Tag Archive for Internet protocol suite

Who Runs The Internet

Who Runs The InternetWhile no one “owns” the Internet (for now, despite republican plans) there are a handful of companies that control the Internet. Unless you are a techno-geek, these six organizations that control how the Internet works, most likely fly under your radar.

 

International Telecommunications Union

United Nations International Telecommunications UnionThe first organization that is actively trying to take over the functions of the Internet is the United Nations International Telecommunications Union (ITU). The ITU in my and many other opinions an outdated, pointless throw-back to the days of the telegraph, with policies to match. I covered the last power grabs by the UN’s ITU here.

Internet Architecture Board

Next is the Internet Architecture Board (AIB). The IAB is the overseer of the technical evolution of the Internet. The IAB supervises the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), which oversees the evolution of TCP/IP, and the Internet Research Task Force (IRTF), which works on network technology.

Internet Architecture BoardThe IAB declared a major strategic move for the Internet. The Internet Architecture Board is calling for global encryption on the web (which I have covered many times from my Bach Seat) to become the norm across the Internet in a move to lock down the privacy and security of information exchange according to Dark Reading.

Internet Engineering Task Force

Internet Engineering Task Force

The Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) develops and promotes voluntary Internet standards. It is most well known for the standards that make up the Internet protocol suite (TCP/IP). It is an open standards organization, with no formal membership or membership requirements. All participants and managers are volunteers, though their work is usually funded by their employers or sponsors. The IETF is also well-known for its RFCs or Request for Comment documents like RFC RFC 1918 and RFC 873.

Internet Society

Internet SocietyAnother organization that shapes the Intertubes is ISOC. The Internet Society (which I am a member of) was formed in 1992 by Vint Cerf and Bob Kahn. ISOC was formed to provide a corporate structure to support the Internet standards development process.

Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers

The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) is perhaps the most critical organization that helps run the Internet. ICANN coordinates the distribution of IP addresses and the Internet’s Domain Name System (DNS). IP addresses are the numbers that are assigned to every computer on the Net to uniquely identify each device. There are two types of IP addresses, IPv4 and IPv6. The web has run out of IPv4 addresses (which I covered here and here) and is very slowly being replaced with IPv6 addresses. ICANN doles out these addresses.

Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and NumbersICANN also manages the Domain Naming System (DNS) on the web that converts IP addresses to names. DNS makes it possible to remember www.google.com, which is easy for humans to remember instead of remembering https://web.archive.org/web/20150507211330/http://74.125.224.72/, which is easy for computers to deal with, to get to Google.

The U.S. government funds ICANN. They Feds have gotten heat from around the globe after Eric Snowden’s revaluations about global spying operations. The role of ICANN is changing.

Internet Service Providers

on rampThe only group that makes money on the Internet but does not help run the Internet (yet) are the Internet Service Providers (ISP). ISP’s control nearly everyone accesses it. The gatekeepers to the web are ATT (T), Comcast (CMCSA), Charter (CHTR) and Time Warner Cable (TWC) are the biggest names of ISP’s. ISP’s “perform” two key functions. First, they provide last-mile connections, that is the connection to your home or business to their offices, which we all over-pay for. Next, they provide back-haul or backbone services that move your email across the town or across the globe. The ISP’s also make money on these ISP-ISP connections.

Right now the FCC is considering the future of the Internet during its Net Neutrality decisions. If the ISP’s get their way, it is likely that homes and businesses will be required to pay the ISP’s more money to maintain the crappy service we already get.

 

Six shadowy organizations that run the Internet infographic

rb-

Let’s add this up big business telecom money + millionaire politicians = the 1% screwing the rest of us. Get involved, save the Internet, get in touch with your alleged representatives and tell them NO MORE. 

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

No More POTS!

No More POTS!A.G. Bell‘s question to Watson over a century ago may be relevant again. Tom Nolle at No Jitter explains how that can happen if the FCC expedites the transition to VoIP. Mr. Nolle, the founder of CIMI Corporation does not think that the basic quality of voice service is at risk. He does believe but there are some truly profound consequences to a decision to abandon TDM voice. He believes it will happen, it’s smart to think about the end of POTS — as relates to both opportunities and risks.

70% of business voice is still TDMTelecommunications has long been more than analog voice and copper loops. The author points out that regulations have stayed in the “TDM” Dark Ages. Operators like AT&T (T) have demanded the FCC modernize things. To deal with these issues, the FCC bundled its transitions (TDM-to-VoIP, fixed to mobile, copper to fiber) into a single Technology Transition Policy Task Force. The recommendations from that activity will hopefully launch experiments in promoting change while controlling the risk of unfavorable impacts. The recommendations of the TTPTF (quite the acronym!) are posted online (PDF) and he says it’s a clarion call for change. So instead of talking about the process, let’s look at the impact.

Who still uses TDM

Mr. Nolle the CIMI principal consultant estimates, that 40% of US households still have TDM voice. Businesses have a higher TDM commitment. The article says that nearly 70% of business voice is still TDM. Suppose we saw TDM voice go away completely; what would happen?

Transition access lines and trunks to EthernetFirst, little besides voice that requires TDM services and trunks. Which he says means we would see all access lines and trunks transition to packet–almost certainly to Ethernet. The author says this could increase the number of Ethernet business connections by about 28%. it would also likely increase the access bandwidth commitments by branch offices and SMBs (using DSL, fiber, cable, etc.) by over 50%. Metro and access vendors would benefit from this almost immediately because it’s likely that operators would start to promote Ethernet access and IP voice more strongly as soon as the “experiments” showed signs of success.

Operators already like the notion of an “access-first” strategy where they supply a fat pipe to a customer and then build ad hoc services over it. Ethernet or packet access encourages that, so giving that to everyone would drive operators quickly to look for rapid service deployment tools so that they don’t lose all the new access-generated opportunities to the over-the-top players (OTTs). The author believes that operator interest in software defined networks (SDN) and network functions virtualization (NFV) are linked to this very thing. After all it’s silly to talk about “improved service velocity” if you have to restring an access connection to upgrade service.

Impact on Internet policy

Net neutrailityThe second impact Mr. Nolle sees is on Internet policy. This voice transition raises the question of the difference between “packet” or “IP” and “the Internet”. You can do VoIP over any IP, including private networking. That’s done with a lot of IP voice today in fact. Operators could in theory augment their services to customers by building IP services that bypass the Internet, but that would pose issues in linking the services to current devices in the home or in businesses. OTTs would surely want to get involved in any new service opportunity, and all that raises the triple-threat question of QoS, settlement, and Net Neutrality.

There’s no barrier to QoS in “private” IP networks, but on the Internet, the Net Neutrality order last year said that you could offer QoS only if the subscriber pays for it. Most practical Internet QoS opportunities arise because an OTT like Netflix (NFLX) could gain by offering QoS to customers. They’d pay the ISPs and either embed the cost or perhaps eat it to improve their differentiation. But the FCC said “No!” Now the new FCC Chairman, Tom Wheeler, says “Perhaps”–at least he did in a speech to a university audience. If that were to become policy, it would likely drive QoS for Internet services, and that would drive settlement among ISPs and content players.

QoS stops where the ISP hands off the trafficSettlement has been a big issue for the Internet since the 1990s. Customers pay their own ISP, so if there’s no money flow from that ISP to others, QoS stops where the ISP hands off the traffic. That’s inhibited the value of the Internet for applications that need QoS, but it perhaps encouraged smaller players and startups who couldn’t pay like Google (GOOG) or Netflix could. Whether this small-player benefit is more for VCs who then have to raise less funding to get an OTT off the ground is an interesting question–but in any event, adding settlement and QoS to the Internet would almost certainly increase operator interest in providing service quality for a fee, which in turn would increase network investment, helping equipment vendors and carriers alike… In short, it would change the industry.

Mr. Nolle concludes that VoIP could be a back door to making the Internet a real network and not a service on top of carrier IP infrastructure. That could remake our experiences online, and the vendors’ fortunes in the marketplace. So watch the progress of this initiative; it could have huge impacts.

rb-

ATT has already made its move to get rid of POTS lines in Michigan. ATT has bribed gotten politicians in Lansing to introduce Senate Bill 636. Michigan SB 636 would amend the Michigan Telecommunications Act (PDF) to let ATT and their fellow travelers eliminate POTS lines in Michigan.

Melissa Seifert, associate state director for government affairs for AARP Michigan says eliminating POTS lines in the Great Lakes State would impact many people. It would affect small-business owners who use fax machines and credit card verification systems, she said, as well as emergency services in parts of the state where cell phone access is unreliable. According to the Michigan Public Service Commission, roughly 3 million Michiganders subscribe to landline service. About 90 percent of households of folks ages 65 and older still use landlines for “lifelines.”

Related articles

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.