Archive for March 28, 2018

Password Bracketology

Password BracketologyThe University of Michigan Basketball Wolverines, the Hockey team, and the Debate team all have made it into the NCAA Final Four. Along the way, the Wolverines busted a few brackets. In keeping with the March bracket madness, Keeper Security ran an analysis they’ve called “Password Madness”. In Password Madness, they developed their own bracketology of bad passwords. During Password Madness, the publisher of password manager software ran an analysis on 1.4 billion clear-text passwords 4iQ found on the dark web for sports team mascots used as passwords.

University of MichiganFollowers of Bach Seat already know that passwords suck and there is a long list of passwords like “password” and “123456” that should be banned from use. According to a statement from Keeper Security, of all the passwords looked at, those containing “Tiger” and its variations (such as “T1ger”, “T1g3r”, etc.) appeared 187 percent more often than passwords containing variations of “Eagle,” the second-most common password set found, and nearly 850 percent more than the least common password, which was “Bluejay” and its variations.

The not so élite eight passwords on their list are:

  • PasswordCowboy
  • Eagle
  • Hurricane
  • Irish
  • Pirate
  • Spartan
  • Tiger
  • Trojan

This is bad, as I have pointed out, many people re-use the same password on nearly every online account. This behavior opens up hundreds of thousands of credentials to speedy hacking. Keeper Security recommends rather than using their favorite sports team as a password hoops fans, instead concentrate on using unique, high-strength, passwords for each login. Strong passwords contain at least eight random characters of upper and lower-case letters, numbers, and symbols.

Related article

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

Will Wi-Fi Be Secure This Time

Will Wi-Fi Be Secure This TimeOne event at CES 2018 that was overlooked by many people was the Wi-Fi Alliance announcement of WPA3, a long overdue update to Wi-Fi Protected Access (WPA). This increases the strength of a security protocol that hasn’t been updated in 14 years.

Wi-Fi AllianceThe Wi-Fi Alliance says Wi-Fi carries more than half of the internet’s traffic, so improvements to WPA are good news. The WPA3 update is a response to the evolution of Wi-Fi usage and WPA2 vulnerabilities. There are four improvements to Wi-Fi Protected Access via WPA3 over the current standard (WPA2).

Stronger passwords

WPA3 gets a new layer of protection so its security is not contingent on passwords (as followers of the Bach Seat know, passwords suck). WPA3 is an improvement on WPA2’s largest vulnerability the handshake when the key is being exchanged. KRACK (Key Reinstallation Attack) is a major vulnerability discovered in 2017 in WPA2 and WPA. It exploits the Wi-Fi handshake. KRACK allows attackers to snoop on encrypted data being transferred between computers and wireless access points (WAP).

WPA2 uses a four-way handshake mechanism, starting with a nonce provided by the access point.Brute force “dictionary attacks” are the backbone of the KRACK attack. WPA3 implements IEEE 802.11s, Simultaneous Authentication of Equals (SAE) to provide protection against this flaw. SAE is also known as the Dragonfly protocol. The Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) describes Dragonfly,employs discrete logarithm cryptography to perform an efficient exchange in a way that performs mutual authentication using a password that is probably resistant to an offline dictionary attack.

This improvement will offer better security even if poor passwords are used. This feature is very useful since we know that users have difficulties creating strong and hard-to-guess passwords. The Wi-Fi Alliance claims WPA3 makes it almost impossible to breach a Wi-Fi network using the current dictionary and brute-force attacks.  Mathy Vanhoef, the security researcher who discovered KRACK, appears very enthusiastic about the security improvements in WPA3.

Secure public Wi-Fi

Secure public Wi-FiWPA3 secured open networks will offer more privacy than ever before. Everything transmitted over today’s open Wi-Fi networks at airports, coffee shop, libraries, are sent in plain text that people can intercept. WPA3 will apply encryption to each user on the public Wi-Fi to eliminate clear text with “individualized data encryption”.

Malwarebytes Lab speculates that WPA3 will include Opportunistic Wireless Encryption. OWE enables connection on an open network without a shared and public Pre-Shared Key (PSK). That’s important because a PSK can give hackers easy access to the Traffic Encryption Keys (TEKs), allowing them access to a data stream. OWE implements a Diffie-Hellman key exchange during network sign-on and uses the resulting secret for the 4-way 802.11 handshake and not the shared, public Pre-Shared Key (PSK) that can be easily exploited. WPA3 will be more difficult for people to snoop on your web browsing without actually cracking the encryption while you’re at Starbucks.

Stronger encryption

WPA3 will use stronger cryptographic algorithms. The new security protocol will use the  Commercial National Security Algorithm (CNSA) 192-bit encryption mandated by the U.S. government for secure Wi-Fi networks. Experts speculate WPA3 will use a 48-bit initialization vector to support backward compatibility with WPA and WPA2  The 192-bit encryption will make WPA3 compliant with the highest security standards and fit for use in networks with the most stringent security requirements. (rb- Ironic – Go to the CNSA site and get an invalid cert warning in Chrome) The CNSS is part of the US National Security Agency.

Easier IoT security

The WPA3 update simplifies setting up secure Wi-Fi connections for devices that don’t have a graphical user interface. This is critical the secure the 30.7 billion IoT devices that will be on the network by 2020. The new protocol will add Device Provisioning Protocol (DPP) which sets up a simple, secure and consistent method for securing devices with limited or no display. NetworkWorld reports that You will be able to tap a smartphone against a device or sensor and then provision the device on the network.

What happens to WPA2 devices

So far, most manufacturers have been quiet about legacy device support. We do know that future W-Fi certified WPA3 routers will be backward compatible to support WPA2. The question remains whether current WPA2 devices will be capable of connecting to WPA3.

WPA2 devices are not immediately obsolete. The Wi-Fi Alliance explained that current WPA2 devices will be able to connect with WPA3 hardware. The Alliance also announced that it will continue to do security tests on WPA2 to further protect wireless networks. WPA3 is not an immediate replacement for WPA2

Even after you get a WPA3 enabled router, you’ll need WPA3 compatible client devices—your laptop, phone, refrigerator, security camera, industrial temperature sensor, or anything that connects to Wi-Fi—to fully take advantage of the WPA3 features. The good news is that shiny new router will accept both WPA2 and WPA3 connections at the same time.

Even when WPA3 is widespread, expect a long transition period where some devices are connecting to your router with WPA2 and others are connecting with WPA3. Once all your devices support WPA3, you should disable WPA2 connectivity on your router to improve security.

rb-

I am suspicious about the NSA link to the new WPA3 encryption. The NSA has introduced weaknesses in other encryption protocols.

Until we get our hands on real hardware, it is safe to speculate that like all things Wi-Fi, backward compatibility will cost your performance. What will the impact of one legacy device have on the capabilities of the WAP? Have a pair and turn off 802.11, 802.11b, WEP, and WPA connections on your current router.

It’s about time to update WPA. But as the 802.11n process proved, if you want to get nothing done, turn it over to an industry consortium. Andy Patrizio at NetworkWorld explained that’s where standards go to die because everyone wants their IP used so they make money off every sale. The end result is nothing gets done.

Related article

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

Take a Plant to Work

Take a Plant to WorkMany of us spend more time at work than anywhere else. And most of our homes away from home are office cubicles. Cube farms, the 50-year-old static symbol of resistance to change, are good for the business and won’t go away anytime soon. So you should have a plant in your cube.

Take a Plant to WorkDespite being good for business, the cube farm is making us sick, according to Danica-Lea Larcombe with Edith Cowan University. She wrote in The Conversation that office cubes can cause real health issues. She argues that office buildings are worse for our health than our homes. Office cubicles usually consist of partitions made of particle board and vinyl carpet, synthetic flooring, a particle board desk, and plastic or synthetic office chairs, lit mainly by artificial lighting with poor ventilation. All of these factors combine to make us cranky and sick.

Chemical compounds

The author writes that formaldehyde is one of the many chemical compounds given off by synthetic office furnishings. It can irritate the mucous membranes of the eyes, nose, and throat and cause allergic contact dermatitis. Irritation of the eyes and upper respiratory tract, as well as headaches, are the most commonly reported symptoms of exposure to formaldehyde toxins.

Dangerous chemicals

Other harmful chemicals in the office mentioned in the article include benzene, ethylbenzene, toluene, xylene, and even ammonia from cleaning products. High carbon dioxide levels breathed out by a roomful of colleagues can give the room that “stuffy” feeling, mainly if there is no air conditioning.

The author says one excellent way to combat sick days and stress is to fill your office with plants. She recommends plants that will “scrub” the air of pathogens, improve the office’s mix of bacteria, and survive in low light with little care.

Cube farm

 

Indoor plants purify the air, reducing volatile organic compounds (VOCs), including formaldehyde. A NASA clean air study tested common indoor plants’ ability to filter pollutants and found that many effectively remove organic compounds from the air. The article says,  one medium-sized plant per 24 square feet of office space should be used for best results.

 microbial cloud

Plant bacterias

Dr. Larcombe says you should also improve the balance of indoor bacteria to survive in the office environment. There are already trillions of bacteria in offices, but only a limited amount come in through open windows and air conditioning from the outdoor environment. Most bacteria, fungi, and viruses come from people; we leave behind a microbial cloud on our skin wherever we go. The office environment creates new habitats for microbial communities that are foreign to human skin and not good for your health.

Beneficial bacteria on indoor plants and their soil are essential to the office, stabilizing its synthetic environment. Plant-associated bacteria could also help avoid disease outbreaks by enhancing microbial biodiversity and balancing the complex network of the ecosystem. A wholesome balance may reduce the incidence of viral illness and the number of sick days among staff. It’s not just the size of the plant that’s important here. Larger pots mean more root mass and soil surface for helpful bacteria and root microbes.

reduce stress

Plants promote public health

The article also claims plants can help beat stress. Over the past 30 years, research has shown that green spaces promote public health and that contact with nature can shift highly stressed people to a more positive emotional state. Research has found that when present, plants reduce mental stresses:

  • Tension/Anxiety – 37% reduction
  • Depression/Dejection – 58% reduction
  • Anger/Hostility – 44% reduction
  • Fatigue – 38% reduction

There are a few basic principles for a good office plant. It must be hardy, easy to maintain, and able to survive without water over weekends (or when the regular plant carer goes on holiday). Plants adapted to low light will do the most good in cubicles and spaces away from windows. Look for species with large leaves (the more leaf surface area, the more efficient it is). Avoiding plants that flower extravagantly is also a good idea, but it may cause allergic reactions. Check with your colleagues before introducing new plants.

Some of the best plants the article recommends for the office are:

rb-

Offices, particularly those with many people, poor ventilation, or low natural light, should consider plants necessary. Plants will improve the atmosphere, mood, and health of the workplace.

Related article

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

Follow the Open Source Money

 Matt Asay at Infoworld recently pointed out some interesting data on who really contributes to open source. Wikipedia, the most well-known open-source project, defines open-source software as software whose source code is published and made available to the public, enabling anyone to copy, modify and redistribute the source code without paying royalties or fees. Open-source code can evolve through community cooperation. These communities include individual programmers as well as large companies.

Open sourceAdobe developer Fil Maj used the GitHub REST API to pull public profile information from GitHub users. The REST API is a low-bandwidth protocol used on the internet that allows two software programs to communicate with each other. Using the API, Mr. Maj collected the company field from all 2,060,011 GitHub user profiles who were active in 2017 (“active” meaning ten or more commits to public projects). Using that data, Mr. Maj was able to pull the total number of corporate contributors to GitHub, with results that might surprise you.

Here are the ranking of GitHub contributors, with their total number of employees actively contributing to open source projects on GitHub:

RankCompanyEmployees Contributing
1Microsoft4,550
2Google2,267
3Red Hat2,027
4IBM1,813
5Intel1,314
6Amazon.com881
7SAP747
8ThoughtWorks739
9Alibaba694
10GitHub676
11Facebook619
12Tencent605
13Pivotal591
14EPAM Systems585
15Baidu584
16Mozilla469
17Oracle455
18Unity Technologies414
19Uber388
20Yandex351
21Shopify345
22LinkedIn343
23Suse325
24ESRI324
25Apple292
26Salesforce.com291
27VMware271
28Adobe Systems270
29Andela259
30Cisco Systems233

The author points out, this is not a perfect measure, but it is a much richer, more accurate data set for figuring out total contributors for any company. Even with that caveat in mind, we end up with many more corporate open source contributors than previous data suggested.

Microsoft’s contributions to open source

Microsoft's contributions to open sourceThe new data shows Microsoft (MSFT) is the number 1 open source contributor. Redmond has twice the number of contributors compared to its next nearest competitor. Remember Steve Ballmer‘s developers! developers! developers! meltdown?  For those of us that were around when Mr. Ballmer, the Microsoft CEO called open source as a “cancer” and “anti-American,” this is a remarkable change of heart for MSFT.

Red Hat

Red Hat (RHT) Mr. Maj’s data puts the open source leader among the top contributors. Red Hat has dramatically fewer engineers on its payroll than Google (GOOG) or Microsoft. As such, it’s doubly impressive that Red Hat would place so highly. Pretty much every engineer in the company works on open-source projects.

Amazon

 

Amazon logoAmazon (AMZN) Often considered an open source ne’er-do-well, Amazon comes in at No. 6 in the rankings. AMZN has nearly 900 open source contributors on staff. The article points out that Amazon has perhaps not publicly led the open source effort in the same way as Google and Microsoft have, but it remains a strong contributor to the projects that feed its developer community.

China is a net consumer of open source

Chinese companies like Baidu, Tencent, and Alibaba, which have long been perceived to be net consumers of open source, actually contribute quite a bit according to the new data.

Legacy firms

Legacy firms like Intel (INTC), Oracle (ORCL), Adobe (ADBE), and Cisco (CSCO) rank among the top 30 open source contributors reports InfoWorld.

rb-

Color me suspicious, but have these firms really embraced open source. Have they just adapted their business model to usurp elements of open source to lay their proprietary code on top of it? This saves them the bother of writing new code and yet they can charge proprietary costs for software where they have reduced their development costs.

Tom Brady hanging high fiveAfter all, numbers don’t lie. Stats say that in 2014, half of the companies said they use open source in their product. Just one year later, the number grew to 78%. Consequently, as long as open source continues to enjoy its place in the sun, we should expect the Microsoft-open source bromance to continue.

Related article

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

MIMO Antennas Explained

MIMO Antennas ExplainedWave 2 of the IEEE 802.11ac Wi-Fi standard has been out for a while now. Wave 2 Wi-Fi can support speeds up to 2.3 Gbps. One of the techniques used to generate the increased speeds of the 802.11ac networks is multi-spacial streams or several streams of the same Wi-Fi signal radiating out from several antennas. The multiple antennas are the most noticeable indicator that an access point is 802.11ac capable, especially in the consumer market.

Multiple-Input Multiple-Output

The technology behind using several antennas is called Multiple-Input Multiple-Output (MIMO). MIMO antennas have two or more antennas in a single physical package and are designed for use in IEEE 802.11n/ac Wi-Fi networks. MIMO makes antennas work smarter by utilizing multiple antennas to combine data streams arriving from different paths and at different times to increase data throughput and range compared to a single antenna using the same radio transmit power. By transmitting multiple data streams at the same time, wireless capacity is increased.

Additionally MIMO antennas improve link reliability and experience less fading than a single antenna system. MIMO antennas use spatial diversity technology, which puts surplus antennas to good use. When there are more antennas than spatial streams, the antennas can add receiver diversity and increase range.

Radio-wave multipath

Asus AC5600 routerMIMO technology takes advantage of a natural radio-wave phenomenon called multipath to improve wireless performance. In the past, multipath caused interference and slowed down wireless signals. With this iteration, Wi-Fi takes advantage of multipath. With multipath transmitted information bounces off walls, ceilings, and other objects, reaching the receiving antenna multiple times via different angles and at slightly different times

MIMO technology takes a single data stream and breaks it down into several separate data streams and sends it out over multiple antennas. This technique provides redundancy. The receiving MIMO antenna will “look” at each stream being sent to determine the strongest one to choose.

Legacy wireless devices use Single-Input Single-Output (SISO) technology. These devices cannot take advantage of multipath, and can only send or receive one spatial stream at a time.

802.11ac Wave 2 MIMO

A new version of MIMO has been developed. TechHive reports that Multi-user multiple-input, multiple-output (MU-MIMO) technology, enables AP’s to transmit and receive data from multiple Wi-Fi devices at the same time. Although the devices must also support MU-MIMO to utilize it, they aren’t required to have multiple antennas.

MU-MIMO was introduced with 802.11ac Wave 2. Wave 2 MU-MIMO support is required on both the access point and client device to work. It operates in the downstream direction, access point to the client, and allows an access point to transmit to multiple client devices simultaneously. This means networks with a dense number of users in an area, such as public Wi-Fi hotspots, could be able to handle more Wi-Fi devices.

TechHive warns the biggest caveat of MU-MIMO is it doesn’t directly improve the wireless speeds of uplink connections.

Only a handful meet the criteria today

MU-MIMO technologyIt’s also important to note that the only way to gain the full benefit of MU-MIMO is when the technology is supported on both the access point and the device that’s connecting to the AP. So in addition to having an 802.11ac adapter onboard, the client must explicitly support MU-MIMO—there are only a handful of adapters that meet that criteria today.

Finally, TechHive says MU-MIMO works best with stationary Wi-Fi devices. If users are walking around while watching a video on a smartphone or tablet, they are not going to get the full benefit of MU-MIMO even if that device supports it. Your router might even limit that connection to using SU-MIMO, so that the connection doesn’t negatively impact stronger MU-MIMO connections.

rb-

The client issue is the main reason 802.11ac Wave 2 will not be widely used in the enterprise. it is a big issue to keep the clients up to date to match the AP version. In fact, Zeus Kerravala at NetworkWorld points out that many of the high-volume manufacturers, such as Apple and Samsung, are skipping 802.11ac Wave 2 and plan to support IEEE 802.11ax in the future.

So skip Wave 2 devices in the enterprise and stick to an 802.11ac Wave 1 AP, and get exactly the same performance as its higher-priced Wave 2 counterpart.

Related articles

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.