Tag Archive for AAPL

Wearable Tech Takes Off

Wearable Tech Takes OffWith the recent release of the Google (GOOGGlass, interest in wearable technology has been on the rise. The impending Apple (AAPLiWatch counter offering will inevitably drive the hype-cycle for wearable technology into hyper-drive. FierceMobileIT cites forecasts from several vendors that predict the wearable tech market will explode.

Wearable enthusiasm

Google GlassesVisiongain believes that over the next five years, the wearable technology market will reach $4.6 billion, with “explosive growth and high adoption rates.”  The wearable technology market includes smartwatches, tech clothing, augmented reality glasses, mobile health devices, and fitness/well-being monitors. Visiongain says:

Due to these devices becoming increasingly cheap to manufacture OEMs are now devising ways to apply this technology to target the consumer market. With virtually limitless applications to a number of verticals, the wearable technology market represents a huge value proposition to all ecosystem members, from manufacturers to app developers and service providers.

Vital jacketIHS Research and Juniper Research share Visiongain’s optimism about wearable technology. IHS predicts that between 2012 and 2017 10 million smart glasses will ship, with a majority of units shipped in 2016. IHS optimistically predicts that shipments of smart glasses will increase by 250% per year.

Juniper Research predicts that wearable devices would be increasingly used in the enterprise. Enterprise wearables include terminal devices, scanners, display devices, and tracking devices. They can also be used for logistics, factory management, and production houses. Juniper projects that overall sales of mobile, wearable devices, and smart glasses will reach 70 million units by 2017.

Wearables will cut into tablets

IDC says wearable computing will cut into tablet sales. They believe wearable devices like Google Glass and smartwatches could hamper tablet sales. Shoppers may choose to spend their money on wearable technology instead of tablets.

Business Insider - Wearable shipment estimates

rb-

Smartwatches augmented reality glasses and even smart contact lenses will save time and increase productivity. These technologies will hit the bottom line of enterprises that choose to embrace this new technology.

Once widespread consumer adoption takes place, the enterprise is never far behind – whether it’s ready or not. Remember how quickly Blackberry’s were tossed aside in favor of more consumer-friendly smartphones? BYOD is evidence that staff members will take technology into their own hands if their employer isn’t providing what they want. 

Companies need to start thinking about policies on existing wearable technology. For instance, many companies who have regulations on using cellphones while driving can expand these to include wearable technology, which will come in handy since wearables could prove distracting.

Related articles

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

Hidden costs of BYOD

Hidden costs of BYODFierceMobileIT points out research from Visage Mobile has identified even more hidden costs in an informative infographic based on data collected between January and April 2013 from 180 companies.

These hidden costs include high roaming charges, as well as downloads of premium text services and sexting apps by employees. Employees download $13,640 worth of unapproved apps, ringtones, and premium services every month. As a result, 15 percent of a company’s phone bill has nothing to do with business, according to the research.

rb-

Ummm – Acceptable use policy? A deduct from their phone stipend?

Hidden costs of BYOD

Related articles

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

Rockstars Team Up Against Google

Rockstars Team Up Against GoogleTo usurp Mark Twain, the reports of Nortel‘s demise are greatly exaggerated. GigaOm reports that the defunct Canadian telco giant has found an afterlife as part of a patent trolling operation that struck Android phone makers and is now targeting network and cable operators, including Google, with lawsuits in Texas and Delaware.

afterlife of a patent trolling operationJeff John Roberts writes that Nortel’s second act as the walking dead is taking place thanks to “Rockstar Consortium,” a group formed by Microsoft (MSFT), Apple (AAPL), Blackberry (BBRY), Sony (SNE), Ericsson AB (ERIC)EMC (EMC) and other Google (GOOG) rivals, which bought bankrupt Nortel’s patent portfolio in 2011 for $4.5 billion. (rb- I covered the sale of Nortel’s IP here)

Nortel was the source of many of the most important innovations in history in the field of telecommunications and networking,” says a new Rockstar lawsuit filed in the seemingly pro-troll U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas that accuses Time Warner Cable (TWC) of violating six patents, including US Patent 6128649, which was issued in the year 2000 and describes a method to show multiple screens in a video conference the article summarizes.

Rockstar Consortium formed by Microsoft, Apple, Blackberry, Sony, Ericsson, EMC

The complaint doesn’t say how exactly Time Warner Cable is infringing the old Nortel patents, but only notes that “TWC operates, sells and offers to sell video, high-speed data and voice services over its broadband cable systems throughout the United States.” The author says Rockstar, which is suing through a subsidiary called Constellation, also complains that the cable company walked away from its licensing demands in 2012.

GigaOm notes a second lawsuit, filed in Delaware by Rockstar under the alias “Bockstar” makes a series of broad-based allegations against Cisco (CSCO) that claim the company is violating six other old Nortel patents, including this one from 1998, related to routers and switches.

costs are passed on to customersLike all patent trolling, the author says that has nothing to do with innovation, but it certainly will lead to higher cable bills as Time Warner will have to spend millions on lawyers to fight the suit or else pay expensive license fees for old patents from a dead company; either way, the costs are passed on to customers.

Joe Mullin of Ars Technica noted when Rockstar sued the phone companies, “it’s patent trolling gone corporate.” And there’s no sign of where this will stop. Apple and Microsoft are sitting on thousands of patents that date from an era when the Patent Office would grant a patent on nearly anything, and it looks like they’re going to use them to sue every industry they can think of.

dysfunctional US CongressThe totally dysfunctional US Congress tried to take on patent trolling but caved into lobbyists. Microsoft has already succeeded in stripping out a part of the law that would have made it easier to challenge bad patents. This means the best hope for a return to patent sanity may lie with the Supreme Court, which agreed to consider what type of software patents should be granted in the first place.

GigaOm cites CBC reports that Ottawa, Nortel’s hometown has been transformed from a one-time innovation hotbed into a tech necropolis where once-proud engineers are paid to pick apart other people’s inventions in search of new patent violations that they can pass on their American masters.

 rb-

I have covered the patent trolling mayhem in the mobile market for a while and this seems to be more of the same. Innovation is dead in the mobile market and the only way these firms can compete is in the courthouse.

In addition to their choice of venue in the pro-troll Texas court, further evidence that Microsoft and Apple have created a patent troll can be found in the fact that Rockstar has filed suit against the leading Android phone producers:

  1. Samsung Electronics Co. (005930) (#1 Android OEM in U.S. sales),
  2. LG Electronics (LGLD) (#2),
  3. ZTE (763) (#4),
  4. Huawei (002502) (#6) and
  5. HTC (2498) (#7).

In addition, DailyTech notes that Rockstar member Sony is a minor Android OEM.  If somehow Microsoft and Apple are able to troll other Android OEMs to death, Sony could see gains in market share, as the only OEM who doesn’t have to pay direct licensing fees to Microsoft/Apple (Sony also notably has preexisting licensing deals with Microsoft and Apple).

Related articles

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

Miami Pauses Tablet Project

Miami Pauses Tablet ProjectFinally some sanity in the rush to push iPads into schools. Miami-Dade school district Superintendent Alberto Carvalho decided to put a hold on the district’s $63 million 250,000+ tablet project. Mr. Carvalho cited problems in LA, Texas, and North Carolina as good reasons to slow down. “Those events put us in a position to say ‘we best pause and learn from their mistakes?” Superintendent Carvalho said according to the Miami Herald.

lack of planningThe article cites Leslie Wilson, CEO of the Michigan-based One-to-One Institute, which advocates successful digital convergence policies. She says that larger iPad efforts have seen a “high rate of failure,” which she blamed on a lack of planning.“We see precious little of that,” she said. (rb- I wrote how about the failure of leadership on these projects here and here.) Ms. Wilson applauded Mr. Carvalho’s decision to step back and look at others’ pitfalls. “When Miami-Dade’s superintendent says ‘I’m pushing the pause button,’ I say bravo. There’s no reason not to get this right,” Ms. Wilson said.

Troubled school tablet projects

Despite the troubled school tablet projects across the country, The Herald says board members push Superintendent Carvalho to move forward. “I hope we will not be delayed in terms of getting devices into kids’ hands as soon as possible,” said School Board Member Carlos Curbelo.

sticker shockLAUSD’s Apple iPad experiment still seems in shambles, costs have just jumped 14%. The LA Times reports that the Apple (AAPL) iPads will cost nearly $100 more apiece — or $770 per tablet. The earlier lower cost estimate for each iPad “preceded the actual procurement process,” the district said in response to questions from The LA Times. “The negotiated discount [i.e. $678] does not go into effect until the district has reached the $400-million spending threshold. “This sticker shock can be avoided, but only after the L.A. Unified School District has spent at least $400 million for the devices. In other words, the district would have to buy nearly 520,000 iPads before getting lower prices.

Other cost increases announced included classroom carts, that charge the iPads and keep them secure, cost rose for this first phase rose from $2.6 million to $3.2 million, according to the paper. The iPad curriculum from Pearson Education Inc. (PSO) is still being developed and not available to those schools that have received their iPads. It is unclear if LAUSD will receive a credit from Pearson for late delivery or if it will ever be available.

Project management failAnother topic at the same meeting was the progress in preparing the schools for iPads. The district reported less than half a percent (40 of the over 1,000 school network) of the schools’ Wi-Fi infrastructure was upgraded for the iPadsso far. (rb- I wonder if they have addressed the proprietary Apple Bonjour issue, and how they are going to limit the number of devices (Apple TVs, Printers, other iPads, Mac’s etc.) that can be selected.

LA parents also have expressed confusion about their responsibility for the devices. And officials have yet to purchase mechanical keyboards that will be necessary to use the iPads on new standardized tests.

Budget shifts

the board shifted iPad project costs to the general fundTo keep the overall budget in check the board shifted iPad project costs to the general fund, which is used for basic operations. That shift is relatively small, about $550,000 at this point, although it’s unclear whether more expenses would be transferred in the future. The price per device, higher than retail, includes a protective case, a limited three-year warranty, technical assistance and training, and one Apple TV setup per 20 students.

The LA Times also reports that these problems have prompted four LA schools to opt-out of the troubled program. Another LA Times article seems to show that the iPad debacle may cost controversial LAUSD Superintendent John Deasy his job.

rb-

no plans or funds on how to sustain their projectsLike I said in my last post on this issue, the LA iPad debacle is driven by the politicians with no real sense of the work required, and I am sure not enough budget to do the work. When I spoke with educational “leaders” about what they were going to do with the iPads they wanted to implement them without solid articulated plans. As is always true in education, there were no plans or funds on how to sustain their projects, they spent all of their money to get the iPads in never mind a plan.

Despite doing the right thing in Miami, the politicians are pushing the Superintendent to just throw the expensive iDevices at the students without any planning.

Related articles

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

How Tough is an iPhone 5s?

How Tough is an iPhone 5s?According to some reports, the Apple (AAPL) iPhone 5s is the greatest iPhone ever. But how tough is it? Apparently, the iPhone 5s does pretty well when dropped on the sidewalk and does not object to a quick dip into the water.

But can the iPhone 5s defeat a .50-Millimeter rifle?

RatedRR answers the question. Click below to see the results.

rb-

I could go on a sociological rant about the modern-Americas need to put heroes (or their representation) on a pedestal only to gleefully knock them down later.

But – today seemed to be the day for some random destruction.

Related articles

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.