Archive for October 14, 2014

25 Years of the Firewall

25 Years of the FirewallThe firewall has turned 25 years old this year. In commemoration, McAfee created a timeline of the events that shaped the development of the device most of us rely on the protect ourselves from each other. The infographic shows how the firewall’s evolution coincided with high-profile security events:

These security breaches triggered security developers to react with more advanced firewall technology:

  • 1998: Evasions researched
  • 2009: Native clustering for high availability and performance introduced
  • 2012: Software enabled security introduced, making blade technology obsolete.

The first generation firewalls were called Packet Filters. Packet Filter firewalls look at network addresses and ports of the packet and determine if that packet should be allowed or blocked based on rules programmed by humans. If a packet does not match the packet filter’s ruleset, the packet filter will drop or reject the packet, breaking the connection.

The second generation firewalls do stateful packet inspection. According to Wikipedia, second generation firewalls record all connections passing through it and determines whether a packet is the start of a new connection, a part of an existing connection, or not part of any connection. Though static rules are still used, these rules can now contain a connection state as one of their test criteria.

Third-generation firewalls use application layer filtering which can “understand” certain applications and protocols (such as File Transfer Protocol (FTP), Domain Name System (DNS), or Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP)). This is useful as it is able to detect if an unwanted protocol is attempting to bypass the firewall on an allowed port or detect if a protocol is being abused in any harmful way.

Next Generation FirewallPat Calhoun, SVP at McAfee, explained in a Help Net Info article that it was not until 2009 when the fourth generation firewall we know and love began to evolve. In 2009 Gartner published its definition and a paper on “Defining the Next-Generation Firewall. (PDF)” According to its definition, NGFWs are:

…deep-packet inspection firewalls that move beyond port/protocol inspection and blocking to add application-level inspection, intrusion prevention, and bringing intelligence from outside the firewall.

In its paper, the Gartner authors explain that “Firewalls need to evolve to be more proactive in blocking new threats, such as botnets and targeted attacks.” Mcafee’s Calhoun points out that NGFW discussions started in 2003 but the technology really didn’t get on the right track until Gartner defined it in 2009.

 

Intel 25th Anniversary of the Firewall infographic

rb-

Future NGFW development efforts need to integrate application control, IPS, and evasion prevention into a single, purpose-built box with enterprise-scale availability and manageability solution.

Back in the day, 2000, I managed a Checkpoint firewall IPSO ver 3.0 on a Nokia appliance (IP300?). The thing was the network had been up and running for 3 years and included over 3,000 devices before the Checkpoint was put in. Can’t get away with that now,  a naked PC on the Innertubes will be compromised within minutes to hours, according to those who know that kind of stuff. 

The most vivid recollection of setting the thing up was just randomly mashing on the keys to create the first key. Other network guys were amazed because apparently, this was the first firewall many had seen with a GUI to configure the rules.

I also remember learning the hard way that Deny All goes at the bottom of the list, not the top. 

Related articles
  • Enterprise Firewall Market: Global Forecast to 2019 by Professional Services (mynewsdesk.com)

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

Comcast to Unplug Motown

Comcast to Unplug MotownComcast (CMCSA) will abandon Detroit. The mega-cableco will abandon Detroit if the Federal Communications Commission approves its acquisition of Time Warner Cable Inc. The cable giant filed a response (PDF) to parties objecting to the nation’s second-largest provider’s plan to acquire TWC arguing against claims that it would grow too big under the merger.

Comcast logoUnder its purchase plan, Comcast will withdraw from some markets. It will continue to operate, as it does now, in 16 of 20 top markets. Comcast will operate in a different set of 16 markets, mostly on both coasts. Comcast lawyers stated, “Comcast will no longer have a presence in the Detroit, Minneapolis-St. Paul, or Cleveland DMAs (designated market areas).

MLive explains that companies like Dish Network, Netflix, and various TV networks have complained that the Comcast-Time-Warner merger. They argue that the new cableco would create a massive cable company with an anti-competitive advantage. Religious television programmer My Christian TV complained that the deal. They claimed it would make Comcast, “the only significant cable outlet in about 98 percent of all African-American communities in the country.” Comcast’s response:

Comcast has never served several markets with significant African-American populations such as St. Louis, Cleveland, and New Orleans, among many others, and after the Transaction, will no longer serve Detroit… Comcast estimates that after the transaction, it will serve markets that include approximately 78 percent of the country’s Hispanic households (not counting Puerto Rico in the denominator), though of course many of those households will not be Comcast customers.

GreatLand Connections Inc.

Cutting the cableBloomberg says the castaways in Detroit, Minneapolis, and elsewhere would belong to a new company. The new company would be called GreatLand Connections Inc. It would be created in what the companies call a tax-efficient spinoff. The new company’s debt would exceed industry averages — something that has raised concerns about service in those communities.

We don’t have the answers we need,” said Ron Styka, an elected trustee with responsibility for cable-service oversight in Meridian Township, Michigan, a town served by Comcast about 80 miles west of Detroit. Municipal officials told Bloomberg they have questions about service. The questions include whether subscribers can keep Comcast e-mail addresses or if the cable-channel lineups may change.

Charter Cable logoGreatLand will start with $7.8 billion in debt, according to a securities filing. Bloomberg says that debt is equal to five times EBITDA, or earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization. The debt ratio for Comcast is 1.99 times EBITDA and for New York-based Time Warner Cable it’s 3.07 times EBITDA, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. David Osberg, city administrator of Eagan, MN told Bloomberg.  “It’s not clear whether GreatLand will be financially qualified,” to provide services.

The new company will buy management services from Charter Communications Inc. (CHTR) according to Bloomberg. Charter, which had sought to buy Time Warner Cable, would own a 33 percent interest in GreatLand and become the second-largest U.S. cable company with more than 8 million customers counting GreatLand’s and subscribers it gets in purchases and swaps with Comcast after the merger is completed.

rb-

I worked a couple of jobs last year with Comcast and it always took them 3 or 4 months to provide service to business customers so many Detroiters may not be sad to see the cable giant go. The Philadelphia company last week acknowledged major customer service woes after a series of viral videos documented the experiences of exasperated customers.

Comcast CEO Neil Smit announced the hiring of a new head of customer service, and wrote in a blog post:

It may take a few years before we can honestly say that a great customer experience is something we’re known for. But that is our goal and our number one priority.

Related articles

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

Patent Wars Are Pointless

Patent Wars Are PointlessThe Business Insider has new data about the value of the patent wars. BI cites Florian Mueller, the founder of the FOSS Patents blog. He says patent litigation is a waste of resources. His research found that the patent wars cost companies millions of dollars in time and lawyer fees. Mr. Mueller analyzed 222 Android smartphone patent assertions. He found that 90% of those cases have gone absolutely nowhere.

Patent trollAccording to BI Intelligence, Mr. Mueller’s data says that 49% of the assertions have failed thus far. Another 42% of assertions were dropped without a comprehensive settlement or a “comparably negative fate.” It turns out that only 9% of the patent assertions were able to establish liability. Even in that small sample, only 50% of those cases resulted in “lasting injunctive relief.” Mr. Mueller says that number would be even smaller if “the patents underlying Nokia’s German injunctions against HTC (2498) had come to judgment in the Federal Patent Court.”

Business Insier chart

In other words, based on patent cases brought to court by Apple (AAPL), Google (GOOG), Samsung (005930), Microsoft (MSFT), Nokia (NOK), Motorola (MSI), and a host of others, litigation is, more often than not, a serious waste of time and money for all parties involved.

 rb-

Back in 2012 Boston University estimated that patent shenanigans have cost the US economy $29 Billion annually, now there is evidence it is a total waste of time and money and only funds the lawyers.

Related articles

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

Superman Most Dangerous on Web

Superman Most Dangerous on WebSuperheroes are supposed to be our friends but sometimes a plot twist allows their arch-enemies to trick our heroes turn against us. This is also true on the intertubes. Attackers are using our superheroes to infect computers to scam people into visiting compromised sites and downloading dangerous software according to Santa Clara, California-based McAfee.

The security company scoured the web and identified the most dangerous superheroes online. The report, “Most Toxic Superhero 2014” estimates how likely the average user is to come across malware by searching for the name of any given superhero.

McAfee lined up 11 likely suspects. They gathered viable threat evidence from popular search engines like Google (GOOG), Yahoo (YHOO), and Microsoft (MSFT) Bing for spyware, adware, spam, phishing, viruses, and other malware. The company also searched each superhero’s name in conjunction with common phrases like “free torrent download” and “free app,” as seeding fake torrents is a common way for attackers to infect computers.

The most dangerous superheroes online by percent of his search traffic leading to unsafe sites are:

  1. Superman 16.5%
  2. Thor 16.35%
  3. Wonder Woman 15.7% (tied)
  4. Aquaman 15.7% (tied)
  5. X-Man Wolverine 15.1%
  6. Batman 14.2%
  7. Black Widow 13.85%
  8. Captain America  13.5%
  9. Green Lantern 11.25%
  10. Ghost Rider 10.83%

McAfee tells citizen do-gooders to protect themselves by:

  • Beware of clicking on third-party links. You should access content directly from the official websites of content providers.
  • Ensure you use web protection that will let you know of risky sites or links before you visit them. Stick to official news sites for breaking news.
  • Don’t download videos from suspect sites. This should be common sense, but it bears repeating: don’t download anything from a website you don’t trust — especially video. Most news clips you’d want to see can easily be found on official video sites and don’t require you to download anything.
  • “Free downloads” are by far the highest virus-prone search term. Anyone searching for videos or files to download should be careful not to unleash unsafe content such as malware onto their computers.
  • Always use password protection on your phone and other mobile devices. If you don’t and your phone is lost or stolen, anyone who picks up the device could have access to your personal information online.
  • Don’t “log in” or provide other information: If anything asks for your information—credit card, email, home address, Facebook login, or other information—to grant access to an exclusive story, don’t give it out. Such requests are a common tactic for phishing that could lead to identity theft.
  • Search online using an Internet security program in the background. These tools protect users from malicious websites and browser exploits. A complimentary version of McAfee’s SiteAdvisor software can be downloaded at www.siteadvisor.com

rb-

Whether you live in Metropolis or Gotham, do-gooders need not work very hard to avoid these scams. Avoid dark alleys where superhero websites tend to have the same flaws as any other unsafe page. Keep an eye out for typos and files that look suspicious. Run an Internet security program in the background (your antivirus or anti-malware program probably has one built-in). Lastly, check what other commenters say before downloading a torrent.

Related articles
  • Mobile malware: Past and current rends, prevention strategies (cloudentr.com)

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.