Archive for April 30, 2017

A Lifetime on Social Media

From the scary stats department – In 2015, time spent on mobile apps exceeded time spent watching TV for U.S. consumers according to TechCrunch. And now influencer marketing agency MediaKix has calculated more scary social media statistics. Social media users will now spend years online during their lifetime.

Time spent on social media is increasingGrowth on many of the top social media platforms continues to rise as each network rolls out new features and functionalities to better compete for users’ daily time. It must be working, not only is the number of people using social media increasing, and the time people are spending each day on social media is increasing. MediaKix says that just  Facebook (FB) users are spending an average of 50 minutes each day on the site.

Time on popular social media platforms

In order to see how much the average person will spend on social media throughout their life, MediaKix calculated the time spent across today’s most popular social media platforms. Across today’s most popular social media platforms, people are spending the following daily averages:

The advertising firm says these social media consumption rates, across a lifetime will total up to:

  • A lifetime on social mediaYouTube: 1 year, 10 months
  • Facebook: 1 year, 7 months
  • Snapchat: 1 year, 2 months
  • Instagram: 8 months
  • Twitter: 18 days

5 years 4 months on social media

Cumulatively, this adds up for a total of 5 years and 4 months spent on social media across a lifetime. Compare the time spent on social media against more mundane life activities.

  • Social Media: 5 years, 4 months
  • Eating & Drinking: 3 years, 5 months
  • Grooming: 1 year, 10 months
  • Socializing: 1 year, 3 months
  • Laundry: 6 months

The Santa Monica, CA firm projected the social media figures across an entire lifetime and put the numbers into the infographic below.

rb-

I have argued for a while that the social media fake news issue is a result of the American educational system. They are obsessed with teaching the common core. They don’t teach any analytical skills. Schools need to reinstate current events and media literacy classes.

Quartz cited a survey that found that teens prefer Facebook as a news source (41%). Tweens break between YouTube (41%) and Facebook (37%). By huge margins, girls prefer Facebook for news, and boys, YouTube.

The converging trends of more time spent online, preferring social media as a news source and no education is putting democracy at risk.

Related articles

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

 

Search Engine Journal offers some good suggestions on how to evaluate if a story is real or fake.

What is the Site? most major recognized sources for news journalism are not going to be producing clickbait fake news. Most of the fake news sites go for “shock” value and produce fake stories that are not as recognized. Look into the source itself and see whether it is a website that can be trusted.

Check the Domain – Many fake news stories use similar URLs and domain names to mimic reputable news sources, but rather than using a .com they use .com.co endings

What are the Authors’ Sources? – Good news stories contain links to other reputable reporting by respected organizations. Be wary of sources that cannot substantiate their claims.

Fact Check! – When in doubt, fact-check the information that you read! You can start with a simple search to look into the keywords or the event that is being reported on. You can also use sites like PolitiFactFactCheck, and Snopes.

Examine the Website Closely – Look at the full spectrum of details on the site. Is there other fake-looking or shocking headlines? What does the overall website look like? How is the user experience? Sometimes doing just a little further digging will make it clear if a news story is fake.

Act! – Once you identify if a story is real or fake, you can make a big difference. Do not share stories on social media that are fake and make them more visible. If you notice a friend or family member share a fake story on a social media outlet, do them a favor and comment or message them showing how you found out it was fake so they don’t repeat the same mistake.

If you come across a fake news article, comment on it stating how you arrived at the conclusion it was fake. If everyone does their part to distinguish fake news stories and make them known, then they won’t be shared as easily.

Can Toshiba Stay in Business?

Can Toshiba Stay in Business?Updated 01/31/2024 – On 12/20/2023 Toshiba ends its 74-year history as a listed company. Toshiba’s new owner TBJH Inc., delisted the scandal ridden firm as part of the acquisition agreement (PDF). The deal structure is quite complex and involves a web of subsidiaries. Here’s an explanation from Bing:

  • TBJH Inc. is an indirect subsidiary of Japan Industrial Partners Inc. (JIP).
  • TBJH will be acquired by another JIP subsidiary, an investment fund called TB Investment Limited Partnership (TBLPS), through Brick Lane Partners.
  • TBJH Inc. acquired all of Toshiba Corporation’s shares listed on the Tokyo and Nagoya Stock Exchanges.
  • The shares of Toshiba Corporation were delisted on Dec. 20, 20232.
  • The same amount of money as tender offer price $15 Billion (4,620 JPY per share) is scheduled to be delivered in April.

This structure allowed TBJH to acquire the complete shareholding of Toshiba Corporation and take Toshiba private.

TBLPS is made up of four JIP funds, 17 Japanese businesses, and six Japanese financial institutions. The Related Fund is made up of JIP overseas cooperative funds and overseas funds including those from Japanese institutional investors.

Updated 06/22/2017 – As predicted below, the NYT reports that the Japanese government formed a coalition including the U.S. venture capital firm Bain Capital to buy Toshiba’s microchip division. Estimates are the Toshiba deal is worth approx. $20 Billion.

Toshiba is being driven to sell off its crown jewel, its microchip business, to stabilize the international giant. The New York Times reports that the stalwart of Japan’s postwar rise as a global industrial giant warned that it has doubts over whether it could stay in business. In a filing in Japan, Toshiba said it wrote off more than $6 billion connected to Westinghouse Electric’s troubled nuclear reactor projects in the United States, which had created “substantial uncertainty” over its ability to continue as a going concern.

Toshiba logoThe Toshiba microchip division is the number two global provider of NAND flash memory. NAND flash memory is a type of non-volatile storage technology that does not need power to keep data. Flash memory is electronic (solid-state) non-volatile computer storage medium that can be electrically erased and reprogrammed.

Toshiba originally invented flash memory in the early 1980s from EEPROM (electrically erasable programmable read-only memory). They introduced it to the market in 1984. Called flash memory, after the flash on a camera, the chips have become an essential building block of the modern electronics industry.

Westinghouse logoThe two main types of flash memory are named after the NAND and NOR logic gates. The individual flash memory cells have internal characteristics similar to those of the corresponding gates.

Where EPROMs had to be completely erased before being rewritten, NAND-type flash memory may be written and read in blocks (or pages) that are generally smaller than the entire device. NOR-type flash allows a single machine word (byte) to be written—an erased location—read independently.

The NAND type operates primarily in memory cards, USB flash drives, some solid-state drives, and similar products for general storage and transfer of data. NAND or NOR flash memory is also often used to store configuration data in many digital products, a task previously made possible by EEPROM or battery-powered static RAM. One key disadvantage of flash memory is that it can only endure a relatively small number of write cycles in a specific block.

Makers of flash memory chips

Samsung Electronics Co. (005930) is the biggest maker of flash memory chips, followed by Toshiba, SK Hynix, and U.S.-based Micron Technology (MU). Toshiba manufactures its NAND Flash Memories at its Yokkaichi Operations to maintain quality.

Up to 12 companies have approached Toshiba with proposalsA sale of Toshiba’s chip business, while offering the business a lifeline, would take away its most successful business — and, more broadly, would represent a shift of a major technology away from Japan, depending on the buyer. The Toshiba sale is still in its early stages, and the NYT says as many as 12 companies have approached Toshiba with proposals. Reports are that Toshiba is asking bidders to value its operations at about $17.6 billion (2 trillion yen), and make at least a 50 percent investment.

One of the better-known suitors is Hon Hai Precision Industry, also known as Foxconn. Foxconn is the assembler of Apple (AAPL) iPhones and is the world’s largest contract electronics maker. Foxconn is based in Taiwan but performs most of its manufacturing in mainland China. According to the article, Foxconn could pay billions to buy the business.

Offered $27 billionSources told Japanese public broadcaster NHK the first round of the Toshiba auction drew 10 offers. Toshiba has narrowed the field of bidders for its chip unit to four: U.S. chipmaker Broadcom (AVGO), a private equity firm Silver Lake Partners which reportedly offered $18 billion; SK Hynix; Western Digital (WDC); and Foxconn (2354), reports say Foxconn offered $27 billion.

Apple is considering teaming up with its supplier Foxconn to bid for the Toshiba semiconductor business, Japan’s NHK reported. Apple is considering investing at least several billion dollars to take a stake of more than 20 percent as part of a plan that would have Toshiba keep a partial holding so the business remains under U.S. and Japanese control, NHK reported.

Japanese government may save Toshiba

The authors point out Toshiba’s situation is a remarkable turnabout for Japan, a country that once controlled the majority of microchip markets. In the past Japanese companies have banded together to rescue flailing domestic rivals and not let them fold or be acquired by foreigners.

BankersThe article speculates that the Japanese government may cobble together a “team Japan” offer, but the response from potential participants — who would have to explain the spending to shareholders — has been tepid. “It is fundamentally unthinkable that the Industry Ministry would intervene and take some kind of action,” Hiroshige Seko, the industry minister, said at a news conference, further dampening expectations.

Mark Newman, an analyst at Sanford C. Bernstein, argued in a report that Toshiba’s memory business remained valuable enough that selling it amounted to “selling the crown jewels to pay next month’s rent.”

Apple teaming up with its supplier Foxconn to bid for ToshibaJapanese politicians and industry leaders have voiced concerns over Chinese investors’ buying advanced chip production technology; semiconductors and memory are a major priority of China’s industrial policy. That could hinder any deal with Foxconn, said Mr. Newman, of Sanford C. Bernstein.

The worry is that Foxconn “would build huge fabs in China,” Mr. Bernstein said, referring to semiconductor fabrication plants. “The jobs would move to China from Japan, and furthermore China would go after market share at the expense of crushing industry economics, so the U.S., Taiwan, Korea, Japan all get hurt substantially by this arrangement.” Foxconn has been successful in attracting subsidies from the Chinese government to build large-scale production facilities in China.

The article speculates that Foxconn could take the Toshiba technology and manufacture it more cheaply in China. Such a move could drive down pricing for memory, a boon for Apple and low-cost Chinese smartphone makers. But it would also propel China forward in its long push to become internationally competitive in semiconductors. Mr. Newman has warned that competition in NAND chips could heat up next year, creating the possibility of oversupply and putting more pressure on Toshiba’s ability to put in effect next-generation technologies.

Related articles

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

Open a New Galaxy Crack with a Pix

Open a New Galaxy Crack with a PixFollowers of the Bach Seat know biometrics have a limited value in replacing passwords. Despite the technical flaws another round of biometric hype is running across the intertubes. The latest round of biometric hype is coming from Samsung (005930). In the hope to revive their brand, they are on the verge of releasing the Galaxy S8. The Samsung Galaxy S8 includes the ability to use facial recognition software to unlock your brand new phone. CNet says that this idea “sounds awesome.”

Samsung Galaxy S8However, this awesome will lower the bar for your security. CNet reports that the video blogger MarcianoTech demonstrated a pre-release version of the Galaxy S8 is seen being unlocked using just a photo (at the 1:09 mark). To their credit Samsung has acknowledged that the Face Unlock feature is more for convenience than for security, and it cannot be used for mobile payments. Weak facial recognition software is a convenience for the user, it could also be very convenient for others, too.

The troubles with Face Unlock date back to 2011 when SlashGear reported that Google admitted the security system can be fooled by a picture of you and not the real thing. CNet reports that a Carnegie Mellon University spin-off in Pittsburgh, PittPatt, developed  that Face Unlock which was later acquired by Google (GOOG).

photographs are stored in facial recognition databasesJust to make Face Unlock and similar facial recognition systems more dangerous, the Guardian reports during recent testimony before congress the FBI admitted that they store about half of all adult Americans’ photographs in a facial recognition databases that can be accessed by the FBI. About 80% of photos in the FBI’s network are non-criminal entries, including driver’s licenses pictures from 18 states including Michigan (pdf) and passports.

The FBI first launched its advanced biometric database, Next Generation Identification, in 2010, augmenting the old fingerprint database with further capabilities including facial recognition. The bureau did not tell the public about its newfound capabilities nor did it publish a privacy impact assessment, required by law, for five years.

Unlike with the collection of fingerprints and DNA, which is done following an arrest, photos of innocent civilians are being collected proactively. The FBI made arrangements with 18 different states to gain access to their databases of driver’s license photos.States allowing FBI to search driver license pictures

 

I’m frankly appalled,” said Paul Mitchell, a congressman for Michigan. “I wasn’t informed when my driver’s license was renewed my photograph was going to be in a repository that could be searched by law enforcement across the country.” So anyone with a photo of you, or maybe even just access to your Facebook photos, could potentially access your phone.

rb-

There are two important reasons why biometrics don’t work, and why the old-fashioned password is still a better option: a person’s biometrics can’t be kept secret and they can’t be revoked.

There's no real way to conceal your eyes, face or fingerprints from the worldPeople expose their biometrics everywhere – they leave fingerprints behind at bars and restaurants, their faces and eyes are captured in photos and film, etc. There’s no real way to conceal your eyes, face, or fingerprints from the world. As far back as 2002, research led by Japanese cryptographer Tsutomu Matsumoto. Matsumoto and his team used clear gelatin to make artificial fingers that they then used to fool fingerprint scanners. The gelatin-based finger was successful in fooling all 11 devices tested. I wrote about spoofing fingerprints in 2016.

However, it’s the second problem with biometrics that is the really big one: once a person’s biometrics have been compromised, they will always be compromised. Since a person can’t change their fingerprint or whatever biometric is being relied upon, it’s ‘once owned, forever owned.’ That is biometrics’ major failing and the one that will be hardest to overcome.

Part of the reason is that it’s silly to only have 10 possible passwords your whole life (20, if you count toes) but unlike a password, once a biometric is compromised, it is permanent. Today, if your Twitter account gets hacked, you just change the password – but if you are using a biometric, you will be stuck with that hacked password for the rest of your life.

With the release of Windows 10, Microsoft (MSFT) stepped up their biometrics game. CNet reports that with the recent improvements in Windows 10 biometric security includes facial recognition software. Besides facial recognition, Windows Hello also supports fingerprint and iris recognition to secure your PC. For facial recognition though, Microsoft has partnered with chipmaker Intel (INTC) for its RealSense 3D camera tech to get the job done. RealSense uses depth-sensing infrared cameras to track the location and positions of objects, which Microsoft then uses to scan a person’s face or iris before unlocking the device in question.

To further push the biometrics agenda, more than 200 companies including Microsoft, Lenovo, Alibaba, and MasterCard have already come together to form a partnership known as the FIDO (Fast Identity Online) Alliance. Founded in 2013, FIDO was set up to address issues such as a worldwide adoption of standards for authentication processes over the Web to help reduce reliance on passwords.

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

Michigan Adds Over 10,700 Tech Jobs in 2016

Michigan Adds Over 10,700 Tech Jobs in 2016Michigan’s technology industry employment grew by an estimated 5.1% in 2016, the MichiganTech News reports. The good news comes from the annual Cyberstates 2017 report from CompTIA. The technology association found that Michigan employers added more than 10,700 new tech jobs in 2016.

Michigan ranks 10th for tech industry employmentThe survey also found that Michigan ranks 10th among the 50 states for tech industry employment with an estimated 221,994 workers. Michigan was in the top five states for 2016 tech industry job growth on a percentage change basis.

Technology occupations across all other industries in Michigan – the second part of the tech workforce – reached an estimated 271,900 in 2016. The tech sector accounts for an estimated 6.6 percent of the overall Michigan economy. The tech industry employs an estimated 5.3 percent of the overall state workforce. Leading tech occupations state-wide include:

  • Mechanical engineers (42,610),
  • Industrial engineers (25,500) and
  • Computer user support specialists (20,130).

metro-Detroit area leading tech jobs are: Software and Web DevelopersThe metro-Detroit area leading tech jobs are:

  • Software and Web Developers 11,434
  • Network Architects, Admins, & Support 10,379
  • Systems & Cybersecurity Analysts 9,441
  • Computer Support Specialists 1,437
  • Database Administrators 1,437

The annualized average wage for a Michigan tech industry worker was an estimated $89,200 in 2016, 77% higher than the average state wage ($50,400). Michigan ranks 21st nationally in average tech industry wages.

Other Key Findings

average wage for a Michigan tech industry worker was an estimated $89,200 Michigan ranks 27th among all states in the Cyberstates 2017 Innovation Score, which is based on an analysis of new tech patents, tech startups, and new tech business establishments on a per capita basis.

Michigan is home to an estimated 11,223 tech business establishments. The Detroit metropolitan area is home to more than one-third of these businesses (4,174).

The strongest year-over-year job growth occurred in the categories of:

  • Engineering services (+ 8.3%)
  • R&D and testing labs (+ 5.4%) and
  • Computer systems design and IT services (+ 5.1%).

Employers posted more than 28,600 job openings for tech occupations in Q4 2016.

“The Cyberstates data affirms the strength and vitality of Michigan’s tech industry, and attests to its essential standing in the economy,” Todd Thibodeaux, president, and CEO of, CompTIA said in a presser. “Technology enables innovation and generates growth for companies, regardless of their size, locale or markets served.”

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

300 Billion Passwords

PasswordsThe death of the password has been predicted for years. Bill Gates predicted the death of the password at an RSA Security conference in 2004. In 2011, IBM (IBM) predicted that biometrics would replace passwords by 2016. In case you haven’t noticed in 2017 and passwords are still with us and they suck. “It’s now years after those statements were made, and passwords are still in heavy use,” Joseph Carson, head of global strategic alliances at Thycotic Software told CSO.

PasswordA new report (Reg. Req.) from cyber-security research firm Cybersecurity Ventures says that the number of passwords in use will grow from about 75 billion today to around 100 billion in 2020. AND the number of passwords used by machines, such as IoT devices, will grow even faster, from around 15 billion in 2015 to around 200 billion in 2020, the report said. That is 300 billion passwords by 2020.

And these numbers don’t include one-time passwords, SSL encryption keys, and other short-term credentials said Thycotic’s Carson. Thycotic Software sponsored the report.

Mr. Carson told CSO the estimates come from worldwide statistics about the total number of computers, operating systems, servers, routers, and other technologies and applications that come with passwords or need users to create passwords to use them. he added, “Then there are the social media accounts, which have been growing significantly.”

The average user has over 25 passwords, he said. There’s no decline in the number of passwords, in fact, the opposite is the case. “We find that the growth is accelerating at a massive pace,” CSO observed that the use — and reuse — of all these passwords is creating an ever-growing attack surface of both human and machine-to-machine passwords. A record number of credential breaches were disclosed in 2016, Mr. Carson added — 3 billion, with 43% of people having had at least one password or credential stolen.

A report released by the Pew Research Center said that for U.S. adults, the number was even higher. According to a 2016 survey, 64% said that they had personally noticed or been notified of a data breach that affected their accounts or personal data.

MoneyAccording to Mr. Carson, the financial damages of the breaches will continue to increase as well. Thycotic and Cybersecurity Ventures predicts potential damages from cyber-crime to reach $6 trillion by 2021.

rb-

Looks like passwords are here to stay. Followers of the Bach Seat know that passwords suck. I have covered a number of options to replace passwords. None of the biometric options have taken off as IBM had predicted.

Where biometric authentication is deployed, it’s been as an adjunct to passwords, not a replacement. Passwords are used to set up the initial trusted relationship, and as a fallback when the biometrics fail. Mr. Carson concludes, “The biometrics are used for ease of access to systems … Biometrics will never replace passwords.”

Related articles

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.