a finer detail of user access control and personalization, can be added as a third layer of security. VPNs offer fine-grain security down to the personal user level and enable secure access for remote sites and business partners. With VPNs, dedicated pipes aren’t required since the use of dynamic routing over secure tunnels over the Internet provides a highly secure, reliable, and scalable solution. VPNs with VLANs and firewalls allow the network administrator to limit access by a user or user group based on policy criteria and business needs. VPNs give more robust assurance of data integrity and confidentiality, and strong data encryption can be enacted at this layer to provide more security.

The fourth layer: Solid security practices

Best practices by the IT security team are yet another level in a layered network security strategy. This can be achieved by ensuring that operating systems are protected against known threats. (This can be accomplished by consulting with the operating system manufacturer to get the latest systems-hardening patches and procedures.) In addition, steps must be followed to ensure all installed software is virus-free.

Securing network management traffic is essential to ensuring the network. To protect HTTP traffic, it’s preferable to encrypt all management traffic at all times using the IPsec or Secure Sockets Layer protocol. Encryption is a must even if traffic travels on the local-area network.

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.