Tag Archive for AAPL

2014’s Major Web Vulnerabilities

2014's Major Web Vulnerabilities2014 was the year of cyber-security mega-vulnerabilities. What makes mega vulnerabilities unique are they strike at the core of the Internet infrastructure and can impact nearly every connected device and every Internet user on the globe. 2014 saw the emergence of three mega-vulnerabilities Hearbleed, Shellshock, and POODLE.

Heartbleed, Shellshock, and POODLE were the top three major web vulnerabilities uncovered in 2014 according to Fred Donovan at FierceITSecurity. In case you have not heard of this trio of troublemakers, Web security firm Incapsula produced the following infographic.

The Incapsula infographic looks at each of these vulnerabilities and layout when they were discovered, what type of vulnerability they are, what systems and the number that are affected, the risks posed by the vulnerabilities, their severity, how easy they are to exploit, and the difficulty of fixing. Tim Matthews, vice president of marketing for Incapsula wrote in their blog:

What makes these mega vulnerabilities special is that unlike most vulnerabilities that are specific to a particular OS, browser or software application, these three relate to the core Internet infrastructure (e.g., SSL and Linux devices) and, in essence, affect just about every connected device owner and every Internet user on the globe.

Incapsula 2014 Mega Vulnetabilities

rb-

In their blog, Incapsula warns this is the tip of the iceberg of mega-vuln‘s that exploit other structural core functions of the Intertubes. Wired reports that after 8 months, 300,000 machines remain unpatched against Heartbleed.

  • Web Freedom Is Seen as a Growing Global Issue (cacm.acm.org)

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

Tablets Still Don’t Rule the World

Tablets Still Don't Rule the WorldThe rise of tablets like Apple’s (AAPL) iPadSamsung‘s (005930) Galaxy Tab, and the Google (GOOG) Nexus have grabbed PC buyers’ attention and dollars for several years at the expense of the PC market. Lately, however, it seems that the carnage in the PC market has stabilized. And the growth of the mighty Apple iPad has plateaued.

iPhone, iPad, and iPod sales

iPhone, iPad, and iPod sales from Q1 06 to Q3 14 (in million units) | Statista

Cloud computingCould this be because there is no real business case for the tablets? After being on the market for several years, they have not replaced the PC at work. Don Reisinger at eWeek, recently put out 10 reasons why tablets still cannot replace PCs where he argues that the Post-PC Era is yet not a done deal. He argues despite their popularity, tablets still aren’t powerful or capable enough to replace PCs. He states in the article tablets cannot–and will not–replace PCs. Let’s look at his reasons why.

1. Component power

Over the last few years, mobile components running in tablets have gained in power. However, processors such as NVidia’s (NVDA) Tegra 3 or Apple’s A6X still pale in comparison to the power delivered in PC chips from Intel (INTC) or AMD (AMD). Until that changes, tablets can never replace PCs for the power-hungry users among us the author says.

Apple vs. Microsoft2. App availability

Apple’s App Store now offers over 800,000 applications. And although many of them are worthwhile downloads, few actually deliver the complexity and sophistication customers would find in Microsoft (MSFT) Windows or OS X. Nowhere is that more clear than in the comparison of Office on mobile and PCs. Eweek says until apps gain in sophistication, mobile can never keep up.

3. Virtual keyboards aren’t loved

The problem with all tablets is that they come with virtual keyboards. And although more people are warming to virtual keys, there are still many folks around the globe that like having the standard physical keyboard found in PCs. The blog asks why not? Typing on traditional keyboards with two hands is far more accurate and efficient.

virtual keyboard as a reason he does not use a tabletPaul Mah at FierceCIO echoed the authors, citing the virtual keyboard as a reason he does not use a tablet as his primary work device. I have struggled with iPad virtual keyboards, and yes I did try Bluetooth keyboard cases and found them disagreeable.

4. Windows is the enterprise’s favorite

The article notes that Microsoft holds a dominant position in the enterprise. Tablets are just one front on that battlefield. The enterprise is adopting tablets at a rapid rate. But that doesn’t mean that the corporate world is ready to drop Windows for iOS or Android. In fact, Windows is still the most important software solution for enterprise users. Granted, Microsoft is bringing Windows to tablets, but for now, those products aren’t proving popular. Until they do catch on, PCs will win out.

5. Think about enterprise productivity

Productivity in the enterpriseProductivity in the enterprise is extremely important. And on that front, Mr. Reisinger says PCs are still winning out, Forbes recently estimated that MSFT Office market share will drop from its current 95% to 90% by 2016. Notebooks deliver the same level of mobility as tablets, and desktops deliver the power that designers and other employees might need. Simply put, PCs are still the ideal productivity-maximizing solutions for enterprise users.

6. Tablet prices are still too high

Tablets are expensive. The latest iPad launch can set customers back $929 for 128GB of storage and 4G LTE support. A more powerful notebook can be purchased for several hundred dollars less. The author believes that given the state of the economy and the fact that many tech buyers are looking to save cash wherever possible, PCs can’t be considered obsolete in their battle with tablets.

7. Notebooks are turning into tablets

mobile malware eWeek points out that PC vendors have made the smart decision to cut off the rise of tablets by delivering touch functionality in their products. Lenovo’s Yoga, for example, has a screen that can swivel around and sit atop the keyboard to act as a tablet. As more notebooks take on tablet functionality, devices like Apple’s iPad might look like an awfully poor value for the price.

8. More options across the PC market

The sheer number of options available to customers in the PC market is something that can’t be overlooked. From notebooks to laptops to desktops to ultrabooks, there’s something for everyone. Best of all, the components in those products can be customized to match the respective customer’s needs. The blog concludes that choice, outside of storage space, is something sorely lacking in the tablet market. And customers know it.

9. The security advantage is going away

 

Tablet malwareWhen tablets started to make inroads into the PC market, many speculated that it was because of the comparative safety that went along with using such products over notebooks. Now, the author says things have changed. Android is the top target for malicious hackers now, according to several security reports, and has become the next frontier in malware. That could prove extremely troublesome for tablet adoption if things continue to get worse.

10. Tablet OSs need to grow up

Android and iOS, the two most popular tablet operating systems, are nice and effective in the mobile world. But they haven’t grown up yet. Mr. Reisinger says Apple’s iOS, lacks a file system. Android comes in too many flavors for customers to get comfortable with its functionality. Mobile operating systems have to grow up. If they don’t, tablets will never match PCs.

rb-

Huge phoneI just got back from the annual run to the big-box store for Christmas shopping and saw another reason the tablet still does not rule the world. Pfablets.  Some of these things are just as big as an iPad Mini. Now it’s time for a good Gin and Tonic after facing the holi-dazed shopping hordes.

Dell and Intel released a report [pdf] that says the desktop is still the workhorse of the average office. They found that 77% of office tasks are completed with a traditional PC.

Related articles

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

Subpeona Served for LA iPads

Subpeona Served for LA iPadsThis bad idea never seems to go away. Remember the Los Angles Unified School District’s $1.3 billion iPads-for-all project? LAUSD big-wigs claimed that the Apple iPads and Pearson software would raise LA students’ Common Core test scores. I covered the questionable decision here and here. While the proverbial other-shoe appears to be dropping. Not only did the apparent sweetheart deal between the LAUSD Superintendent, Apple (AAPL), and Pearson (PSO) cost Supt. John Deasy his $350,000 a year job – now the Feds are involved.

FBI served a subpoena against the LA school districtThe LA Times reports that the FBI served a subpoena against the LA school district which compelled America’s second-largest school district to cough up 20 boxes of documents related to the flawed iPad project, to a federal grand jury.

The subpoena asked for documents related to the bidding process as well as to the winning bidders in the $1.3-billion poorly planned project. The subpoena, which was provided to The LA Times, is part of a wide-ranging investigation is looking into records related to Apple and Pearson that predate the bidding process or that involve other projects. The article says the documents sought include all kinds of documents:

… score sheets; complete notepads, notebooks and binders; reports; contracts; agreements; consent forms; files; notices; agenda; meetings notes and minutes; instructions; accounting records” and much more.

The article notes that the morning after the FBI seized the documents, Supt. Ramon C. Cortines said he was shelving the contract. He denies that decision was based on the surprise visit by the FBI. Supt. Cortines told the LA Times;

We’re not going to use the original iPad contract anymore. I think there have been too many innuendos, rumors, etc…

rb-

The grand jury process has recently developed a credibility problem in the US. So who knows what they will find in this case. Apple and Pearson have billions in cash to spread around to “educate” people about how great they are.

This just goes to prove how the confluence of bad ideas, poor planning, and greed can go terribly wrong.

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

Tablet Trouble

Tablet TroubleThere has been a shocking long-term trend in Apple (AAPL) iPad tablet sales. Despite the much bally hoed launch of the new iPad Air 2 and iPad mini 3, sales of Apple’s iPad have sunk to their lowest level since the 2011 introduction of the iDevice.This chart from Business Insider shows the decline of iPad sales.

Apple CEO Tim Cook was unfazed about the iPad’s plunging sales. During Apple’s latest earnings call Apple’s Cook said, “I’m very bullish on where we can take iPad over time.”Apple Quarterly Revenue

Users don’t want a tablet

Despite CEO Cook’s optimism, research from Kantar Worldpanel Comtech is not so sure. In an analysis of the tablet market, they found that consumers believe that they need the latest iPad. Or any tablet for that matter.

Their conclusion is based on research which found:

  • A majority of U.S. non-tablet owners said they would not buy a tablet in the next 12 months.
  • Of those who will not buy a tablet, 725 said that their PC or laptop was “good enough” as the reason why they are not buying a tablet in the next year.
  • Tablets are not seen as an alternative to smartphones.

Carolina Milanesi, chief of research at Kantar Worldpanel laid out four reasons why tablets sales are not growing at the rate many had expected.

  1. current tablet owners plan to keep their tablets even after upgrading to a new oneReplacement cycles are longer for tablets than smartphones. Ms. Milanesi explains,”Software upgrades help refresh the devices, and carriers do not provide incentives/subsidies to encourage replacements every two years, as they do with smartphones.
  2. Tablets are not as personal as smartphones.While there is no question that tablets are more personal than PCs, if less personal than smartphones, they still land in between the two,” the Kantar chief of research says.
  3. Tablet owners hang on to their old tablet when they get a new one. Smartphone users tend to turn in their old smartphone when they upgrade to a newer one according to Kantar Worldpanel data:
    • 36% of current tablet owners plan to keep their tablets even after upgrading to a new one.
    • 18% plan to pass their old ones on to a friend or relative, according to Kantar Worldpanel data.
  4. Finally, the value proposition of tablets remains weak.They report that only 3% of U.S. non-tablet owners said they will definitely buy a tablet in the next 12 months.

rb-

I thought that tablets were going to take over the world.

So what is the use case for tablets?

If the Apple fanboyz and gurls aren’t buying new iPads why should anyone else?

Related articles

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

Tech Giant Lobbying

Tech Giant LobbyingIn honor of election day, here is some unsettling info from IDG. The research firm reports that 2013 was a record year for computer and internet company spending on lobbying in the U.S., and 2014 is looking set to continue that trend. They presented an infographic that tracks information technology firms’ money spent buying, corrupting, lobbying politicians.

record year for computer and internet company spending on lobbying in the U.S.The article says that advertising, privacy, cybersecurity, patents & IP, tax, immigration, energy, drones, and mobile payments are all issues the tech industry wants to control, dominate influence on Capitol Hill. IDG’s research says that Google was the biggest spender; the search giant spent $3.94M in Q3, an increase from this time last year.

IDG reports that many well-known tech firms have increased their political spending when compared to last year. They report that social networking giant Facebook (FB) has already surpassed its lobbying spend compared to all of last year. Other tech mega-firms that have increased their attempts to buy political power lobbying include:

tech mega-firms have increased their lobbyingMicrosoft (MSFT), historically one of the biggest spenders in this area, was one of the few companies to actually decrease its spending from this time last year, down by a quarter to $1.66M according to the report. It seems a lot of the other legacy enterprise companies are also cutting back. Other companies reducing lobbying spend compared to this time last year are:

Don’t worry about the fat-cats, IDG says there are plenty of other companies also lining politicians pockets spending +/- $1M each on lobbying including the likes of:

2014 Tecch Lobby Spending - IDG

rb-

No wonder Washington is broken, how much of this money goes into the stupid TV ads you can’t escape. Maybe if these firms paid their proper taxes they would not have so much cash to spend buying congress. Oh right – IBM is a person who has rights.

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.