Tag Archive for SSL

2014’s Major Web Vulnerabilities

2014's Major Web Vulnerabilities2014 was the year of cyber-security mega-vulnerabilities. What makes mega vulnerabilities unique are they strike at the core of the Internet infrastructure and can impact nearly every connected device and every Internet user on the globe. 2014 saw the emergence of three mega-vulnerabilities Hearbleed, Shellshock, and POODLE.

Heartbleed, Shellshock, and POODLE were the top three major web vulnerabilities uncovered in 2014 according to Fred Donovan at FierceITSecurity. In case you have not heard of this trio of troublemakers, Web security firm Incapsula produced the following infographic.

The Incapsula infographic looks at each of these vulnerabilities and layout when they were discovered, what type of vulnerability they are, what systems and the number that are affected, the risks posed by the vulnerabilities, their severity, how easy they are to exploit, and the difficulty of fixing. Tim Matthews, vice president of marketing for Incapsula wrote in their blog:

What makes these mega vulnerabilities special is that unlike most vulnerabilities that are specific to a particular OS, browser or software application, these three relate to the core Internet infrastructure (e.g., SSL and Linux devices) and, in essence, affect just about every connected device owner and every Internet user on the globe.

Incapsula 2014 Mega Vulnetabilities

rb-

In their blog, Incapsula warns this is the tip of the iceberg of mega-vuln‘s that exploit other structural core functions of the Intertubes. Wired reports that after 8 months, 300,000 machines remain unpatched against Heartbleed.

  • Web Freedom Is Seen as a Growing Global Issue (cacm.acm.org)

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

UMich Helps Secure the Web with Let’s Encrypt

UMich Helps Secure the Web with Let’s EncryptThe University of Michigan is teaming up with leading Internet firms to help secure the web. UMichCisco (CSCO), Akamai (AKAM), Mozilla, the Electronic Frontier Foundation, and public key certificate authority IdenTrust, have launched a new free certificate authority (CA) called Let’s Encrypt.

The Let’s Encrypt CA, which will be available in the Summer of 2015. It aims to get people to encrypt their connections to their websites according to a recent GigaOM article. Let’s Encrypt goal is to make it easier to get a proper Secure Sockets Layer/Transfer Layer Security (SSL/TLS) certificate. That way the certs can be deployed to secure a Web server and its users.

Let’s Encrypt will help secure the Internet

Let’s EncryptAccording to the article Let’s Encrypt, comes as the tech industry scrambles to encrypt the web. This is more important after the mass surveillance revelations of NSA leaker Edward Snowden. The CA will aid other efforts to secure the Internet.

Let’s Encrypt is developing the Automated Certificate Management Environment or ACME protocol. The ACME protocol. will sit between Web servers and the CA. It includes support for new, stronger forms of domain validation.

University of MichiganLet’s Encrypt will serve as its own root CA. The nonprofit CA public benefit corporation, Internet Security Research Group (ISRG) will run the root CA. Josh Aas, the executive director of ISRG, explained securing the web is just not a simple thing to use Transport Layer Security (TLS), the successor to Secure Socket Layer (SSL). He explains that getting, paying for, and installing a certificate is too hard for many network administrators.

The anchor for any TLS-protected communication is a public-key certificate which demonstrates that the server you’re actually talking to is the server you intended to talk to. For many server operators, getting even a basic server certificate is just too much of a hassle. The application process can be confusing. It usually costs money. It’s tricky to install correctly. It’s a pain to update.

Electronic Frontier FoundationAccording to the statement, Let’s Encrypt’s certificates will be free. It will have an automated issuance and renewal protocol – an open standard. A step to reduce the need for input from the domain holder’s side. According to an EFF blog post, “switching a webserver from HTTP to HTTPS with this CA will be as easy as issuing one command, or clicking one button.”

Records of certificate issuance and revocation will be publicly available. The organizations behind Let’s Encrypt are stressing that the system won’t be under any one organization’s control.

The EFF has been working on helping users take advantage of HTTPS for a while. The EFF worked with the Tor Project, to create the HTTPS Everywhere extension for Firefox, Firefox for Android, Chrome, and Opera browsers.

The Let’s Encrypt project will use Internet-wide datasets of certificates to make higher-security decisions about when a certificate is safe to issue. The data will include the EFF’s Decentralized SSL Observatory, the University of Michigan’s scans.io, and Google‘s (GOOG) Certificate Transparency logs.

In addition to the Let’s Encrypt project, some of the paths to secure the web include:

  • The next version of the HTTP protocol will likely be encrypted by default.
  • Mozilla and Firefox are collaborating with the EFF to bring Microsoft, Google, Opera, and others to add Let’s Encrypt to their list of valid CAs.
  • Google will rank up sites that use SSL/TLS encryption.
  • The content delivery and security outfit Cloudflare is offering free SSL encryption for millions of its customers.
  • And now Let’s Encrypt aims to equip websites with free certificates – the proof they need to tell users’ browsers that their public encryption keys are genuine and the connection is properly secured.

rb-

Many websites currently use the HTTP protocol, a standard that exposes site owners to a number of threats including cyber espionage, keyword-based censorship, account hijacking, and a host of web application attacks such as SQLi and XSS. Let’s Encrypt helps reduce these risks which I think it is a good step in the right direction.

argues on Wired that Let’s Encrypt does not go far enough. We want the project to not only encrypt data but also authenticate users. IMHO that is a pipe dream. Authentication will step on the toes of Symantec, Oracle, and other hugely funded firms that will squash anybody doing the right thing that threatens their profits.

Related Posts

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

Social Media Biggest Risk in 2012

Social Media Biggest Risk in 2012The Security Labs over at Websense (WBSN) a provider of Web, data, and email content security have used the Websense ThreatSeeker Network (PDF) which provides real-time reputation analysis, behavioral analysis, and real data identification to announce (PDF) their picks for the top IT security threats for 2012. Social media is the #1 risk in 2012,.

1. Websense says that stealing, buying, trading credit card, and social security numbers is old news. They say that your social media identity may prove more valuable to cybercriminals than your credit cards.

LinkedIn connections for saleToday, your social identity may have greater value to the bad guys because Facebook (FB) has more than 800 million active users. More than half of FB users log on daily and they have an average of 130 friends. Trust is the basis of social networking, so if a bad guy compromises social media logins, the security firm says there is a good chance they can manipulate your friends. (Stacy Cowley at CNN Money has an excellent article on how this can work with LinkedIn (LNKD). Which leads to their second prediction.

2. According to Websense most 2012 advanced attacks’ primary attack vector will blend social media “friends,” mobile devices, and the cloud. In the past, advanced persistent threats (APTs) blended email and web attacks together. In 2012, the researchers believe advanced attacks could use emerging technologies like: social media, cloud platforms, and mobile. They warn that blended attacks will be the primary vector in most persistent and advanced attacks of 2012.

iPad malware3. The San Diego CA-based firm says to expect increases in exposed vulnerabilities for mobile devices in 2012. They predict more than 1,000 different variants of exploits, malicious applications, and botnets will attack smartphones or tablets. Websense security investigators predict that a new variant of malware for mobile devices will appear every day.

The Internet security firm stresses that application creators need to protectively sandbox their apps. Without sandbox technology malware will be able to get access to banking and social credentials as well as other data on the mobile device. This includes work documents and any cloud applications on that handy device. The firm believes that social engineering designed to specifically lure mobile users to infected apps and websites will increase. Websense predicts the number of mobile device users that will fall victim to social engineering scams will explode when attackers start to use mobile location-based services to design hyper-specific geolocation social engineering attempts.

SSL/TLS blindspot4. SSL/TLS will put net traffic into a corporate IT blind spot. Two items are increasing traffic over SSL/TLS secure tunnels for privacy and protection. First, the disruptive growth of mobile and tablet devices is moving packaged software to the cloud and distributing data to new locations.

Second, many of the largest, most commonly used websites, like Google (GOOG) Search, Facebook, and Twitter have switched their sites to default to HTTPS sessions. This may seem like a positive since it encrypts the communications between the computer and destination. But as more traffic moves through encrypted tunnels, Websense correctly says that many traditional enterprise security defenses (like firewalls, IDS/IDP, network AV, and passive monitoring) will be left looking for a threat needle in a haystack, since they cannot inspect the encoded traffic. These blind spots offer a big doorway for cybercriminals to walk through. (We have started to battle this as we move from a POC system from McAfee another vendor to a modem content filter to be nameless but was just bought and we haven’t solved it yet, the NoSSLSearch for GOOG still needs some work)

Network security5. For years, security defenses have focused on keeping cybercrime and malware out (Also called M&M security, hard on the outside, soft and chewy on the inside). The Websense Security Lab team says that there’s been much less attention on watching outbound traffic for data theft and evasive command and control communications. The researchers say hacking and malware are related to most data theft; they estimate that more than 50 percent of data loss incidents happen over the web. This is aggravated by delayed DLP deployments as vendors use traditional overly excessive processes like data discovery (designed to over-sell professional services?).

In 2012, organizations will have to stop data theft at corporate gateways that detect custom encryption, geolocations for web destinations, and command and control communications.  The security firm predicts organizations on the leading edge will add outbound inspection and will focus on adapting prevention technologies to be more about containment, severing communications, and data loss mitigation after an initial infection.

Black-Hat-SEO_full6. The London Olympics, U.S. presidential elections and Mayan calendar apocalyptic predictions will lead to broad attacks by criminals. SEO poisoning has become an everyday occurrence. The Websense Security Labs still sees highly popular search terms deliver a quarter of the first page of results as poisoned.

The researchers expect that as the search engines have become savvier on removing poisoned results, criminals will port the same techniques to new platforms in 2012. They will continue to take advantage of today’s 24-hour, up-to-the-minute news cycle, only now they will infect users where they are less suspicious: Twitter feeds, Facebook posts/emails, LinkedIn updates, YouTube video comments, and forum conversations. Websense recommends extreme caution with searches, wall posts, forum discussions, and tweets dealing with the topics listed above, as well as any celebrity death or other surprising news from the U.S. presidential campaign.

Scareware7. Scareware tactics and the use of rogue anti-virus, will stage a comeback. With easy to acquire malicious tool kits, designed to cause massive exploitation and compromise of websites, rogue application crimeware will reemerge Websense says. Except, instead of seeing “You have been infected” pages, they expect three areas will emerge as growing scareware subcategories in 2012: a growth in fake registry clean-up, fake speed improvement software, and fake back-up software mimicking popular personal cloud backup systems. Also, expect that the use of polymorphic code and IP lookup will continue to be built into each of these tactics to bypass blacklisting and hashing detection by security vendors. (Rival IT Security firm GFI Software proves Websense’s point by reporting a “new wave of fake antivirus applications (or rogue AV)” since the start of the year and are “a popular tactic among cybercriminals.”)

Related articles

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

Copier Security Best Practices

Copier Security Best PracticesMulti-function printers (MFP) can scan, copy, fax, and print. The lowly office copier can now send emails, host web-based administrative pages, and even tell you when the ink is low. While doing all that, MFPs can store image files on onboard hard drives, which can contain sensitive, personally identifiable information (PII). Compliance with standards/laws such as PCI-DSS, HIPAA, Sarbanes Oxley, state privacy laws, etc., may force MFPs to be secured.

MFP printer SecureState suggests some general questions to ask when trying to understand the criticality of these copier systems and to show some due diligence:

• Are these devices accessible on the network? If so, how is “Administrative” access controlled?
• How long are the image files retained on these systems?
• If the copier is compromised, can the attackers capture sensitive data?
• If a hard drive fails, does the replacement process follow the usual standard for securely destroying the disk?
• What are some of the services enabled on these devices? Is there an administrative website, SNMP client, or SMTP server? How about the accounts and passwords of the administrative websites; are they set to default accounts and passwords?

SecureState says If you answered “No” or “I don’t know” to these questions, some of the issues more than likely need to be addressed.

Just like any network appliance, MFPs and other print devices are small computers connected to the network that have memory, storage, processors, an operating system, and full-fledged web servers. These devices can hold sensitive information. Before that old printer is decommissioned, ensure the copier hard drive is securely wiped. If the existing device does not have advanced security options such as disk encryption or immediately overwriting data, the hard drive should be removed and securely wiped or destroyed separately before being decommissioned.

Recommended best practices

Recommended best practices for multi-function printers and copiers with disk drives:

  • Review vendor security configuration guides
  • Develop a standard configuration and check regularly
  • Enable immediate image to overwrite and schedule regular off-hours overwrite (DoD 3 pass)
  • Enable encryption (minimum 128-bit AES)
  • Use encryption and secure protocols such as IPSec, SSL, and SNMPv3 if network-enabled.
  • Regularly review copier vendor security bulletins.
  • Enable authentication and authorization (if possible, use network credentials)
  • Change admin password regularly
  • Enable audit log and review periodically
  • Treat network-enabled devices like any other computer on the network
  • Purchase a device that has an EAL2 Common Criteria certification

If the copier processes restricted data, it MUST have encryption and image overwrite. For devices that process restricted data but do not have the necessary security features:

  • Data destructionIf possible, buy the required security modules and enable the features.
  • If security features cannot be purchased or enabled, replace the copier as soon as appropriate and have the hard drive removed and destroyed.

By Copier Vendor

XeroxXerox—Newer Xerox (XRX) devices have security features that often need to be turned on. For more information, see the Xerox Information Security Guides.

RicohRicoh—Security options for Ricoh’s (7752) have to be purchased separately. For more information, see the Ricoh Common Security Features Guide (PDF).

CanonCanon—Security options for Canon (CAJ) devices must be purchased separately. For more information, see Canon Security Solutions for iR and iP Devices (PDF).

HP – All HP (HPQ) multi-function printers have hard drives.

  • HPThere is a disk-wipe utility for all MFPs.
  • This utility is not installed by default and must be downloaded from HP.COM. It is protected by an admin account and password.
  • The admin can configure the utility to do a printer disk wipe daily.
  • Some non-MFP HP printers may have hard drives. These printers will have an occupied EIO card (with a resident hard drive) in the slot next to the network card. Viewing the printer’s external case, this EIO card should be physically evident.
  • Third-party disk wipe utility cannot be used against HP MFP hard drives without removing the drive from the card, which is likely to damage the card and, possibly, the hard drive.
  • Non-MFPs with hard drives are rare and may be purchased for particular purposes.
  • Non-MFPs with hard drives and network connections can be remotely disk wiped. Non-MFPs with a hard drive but without a network connection need to be handled by HP.
  • The agreements should include a defective media retention provision for leased HP printers that permits the lessor to keep the hard drive before releasing the printer.
  • The WebJetAdmin tool, downloadable from HP.COM, can scan a network subnet and identify HP printers (and non-HP printers if the tool has an MIB for the non-HP printer).
rb-

Richard Nixon

All they focused on was the costs; they did not ask any of the due diligence questions pointed out in this post. They had no plans on wiping the HDDs on the 12 networked copy/scan/print Ricohs. It is pretty clear that all the info on the HDDs was bound for South America or else on the secondary market, as I wrote about here.

Related articles

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

LinkedIn Accounts can be Hijacked

Help Net Security has a report that users of the newly minted public LinkedIn (LNKD) are in danger of having their account hijacked. The Linkedin accounts can be hacked when accessing them over insecure Wi-Fi networks or public computers. Independent security researcher Rishi Narang told Help Net Security that the risk is due to two reasons. First, the LinkedIn session and authentication cookies have an unnaturally long lifespan. Secondly, LinkedIn does not remove the cookies once the user logs out.

LinkedInThe article says the cookies in question are JSESSIONID and LEO_AUTH_TOKEN, and are available even after the session initiated by the user has been terminated. The cookies are also set to expire only after one solid year, and this fact allowed the researcher to get access to a number of active accounts of various people from all over the world during a period of many months. “They would have login/logged out many times in these months but their cookie was still valid,” Mr.Narnag writes on his blog.

In addition to all of that, those two cookies and the others that the welcome page stores are transmitted in clear text over HTTP, because they don’t have a secure flag set. “If the secure flag is set on a cookie, then browsers will not submit the cookie in any requests that use an unencrypted HTTP connection, thereby preventing the cookie from being trivially intercepted by an attacker monitoring network traffic,” explains Mr. Narang.

According to the researcher, until LinkedIn makes some changes, the only way to “expire” the cookies is for the users to change their password and then authenticate themselves with the new credentials. This could be a stopgap measure if you know that someone has stolen those cookies and is accessing your account, but won’t new cookies be created after the password change and authentication?

Help Net Security says that the only solution to this problem is for LinkedIn to effect some changes, and according to Reuters, they are planning to offer “opt-in” SSL support for the entire site in the coming months (and that would encrypt the cookies in questions), but have not commented on the cookies have such a long lifespan.

Related articles

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.