Tag Archive for 2013

Detroit Tech City

Detroit Tech CityDetroit has become the only two-time winner on the top five list of fastest-growing tech cities, says Dice.Com. According to MiTechNews, Detroit was No. 5 on the Dice list this year, with year-to-year growth of 10 percent in tech job listings. The Motor City was No. 1 on Dice’s list in 2011.

Back in 2011, Dice said Detroit had more than 800 tech jobs posted on any given day; now it’s more than 1,100. Automation Alley ranked the greater Detroit region among the best for its strong record of students completing science, technology, engineering, and math degrees.

The article says that annual salaries for Detroit-based tech pros are rising at above-average rates, up 7 percent from last year to $76,515 on average.

Dice says St. Louis, Mo. was No. 1 on this year’s Dice survey at 25 percent year-over-year growth in tech job listings, followed by:

“Detroit is a great place to be, and that’s what’s driving it,” said Dice.com senior vice president Tom Silver. “I think what’s contributing to it is a growth in opportunity as well as a pretty good cost of living. Increasingly, people are moving from more traditional tech centers like the Valley and NYC where it’s really expensive, to cities like Detroit, which are a great place to live.”

Employers are also discovering a “rich pool of talent” in cities like Detroit too — that they can get for more reasonable salaries, given the lower local cost of living.

Dice noted that Quicken Loans, Domino’s Pizza (DPZ) and New World Systems are high-profile Motown-based companies with listings on Dice.com.

rb-

I have covered what I have called the Detroit Miracle for a while here and here.

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

What Happens To Old Smartphones

The Business Insider has some new stats on what happens to old smartphones when people are done with them. The article says, for the most part, they just sit around. The author cites a survey by Gazelle, a site that takes trade-ins of old smartphones, tablets, and laptops. As you can see in this chart, 51% of people put old smartphones in a drawer or closet, according to Gazelle’s research.

MarketWatch estimates that all of those old phones sitting around are worth $34 billion. (That’s all phones, not just smartphones.) Companies like Gazelle are trying to get people to sell their smartphones to Gazelle, so they can resell the phones around the world and make a nice profit.

What happens to old smartphones

rb-

I’ve cover electronics recycling a number of times on Bach Seat.

Related articles

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

Sitting Is the Smoking of Our Generation

Sitting Is the Smoking of Our GenerationNilofer Merchant recently posted the article Sitting Is the Smoking of Our Generation at Harvard Business Review. In the article, Ms. Merchant argues that the amount of time spent sitting in meetings and watching TV has a negative impact on our health, akin to the preventable risk of smoking.

The author says people spend more time sitting than anything else throughout the day. She cites some statistics: “… we sit more than we do anything else. We’re averaging 9.3 hours a day, compared to 7.7 hours of sleep. Sitting is so prevalent and so pervasive that we don’t even question how much we’re doing it. “

There are big problems caused by sitting according to the article, health studies conclude that people should sit less, and get up and move around.

  • After 1 hour of sitting, the production of enzymes that burn fat declines by as much as 90%.
  • Extended sitting slows the body’s metabolism affecting things like (good cholesterol) HDL levels in our bodies.
  • Lack of physical activity is directly tied to 6% of the impact for heart diseases, 7% for type 2 diabetes, and 10% for breast cancer, or colon cancer.

The New York Times reported on another study, published last year in the journal Circulation that looked at nearly 9,000 Australians and found that for each additional hour of television a person sat and watched per day, the risk of dying rose by 11%. In that article, a doctor is quoted as saying that excessive sitting, which he defines as nine hours a day, is a lethal activity.

The author points out some trends to combat the negative impacts of sitting. The first is the mainstreaming of the standing desk. She concludes that, while it gets you off your duff, won’t help you get real exercise.

Additionally, Ms. Merchant describes a change she has made to her routine. “… I switched one meeting from a coffee meeting to a walking meeting… I now average four such meetings, and 20 to 30 miles each week.”

She also cites the work of James Fowler and Nicholas Christakis’s, book Connected. They observed that obesity spreads according to network effects; if your friend’s friend’s friend who lives a thousand miles away gains weight, you’re likely to gain weight, too. And if that extended friend also loses weight, even if you’re not in the same city, you’re likely to lose weight, too. Her goal, ” is to be someone who socializes the idea that physical activity matters, and that we each matter enough to take care of our health.”

The author says that her walking meetings had some unanticipated side benefits. She reports walking helps her listen to her participants. “… I can actually listen better when I am walking next to someone than when I’m across from them in some coffee shop. There’s something about being side-by-side that puts the problem or ideas before us, and us working on it together.”

Secondly, she reports that the meetings are more focused, because the iTimeWasters stay in the pocket, “the simple act of moving also means the mobile device mostly stays put away. Undivided attention is perhaps today’s scarcest resource, and hiking meetings allow me to invest that resource very differently.”

listen betterThe authors claim that the results of these off-beat meetings are positive.  “The number one thing I’ve heard people say is “That was the most creative time I’ve had in a long time” And that could be because we’re outside, or a result of walking. Research certainly says that walking is good for the brain.”

rb-

The author concludes that if you want to get out of the box thinking, you need to literally get out of the box.

If nothing else, when sitting for long periods, standing up every 20 minutes produces significant positive health benefits. I wrote about the link between inactivity and health back in 2009.

Do you believe that sitting to the smoking of our generation?

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

Cables Carrying Fake UL Marks

Cables Carrying Fake UL MarksUnderwriters Laboratories recently warned that two communications cable products carried “counterfeit UL marks.” Neither cable has been evaluated by the laboratory for safety. In addition, UL claims that the two cables do not contain required flame-retardant elements, so they both pose fire hazards. The first warning regards a StarTech product while the second carries the brand name Monoprice.

StarTech communications cableBack in January Underwriters Laboratories (UL) issued a public notice that identified StarTech communications cable as being mislabeled. According to an article in Cabling Installation & Maintenance, UL stated that the cable, “bears a counterfeit UL Mark for the United States and may pose a fire hazard.” The safety organization states, “The communications cable has not been evaluated by UL to the appropriate standard for safety in the United States, and is not authorized to bear the UL mark or any reference to UL.”

Further, the notice states that the cable “is missing required flame retardant elements. This may cause an increased risk of fire.” The box bears the brand name StarTech and has the terms “ISO 9011,” “UL,” “ETL,” and “IECQ” printed on it. According to UL’s notice, the cable jacket includes the following: “CMR Type 4PR 24AWG 75C (UL) E151955-A CSA LL79189 ETL Verified TIA/EIA-568-B.2 CAT 5E UTP 350 MHZ Patch Cable B-8A1004 ROHS Compliant.” The UL alert says that the cable was sold at overstock.com and may have been sold at other locations.

In a February article at Cabling Installation & Maintenance, there is a similar problem with cable sold by Monoprice. The UL issued, an alert to the public that Monoprice cable uses the UL mark without authorization and lacks certain fire-retardant materials. The UL alert says this cable is known to be also sold at www.greenconnectionsusa.com

The Fiber Optic Association has a YouTube video that demonstrates the fire dangers of counterfeit communications cable.

The StarTech response to the UL warning shared with Cabling Installation & Maintenance seemed more concerned about their ISO certification than correcting the problem. StarTech issued the following statement on January 24: “StarTech.com has been an ISO 9001 registered company since 1998 and is currently certified as ISO 9001:2008 compliant. As such, we take this matter seriously and have issued an internal corrective action report (CAR) and are investigating the circumstances surrounding this incident. Based on the outcome of our investigation, appropriate action will be taken.”

Unbeknownst to usMonoprice’s response to Cabling Installation & Maintenance came from company rep. Chris Apland. The firm claimed they did not know about the misleading and dangerous cat 5 cables. He claims they did not know what their vendor was doing. “Unbeknownst to us at the time, Monoprice’s former vendor for the product in question was inappropriately labeling our product certifications.

He goes on to claim the firm is sorry and has changed its ways. “Monoprice terminated our relationship with the vendor in question … We apologize to both UL and to our customers for any confusion this may have caused.” Mr. Apland added in the firm’s response that Monoprice’s “new vendor provides a higher quality Cat 6 bulk cable that includes the critical fire-retardant material called for in the UL complaint … we have since been in contact with UL through our China office…

rb-

In order to prevent safety problems on your job site, the Communications Cable and Connectivity Association (CCCA) recommends the best practice is to buy proven quality, name-brand cables and patch cords for known vendors.

Other recommendations include:

  1. Check for the UL holographic label on all boxes or reels of cable.
  2. Verify the UL mark and cable type on the cable jacket.
  3. Consult the UL online certifications directory to find if the manufacturer has a UL listing via the UL file number (the E number).
  4. Verify the authorized UL marks and correct terminology appear in cable specifications (cut sheets)
  5. Weigh the box of cable. Substantially less weight may indicate non-compliant copper clad aluminum (CCA) conductors were used in place of solid copper

The CCCA has developed the Cable Check™ App to help check these best practices. Download the app from Apple’s (AAPL) iTunes to detect cables carrying fake UL marks on your job.

Related articles

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

Dropbox Warms Up to Corp IT for IPO

Dropbox Warms Up to Corp IT for IPOIn preparation for its IPO, Dropbox is warming up to corporate customers reports InfoSecurity. the general consensus about Dropbox within the business community is that it is an excellent service, but lacks security. Data breaches, a lack of visibility into and control over how stored and shared files are used make the app seem insecure to many corporate users. GigaOM points out that large companies, including IBM (IBM), forbid its use. One of the criticisms, InfoSecurity cites is that employees leaving the company (either through termination or leaving to join a competitor) will automatically take any potentially sensitive files stored in their Dropbox accounts when they leave the company.

Dropbox logoThe new Dropbox Team (the corporate multi-user offering) dashboard seeks to make that more attractive. This paid-for service costs $795 per year for 5 users plus $125 for each additional user. The new dashboard provides the team leader with greater visibility and control over which members can access individual files, and what they can do with those files. In particular, if a team member leaves the company or just the team, access to the stored files can be immediately blocked.

These new features do not prevent an employee from opening a separate personal account and using that to exfiltrate sensitive files. However, InfoSecurity claims they make it more likely that it would be a planned (and probably illegal) act. Unfortunately, the greater part of the shadow IT use of Dropbox is likely to occur simply because the staff is seeking to make their jobs easier and more efficient. By providing an official Dropbox Team account, the need to bypass security becomes less pressing. Dropbox will benefit from increased income while business benefits from increased control.

two-factor authenticationA second new security feature within the new dashboard is the ability for the team leader to insist on and ensure the use of two-factor authentication by the team members. Optional two-factor authentication was announced by Dropbox last July. It followed the breach involving users’ re-used passwords. “Our investigation found that usernames and passwords recently stolen from other websites were used to sign in to a small number of Dropbox accounts,” announced the company at the time. Two-factor authentication can solve this issue, and the team leader can now insist upon it and ensure that individual team members do not subsequently turn it off.

It is possible that this improvement to the corporate Dropbox may be the start of preparation for a Dropbox IPO. IDC estimates that the enterprise file-sharing market will be worth $20 billion by 2015, and Dropbox is currently valued at around $4 billion.

we just want to make it easier for IT to say yesOver 2 million businesses have people inside them using Dropbox. It’s already pervasive, we just want to make it easier for IT to say yes to those people asking for Dropbox,” Sujay Jaswa, VP of business development for Dropbox said in an interview with GigaOM.

Among business accounts, GigaOM says Google (GOOG) is getting traction with the Google AppsGoogle Drive combo and Microsoft (MSFT) integrates SkyDrive storage with Office and Windows 8. Box, the company most associated with Dropbox-of-the-Enterprise, touts its support of all client devices but targets larger companies including Netflix, Dow Chemical, and Procter & Gamble.

rb-

Other competitors in the Dropbox-of-the-Enterprise niche are Accellion’s kitedrive, Egnyte, GroupLogic’s activEcho, SurDoc, and ownCloud. Still, it’s hard not to see all these rivals battling it out for the same paying business customers down the road.

At $125 per seat it seems awfully expensive, is it good enough for corporate IT to warm up to Dropbox in time to save its IPO?

Related articles

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.