Tag Archive for Apple

Windows 8 Passes Vista – Finally

Windows 8 Passes Vista - FinallyThere must be some happiness in Redmond. Microsoft’s Windows 8 is finally more popular than the reviled Windows Vista. Windows 8 has been available since August 2012, which means it took Microsoft‘s (MSFT) latest operating system nearly 11 months to surpass the highly unpopular Windows Vista.

Windows 8 logoPCWorld cites data from Net Applications’ NetMarketshare tracker, which found that Windows 8 captured a whopping 5.10 percent of all desktop systems the firm tracks for the month of June. Vista’s market share now stands at 4.62 percent. Of course, both will need a few months (or years) before they pass Windows XP and Windows 7, both of which dipped about half a percentage point’s worth of share to finish the month with 44.37 percent and 37.17 percent, respectively.

Windows 8 takes the keadNetApplications

Both Windows 7 and Windows XP’s sales are on the wane, Net Applications says, but it will be several years before Windows 8 passes them by. The article reports new momentum for Windows 8, which has struggled to lift its head above both third-party operating systems, as well as its own rivals in the Microsoft nest.

Waiting a long timeMicrosoft’s Windows 8 passed Apple’s (AAPL) Mac OS X 10.8 in February 2013. PCWorld calculates that if Windows 8 continues to increase its share at its current pace of about 0.5 percentage points per month—and if Windows XP continues to decline at about the same rate—Microsoft would need roughly 32 months, or until about February 2016, for Windows 8 to pass Windows XP.

The author also reports that analytics firm StatCounter showed similar results in June 2013, from its worldwide measurements of browser data which confirms that Windows 8 has increased its market share over Windows Vista. StatCounter said that Windows 8 captured 6.44 percent of all PCs, versus 5.94 percent at the beginning of June. StatCounter said, however, that the versions of Mac OS X combined, at 8.52 percent, were still higher than Windows 8.

rb-

The good news for most in Redmond (except those who were recently re-org’d) is that Windows 8 has finally gained more ground than Vista on desktops. Back in 2006, Vista had the same problem Windows 8 now has, but for different reasons. Windows Vista just did not work and now Windows 8 is confusing to consumers who don’t know what to do with the “Modern” touchscreen interface on their mouse-based systems.

MSFT joins the "post-pc era"MSFT might be trying to kill the desktop to join the “post-pc era” with the Metro apps in favor of touch tablets, laptops, and phones it has not worked out really well so far. To a degree, MSFT has caved in the pressure for a more traditional desktop experience with the recent free update to Windows 8.1 which restores some of the Start Button functionality.

Does it matter to you that it took Windows 8 nearly a year to become more popular than Vista?

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

Did You Wipe Your Tablet?

Did You Wipe Your Tablet?Techno prognostication firm IDC says (I think they are right on this one) that worldwide sales of tablets will surpass desktop PCs and laptops by the end of 2014. This will result in a boomlet in the second-hand tablet market and a recent article on Infosecurity says that in response, firms will need to start data wipe their old tablets just as thoroughly as old hard disks to protect their data.

take responsibility for removing dataThe company is responsible for any company data held on the mobile device; no matter the flavor of BYOD practiced so it is the company that must take responsibility for removing data from the device before disposal. The Infosecurity article says that ensuring that mobile device solid-state memory is completely clean is technically difficult.

Solid-state memory

The article highlights BlackBelt, which has just enhanced its data wiping product to include Apple (AAPL) and Google (GOOG) Android tablets explained the difficulty to the author. “Solid-state memory uses a technique called wear leveling to maximize the life expectancy of the memory chips.” BlackBelt’s business development manager Ken Garner told Infosecurity,It works by spreading the binary information (0s and 1s) randomly across all the memory cells in the chip. This means that unlike on spinning disk memory, the location of the data on the user interface bears no relation to where it is stored on the drive, making traditional forms of deletion ineffective.

end users can't data wipe their mobile devicesBlackBelt says end-users can’t data wipe their phones, “it isn’t possible for an individual to perform a full removal of personal data from any smartphone or tablet using a device’s in-built factory reset or by re-flashing the operating system.” the vendor explains to Help Desk Security that wear leveling will, “over-rule instructions to permanently overwrite old data.

Solid-state memory wear leveling

Because of ‘wear leveling, neither remote wipes nor factory resets are guaranteed to remove all the data from solid-state memory. The blog points out that a low-cost product called Wondershare, can recover data from solid-state memory. Mr. Garner claims the software, “recovers just about everything after either a factory reset or a local (phone operating system) delete.

Many data wiping solutions don’t work on solid state memoryWhen a tablet is retired it is incumbent on the company to make sure that all data held on the device is adequately deleted. One problem, says Garner, is that “Many data wiping solutions, more often than not, have been “…re-purposed from data wiping solutions for traditional hard disk drives,” and that simply doesn’t work on solid-state memory.

Three-stage process to wipe SSM

DataWipe, uses a three-stage process: first writing 0s in every memory cell, secondly writing 1s in every cell, and thirdly writing random 0s and 1s across every memory cell. The result, he claims, is guaranteed data erasure that can also provide audit, compliance, and reporting data in an industry-standard XML format that is easily exchanged with all the major DLP, SIEM, policy management, and mobile device management solutions solving both the technical difficulties around tablet recycling.

difficulties around tablet recyclingWiping data from a PC or a first-generation Apple iPad that is being retired is important because of the enormous amount of data they can store. This makes the proper destruction of that data on the device essential before it leaves the organization. Unfortunately, IT asset disposition firm Retire-IT sees that many firms simply swap the devices with new ones or merely format the drives without securely wiping the data. The Columbus, OH-based firm says this leaves organizations vulnerable.  Kyle Marks, CEO of Retire-IT told Help Net Security that:

99% of problems happen before a disposal vendor touches equipment. No vendor can destroy data if they don’t receive an asset, which is why we strongly encourage clients to destroy data before any move. Better safe than sorry. Of course, disposal vendors should destroy data (again) regardless

Retire-IT looked at tracking data from 1,072 corporate disposal projects encompassing 233 different companies and reported some shocking figures:

  • 4 out of 5 projects (81.5%) had at least one missing asset.
  • 1 out of 8 (11.6%) had a negative variance. The devil is in the details, but nobody looks very closely.
  • Only 79% of the serial numbers were matched with subjective matching.
  • Without subjective matching, only 58% of serial numbers were matched.

Sanitize IT equipment

Help Net Security offers some suggestions to help sanitize IT equipment:

Computers – Derik Boot and Nuke Linux Live CD for full disk wiping. It supports many types of wiping, including the DoD 5220.22-M method with 3 passes.

sanitize IT equipmentStarting with Windows Vista (and Windows 2008 Server), the Microsoft OS overwrites the contents of each sector when you do a Slow Format on your media. They recommend Microsoft’s SDelete for wiping files on Windows.

For Apple OS X there’s the Disk Utility.

On Linux use the “wipe”, “srm” or “shred” commands to securely sanitize files on most distributions.

Printers and copiers – Consult the manual to find out how to clear the memory or use third-party software to wipe the hard drive. Which I covered here

Mobile devices – Wired recommends a hammer and don’t forget to remove the SIM card.

Related articles
  • BYOD: Preventing Breaches Can Be A Challenge (healthsecuritysolutions.com)

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

Business PC Not Dead Yet

Business PC Not Dead YetThe BusinessInsider says that the PC market imploded last quarter. They cite data from technology prognosticators IDC who reported PC sales fell 14 percent in the first quarter, which is worse than their forecast of a 7.7 percent drop. IDC claims this is the worst quarter for PC’s since they started tracking sales.

IDC blames Microsoft’s (MSFT) Windows 8 operating system for alienating consumers. The new tile-based interface is too weird for consumers, says IDC. Instead of buying new laptops or desktops, people are buying tablets and smartphones which serve as good-enough alternatives claims the article.

PC Shipments Q1 2013

Despite the wave of doom and gloom in the headlines from Gartner (IT) and IDC, Paul Mah at FierceCIO warns IT, managers and executives, to think before they ditch their existing PCs fleet in favor of tablets and smartphones; or perhaps reallocate their budgets to migrate existing business apps for a tablet-only environment future.

Gartner logoFierceCIO makes the point that the decline in shipments pertains only to the consumer section of the PC market. According to Mikako Kitagawa, at Gartner: “Unlike the consumer PC segment, the professional PC market, which accounts for about half of overall PC shipments, has seen growth, driven by continuing PC refreshes.

What’s more, this growth is taking place even though some regions already have passed the peak of their PC refresh cycles. And at half of the overall PC shipments, the professional PC market is nothing to be scoffed at. On the other hand, the overall dip–despite the growth in the professional PC market–does speak to just how sharply the drop in consumer PC shipments has been according to the article.

Consumers are clearly moving their content consumption from PCs to connected devices, such as tablets and smartphones. As far as enterprises should be concerned though, businesses are still buying PCs.

rb-

Microsoft CEO Steve BallmerDespite what many people wish, I still don’t see many ways in which tablets can replace the office PC. How do you run a 40 column excel on a 9.5 inch Apple (AAPL) iPad screen? Can you use Access on a consumer-centric tablet like the iPad?

 

Related articles

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

Enterprise Resisting Office 365

Microsoft has bet big on Microsoft Office 365 but CITEworld says so far, the big enterprises that make up the bulk of Microsoft’s revenue haven’t jumped on board. Microsoft channel boss Jon Roskill told Redmond Channel Partner that “90 percent” of Office 365 customers are from businesses with fewer than 50 employees, and explained, “small business is at the core of this product customer base.” Mr. Roskill also said that Office 365 “penetration is still in the low single digits” in other words, less than 5%.

Microsoft Office 365Office 365 was originally introduced in June 2011, and the first focus was on Microsoft-hosted versions of servers like Exchange and SharePoint. But enterprise customers tend to have multi-year license agreements.

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

Mobile Patent Troll Sues Everyone

Mobile Patent Troll Sues EveryoneSurprise, surprise there’s another mobile-related patent lawsuit. at GigaOM says this time the plaintiff is an obscure Delaware-registered limited liability non-practicing entity called Steelhead. The patent in question covers ‘mobile radio handover initiation determination’ – in other words, choosing which cellular base station has the best signal as the handset moves from one place to another.

Cell phonesThe defendants are a who’s who of the mobile world: Apple (AAPL), AT&T (T), Google (GOOG), HTCKyocera (KYO), LG (LGLD), MetroPCS (PCS), Motorola Mobility, NEC Corporation (6701), Pantech, Research In Motion (RIMM), Sony (SNE), Sprint (S), T-Mobile, Verizon (VZ) and ZTE (763). The article says these firms committed the mortal sin of allowing their mobile phones to act like mobile phones. But the interesting thing about this particular suit is the origin of the suit – or, more precisely, the reporting around that origin.

Mr. Meyer reports that U.S. Patent No. 5,491,834 comes from BT (BT). It was filed in 1993 and granted in 1996. The patent is still listed by the USPTO as belonging to BT. In its court filings provided by the author, (the Motorola/Google example is here), Steelhead notes that it “owns all rights of recovery under the ‘834 Patent, including the exclusive right to recover for past infringement.

aggressively monetizingThe author suggests that this case may not be BT “aggressively monetizing” its patent portfolio. BT told Mr. Meyer, “BT sold all of its rights to the patents last year. We have no involvement in Steelhead Licensing LLC’s litigation activity.

BT claims the troll is not a shell front for the firm. A spokesperson for the telecom giant told GigaOM,  “BT doesn’t share in Steelhead’s licensing income”.

rb-

I have covered the mobile patent wars many times here. I don’t know why I find patent trolling so interesting to follow. Maybe it is the same reason I watch NASCAR highlights, for the crashes, or the buy a few Powerball tickets, just in case.

Maybe someday all the money spent on lawyers will actually go back to making things and creating jobs.

Kids squabblingShame on BT if this is a legit patent and they were not smart enough to enforce their claim when they had it. I’m no lawyer, it seems to me that mobiles that can’t find a cell tower to connect to don’t work.

Related articles

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.