Tag Archive for Malware

Data Breach Is No Monkey Business

ReData Breach Is No Monkey Businessports are emerging that zoo’s across the nation have fallen victim to a POS attack and data breach. MLive warns anyone who made a purchase with a credit card at gift shops at the Detroit Zoo between March 23 and June 25, 2015, might be in danger of having the credit card information stolen. The Detroit Zoo posted a notice which claims that the only systems hacked were those run by Denver-based Service Systems Associates, the third-party responsible for running the systems at the Detroit Zoo’s retail stands.

Detroit ZooSSA posted a notice on their site confirming a breach but no other details. Officials are investigating data breaches of the point-of-sale systems at nine or more U.S. zoos, including the Detroit Zoo. MLive reports that hackers gained access to card holders’ names, expiration dates, CVV security codes in addition to the credit and debit card numbers.

Sources claim the malware has been since identified and removed from the systems, though the case remains under investigation. In response, A separate credit card processing system was installed after the Zoo learned of the breach. Gerry VanAcker, Detroit Zoological Society chief operating officer, said in a release:

We are obviously concerned that the vendor’s system was compromised,” s “Transactions made since June 26 are not affected by the previous breach, and it is safe to use a credit or debit card at SSA’s retail locations.

Data thiefKrebs on Security reports that the attack is widespread. Mr. Krebs cites financial industry sources that say the breach likely involves SSA concession and gift shops at zoo locations in Alabama, Arizona, California, Florida, Hawaii, Idaho, Indiana, Minnesota, Ohio, Oklahoma. Pennsylvania, South Caroline, Texas, and Tennessee.

Systems used at the Detroit Zoo for tickets food sales and membership sales were not affected by the breach and remain secure. Anyone who made a purchase via credit or debit card at a Zoo gift shop should check their bank statements immediately.

Those who expect that their identity has been stolen are asked to contact one of the consumer reporting agencies and place a fraud alert on their credit report.

rb-

Why don’t these POS companies give a damn? I have covered POS data breaches a number of times from the Bach Seat. POS breaches have been the largest source of data disclosure for at least 3 years. Of course, we know the answer, follow the money.

FPOS systemirms like SSA have no accountability. There are no costs or fines or even a demerit on their permanent record when they get breached. It is less costly for companies like SSA to allow a breach to happen than it is to update their systems and stop the attackers.

Maybe that will change in the future. Beginning in October 2015 firms like SSA that have not yet installed card readers which accept more secure chip-based cards will assume responsibility for the cost of fraud from counterfeit cards.  – maybe.

Related articles

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

Mobile Malware FUD?

Mobile Malware FUD?Just last week, I wondered out loud from my Bach Seat if all the hype around mobile malware was real or just more FUD. Looks like I am not alone, TechCo recently asked a similar question, “Are We Overstating the Threats from Mobile Devices?

mobile threatsThe author cites several recent reports that back up the claim that the actual mobile threats that mobile devices introduce into the enterprise are overstated. The data indicates that the mobile malware threat is statistically small and has even decreased since 2012.

• A McAfee report shows out of all the malware now out there, only 1.9% of it is mobile malware. The author equates the mobile threat to 4 million / 195 million McAfee knows about.
• Another report (PDF) from Verizon (VZ) shows even lower numbers, with only 0.03 percent of smartphones being infected with what is called “higher grade malicious code.”
hit by lighting• But some numbers go even lower than that. Damballa, a mobile security vendor that monitors roughly half of mobile data traffic, recently released a report that claims you have a better chance of getting hit by lightning than by mobile malware. Dramballa found only 9,688 smartphones out of more than 150 million showed signs of malware infection. If you do the math, that comes out to an infection rate of 0.0064 percent.

Even more interesting is that despite the increase in mobile devices, Damballa found the infection rate had declined by half compared to 2012.

Walled gardenThese reports may show mobile threats aren’t as big of a problem as previously thought, but the author asks, why the numbers are so low at all. After all, cybercriminals like to target new platforms and exploit security weaknesses. Why do they seem to be avoiding mobile devices?

The truth of the matter is that mobile users tend to get their apps from high-quality app stores. The stores from Google (GOOG) and Apple (AAPL) work to filter out suspicious apps. If malware is found in apps after they’ve already been on the market for a while, app stores can also execute a kill switch, which takes the app off the store and the devices where they were downloaded. This limits malware’s ability to spread.

remotely wipe devicesThe article concludes that companies that adopt BYOD should just ignore BYOD security; they just don’t have to go all-out as many businesses have done. Most mobile security experts say a mobile device management system remains a good investment to make sure mobile devices are handled appropriately. MDM systems also allow an organization to remotely wipe devices, thus keeping sensitive data safe in the event a device is lost or stolen. But malware really isn’t a factor in those cases, so the overall message from these recent reports is that getting worked up over mobile threats is not necessary. A company can still gain all the benefits of BYOD without having to worry incessantly over what they’re doing to protect every device that connects to their network.

rb-

What do you think?

Is mobile malware over-hyped FUD?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

 

Related articles
  • Your BYOD implementation checklist (powermore.dell.com)

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

EDU- The Most Bot-Infested Sector

EDU- The Most Bot-Infested SectorDarkReading confirms, what I have pointed out to Bach Seat readers for a while, education people are terrible at IT security. The latest evidence comes from a BitSight report which concludes that the more bots in-house, the more a company is likely to have reported a data breach. The report finds that the education sector harbors the most botnet infections, according to a new study. The study highlights how bot infections correlate with a higher rate of data breaches.

education sector harbor the most botnet infectionsThe DarkReading article says BitSight, a security ratings firm, studied public breach disclosure data between March 2014 and March 2015 across the finance, retail, healthcare, utilities, and education industries. The study concluded that organizations with a botnet grade of B or below had experienced data breaches at a rate of 2.2 times more than organizations with an A grade. The report says there is a correlation between botnet infestations and data breaches; “This does not mean the infections were the cause of the breaches; rather, it means that the infections and breach incidents are correlated.

The education sector fared poorly. Only 23% of institutions got an A as their botnet grade, and 33% get an F. The main botnets dogging schools and universities:

  • Jadtre (59.2%) – Downloads other malware and steals info;
  • Flashback (22.1%) – The Java exploit targeting Apple OS X;
  • TDSS (8.3%) – Discovered in 2011 It infects the master boot record of the target machine among other things it deletes other malware;
  • Zeus (6%) – Financial credential-stealing malware, and
  • Sality (4.4%) One of the longest-lived botnets. It was first discovered in 2003. Sality is considered to be one of the most complex and formidable forms of malware to date.

Ed TechThe report notes Flashback is malware that targets Apple computers by taking advantage of a Java vulnerability. Mac computers are popular among younger generations and educational institutions, intensifying the proliferation of this malware in education. Although the Flashback botnet itself has largely been shut down, the large number of infections that still exist indicates that people are running machines that have not been updated; thus, they are still vulnerable to other forms of infection.

Other industries received better scores better than Education.
• 74% of Financial Services firms got an A
• 57% of Retailers receive an A grade
• 53% of healthcare received an A grade
• 50% of Utilities received an A

there is a correlation between botnet infestations and data breachesThe report concludes that organizations with bot-infected machines are more likely to report a data breach. “The implications for organizations across industries are that botnet infections cannot be ignored. Companies with poor botnet grades have been breached far more often than those with good grades, and actions should be taken to mitigate these risks.

rb-

Been there done that … EDU people don’t get IT security. They don’t understand how much PII they collect and randomly hang onto. Their systems send data in clear text across the inter-tubes to change schools.

Someone is going to get breached and sued and maybe they will learn.

Related articles

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

25% of Employees Access Past Employers Work Docs

25% of Employees Access Past Employers Work Doc'sMore than 25% of file-sharing service users report still having access to work documents from their previous employer, according to a “Rogue Cloud in Business” survey of 2,000 U.S. adults by Harris Interactive for Egnyte, an enterprise file-sharing platform provider.

uncontrolled file-sharingAccording to FierceITSecurity, the survey highlights the security risks uncontrolled file-sharing practices pose to the work place from these practices are obvious. An Egnyte presser claims The survey results illustrate a major exposure for today’s businesses when it comes to the transfer and storage of data through unapproved and insecure cloud-only file-sharing services.

The new survey uncovers deep issues around the rogue usage of consumer-based cloud services and illustrates the need for IT to deploy a secure enterprise-grade solution that meets the file-sharing needs of employees while protecting sensitive business data from the risks associated with insecure file sharing through the cloud

The survey found that:

  • easy to take sensitive business documents51% agree that collaborating on file-sharing services (such as Dropbox and YouSendIt) is secure for work documents;
  • 46% agree that it would be easy to take sensitive business documents to another employer;
  • 41% agree that they could easily transfer business-sensitive data outside the company using a file-sharing service;
  • 38% have used file-sharing services have transferred sensitive files on an unapproved file-sharing service to someone else at least once; 10% have done it 6 or more times;
  • 31% agree that they would share large documents that are too big for email through a file-sharing service without checking with their IT departments;
  • 27% of file-share service users report still having access to documents from that previous employer.

mobile users are willing to bypass IT policiesAnother report from Workshare paints a grimmer picture for those of us tasked with protecting a firm’s intellectual property. The report titled “Workforce Mobilization” shows the true extent to which mobile users are willing to bypass IT policies and use unsanctioned applications to share large files and collaborate on documents outside of the office.

  • 72% of workers are using free file-sharing services without authorization from their IT departments.
  • 62% of knowledge workers use their personal devices for work.
  • 69% of these workers also use free file sharing services to collaborate and access shared documents.
  • At companies with fewer than 500 employees only 24% of employees using authorized file sharing solutions.

Robert Hamilton, director of information risk management at Symantec (SYMC) in Mountain View, CA also told FierceCIO a continued threat to the company’s data comes from employees who feel like they live in a “finder’s keepers” environment.

Not encouraging

The results of the survey report, entitled “What’s Yours Is Mine,” were not encouraging to IT security professionals and IT management. According to the Symantec survey of employees:

  • "finder's keepers" environment68% of their company doesn’t take proper steps to protect sensitive work information;
  • 56% do not believe it is a crime to use a competitor’s trade secrets;
  • 40% download work files to personal devices;
  • 40% plan to use old company information in a new job role.

Symantec’s Hamilton told FierceCIO:

Employees are taking increasing amounts of data outside the company, and most people do not believe using corporate data for themselves is wrong … The attitude is that ownership lies with the person that created it, not with the company that employs them.

rb-

All three of these firms sell products they claim that can stop a firm’s intellectual property from leaking out through public file-sharing services. But before you engage any firm, some basic steps should be taken.

  1. Develop a technology acceptable use policy.
  2. Include public file-sharing services in the AUP.
  3. Incorporate the AUP in the staff handbook, and make sure staff sign it before they are given network access.
  4. Train staff on the risks associated with using public file sharing services for sharing corporate documents. Risks include HIPAA violations, PII release, Malware, PCI-DSS violations, and Government “Snooping.” Only then –
  5. Engage a service provider to implement an enterprise-approved alternative to the free file-sharing services.
What's Your is Mine

Symantec Infographic

Related articles

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

2014’s Major Web Vulnerabilities

2014's Major Web Vulnerabilities2014 was the year of cyber-security mega-vulnerabilities. What makes mega vulnerabilities unique are they strike at the core of the Internet infrastructure and can impact nearly every connected device and every Internet user on the globe. 2014 saw the emergence of three mega-vulnerabilities Hearbleed, Shellshock, and POODLE.

Heartbleed, Shellshock, and POODLE were the top three major web vulnerabilities uncovered in 2014 according to Fred Donovan at FierceITSecurity. In case you have not heard of this trio of troublemakers, Web security firm Incapsula produced the following infographic.

The Incapsula infographic looks at each of these vulnerabilities and layout when they were discovered, what type of vulnerability they are, what systems and the number that are affected, the risks posed by the vulnerabilities, their severity, how easy they are to exploit, and the difficulty of fixing. Tim Matthews, vice president of marketing for Incapsula wrote in their blog:

What makes these mega vulnerabilities special is that unlike most vulnerabilities that are specific to a particular OS, browser or software application, these three relate to the core Internet infrastructure (e.g., SSL and Linux devices) and, in essence, affect just about every connected device owner and every Internet user on the globe.

Incapsula 2014 Mega Vulnetabilities

rb-

In their blog, Incapsula warns this is the tip of the iceberg of mega-vuln‘s that exploit other structural core functions of the Intertubes. Wired reports that after 8 months, 300,000 machines remain unpatched against Heartbleed.

  • Web Freedom Is Seen as a Growing Global Issue (cacm.acm.org)

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.