Tag Archive for Planning

Miami Pauses Tablet Project

Miami Pauses Tablet ProjectFinally some sanity in the rush to push iPads into schools. Miami-Dade school district Superintendent Alberto Carvalho decided to put a hold on the district’s $63 million 250,000+ tablet project. Mr. Carvalho cited problems in LA, Texas, and North Carolina as good reasons to slow down. “Those events put us in a position to say ‘we best pause and learn from their mistakes?” Superintendent Carvalho said according to the Miami Herald.

lack of planningThe article cites Leslie Wilson, CEO of the Michigan-based One-to-One Institute, which advocates successful digital convergence policies. She says that larger iPad efforts have seen a “high rate of failure,” which she blamed on a lack of planning.“We see precious little of that,” she said. (rb- I wrote how about the failure of leadership on these projects here and here.) Ms. Wilson applauded Mr. Carvalho’s decision to step back and look at others’ pitfalls. “When Miami-Dade’s superintendent says ‘I’m pushing the pause button,’ I say bravo. There’s no reason not to get this right,” Ms. Wilson said.

Troubled school tablet projects

Despite the troubled school tablet projects across the country, The Herald says board members push Superintendent Carvalho to move forward. “I hope we will not be delayed in terms of getting devices into kids’ hands as soon as possible,” said School Board Member Carlos Curbelo.

sticker shockLAUSD’s Apple iPad experiment still seems in shambles, costs have just jumped 14%. The LA Times reports that the Apple (AAPL) iPads will cost nearly $100 more apiece — or $770 per tablet. The earlier lower cost estimate for each iPad “preceded the actual procurement process,” the district said in response to questions from The LA Times. “The negotiated discount [i.e. $678] does not go into effect until the district has reached the $400-million spending threshold. “This sticker shock can be avoided, but only after the L.A. Unified School District has spent at least $400 million for the devices. In other words, the district would have to buy nearly 520,000 iPads before getting lower prices.

Other cost increases announced included classroom carts, that charge the iPads and keep them secure, cost rose for this first phase rose from $2.6 million to $3.2 million, according to the paper. The iPad curriculum from Pearson Education Inc. (PSO) is still being developed and not available to those schools that have received their iPads. It is unclear if LAUSD will receive a credit from Pearson for late delivery or if it will ever be available.

Project management failAnother topic at the same meeting was the progress in preparing the schools for iPads. The district reported less than half a percent (40 of the over 1,000 school network) of the schools’ Wi-Fi infrastructure was upgraded for the iPadsso far. (rb- I wonder if they have addressed the proprietary Apple Bonjour issue, and how they are going to limit the number of devices (Apple TVs, Printers, other iPads, Mac’s etc.) that can be selected.

LA parents also have expressed confusion about their responsibility for the devices. And officials have yet to purchase mechanical keyboards that will be necessary to use the iPads on new standardized tests.

Budget shifts

the board shifted iPad project costs to the general fundTo keep the overall budget in check the board shifted iPad project costs to the general fund, which is used for basic operations. That shift is relatively small, about $550,000 at this point, although it’s unclear whether more expenses would be transferred in the future. The price per device, higher than retail, includes a protective case, a limited three-year warranty, technical assistance and training, and one Apple TV setup per 20 students.

The LA Times also reports that these problems have prompted four LA schools to opt-out of the troubled program. Another LA Times article seems to show that the iPad debacle may cost controversial LAUSD Superintendent John Deasy his job.

rb-

no plans or funds on how to sustain their projectsLike I said in my last post on this issue, the LA iPad debacle is driven by the politicians with no real sense of the work required, and I am sure not enough budget to do the work. When I spoke with educational “leaders” about what they were going to do with the iPads they wanted to implement them without solid articulated plans. As is always true in education, there were no plans or funds on how to sustain their projects, they spent all of their money to get the iPads in never mind a plan.

Despite doing the right thing in Miami, the politicians are pushing the Superintendent to just throw the expensive iDevices at the students without any planning.

Related articles

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

Cloud Exit Plan

Cloud Exit PlanAnother cloud services provider seems to have closed up shop. NetworkWorld reports that MegaCloud.com, a consumer cloud storage provider has been inaccessible. Users started complaining on social media that they have not had access to their data since at least October 30th. (rb- there is likely lots of enterprise data as well. FierceMobileIT reports that 72 percent of workers are using free file-sharing services without authorization.)

Cloud computingMegaCloud had offered customers up to 8GB of free cloud storage, with another 8GB of free backup storage. That 16GB of free cloud storage was one of the largest giveaways of cloud storage from a consumer cloud provider. MegaCloud offered a desktop client, as well as mobile apps for Apple (AAPL) iOS, Google (GOOG) Android, and Microsoft (MSFT) Windows phones.

At the end of September, San José, CA-based Nirvanix cloud provider gave their mostly business customers 2-weeks notice to get their files back before they went dark, taking all the data with them. There are reports that Nirvanix hosted around 40 petabytes of data. Getting their data out in time must have challenged Nirvanix customers.

Moving data from cloud to cloudCharles Babcock at InformationWeek explained in an intriguing article that data movements in the cloud are dependent on the speed with which the service provider can write data to an external source and the amount of bandwidth made available to do so. He cited tests by Nirvanix competitor, Nasuni, which found that moving 12 TB of data from one Amazon (AMZN) S3 bucket to another took four hours. Moving the same amount from Amazon S3 to Microsoft Azure took 40 hours, and from S3 to Rackspace (RAX), just under one week. Moving data from Rackspace into Amazon took only five hours.

In a Data Center Knowledge article, Gartner (IT) analyst Kyle Hilgendorf reinforces my point that cloud meltdowns should prompt cloud users to get serious about contingency planning. Gartner’s Hilgendorf wrote in a blog post:

Exit plan“Cloud exits are not nearly as sexy as cloud deployments – they are an afterthought …  It’s analogous to disaster recovery and other mundane IT risk mitigation responsibilities. These functions rarely receive the attention they deserve in IT, except for immediately following major events like Hurricane Sandy or 9/11.”

“If you are a customer of any other cloud service (that is basically all of us) – take some time and build a cloud exit strategy/plan for every service you depend upon,” he added. “Cloud providers will continue to go out of business. It may not be a frequent occurrence, but it will happen. ”

Nicos Vekiarides, co-founder and CEO of Natick, MA-based cloud storage provider TwinStrata told NetWorkWorld that in the long-term, the economic draw of the cloud should overcome the fear and hesitancy of many businesses considering cloud storage solutions He predicts that the shut-downs will drive businesses toward larger, better-known cloud storage brands instead of to smaller, newer providers. He says:

Afraid of cloudsThe storage needs of businesses haven’t gone away. Organizations’ data storage requirements still are growing at 40 percent to 60 percent a year … What will change is how CIOs shop for and deploy cloud services, in that everyone still wants choice, but they’ll be much more wary. There’s always the need for choice among a number of vendors, and CIOs will want the best of breed. That might mean they will gravitate toward more established vendors.”

rb-

These events may put a few firms off the cloud, but not all. These events should point out the need for due diligence when planning what to do with their data.

Barb Darrow at GigaOM said it most Data centerpoetically, “cloud storage offerings have multiplied like rabbits over the past year, and the notion that you could entrust business data to a company that appears to be well-funded only to see it shutting its doors could be more paranoia-inducing than the NSA spooks.”

IMHO, continuity plans need to account for data in the cloud. Cloud providers can offer better availability and redundancy, but still pose risks. But do they guarantee your data?  Continuity plans need to protect complete business services, including parts that may rely on a cloud piece.  Some of the questions I would ask:

  • Does it make sense to have all data in the cloud?
  • Is the firm’s data categorized so that when another cloud provider folds, IT can spend any time they have moving data to another provider? Mr. Babcock demonstrated that move would not be instantaneous.
  • Can the data even be brought back in-house? Did you throw out your old SAN when the data was moved to the cloud?
  • What format is the data in? You did check your contract right?
  • Will a firm going under even worry about contractual obligations?
  • Can IT and legal get together to make a deal with another cloud provider fast enough?

Does your Business Continuity Plan cover cloud melt-downs?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
Related articles

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.