Discover how mastering email communication can boost business efficiency, avoid common pitfalls, and ensure secure, respectful online interactions.
Turkey Revenge
The turkeys are pissed this Thanksgiving they are seeking revenge.
Germs Infest 60% of Americas Phones
60% of Americans sleep with their phones, harboring germs. Cleaning regularly with UV sanitizer or alcohol wipes can help keep your phone and bed germ-free.
Smartphone Sanitizing: A Practical Guide
Securely erase personal data from your old smartphone before recycling. Protect your identity from hackers—easy steps to follow.
Why Soft Skills Matter in Today’s Job Market
Boost your career with essential soft skills like communication, teamwork, and emotional intelligence. Learn why they’re crucial for workplace success.
Cameron Diaz Most Dangerous Celebrity in Cyberspace
Charlie’s Angels and Shrek actress
Cameron Diaz is the most dangerous celebrity in cyberspace according to the 4th annual McAfee Most Dangerous Celebrities study. Ms. Diaz has replaced Jessica Biel as the most dangerous celebrity to search for on the Web, according to security company McAfee, Inc. (MCFE).
For the fourth year in a row, McAfee researched popular culture’s most famous people to reveal the riskiest celebrity athletes, musicians, politicians, comedians, and Hollywood stars on the Web. “Whether you’re surfing the Web from your computer or your phone or clicking on links in Twitter about your favorite celeb, you should surf safely, and make sure you’re using the latest security software.”
Cyber-criminals use celebrity as lure
Cyber-criminals often use the names of popular celebrities to lure people to sites that are actually laden with malicious software. Anyone looking for the latest videos or pictures could end up with a malware-ridden computer instead of just trendy content. “Cyber-criminals follow the same hot topics as consumers, and create traps based on the latest trends,” Dave Marcus, security researcher for McAfee Labs said, “Whether you’re surfing the Web from your computer or your phone or clicking on links in Twitter about your favorite celeb, you should surf safely, and make sure you’re using the latest security software.”
McAfee research found that searching for the latest Cameron Diaz pictures and downloads yields a ten percent chance of landing on a website that’s tested positive for online threats, such as spyware, adware, spam, phishing, viruses, and other malware. These fans are at risk of running into online threats designed to steal personal information. Clicking on these risky sites and downloading files like photos, videos, or screen savers exposes surfers or consumers to the risk of downloading viruses and malware.
Mr. Marcus continues, “ … consumers are getting smarter about searching online, yet cybercriminals are getting sneakier in their techniques. Now they’re hiding malicious content in ‘tiny’ places like shortened URLs that can spread virally in social networking sites and Twitter, instead of on websites and downloads.”
The study uses SiteAdvisor site ratings, which indicates which sites are risky to search for celebrity names on the Web and calculate an overall risk percentage.
| 1 | Cameron Diaz | Searching for Ms. Diaz results in a one in ten chance of landing on a risky site. She has most recently been in the spotlight with blockbuster movies, “Knight and Day” and “Shrek Forever After.” When “Cameron Diaz and screensavers” was searched, 19% of the sites were identified as containing malicious downloads |
| 2 | Julia Roberts | The Academy Award-winning actress is one of America’s sweethearts, and was recently in the spotlight with her upcoming release of “Eat, Pray, Love.” The overall risk of searching for Roberts is 9%, yet searching for “Julia Roberts and downloads” results in a 20% chance of downloading a photo, wallpaper or other file laden with malware. |
| 3 | Jessica Biel | Last year’s Most Dangerous Celebrity fell 2 spots with searches resulting in fewer risky sites this year. Her on-again, off-again relationship with Justin Timberlake, keeps M. Biel iin the spotlight along with her 2010 appearance in “The A-Team.". While her overall search risk is 9%, searching for “Jessica Biel and screensavers” results in a 17% chance of landing on a risky site. |
| 4 | Gisele Bündchen | The world’s highest-paid supermodel moved up 2 spots since last year. Searching for “Gisele Bündchen and screensavers” can prove risky, 15% of the search results for this beauty can put spyware, malware or viruses on your computer. |
| 5 | Brad Pitt | Mr. Pitt is often in the spotlight with news of his movies and his personal life. It’s no wonder why this leading man has been in the top ten for the past 3 years. He moved up in rank 5 spots this year. Downloading photos, screensavers, or other files of the actor can potentially put adware or spyware in your computer. |
| 6 | Adriana Lima | Searching for downloads of this Brazilian beauty can direct users to red-ranked sites. Ms. Ms. Lima is best known for being a Victoria’s Secret Angel since 2000. |
| 7 | Tie- Jennifer Love Hewitt and Nicole Kidman | Searching for these Hollywood starlets resulted in an equal number of risky download websites. |
| 8 | Tom Cruise | With recent buzz around his MTV Awards performance as well as his movie, “Knight and Day,” Mr. Cruise rises to the top ten. |
| 9 | Tie - Heidi Klum and Penelope Cruz | Both of these women are consistently in the spotlight, and share the #9 spot. Cybercriminals use their names to lure people to risky sites. Ms. Klum hosts “Project Runway” and Ms. Cruz has been in the spotlight recently for her role in the “Sex and the City 2” movie and is expected to star in the fourth film of the “Pirates of the Caribbean” series. |
| 10 | Anna Paquin | This “True Blood” star is as dangerous on the Web as she is on the screen. Searching for screensavers of Ms, Paquin can lead you to downloads filled with malware. |
| 49 | President Barack Obama | Searchs for Mr.Oboma is not that risky.His rank of 49 places him in the bottom of this year’s results, moving even lower on the list compared to last year. |
rb-
McAfee released this celebrity list just minutes before it announced Intel was buying the company for nearly $8 billion.
Just pointing out the timing, maybe marketing is why McAfee was able to get $8 billion from Intel for the company.
What do you think?
Cameron Diaz? Really?
Is the anti-virus industry based on marketing?
Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedIn, Facebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.
BP Data Spill
National Public Radio (NPR) reports that British Petroleum‘s (BP) problems in the U.S. now include a data spill as well as the oil spill. BP is paying compensation amounting to $4,000,000,000 to victims of its mishap incident disaster in the Gulf of Mexico last summer. Now BP has lost the personally identifiable information (PII) on approx. 13,000 of its victims are seeking compensation for oil spill damages. NPR reports that names, addresses, phone numbers, and social security numbers, were lost opening these people to identity theft.
BP spokesman Curtis Thomas told NPR that the oil giant mailed letters to roughly 13,000 people whose data was stored on the missing computer, notifying them about the potential data security breach and offering to pay for their credit to be monitored. The company also reported the missing laptop to law enforcement, he said. The laptop was password-protected, but the information was not encrypted, Mr. Thomas said.
The employee lost the laptop on March 1 during “routine business travel,” said BP’s Thomas, who declined to elaborate on the circumstances. “If it was stolen, we think it was a crime of opportunity, but it was initially lost,” Thomas said. Asked why nearly a month elapsed before BP notified residents about the missing laptop, Mr. Thomas said, “We were doing our due diligence and investigating.”
Matt O’Brien, the part-owner of Tiger Pass Seafood, a shrimp dock in Venice, La., who said he had filed a claim with BP, told an AP reporter this was the first he had heard about the possible compromise of his personal information by BP. “That’s like it’s par for the course for them.” Mr. O’Brien said of BP, “They can’t seem to do nothing right.”
Once again, 13,000 lives are disrupted because a single laptop that was not encrypted, was lost or stolen “during routine business travel.” Sophos‘ Naked Security blog pointed out in 2008 that laptops are easy to lose. The security vendor cited a survey that found that 12,000 laptops are lost every week at U.S. airports alone.
In that 2008 survey, almost three years ago now, 53% of people said that their laptops contained confidential business information, with two-thirds having taken no measures to secure their data. Clearly, some companies still aren’t taking proper measures.
rb-
As BP again has demonstrated, we all need to lift our game, As Sophos says, even if your organization is willing to take risks with your own data, firms have a clear moral duty not to take risks with data you keep about other people.
During these economic times, many organizations are saving a few pennies by doing as little as possible about encryption-related security. Why not consider the value of encryption to your business, instead of considering only the cost?
What do you think?
Oil spills, Data spills, Outrageous gas prices – Is BP out to get the U.S.?
Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedIn, Facebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.
IPv4 Address Worth $11.25
Now that the last IPv4 addresses are gone, the Internet numbers are increasing in value. Microsoft is spending $7.5 million for 666,625 IPv4 addresses from Nortel (NRTLQ). As Google (GOOG) and Apple (AAPL) fight over Nortel’s 4G bones (which I noted earlier), DownloadSquad reports that Microsoft (MSFT) jumped all over Nortel’s stash of IPv4 addresses when they became available for purchase through bankruptcy proceedings.
Microsoft ponied up $7.5 million for the Nortel pool, which works out to $11.25 per IP address. There were 13 other interested buyers, but only Microsoft and three others actually submitted bids according to DownloadSquad. With the last block of IPv4 addresses already issued (which I wrote about when it happened), snatching up over 666,000 IPv4 addresses in one fell swoop is a smart move by Microsoft.
rb-
Could Ballmer‘s boys be planning a cloud-based IPv6 <–> IPv4 transition service?
Are they trying to jump-start an IPv4 address space underground economy?
As the authors say, we’ll just have to wait and see.
What do you think?
What is Redmond up to?
Related articles
- No IPv6 Doomsday In 2012 (tech.slashdot.org)
Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedIn, Facebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.





