Tag Archive for GOOG

Blackberry is Dead – Long Live Blackberry

Blackberry is Dead - Long Live BlackberryLast week BlackBerry (BB) tweeted that they were letting their agreement with the Chinese electronics group TCL Communication lapse at the end of August 2020. This most likely is the end of the BlackBerry smartphone. TCL had been manufacturing BlackBerry smartphones since the Canadian company stopped making its name-sake phones in 2016 amid an attempt to re-shape itself into a cyber-security company.

BlackBerry’s preceded the iPhone and Android in important ways. How did the Blackberry phone go from world domination to last week’s announcement?

Blackberry history

March 1984: Research in Motion (RIM) was founded in Canada.

October 1997: RIM went public with an IPO on the Toronto Stock Exchange which raised $115 million.

July 1998: The RIM 850 the initial BlackBerry device offered something all its competitors couldn’t touch at the time – access to emails on the go (no voice).

1999: RIM joined NASDAQ as RIMM.

November 2001: Patent holding company NTP sued RIM for patent infringement RIM lost and was forced to settle for $612.5M in 2006.

March 2002: BlackBerry 5810 released, with both voice and data support. It ran on a 2G network and came with a color screen. It became the device of choice in corporate America due to its enterprise-level security.

BlackBerry Messenger2005:  RIM launched a proprietary mobile instant-messaging application BlackBerry Messenger. BBM came at a time when other mobile messaging options — like SMS messages — were subpar.

March 2007: The company “restated” $250M earnings relating to a “backdating” stock options scandal. RIM executives changed the date of stock sales to a low share price date to make money on their stock options. The scandal cost RIM’s co-CEOs Balsillie and Lazaridis and others their jobs at RIM and a total of C$77M in fines.

January 2007: Apple launched its first iPhone, opening the market to full touch screen phones.

January 2007 Apple launched its first iPhone,June 2007: BlackBerry had some 8 million customers.

October 2008: First Android-powered smartphone is released.

November 2008: BlackBerry launched the ill-fated Storm, its first full touch phone in reaction to iPhone.

September 2009: BlackBerry hits 20.7% worldwide smartphone market share in Q3. iPhone is at 17.1% and Android at 3.5%.

April 2010: Apple released the original iPad.

April 2011: RIM released the PlayBook tablet as a knee-jerk reaction to the success of the Apple iPad. Contributing to the PlayBook’s poor sales was the dumb decision to not offer email services without a BlackBerry smartphone.

July 2011: 10% of RIM workforce (2,000 workers) laid off.

October 2011: RIM had a global failure of its infrastructure – users are left without service for four days (Oct 10-13).

June 2012 RIM announces 5,000 layoffsJune 2012: RIM announced 5,000 layoffs.

January 2013: The company changed its name from Research in Motion to Blackberry and goes from RIMM to BBRY on the NASDAQ.

September 2013: BlackBerry peaked with 79 million global users and 4,500 employees are laid-off (40% of staff).

November 2013: John Chen becomes CEO and starts to pivot BBRY from a phone maker to a security firm.

September 2015: BlackBerry launched the Priv, the first Android-powered BlackBerry smartphone. BlackBerry acquired mobile security provider Good Technology for $425M and integrated it into the BlackBerry Enterprise Mobility Suite, for its enterprise customers.

September 2016: Blackberry becomes Blackberry Limited and stops making smartphones and outsource all hardware development and manufacturing.

BlackBerry users plummets to 11 million.May 2017: The number of BlackBerry users plummets from 80 million to 11 million.

October 2017: BlackBerry Ltd moved from NASDAQ as BBRY to BB on the NYSE.

November 2018: BlackBerry Limited purchased security firm Cylance for $1.4B.

May 2019: BBM for consumers is shut down.

The Blackberry Limited tweet marks the end of a line of devices that revolutionized mobile productivity for the enterprise. For the uninitiated (those under 30) in its heyday, Blackberry set the bar for mobile innovation. BlackBerry smartphones or “crackberries” as many referred to them helped set the stage for many of the mobile features we rely on today.

Blackberry Curve_8320The company made its own hardware which included a QWERTY keyboard. Qwerty keyboards that made it easier to fire off emails and instant messages. BlackBerry smartphones were the best way to stay connected without a laptop.

BlackBerry Mobile Services provided business users with quick encrypted end-to-end email over a low bandwidth connection. BMS also provided users access to not only their contacts, calendar, and email, but connected enterprise apps and data.

Back in the day when I was sharing technical services we even stood up a Blackberry Enterprise Server (BES) for our customers to link their BBeries to Exchange. BES was sold as a highly secure BES platform that ensured the content was always encrypted and uncrackable.

Holger Mueller, the principal analyst at Constellation Research, pointed out to TargetTech the irony of BlackBerry’s fall.

That’s the irony — users and CIOs got rid of [their] BlackBerrys despite email volume being up … Business users went from being productive on the go to [becoming] lurkers and [doing] email at night.

Tuong Nguyen, a senior principal analyst at Gartner, told TargetTech the BlackBerry smartphone relevance disappeared well before this week’s announcement.

By the time the company stopped making its own phones, its global smartphone market share was well under 1% .. In fact, they had started dipping under the 1% threshold [around] 2013-2014.

rb-

I think the market has space for a productivity-oriented company that respects its users. But to unseat Apple, that firm would have to excel at something else, like folding screens, projection, AR/VR.

Why Blackberry phones are deadThe original BlackBerry company — BlackBerry Limited — now focuses on security software. This is ironic since the Snowden papers revealed that the NSA has access to user data on BlackBerry devices.

In the end BlackBerry, just like Nokia, Palm and Microsoft underestimated the challenge from Apple  Perhaps BlackBerry needs to be done with phones.

Related article

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

EULA – The Biggest Lie on the Web

EULA - The Biggest Lie on the WebTuesday, January 28, 2020, is international Data Privacy Day (DPD). The purpose of Data Privacy Day is to raise awareness and promote privacy and data protection best practices. One privacy best practice is to actually read the end-user license agreements (EULA) that come with everything you download from the Internet.

ead the end-user license agreements (EULA)If you can’t wade through the legal gibberish telling you they are going to sell all your data to someone you never heard of? I don’t blame you – two law professors analyzed the terms and conditions of 500 popular U.S. websites and found that more than 99% of them were “unreadable,” far exceeding the level most American adults read at but are still enforced. The researchers wrote that the average readability level of the EULA agreements they reviewed was comparable to articles in academic journals – take a look at “Terms of Service; Didn’t Read (ToS;DR).

EULA grades

ToS;DR is a project started to help fix the “biggest lie on the web”: almost no one really reads the terms of service we agree to all the time. The service grades website EULA’s from Amazon to Zappos from A (best) to E (worst) once a comprehensive list of cases has been reviewed by volunteers. Some of the ratings are:

  • grades websites from Amazon to ZapposA – The best terms of services: they treat you fairly, respect your rights, and will not abuse your data.
  • B – The terms of services are fair towards the user but they could be improved.
  • C – The terms of service are okay but some issues need your consideration.
  • D The terms of service are very uneven or there are some important issues that need your attention.
  • E The terms of service raise very serious concerns.
  • No Class Yet ToS;DR has not sufficiently reviewed the terms yet.

Here are the privacy ratings of the FAANG largest websites according to ToS;DR:

There are a few sites that respect users privacy and get a Class A rating from ToS;DR:

  1. DuckDuckGo search engineDuckDudkGo (Search engine),
  2. Kolab Now (Email/groupware),
  3. SeenThis (Advertising),
  4. WindowsLogic Productions (Software developer).

Other well-known sites with ToS;DR ratings:

  1. IMDb = Class C,
  2. YouTube = Class D,
  3. Twitter = Class D,
  4. Stack Overflow Class E.

You can download the ToS;DR:browser extensions here.

Related article

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

Your Smart TV is Spying On You

Your Smart TV is Spying On YouMany people will find a smart TV under their tree this year. Smart TVs are like regular televisions but with an internet connection. The global smart TVs market is expected to reach 249.9M units by 2024. And all those smart TVs may be spying on you. A while ago I wrote about Vizio (VZIO) getting caught invading your privacy by collecting and selling your personal data. Despite the fact that Vizo had to pay a $2.2M fine, smart TV manufacturers continue to spy on their customers.

Data leakZDNet reports that that smart TVs send user data to tech titans including Facebook (FB), Google (GOOG), and Netflix. These devices are spying on you even when they are idle. U.S. and UK researchers say smart television sets produced by popular vendors including Samsung (005930), Apple (AAPL), and LG (LGLD), alongside content and app streaming devices such as Amazon (AMZN) FireTV, and Roku, are sending out information potentially without the knowledge or consent of users.

Smart TV's sharing users' personal data

Financial Times

Your Smart TV is Spying On You

In a paper titled, “Information Exposure From Consumer IoT Devices” (PDF), the team said that 34,586 controlled experiments found that 88% of devices send information to firms other than the device manufacturer; 56% of U.S. devices and 83.8% of UK devices send your info overseas. They also report every device they studied exposed some kind of information in plain-text.

eavesdroppingThe researchers from Northeastern University and Imperial College London found that 37% could “reliably inferred” user and device behavior from eavesdropping on the user’s interactions with television sets and other household IoT products.

The study found that almost half of the tested devices contacted Amazon. That includes devices not manufactured by Amazon. David Choffnes, one of the authors of the paper warns that Amazon has a lot of information about what you are doing in your home.

According to the paper location data and IP addresses were commonly sent by our IoT devices to third parties in the cloud including Netflix, Spotify, Microsoft (MSFT), Akamai (AKAM), and Google.

Netflix logoWhen it came to smart TVs, however, almost all of the devices included in the study would contact Netflix — whether or not a TV was configured with an account for the content streaming service. “This, at the very least, exposes information to Netflix about the model of [a] TV at a given location,” the paper reads.

Some of the tech titans collecting your data responded to the researchers.

  • Facebook said that it was “common” for services with Facebook integrated into them to send data to third-party services.
  • Netflix said that data transfers were “confined to how Netflix performs and appears on screen,” and
  • Google said user preferences and consent levels dictate how publishers “may share data with Google’s that’s similar to data used for ads in apps or on the web.”

Internet-connected smart TVs combined with streaming services like Netflix and Hulu seem to be a cord-cutter’s dream. But like anything else that connects to the internet, it opens up smart TVs to security vulnerabilities and hackers. But as is the case with most other internet-connected devices, manufacturers often don’t put security as a priority. Not only that, many smart TVs come with a camera and a microphone that attackers can access.

FBI warning

FBI issued a warning about smart TVsBecause manufacturers don’t put security as a priority, the FBI issued a warning about the risks that smart TVs pose. The FBI warned that hackers can take control of your unsecured smart TV and in worst cases, take control of the camera and microphone to watch and listen in.

… TV manufacturers and app developers may be listening and watching you, that television can also be a gateway for hackers to come into your home … your unsecured TV can give him or her an easy way in the backdoor through your router.

TechCrunch notes that some of the biggest attacks targeting smart TVs were developed by the CIA, but were stolen. The files were later published online by WikiLeaks.

rb-

If you are interested in inspecting the IoT network traffic in your smart home, Princeton University has developed and released an open source tool called IoT Inspector. The software uses ARP spoofing to analyze what IoT devices are connected to the Internet, how much data is exchanged, and how often information is traded.

Related Posts

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

Quantum Supremacy

Quantum SupremacyThere are reports are that Google (GOOG) has demonstrated quantum supremacy. In quantum computing, quantum supremacy means that a quantum computer is able to perform a calculation that is practically impossible for a classical computer. Before we fear and weep for the western dream, ScienceAlert explains that we can’t be sure of the claim.

Shortly after the research article was uploaded to the NASA site it was withdrawn for unknown reasons. The news was originally broken by the paywalled Financial Times, which reported both seeing the paper and also that it was subsequently taken down. Now there are only copies of the original paper available online. Further, Google has not officially explained to anybody what’s going on, sparking no end of speculation online about what has or hasn’t happened.

Assuming the briefly released paper, is real – why is this important? Wired explains that the Google researchers used a quantum processor called Sycamore, with 54 qubits. It tackled a random sampling problem – that is, checking that a set of numbers has a truly random distribution. ScienceAlert says the experimental quantum processor took about 200 seconds to solve a particular computational problem.

As part of the experiment, they set a version of the same challenge to some powerful Google server clusters, as well as to the current world’s fastest supercomputer, the IBM-built Summit supercomputer at Oak Ridge National Lab. The state-of-the-art supercomputer would require approximately 10,000 years to perform the same task.

According to copies (PDF) of the vanished report,

This dramatic speedup relative to all known classical algorithms provides an experimental realization of quantum supremacy on a computational task and heralds the advent of a much-anticipated computing paradigm

Summit SupercomputerIn the Wired article, John Preskill, the Caltech professor who coined the term “quantum supremacy,” calls the breakthrough, if accurate, ”truly impressive achievement in experimental physics.” But he and other experts, and even Google’s own paper, caution that the result doesn’t mean quantum computers are ready for practical work. Professor Preskill explains, “The problem their machine solves with astounding speed has been very carefully chosen just for the purpose of demonstrating the quantum computer’s superiority.

Professor Preskill told Wired,  it’s unclear how long it will take quantum computers to become commercially useful; breaking encryption—a theorized use for the technology—remains a distant hope. “That’s still many years out,” says Jonathan Dowling, a professor at Louisiana State University and New Scientist said although that is impressive, there is no practical use for it.

Will Oliver, a quantum specialist at MIT, told Technology Review, the computing milestone is similar to the first flight of the Wright brothers at Kitty Hawk in aviation. He said it would give added impetus to research in the field, which should help quantum machines achieve their promise more quickly.

1904 Wright Flyer

New Scientist says there are plenty of hurdles left to overcome before quantum computing hits the big time. The author cites a number of steps:

For a start, the processors need to be more powerful. Google’s Sycamore quantum computer, consisted of only 54 qubits. For quantum computers to really come into their own, they will probably need thousands. Scaling up the number of qubits won’t be easy. Qubits must be isolated from vibrations as they can be easily disturbed.

Next quantum computers need error-correcting codes. Classical computers have mechanisms to make sure that when little mistakes happen they are automatically rectified.

The same will be needed for quantum computers, especially considering the delicate nature of qubits. The challenge now is to build a quantum computer that has quantum supremacy, as well as error-correcting codes.

The final, biggest step is to actually do something useful. Google’s quantum computer tackled a task specifically tailored  to prove quantum supremacy, not do anything useful.

New Scientist called the achievement impressive, there is no practical use for it. Ciarán Gilligan-Lee at University College London said, “We shouldn’t get too carried away with this … but there’s still a long way to go.

rb-

This bench-marking task is a proof of concept. SkyNet is not coming –  yet.

Combining quantum with machine learning and AI may be a different story. But for a year or so we are probably safe. Unless of course, some TLA that is already using quantum computing made the paper disappear.

Related articles

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

What is Quantum Computing?

What is Quantum Computing?The world of theoretical physics has been the domain of geniuses like Stephen Hawking and fictional characters such as The Big Bang Theory’s Sheldon Cooper. But now companies like Google (GOOG), IBM (IBM), and Intel (INTC) are building quantum computer systems, that may soon outperform even the fastest supercomputers in the world. So, it’s a good time to learn some basic quantum computing terms and concepts.

It’s physics

Quantum mechanicsQuantum Computing is based on Quantum Physics. Quantum Physics is the arm of modern physics that explains the nature and behavior of matter and energy on the atomic and subatomic levels. It is also called quantum theory and quantum mechanics. Quantum computers use quantum physics to compute.

Before quantum physics, “classical” physics explained the world around us (calculations of speeds, rotations, weights, forces …).  Then came Einstein who explained the “infinitely large”, the universe, time, big bang, black holes… But the classic mechanics did not explain everything and this is where quantum physics, steps in. The world of atoms, the infinitely small, does not work like the world that we, humans, see every day. The algebra story problems about a ball bouncing off a wall at 37 degrees and landing 43 feet away no longer apply in the world of quantum physics. Quantum computing devices use these newly discovered properties to perform computations using quantum bits, or qubits.

Classical computers

EinsteinPierre Pinna at IPFCOnline explains that the “classical” computer sitting on your desk, manipulates information (software, texts, pictures, videos, etc.). Inside your laptop, this information is made up of “1” and “0”. All computers have one (or more) micro-processors that manipulate the “0” and “1”, by applying the basic operations (addition, subtraction, multiplication) to “order” the 1’s and 0’s into software, texts, pictures, videos, etc.

The 1’s and 0’s are physically created by electric current inside transistors. Each transistor can be on or off, which indicates the 1 or 0 to be used to compute the next step in a program.

When the transistor is open, the electric current does not pass through the transistor and we say that we are in the state “0” and conversely if the transistor is closed, the electrical current can pass through it, we are in state “1”. The transistors inside the CPU can be combined into logic gates to perform logic operations like “OR”, “XOR”, “AND.” The classical computers 1’s and 0’s are called “bits.”

Quantum computers

Quantum bitsQuantum computers also handle “1” and “0” just like your laptop. But the information is no longer manipulated by transistors but by atomic and subatomic particles (electrons, protons, ions, photons, neutrons, etc.). You know, the stuff they taught in Mr. Birchmeier’s high school science class. Quantum computers don’t use bits; they use quantum bits (qubits). And that’s where quantum computing gets interesting – the subatomic world does not work like the physical world we live in.  Quantum physics explains how the subatomic world works.

Tristan Greene at TNW writes that qubits have extra functions that bits don’t. Instead of only being represented as a 1 or 0, qubits can actually be both at the same time. Mr. Greene writes that qubits, when unobserved, are considered to be “spinning.” Instead of referring to these types of “spin qubits” using ones or zeros, they’re measured in states of “up,” “down,” and “both.”

This lab at IBM houses quantum machines connected to the cloud.

The IPFCOnline article explains that to better understand all of this, we must see each particle as a wave and not a single physical element. The particles are then characterized by their “spin” to create a state called superposition.

Mr. Greene at TNW writes that quantum superposition in qubits can be explained by flipping a coin. We know that the coin will land in one of two states: heads or tails. This is how classical computers think. While the coin is still spinning in the air, the coin is actually in both states at the same time. Essentially until the coin lands, it has to be considered both heads and tails simultaneously.

Quantum computing use superposition

Observation theorySuperposition is based on Observation theory. Observation theory basically says the universe acts one way when we’re looking, another way when we aren’t. Mr. Pinna at IPFCOnline writes that with superposition, while we do not know what the state of any object is, it is actually in all possible states simultaneously, as long as we don’t look to check. To illustrate this theory, we can use the famous and somewhat cruel analogy of Schrodinger’s Cat using a cat in a box as being both alive and dead at the same time.

All of these sub-atomic activities make the quantum computer very sensitive to disturbances from the outside world. When quantum computers are disturbed they become unstable, and revert to “classical computers.” In order to keep the quantum properties of the system, it must be protected from the outside world. According to the article, this is typically done by cooling the quantum computer to temperatures very close to absolute zero (-273.145°C – colder than in space). Another factor when working with qubits is noise. The more qubits a system has, the more errors you get.

All of these factors make working with qubits incredibly difficult. These challenges are made worse by the unsustainable amount of electricity currently needed to generate quantum computing results. Reports are that one quantum computer burns about 20 megawatts of electricity — enough to power 20,000 households.

Therefore, the current state-of-the-art quantum computing theoretical speed gain is limited by the cost, size, and instability of the system. Right now, quantum computers aren’t worth the trouble and money they take to build and operate. A quantum computer is not going to run MS Word on your desktop.

Related article

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.