Tag Archive for Security

Voice Mail Open to Hacking

Voice Mail Open to HackingMobile carriers ‘proven’ to be open to surveillance and customer ID theft. The New York Times reports on a study by Karsten Nohl, a Berlin hacker and mobile security specialist who found that many mobile operators provided poor protection of voice mail from hacks.

Original mobile phoneIn a study of 31 mobile operators in Europe, Morocco, and Thailand, Mr. Nohl, found that he could hack into mobile conversations and text messages. The NYT says he used an inexpensive, seven-year-old Motorola mobile phone and free decryption software available on the internet.

He tested each mobile operator more than 100 times and ranked the quality of their defenses. He presented the findings at a recent Chaos Computer Club convention. While his research focused mostly on Europe, Mr. Nohl, a German with a computer science doctorate from the University of Virginia, said the level of security provided by network operators in the US was on a par with that provided by European operators, meaning there was room for improvement.

Voice mailIn Asia, the Middle East, and Latin America, mobile security varies widely and can be much lower. Operators in India and China, Mr. Nohl said, encrypt digital traffic poorly or not at all, either to contain operating costs or to allow government censors unfettered access to communications.

In 2009 Mr. Nohl, who runs Security Research Labs in Berlin, published the algorithms used to encrypt voice and data conversations on GSM digital networks, used in Europe and elsewhere.

Cell phne towerAccording to the NYT article, Mr. Nohl focused on deciphering the predictable, standard electronic ”conversations” that take place between a mobile phone and a mobile network at the start of each call. Typically, Nohl said, as many as 40 packets of coded information are sent back and forth, many just simple commands like, ”I have a call for you,” or ”Wait.” Most operators vary little from this set-up procedure, which he said allowed him to use hacking software to make high-speed, educated guesses to decipher the complex algorithmic keys networks use to encrypt transmissions. (rb- seems like the same problem that WEP has)

Once he derived this key, he said, he could intercept voice and data conversations by impersonating another user to listen to the user’s voice-mail messages or make calls or send text messages on the user’s mobile accounts.

Software patchThe author claims operators could easily end this vulnerability in the GSM system, which is found in older 2G networks used by almost every cellphone, including smartphones, with a simple software patch. His research found that only two operators, T-Mobile in Germany and Swisscom in Switzerland, used this enhanced security measure, which involves adding a random digit to the end of each set-up command to thwart decoding. For example, ”I have a call for you 4.”

This is a major vulnerability in most networks we tested, and the irony is that it costs very little, if nothing, to repair,” he said.

really old mobile phonePhilip Lieberman, CEO of Lieberman Software, a LA company that sells identity management software to large businesses and the US government, said much of the digital technology that protects the privacy of mobile calls was developed in the 1980s and 1990s and is ripe for attack.

The researcher found that Telefonica’s O2 network in the Czech Republic, Belgacom Proximus in Belgium, and Orange Switzerland provided the least security preventing the impersonation and use of another’s mobile account details for calling, texting, or other purposes. T-Mobile Slovakia, T-Mobile Germany, and SFR in France had the best.

least effective in guarding against the trackingThe study reports that T-Mobile Slovakia and the Moroccan operators Wana and Medi Telecom were least effective in guarding against the tracking of a cellphone user’s geographic position through the Internet and global positioning satellites had the weakest safeguards; Vodafone Italy, T-Mobile Germany, and Vodafone Germany had the best.

Protect your voice mail

The author concludes that voice mail security does not seem to be a priority for mobile phone networks. Hence, users should be proactive about their privacy. Anyone’s phone can be hacked, if it was easy for Rupert Murdoch’s journalists, it would be easy for anyone to do…

In order to prevent your mobile voice mail from being hacked set an unlock password on your phone. Experts urge you to avoid the following  popular passwords on mobile phones:

  • 1234
  • 0000
  • 2580 (the middle column of numbers on a telephone keypad)
  • 1111
  • 5555Monkey typing
  • 5683 (Spells “LOVE”)
  • 0852 (the middle column of numbers on a telephone keypad in reverse)
  • 2222
  • 1212
  • 1998

Set a secure voice mail password. You shouldn’t need to memorize it as your phone will store the information. In most cases you should be able to do this manually, but if not contact your mobile network.

Maintaining completely different passwords for all of your various telephone and online accounts is vital, if slightly tricky to do.

Change your passwords regularly.

Hang on to your cell phone. Voice mail hacking can be done from your own phone if the device is left unsecured and there is no unlock PIN setup.

Related articles

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

Attacking Electronic Door Access Control Systems

Attacking Electronic Door Access Control SystemsDarkReading pointed out research by independent security researcher, Shawn Merdinger, into vulnerabilities within embedded door access control systems. The researcher investigated the inner workings of electronic door access controls (EDAC). Mr. Merdinger disclosed some of his findings at the 2010 CarolinaCon conference.

S2 Security logoThe DarkReading article Attacking Electronic Door Access Control Systems reports that the researcher found several flaws in the S2 Security NetBox. According to the firm’s website, more than 9,000 customers in 50 countries worldwide use S2 Security Corporation’s integrated security management platforms. Among the flaws in the system, he found an unauthenticated factory reset and unauthorized access to backup data. The author says the first issue is obviously a pretty serious one that could lead to a potential denial of service, but it’s the last one that turns heads.

According to the CarolinaCon presentation, the backup files are stored in a location with predictable file names that do not need authentication to access. Inside a software dump of the electronic door access control system, an attacker can find goodies like the configuration and something that might come in handy like the administrator’s password hash. From there, the attacker can do pretty much anything he or she wants, including unlocking doors at will.

door access control system, administrator’s passwordThe article further states that Mr. Merdinger found that the door access control database also has the user names, passwords, and IP addresses for the network cameras and digital video recorders (DVRs). Now the attacker can watch the facility, learn traffic patterns, and plan for a physical penetration of the facility. The stolen credentials will allow the attacker to turn off cameras and/or recordings during their assault on the facility. To make matters worse, Mr. Merdinger points out that marketing folks for these products will actually state that it’s safe to put these management systems on the Internet. And apparently, people do, because in the presentation he demonstrates production systems that are online with a Shodan search.

DarkReading acknowledges that the presentation doesn’t stop at showing the scary stuff. It takes the next step that most audiences are dying to see, but don’t always get, and that’s how to fix these things as both the vendor and the customer. The blog recommends the video, the detailed paper, and his updated presentation from Hack in the Box 2010 (in Dubai) on attacking electronic door access control systems.

Related articles
  • New Access Control Technology Holds the Key to Safer Schools: Unique RFID-based System Addresses the Shortcomings of Expensive and Inefficient Alternatives (prweb.com)

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

A History of Mac Malware: Part 2

A History of Mac Malware: Part 2Graham Cluley at Sophos recently wrote an excellent history of Apple Macintosh malware. He points out that Mac malware is a subject that raises strong emotions. There are some who believe that the problem is over-hyped and others who believe that the malware problem on Macs is underestimated by the Apple-loving community. The author writes that hopefully, this short history will go some way to present the facts and encourage sensible debate. (rb- We have just taken on a new customer which is 85% Mac and 15% PC. I have had this very conversation with my Apple certified tech who does the field support.)

Click here to read part 1 of the History of Mac Malware. Click here to read my recent series commemorating the 25th anniversary of the computer virus.

Sophos logoBig changes to the Mac malware scene arrived with the release of Mac OS X – a whole new version of the operating system which would mean that much of the old malware would no longer run. All future, Mac-specific malware would have to be written with a new OS in mind.

2004 – The Renepo script worm (also known as “Opener”) attempted to disable Mac OS X security including the Mac OS X firewall. The author reports that the Renepo worm would download and install hacker tools for password-sniffing and cracking, make key system directories world-writable, and create an admin-level user for hackers to later abuse.

Renepo script wormIn 2004, hackers also wrote a proof-of-concept program called Amphimix which demonstrated how executable code could be disguised as an MP3 music file on an Apple (AAPL) Mac. Amphimix appeared to been written as a proof-of-concept highlighting a vulnerability in Apple’s software.

2006 – The first virus for Mac OS X was discovered in 2006. OSX/Leap-A was designed to use the Apple iChat instant messaging system to spread itself to other users. As such, it was comparable to an email or instant messaging worm on the Windows platform.

iChatThe author concludes that it was correct to call OSX/Leap-A a virus or a worm. It was not correct to call OSX/Leap-A a Trojan horse. Not that that stopped many in the Mac community claiming it wasn’t a real virus.

2007 – Sophos discovered an OpenOffice multi-platform macro worm capable of running on Windows, Linux, and Mac computers. The BadBunny worm dropped Ruby script viruses on Mac OS X systems and displayed an indecent JPEG image of a man wearing a rabbit costume.

BadBunny wormThe first financial malware for Mac appeared in 2007. The OSX/RSPlug-A Trojan horse was first detected by researchers at Intego. Mac users infected themselves by downloading and running a fake codec that claimed to help users view pornographic videos. Once on a victim’s Mac, RSPlug changed that machine’s DNS settings so that, while browsing the web, users would redirect to phishing sites or sites containing advertisements for other pornographic sites.

According to Kasperskey’s Threat Post, RSPlug’s various incarnations are all forms of the DNSChanger malware. DNSChanger featured prominently as the target of the FBI’s 2011 take-down of the malware network, dubbed Operation Ghost Click.

2008 – Apple malware became more sophisticated in 2008. Cybercriminals targeted Mac and PC users in equal measure, by planting poisoned ads on TV-related websites. If accessed via an Apple Mac, surfers would be attacked by a piece of Macintosh scareware called MacSweeper. Close relatives of MacSweeper including Imunizator, claimed to find privacy issues on the user’s computer.

The author details the growing sophistication of Mac malware in 2008.

  • Mac scarewareThe OSX/Hovdy-A Trojan horse would steal passwords from Mac OS X users, open the firewall to give access to hackers, and disable security settings.
  • Troj/RKOSX-A a Trojan horse is a Mac OS X tool to assist hackers to create backdoor Trojans, which can give them access and control over your Apple Mac computer.
  • The Jahlav Trojan was similar to other malware campaigns, cybercriminals created a bogus webpage claiming to contain a video. Visiting the site produces a message saying that you don’t have the correct codec installed to watch the video whereupon the site offers you a DMG file for Apple Macs.

Ironically Apple issued a support advisory in 2008 urging customers to run anti-virus software – but after media interest, rapidly deleted the page from their website.

OSX/iWorkS-A Trojan horse2009 – ThreatPost reports that in 2009 Symantec found the OSX/iWorkS-A Trojan horse. The malware was added to a version of Apple’s iWork ’09 software suite that popped up on BitTorrent file sharing sites. The incident was noteworthy because the trojan was packaged with the actual iWork application, so the Mac users, many of which do not use an antivirus solution, would have no reason to suspect that their machines were infected because of the download. The trojan itself communicated with a remote server and was intended to scan machines for data and track Internet history and keystrokes. A new variant of the Trojan was distributed in a pirated version of Adobe (ADBE) Photoshop CS4.

Online video was a major conduit for Mac malware in 2009.

  • Sophos reported on how hackers were planting versions of the RSPlug Trojan horse on websites, posing as an HDTV program called MacCinema.
  • Hackers planted a version of the Jahlav Mac Trojan horse on a website posing as a portal for hardcore porn videos.
  • The Twitter account of celebrity blogger Guy Kawasaki had a malicious link posted onto it, claiming to point to a sex video of Gossip Girl actress Leighton Meester. In reality, however, the link leads unsuspecting users to malware that could infect Mac users.

Leighton MeeterIn 2009 Apple finally began to build some rudimentary anti-malware protection into Mac OS X. Although it wasn’t really equal to a true anti-virus product (it only protected against a handful of Mac malware, doesn’t defend you if you try to copy an infected file from a USB stick for instance, and doesn’t offer clean-up facilities), it was still encouraging to see some attempt to offer more protection for Mac users.

2010 – Throughout 2010 Mac malware was distributed disguised as a legitimate application.

  • The OSX/Pinhead Trojan (aka HellRTS) was disguised as iPhoto, the photo application which ships on modern Macs. The backdoor Trojan horse can allow hackers to gain remote control over your iMac or MacBook.
  • Boonana cross-platform wormA Java applet distributed via Facebook (FB) was used to target not just Windows computers but Mac OS X and Linux too. The Boonana cross-platform worm appeared, disguised as a video and runs in the background, and reports system information to servers on the Internet, which can be a big breach of personal information. The Trojan also attempts to spread itself by sending messages from the user account to other people through spam.
  • A piece of Mac spyware called Spynion (also known as OpinionSpy or PremierOpinion) came to light, attached to screen savers and other add-ons for users’ Macs. it’s a variant of Windows spyware that has existed since 2008. Spynion would take advantage of users not properly reading End User License Agreements (EULAs), allowing it to spy on browsing habits and search behavior.

In late 2010, Sophos issued a free anti-virus for Mac home users. Early reports indicated that there are plenty of Mac users with malware on their computers – some of it Windows malware, some Mac OS X, and some cross-platform. The author states that there’s no doubt that the Windows malware problem is much larger than the Mac threat, but that doesn’t mean that the danger of malware infection on Mac OS X is non-existent.

The events of 2011 would make it clearer to Mac users than ever before that the malware threat was real..

Related articles

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

IVR Security Threats

IVR Security ThreatsOn his excellent VoIP/UC Security Blog, Mark Collier points to some interesting work on Interactive Voice Response (IVR) security threats by Rahul Sasi. IVR systems are used in phone banking, call centers, hospitals, and corporations mainly for information retrieval and account management via phone lines. As a security researcher for iSIGHT Partners, Sasi is doing research on a variety of security vulnerabilities that may be present in IVRs.

The author says that IVR security threats are present in IVR systems used for financial transactions. Sasi presented some of his findings at Hack In The Box Malaysia 2011 and the video is available here. Collier summarizes the IVR security threats in his blog:

  • Telcom closetInformation harvesting – for account numbers and PINs, guessing a static 4-digit PIN for a range of account numbers. The odds of a hit are pretty good. Some IVRs lock the account but reset at midnight.
  • Injection – through the input of spoken words (“test”, “.”, “com”, etc.), supporting VXML servers can be fingerprinted, affected, and possibly even crashed.
  • DTMF DoS – by entering a large number of tones or adjusting frequency/tone duration, it may be possible to affect or crash DTMF processing software in IVRs. This could be particularly nasty, as DTMF processing is very common.

Collier concludes that since most of these IVR attacks simply involve the transmission of DTMF, they are very easy to execute and automate. These vulnerabilities could impact any IVR, whether it is TDM, VoIP, the latest UC.

rb-

None of these issues seem new to me, they are just new applications of old attack vectors.

  • Ma Nell telephone operatorsWho remembers blue boxes or the most famous phone phreak John “Captain Crunch” Draper.
  • Info harvesting is a typical technique in web 2.0. Attackers successfully harvest personal info from websites like LinkedIn all the time.
  • Does VXML injection = SQL injection? time for the programmers to step up.
  • DTMF DOS can lead to a buffer-overflow, are your systems patched? 

All in all these vulnerabilities create IVR security threats.

Related articles

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

SmartPhone Zombie Apocalypse

SmartPhone Zombie ApocalypseIf you have a smartphone, online criminals may soon have your number. Smartphone malware is getting increasingly sophisticated, and MIT‘s Technology Review reports that a security researcher has created software that turns a smartphone into a “zombie” that can be controlled remotely. The blog says Georgia Weidman created the program, which controls a Google (GOOG) Android phone via short message service (SMS) to bring about a smartphone zombie apocalypse.

malicious software on mobile phonesOnce only theoretical, real-world cell-phone viruses are becoming more common. The article reports the most famous was a scam in Russia that tricked users into installing malicious software on Android phones and using the SMS functionality to send messages to a number that charged a premium fee. In late 2010, a Chinese virus for Android devices stole personal data according to the article.

Botnets have become a staple of Internet crime. They can be used to attack other systems, host attack tools, send spam, or just steal data. The blog says this type of attack has been rare with mobile devices, but that seems to be changing. “We have been taking down Internet botnets for years now, but there is not as much understanding [of telecom networking],” Ms. Weidman says. “I definitely see criminals going more and more toward using the telco’s network.”

zombie nodes of a botnetTR explains that Ms. Weidman’s program is one of the first known to turn smartphones into zombie nodes of a botnet. Her attack works like this: After infecting a phone with a rootkit, she uses that phone to send spam text messages, takes part in a denial-of-service, or degrade the communications of the phone—all without the user knowing. The techniques apply to any smartphone, Weidman says.

Today’s smartphones have multiple layers of defense. For one, they can block malicious applications. They also have managed channels, such as the Apple (AAPL) App Store and Google’s Android Marketplace, for applications.

botnet controlAs a result, Weidman says, infecting a smartphone is not easy. “The hurdle with any malware is infecting the phone,” she told Technology Review, noting that the methods used by cybercriminals usually do not work. “More of what you see of malware is people downloading applications for their phone that are infected,” she says.

The problem of cyber-criminals targeting consumers’ phones will only get worse Kevin Mahaffey, chief technology officer of mobile-security startup Lookout told the author. Because the control of phones is so easy to turn into cash via premium text messages, criminals will be drawn to attack the devices.

Lookout logo“I always tend to look at the economics of the problem to ask myself whether it will continue in the future,” the CTO explained. “And because there is an incentive for attackers to compromise mobile phones, and the cost of compromising is not that high, that says it will become more prevalent in the future.”

Using the telecommunications network, rather than the Internet, for botnet control allows attackers to hide their actions from users. When the attacker does it using malicious software, the user has little chance of detecting it, says Weidman.

smartphone botnet zombie“When I infected a phone in my botnet—my lab botnet—with malware, the smartphone would receive a message through SMS and I would check to see if it has botnet instructions in it,” she says. “If it does, it would perform the functionality requests, and then it would swallow the message, so the user does not know that there was a message at all.”

While phones do not have the computing power of more traditional computers, they are hefty enough to handle many of the tasks that cyber-criminals desire, she says. She adds that the sheer number of smartphones means that any botnet could be “a real threat” to create a smartphone zombie apocalypse.

Related articles

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.