Tag Archive for Google

COVID On Your Cell Phone

COVID On Your Cell PhoneAmid the chaos of the COVID-19 lock-down one of your only allies in the social distancing campaign is your cell phone. Right? After all, everybody is attached to their mobile phone. In fact, research has shown that millennials check their phones 150 times a day (PDF). Why do we check our cell phones so much?

Researchers from the University of Illinois found in a recent study that 37% of women and 30% of men walking down the street have a smartphone in their hand. The UofI researchers Laura Schaposnik and James Unwin paper The Phone Walkers: A study of human dependence on inactive mobile devices propose four plausible reasons that pedestrians practice this behavior.

Appeasement – The first proposal is that we need immediate access to our phones now because so much of our social lives exist on the phone. In particular, research suggests that people in romantic relationships expect to be texted back within five minutes. We keep our phones out to appease partners.

anxiety if separated from mobile phonesAnxiety – The researcher’s next hypothesis was that we might be psychologically dependent on these phones to the point that we have anxiety if we’re separated from them. The researchers write. “… the simple manipulation of the object could lead to a corresponding decrease in tension or anxiety ….”

Safety – Personal safety is another distinct possibility. Research has found that technology gives young people confidence when facing the potential dangers of crime in a public place. The UofI team says we “..may hold their phones both for personal reassurance against perceived threats and as a visible warning sign to potential assailants.

peacock effectThe peacock effect – We might want to impress a possible partner with our fancy phones. The researchers compared the phenomenon to “displays of affluence by wearing designer fashion clothes or jewelry … to enhance or affirm a person’s social standing and to attract a suitable mate.

We are addicted to our cell phones so what? I have covered the germiness of mobiles on the Bach Seat before. But in the wake of recent events, I checked on current thinking and found that COVID-19 is probably on your mobile. German researchers reported (PDF) in the Journal of Hospital Infection that Coronaviruses can live on inanimate surfaces like metal, glass, or plastic, and remain infectious “from 2 hours up to 9 days.

Coronaviruses can live on surfaces like metal, glass, or plastic, and remain infectious "from 2 hours up to 9 days."Lead researcher Günter Kampf, M.D., an associated professor at the University of Greifswald, reported that a good strategy for surface disinfection is with a solution that contains 0.1% sodium hypochlorite or 62 to 71% ethanol. Either of these “significantly reduces coronavirus infectivity on surfaces within 1 min exposure time.

Charles Gerba, Ph.D., professor of microbiology and immunology at The University of Arizona, told Mens Health

…What we found … in office buildings is that you touch a surface with a virus on it and then you place it on your cell phone.” (A door handle, for example.) … You then go home or to another location and you touch your phone again a touch a table moving it to another location—great way to spread viruses around an office.

great way to spread viruses around an officeDr. Kampf warns,Check with the manufacturer. First, it should be effective against coronavirus … Second, not all disinfectants are compatible with the material of the smartphone surface.

Professor Gerba recommends an alcohol wipe or a microfiber cloth. “I would do it every time I have been out in public,” he says.

rb-

To safely clean your mobile:

Related article

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

Son of Facebook Phone

Son of Facebook PhoneThe tech world never learns from its mistakes. Rumors are that data-leaker Facebook is combining two bad ideas, software from Windows NT with FB hardware. The Verge reports that Facebook is developing its own operating system. Facebook’s effort is being led by Mark Lucovsky, who co-authored the Windows NT operating system.

Could the FB OS be the greatest thing since?The reports say the FB OS could be used on Facebook’s hardware products. Oculus, Portal, and forthcoming augmented reality glasses, code-named “Orion,” currently run on a modified version of Google’s Android. FB wants to reduce or remove entirely the control GOOG has over its hardware.

Ficus Kirkpatrick, who heads Facebook’s AR and VR group hedges his bets, he told The Verge “it’s possible” that future FB hardware won’t rely on Google’s software. Facebook’s head of hardware, Andrew Bosworth is more definitive, “… we’re gonna do it ourselves.

Facebook phone crashed and burned almost immediately.The Verge points out that Facebook’s last attempt at producing its own OS did not go so well. The Facebook phone, or, more precisely, the Facebook phone mobile operating system, crashed and burned almost immediately. Unveiled in 2013, Mark Zuckerberg promised the $99 device would “turn your Android phone into a great social device.

It didn’t exactly work out that way. Instead, shortly after the Facebook phone went on sale, the price dropped to 99 cents. The operating system was called out as mediocre, and early adopters complained that it was counter-intuitive and hard to — of all things — place a phone call. By 2014, the New York Times reported that Facebook had disbanded the mobile OS engineering team.

The FB mobile OS attempt resulted in a forked version of Android that ran on an HTC produced phone back in 2013. Flooding a phone with Facebook’s social feed was wildly unpopular even back before Facebook’s brand was tarnished with numerous privacy scandals. Facebook will have an uphill battle on its hands if it wants people to give its software another shot.

For those with short memories FB has leaked nearly 1 billion personal data records that we know about since 2018:

The idea of another FB OS gets even scarier when you add the legacy of Windows NT on top of FB’s lack of respect for its user privacy. The for uninitiated, Windows NT was released in 1993. It was Microsoft’s first foray into a network operating system (NOS). WinNT had a number of issues that made the Blue Screen of Death (BSOD) a household phrase.

Blue Screen of DeathA blue screen occurs when Windows encounters a “STOP Error.” This critical failure causes Windows to crash and stop working. The only thing Windows can do at that point is to restart the PC. This can lead to data loss, as programs don’t have a chance to save their open data. FB has put Mark Lucovsky, who co-authored the Windows NT operating system in charge of writing the FB OS. Some of the more notable problems with WinNT included,

  • Allowing the default user to run at admin/root privilege without a password.
  • Noted cryptographer Bruce Schneier, noted that part of Windows NT 4.0 is so broken it can’t be fixed with patches. Schneier said, “Last time they released a fix, it broke so many other parts of Windows NT.”
  • WinNT did not support USB.
  • NTVDM (also known as Windows on Windows, or WOW) that blocked access to the hardware so that legacy applications would run as though on a DOS computer, except without access to protected areas of memory. This resulted in a substantial number of applications simply did not work.

rb-

People back then perhaps thought better of letting Facebook on their phones. Toward the end of the decade, it seems we’ve come full circle

The rumor mill also says Facebook is working on a brain control interface for its devices, which could allow users to control them with their thoughts. But of course, that also means that FB could have access to the user’s brain – and sell their thoughts and then your brain will throw a BSOD, and will you have to reboot your brain to recover.- I’m just saying……

Related article

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

Blackberry is Dead – Long Live Blackberry

Blackberry is Dead - Long Live BlackberryLast week BlackBerry (BB) tweeted that they were letting their agreement with the Chinese electronics group TCL Communication lapse at the end of August 2020. This most likely is the end of the BlackBerry smartphone. TCL had been manufacturing BlackBerry smartphones since the Canadian company stopped making its name-sake phones in 2016 amid an attempt to re-shape itself into a cyber-security company.

BlackBerry’s preceded the iPhone and Android in important ways. How did the Blackberry phone go from world domination to last week’s announcement?

Blackberry history

March 1984: Research in Motion (RIM) was founded in Canada.

October 1997: RIM went public with an IPO on the Toronto Stock Exchange which raised $115 million.

July 1998: The RIM 850 the initial BlackBerry device offered something all its competitors couldn’t touch at the time – access to emails on the go (no voice).

1999: RIM joined NASDAQ as RIMM.

November 2001: Patent holding company NTP sued RIM for patent infringement RIM lost and was forced to settle for $612.5M in 2006.

March 2002: BlackBerry 5810 released, with both voice and data support. It ran on a 2G network and came with a color screen. It became the device of choice in corporate America due to its enterprise-level security.

BlackBerry Messenger2005:  RIM launched a proprietary mobile instant-messaging application BlackBerry Messenger. BBM came at a time when other mobile messaging options — like SMS messages — were subpar.

March 2007: The company “restated” $250M earnings relating to a “backdating” stock options scandal. RIM executives changed the date of stock sales to a low share price date to make money on their stock options. The scandal cost RIM’s co-CEOs Balsillie and Lazaridis and others their jobs at RIM and a total of C$77M in fines.

January 2007: Apple launched its first iPhone, opening the market to full touch screen phones.

January 2007 Apple launched its first iPhone,June 2007: BlackBerry had some 8 million customers.

October 2008: First Android-powered smartphone is released.

November 2008: BlackBerry launched the ill-fated Storm, its first full touch phone in reaction to iPhone.

September 2009: BlackBerry hits 20.7% worldwide smartphone market share in Q3. iPhone is at 17.1% and Android at 3.5%.

April 2010: Apple released the original iPad.

April 2011: RIM released the PlayBook tablet as a knee-jerk reaction to the success of the Apple iPad. Contributing to the PlayBook’s poor sales was the dumb decision to not offer email services without a BlackBerry smartphone.

July 2011: 10% of RIM workforce (2,000 workers) laid off.

October 2011: RIM had a global failure of its infrastructure – users are left without service for four days (Oct 10-13).

June 2012 RIM announces 5,000 layoffsJune 2012: RIM announced 5,000 layoffs.

January 2013: The company changed its name from Research in Motion to Blackberry and goes from RIMM to BBRY on the NASDAQ.

September 2013: BlackBerry peaked with 79 million global users and 4,500 employees are laid-off (40% of staff).

November 2013: John Chen becomes CEO and starts to pivot BBRY from a phone maker to a security firm.

September 2015: BlackBerry launched the Priv, the first Android-powered BlackBerry smartphone. BlackBerry acquired mobile security provider Good Technology for $425M and integrated it into the BlackBerry Enterprise Mobility Suite, for its enterprise customers.

September 2016: Blackberry becomes Blackberry Limited and stops making smartphones and outsource all hardware development and manufacturing.

BlackBerry users plummets to 11 million.May 2017: The number of BlackBerry users plummets from 80 million to 11 million.

October 2017: BlackBerry Ltd moved from NASDAQ as BBRY to BB on the NYSE.

November 2018: BlackBerry Limited purchased security firm Cylance for $1.4B.

May 2019: BBM for consumers is shut down.

The Blackberry Limited tweet marks the end of a line of devices that revolutionized mobile productivity for the enterprise. For the uninitiated (those under 30) in its heyday, Blackberry set the bar for mobile innovation. BlackBerry smartphones or “crackberries” as many referred to them helped set the stage for many of the mobile features we rely on today.

Blackberry Curve_8320The company made its own hardware which included a QWERTY keyboard. Qwerty keyboards that made it easier to fire off emails and instant messages. BlackBerry smartphones were the best way to stay connected without a laptop.

BlackBerry Mobile Services provided business users with quick encrypted end-to-end email over a low bandwidth connection. BMS also provided users access to not only their contacts, calendar, and email, but connected enterprise apps and data.

Back in the day when I was sharing technical services we even stood up a Blackberry Enterprise Server (BES) for our customers to link their BBeries to Exchange. BES was sold as a highly secure BES platform that ensured the content was always encrypted and uncrackable.

Holger Mueller, the principal analyst at Constellation Research, pointed out to TargetTech the irony of BlackBerry’s fall.

That’s the irony — users and CIOs got rid of [their] BlackBerrys despite email volume being up … Business users went from being productive on the go to [becoming] lurkers and [doing] email at night.

Tuong Nguyen, a senior principal analyst at Gartner, told TargetTech the BlackBerry smartphone relevance disappeared well before this week’s announcement.

By the time the company stopped making its own phones, its global smartphone market share was well under 1% .. In fact, they had started dipping under the 1% threshold [around] 2013-2014.

rb-

I think the market has space for a productivity-oriented company that respects its users. But to unseat Apple, that firm would have to excel at something else, like folding screens, projection, AR/VR.

Why Blackberry phones are deadThe original BlackBerry company — BlackBerry Limited — now focuses on security software. This is ironic since the Snowden papers revealed that the NSA has access to user data on BlackBerry devices.

In the end BlackBerry, just like Nokia, Palm and Microsoft underestimated the challenge from Apple  Perhaps BlackBerry needs to be done with phones.

Related article

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

EULA – The Biggest Lie on the Web

EULA - The Biggest Lie on the WebTuesday, January 28, 2020, is international Data Privacy Day (DPD). The purpose of Data Privacy Day is to raise awareness and promote privacy and data protection best practices. One privacy best practice is to actually read the end-user license agreements (EULA) that come with everything you download from the Internet.

ead the end-user license agreements (EULA)If you can’t wade through the legal gibberish telling you they are going to sell all your data to someone you never heard of? I don’t blame you – two law professors analyzed the terms and conditions of 500 popular U.S. websites and found that more than 99% of them were “unreadable,” far exceeding the level most American adults read at but are still enforced. The researchers wrote that the average readability level of the EULA agreements they reviewed was comparable to articles in academic journals – take a look at “Terms of Service; Didn’t Read (ToS;DR).

EULA grades

ToS;DR is a project started to help fix the “biggest lie on the web”: almost no one really reads the terms of service we agree to all the time. The service grades website EULA’s from Amazon to Zappos from A (best) to E (worst) once a comprehensive list of cases has been reviewed by volunteers. Some of the ratings are:

  • grades websites from Amazon to ZapposA – The best terms of services: they treat you fairly, respect your rights, and will not abuse your data.
  • B – The terms of services are fair towards the user but they could be improved.
  • C – The terms of service are okay but some issues need your consideration.
  • D The terms of service are very uneven or there are some important issues that need your attention.
  • E The terms of service raise very serious concerns.
  • No Class Yet ToS;DR has not sufficiently reviewed the terms yet.

Here are the privacy ratings of the FAANG largest websites according to ToS;DR:

There are a few sites that respect users privacy and get a Class A rating from ToS;DR:

  1. DuckDuckGo search engineDuckDudkGo (Search engine),
  2. Kolab Now (Email/groupware),
  3. SeenThis (Advertising),
  4. WindowsLogic Productions (Software developer).

Other well-known sites with ToS;DR ratings:

  1. IMDb = Class C,
  2. YouTube = Class D,
  3. Twitter = Class D,
  4. Stack Overflow Class E.

You can download the ToS;DR:browser extensions here.

Related article

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

Your Smart TV is Spying On You

Your Smart TV is Spying On YouMany people will find a smart TV under their tree this year. Smart TVs are like regular televisions but with an internet connection. The global smart TVs market is expected to reach 249.9M units by 2024. And all those smart TVs may be spying on you. A while ago I wrote about Vizio (VZIO) getting caught invading your privacy by collecting and selling your personal data. Despite the fact that Vizo had to pay a $2.2M fine, smart TV manufacturers continue to spy on their customers.

Data leakZDNet reports that that smart TVs send user data to tech titans including Facebook (FB), Google (GOOG), and Netflix. These devices are spying on you even when they are idle. U.S. and UK researchers say smart television sets produced by popular vendors including Samsung (005930), Apple (AAPL), and LG (LGLD), alongside content and app streaming devices such as Amazon (AMZN) FireTV, and Roku, are sending out information potentially without the knowledge or consent of users.

Smart TV's sharing users' personal data

Financial Times

Your Smart TV is Spying On You

In a paper titled, “Information Exposure From Consumer IoT Devices” (PDF), the team said that 34,586 controlled experiments found that 88% of devices send information to firms other than the device manufacturer; 56% of U.S. devices and 83.8% of UK devices send your info overseas. They also report every device they studied exposed some kind of information in plain-text.

eavesdroppingThe researchers from Northeastern University and Imperial College London found that 37% could “reliably inferred” user and device behavior from eavesdropping on the user’s interactions with television sets and other household IoT products.

The study found that almost half of the tested devices contacted Amazon. That includes devices not manufactured by Amazon. David Choffnes, one of the authors of the paper warns that Amazon has a lot of information about what you are doing in your home.

According to the paper location data and IP addresses were commonly sent by our IoT devices to third parties in the cloud including Netflix, Spotify, Microsoft (MSFT), Akamai (AKAM), and Google.

Netflix logoWhen it came to smart TVs, however, almost all of the devices included in the study would contact Netflix — whether or not a TV was configured with an account for the content streaming service. “This, at the very least, exposes information to Netflix about the model of [a] TV at a given location,” the paper reads.

Some of the tech titans collecting your data responded to the researchers.

  • Facebook said that it was “common” for services with Facebook integrated into them to send data to third-party services.
  • Netflix said that data transfers were “confined to how Netflix performs and appears on screen,” and
  • Google said user preferences and consent levels dictate how publishers “may share data with Google’s that’s similar to data used for ads in apps or on the web.”

Internet-connected smart TVs combined with streaming services like Netflix and Hulu seem to be a cord-cutter’s dream. But like anything else that connects to the internet, it opens up smart TVs to security vulnerabilities and hackers. But as is the case with most other internet-connected devices, manufacturers often don’t put security as a priority. Not only that, many smart TVs come with a camera and a microphone that attackers can access.

FBI warning

FBI issued a warning about smart TVsBecause manufacturers don’t put security as a priority, the FBI issued a warning about the risks that smart TVs pose. The FBI warned that hackers can take control of your unsecured smart TV and in worst cases, take control of the camera and microphone to watch and listen in.

… TV manufacturers and app developers may be listening and watching you, that television can also be a gateway for hackers to come into your home … your unsecured TV can give him or her an easy way in the backdoor through your router.

TechCrunch notes that some of the biggest attacks targeting smart TVs were developed by the CIA, but were stolen. The files were later published online by WikiLeaks.

rb-

If you are interested in inspecting the IoT network traffic in your smart home, Princeton University has developed and released an open source tool called IoT Inspector. The software uses ARP spoofing to analyze what IoT devices are connected to the Internet, how much data is exchanged, and how often information is traded.

Related Posts

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.