Tag Archive for Facebook

LinkedIn Pulls A Facebook

LinkedIn Pulls A FacebookBusiness social networking firm LinkedIn made me get out of my Bach Seat and jump up and down this morning, LinkedIn (LNKD) pulled a Facebook and made a sneaky change to the terms of service that made user’s names and photographs available to advertisers if they want to use them.

Thankfully BrandImpact tells how to keep up your privacy.

  1. LinkedIn logogClick on your name on your LinkedIn homepage in the upper right corner. From the drop-down menu, select “Settings.”
  2. In the “Settings” page, select “Account.”
  3. In the column next to “Account,” click “Manage Social Advertising.”
  4. Uncheck the box next to “LinkedIn may use my name, photo in social advertising.”
  5. Now check the new default settings under “E-mail Preferences” and “Groups, Companies & Applications.” Make sure to opt-out of “Data Sharing with 3rd-party applications” as well.

In the face of negative user reactions and a growing media firestorm, LinkedIn has decided to make a change in the policy. That’s a step in the right direction. I have written about social networking’s assault on privacy here, here, and here.

rb-

Even though LinkedIn has backtracked on this it still irks me. I believe that most people on LinkedIn are working on their professional brand and do not want to be associated with ads. Facebook is for kids who don’t care, LinkedIn was for professionals. This seems like LinkedIn is wasting the goodwill they’ve built up over the years as it tries to justify its $9 billion IPO valuation. This is not a good sign for LinkedIn, I doubt they can beat Facebook in the teenie-bopper social network segment.

What do you think?

Are you concerned about your privacy on Facebook?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
Related articles

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

Tech Regulatory Capture

ATech Regulatory Captures I have noted from my Bach Seat, the revolving door or regulatory capture between the federal government and the tech titans isn’t new. The tech titans like Google (GOOG), Facebook, and Apple (AAPL) hire former feds to protect their turf while their web 2.0 applications attract attention from lawmakers and regulators concerned about issues like privacy, competition, pricing, and other aspects of the online economy.

Tech Firms Capture White House Staffers

Tech Firms Hiring White House Staffers“These companies are at the crosshairs of privacy and policy issues and they see people in the White House and federal government as protectors of their plans to expand into new markets,” Jeffrey Chester, an online privacy advocate and executive director of the Center for Digital Democracy told the Washington Post. “These are uber influence-makers they are hiring.”

Three examples of this in the Washington Post article are:

  • Google’s green energy initiative hired consultant Colin Crowell, who is both a former senior adviser to the FCC’s chairman and a former aide to Rep. Edward J. Markey (D-Mass.).
  • AT&T’s (T) lobbying leader James Cicconi, is a former staffer for George W. Bush. Mr. Cicconi has a long track record of regulatory success at the FCC and approval of several mergers for AT&T.
  • AT&T also hired Bill Clinton spokesman Mike McCurry heads Arts & Labs, a group that has lobbied against Internet access rules known as net neutrality, for AT&T, Verizon and cable companies.

Facebook Hires Former Clinton Spokesman

Facebook logoThe Washington Post reports that Facebook recently hired former Clinton White House spokesman Joe Lockhart to its communications team, as the company faces increased scrutiny caused by the company’s global expansion and treatment of data shared by the site’s more than 600 million users and its privacy practices. Mr. Lockhart, who served as press secretary for President Bill Clinton will be vice president of global communications. Mr. Lockhart will be located at the company’s Silicon Valley headquarters and report to Elliott Schrage, VP of global communications, marketing, and public policy.

Facebook has also hired former George W. Bush deputy chief of staff, Joel Kaplan, to head its D.C. federal lobbying and policy shop. The Facebook office had just one employee in 2007 and now has a dozen on staff.

Larry Summers to Join VC Firm

Andreesen Horowitz logoSilicon Valley venture fund Andreesen Horowitz has added former White House economic director Larry Summers as an exclusive “long-term” special adviser. The Washington Post reports. Marc Andreesen, a co-founder of the venture capital investment firm, said the appointment brings the former government official’s international economic expertise to a fast-changing high-tech industry where Internet companies are quickly expanding overseas and fundamentally changing the way business markets work. Summers doesn’t have experience in tech, but that’s not why the venture firm wants him, they said. As the former Treasury secretary and a noted economist, the venture firm wants his economic knowledge to help companies think more broadly about how they can break into new markets and bring their services to various industries.

Andreesen Horowitz, with investments in Facebook, Digg, and Zynga, said Mr.Summers will receive “long-term” compensation, which would probably include a stake in companies or the fund, but Andreesen declined to give more details on their arrangement.

AT&T Gave Cash to Merger Backers

ATT logoEliza Krigman at POLITICO.com reports that AT&T (T) is lining up support for its acquisition of T-Mobile from a slew of groups with no obvious interest in telecom deals, except that they’ve received big piles of AT&T’s cash.

AT&T says it supports nonprofit groups because it’s the right thing to do — and not because of any quid pro quo. “For decades, AT&T has proudly supported numerous diverse groups and organizations,” a company spokesperson told POLITICO.

But not everyone’s buying it according to the article, “The money that nonprofits receive from their corporate sponsors sticks not only in their bank accounts but in their minds,” Ellen Miller, executive director of the Sunlight Foundation, told POLITICO.com. “This is what I think of as deep lobbying — there is an expectation that when push comes to shove, these groups will come out in favor of their benefactors.”

Politico logoAT&T’s corporate giving arm, the AT&T Foundation, doled out $62 million in 2009 to support a variety of arts and education programs, charities, and organizations according to the article. Jim Cicconi, AT&T’s senior vice president and top lobbyist, chairs the foundation. some of the payments AT&T has made include

The NAACP received a $1 million contribution from AT&T in 2009 and has received funding in the six figures dating to 2006, according to the group’s annual reports. The NAACP was one of the first groups to announce public support of the T-Mobile acquisition. William Barber, head of the North Carolina chapter of the NAACP, told POLITICO that AT&T’s financial support did not influence his group’s decision to write to the FCC in support of the merger.

GLAAD which has received $50,000 from AT&T, recently backed the merger deal. Rich Ferraro, a GLAAD official, told POLITICO, “We do not make policy decisions based on what’s best for our corporate sponsors.”

The Columbia Urban League received a $25,000 grant from the AT&T Foundation in 2009 to offer “underserved populations with resources to help their children achieve academic success,” according to the foundation’s IRS Form 990. On May 27, the group’s president and CEO, James McLawhorn, wrote to urge the FCC to approve AT&T’s acquisition of T-Mobile.

Some public interest groups question whether AT&T is now cashing in on its status as one of the country’s biggest corporate donors. I wrote about AT&T’s habit of showering everyone with money here

Related articles

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

10 Security Reasons to Quit Facebook

10 Security Reasons to Quit FacebookJoan Goodchild wrote an article for CSO Online that said Baby Boomers quit Facebook faster than they join based on information from Inside Facebook. The data indicate that after a huge growth in Facebook membership among the over-55 age group that same demographic began to defect in large numbers, just months after signing up. The CSO Online article quotes Scott Wright, a security consultant based in Canada and runs the site streetwise-security-zone.com says Boomers leave Facebook because they have discretion.

10 ways Facebook does not allow discretion

Here are 10 ways that Facebook does not allow for discretion, driving Boomer permanently off of Facebook.

Facebook1. Your Privacy is History Mr. Wright recalled an academic claim that the notion of privacy differs widely among generations. “The 20-something view of privacy is basically that their parents not see what they are doing. That’s about it,” he said. Apparently, Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg agrees. He claims that openly sharing information with many people is today’s social norm. He went on to say “We view it as our role in the system to constantly be innovating and be updating what our system is to reflect what the current social norms are.” Many have translated this to mean Facebook doesn’t think its users want much privacy, and the policies of the site show that view. “If you can’t maintain privacy online and off, then you can’t speak freely,” said Bethan Tuttle, an Washington-based independent consultant and privacy advocate. Tuttle says in the article that the massive and quick growth Facebook has experienced, coupled with a lack of privacy-centric leadership has left end-user privacy as casualty.

2. They don’t have your best interests in mind Tom Eston, creator of the website socialmediasecurity.com points out, the business model of Facebook and Twitter, is to make user information as public as possible to generate new ways to make money. Mr. Eston said in the article;

They are really startups if you think about it. They don’t have a true business model … Their philosophy is the more you share, the more information they have to make money with. With that in mind, can you really count on them to protect you?

And do you know just how much information you are sharing that can be used not only by Facebook, but by the application developers that create those fun quizzes and games? Wright says most people don’t. (I wrote about this problem here).

3. Frequent redesigns affect privacy settings Mr. Wright in the CSO Online article said,

Just when people figure out the privacy settings on Facebook, they go and change them again … It always seems like it is being done in everyone’s best interest, but if you really examine it, they have never done anything other than to try to get people to share more information.

Facebook redesigns often make public, and searchable, certain user information that was previously private, and many of the features you can make private are left public unless you go in and adjust your privacy settings. This is no small task, according to Ms. Tuttle, “I am really good online but it took me several tries to get my Facebook privacy settings where I needed them to be.”

Phishing4. Social engineering attacks are getting more targeted Most Facebook users have received messages on their wall asking “Have you seen this video?” or “Is this you in this photo?” By clicking on the link, the user runs the risk of being infected by malware. These are known as social engineering attacks, and they are becoming more sophisticated said Mr. Wright. “They are becoming very targeted. Even seasoned security professionals are falling for them,” he said. The more information you share, coupled with a decrease in privacy, only means it is even easier for cyber criminals to get information about you that can be used to trick you into clicking on a bad link.

5. You can’t trust the ads Most web users think advertisements are harmless, unfortunately, some contain malicious links. One common scenario involves a pop-up from the ad that claims your computer is infected and prompts you to download software to fix it. Instead of helpful software, you end up downloading something nasty. This is now commonly known in the security community as “scareware,” and it’s still a very effective way to snare unsuspecting users.

6. Spam Spam claiming to be from Facebook has increased according to the article. “I think it’s a security concern,” said Mr. Eston. “Mostly because spammers can use that vulnerability to make you think the message is coming from Facebook when it is not. Many users simply wonder “Why is Facebook sending me this?” and instinctively open the message and log in to what turns out to be a fake screen that steals credentials.

7. You don’t really know your friends The author cites a report from security firm Cloudmark which concluded that close to 40 percent of new Facebook profiles are fakes.  Having lots of friends is dangerous because it opens you up to more security risks. Mr. Wright said those who get targeted for hacking are the users who have lots of friends (here is an example). The more friends you have, the more reach a criminal will have when he breaks into your profile and sends out a bad link to everyone.

8. You can’t help yourself from being dumb The attention around the site pleaserobme.com brought to light the safety concerns around social networking. Pleaserobme aggregates the Twitter feeds of people who play Foursquare, a location-sharing application. The problem is while playing the game, many users are also publicly broadcasting that their home is likely unattended and a good “opportunity” (as the site terms it) for thieves. As Ms. Tuttle put it, you need to think about what you are doing and many people are not. You’re putting yourself out there in potentially dangerous ways, particularly if you don’t know all of your “friends” that well.

9. The great unknown CSO Online says there is a lot of speculation about a Facebook IPO and future business strategy. What does this mean for users? Mr. Wright said some fear it means an increase loss of privacy as the social networking site inevitably looks for ways to make money by offering up valuable user information to advertisers and developers. Mr. Wright said,

One of the things I find most interesting is that there are still many people who are scared to death of social networking sites. These are usually the people who don’t see value in them. In the end, they may be the wisest of us all.

Bill Clinton i angry at you for using social media

10. Ex’s, creeps and parents Facebook is making it possible for people to be cyber stalked, even if they aren’t friends anymore, said Mr. Eston. Although the physical and virtual connections are broken, having mutual friends makes it easier for your ex to keep tabs on you. The same goes for any creepy guy or girl you are trying to avoid. Or you may get a friend request from a parent, which Mr. Wright claims many 20-something users consider the worst thing that could ever happen in the history of social networking. “That is a big driver for quitting,” he said. “Once the parent friends some of these people they immediately think ‘I’ve got to get out of this!

What do you think?

Are you concerned about your privacy on Facebook?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
Related articles

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

Jay Leno Most Dangerous Celebrity in Cyberspace

There are many late nights when I sit in the Bach Seat after a long day of coordinating shared technical services and need some silliness. Tonight Show funny-guy Jay Leno was my late-night source of silliness until BitDefender told me he is the Most Dangerous Celebrity in Cyberspace.

Jay Leno is BitDefenders 2011 Most Dangerous Celebrity in CyberspaceAccording to an analysis of 25 million spam messages by the Bucharest, Romania-based anti-malware firm, comedian and TV host Jay Leno is the most dangerous Hollywood celebrity in cyberspace. BitDefender found Mr. Leno mentioned in the subject line of 38,000 spam messages most of which focused around medicine and the purchasing of pills but come with enticing subjects such as ‘Jay Leno found taking drugs.’

“Cybercriminals follow the latest trends just as consumers do and they use these and the names of popular celebrities in their campaigns to lure people to websites that are full of malicious software (malware),” said Catalin Cosoi, Head of the BitDefender Online Threats Lab.

AfBitDefender logoter Mr. Leno, the article at InfosSec Island says that cybercriminals next most often used Madonna and Cameron Diaz to spread spam. (I noted Cameron Diaz’s reign as the McAfee “Most Dangerous Celebrity on the Web” here). The rest of the top 10 personalities used by spammers include:

Other notables on the list are:

Notable for their absence from the list are:

rb-

The use of celebrities to promote malware and spam is deeply rooted in social networking and Web 2.0. In 2009, Barracuda Networks identified a ‘Twitter crimewave’ on Twitter after popular celebrities joined the service to tweet to fans. Criminals followed the celebrities to the new service sensing a new population of easy-to-fool users, using a range of techniques including impersonation and simple link spamming to draw people to malware-infested websites. Facebook still has a major problem with celebrity abuse.

This may seem trivial because most firms have set up gateways to filter these spam-mails from hapless users’ inboxes. However, there are enough users that ignore the warnings and open spam-mails to make spamming on a vast scale worthwhile to the spammers.

Related articles

What do you think?

Who is your favorite late nigt host?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.