Archive for RB

Subpeona Served for LA iPads

Subpeona Served for LA iPadsThis bad idea never seems to go away. Remember the Los Angles Unified School District’s $1.3 billion iPads-for-all project? LAUSD big-wigs claimed that the Apple iPads and Pearson software would raise LA students’ Common Core test scores. I covered the questionable decision here and here. While the proverbial other-shoe appears to be dropping. Not only did the apparent sweetheart deal between the LAUSD Superintendent, Apple (AAPL), and Pearson (PSO) cost Supt. John Deasy his $350,000 a year job – now the Feds are involved.

FBI served a subpoena against the LA school districtThe LA Times reports that the FBI served a subpoena against the LA school district which compelled America’s second-largest school district to cough up 20 boxes of documents related to the flawed iPad project, to a federal grand jury.

The subpoena asked for documents related to the bidding process as well as to the winning bidders in the $1.3-billion poorly planned project. The subpoena, which was provided to The LA Times, is part of a wide-ranging investigation is looking into records related to Apple and Pearson that predate the bidding process or that involve other projects. The article says the documents sought include all kinds of documents:

… score sheets; complete notepads, notebooks and binders; reports; contracts; agreements; consent forms; files; notices; agenda; meetings notes and minutes; instructions; accounting records” and much more.

The article notes that the morning after the FBI seized the documents, Supt. Ramon C. Cortines said he was shelving the contract. He denies that decision was based on the surprise visit by the FBI. Supt. Cortines told the LA Times;

We’re not going to use the original iPad contract anymore. I think there have been too many innuendos, rumors, etc…

rb-

The grand jury process has recently developed a credibility problem in the US. So who knows what they will find in this case. Apple and Pearson have billions in cash to spread around to “educate” people about how great they are.

This just goes to prove how the confluence of bad ideas, poor planning, and greed can go terribly wrong.

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

Privacy for Drivers

Privacy for DriversFord Motor Company (F) Global Marketing Director Jim Farley touched off a privacy storm when he told an audience at the Consumer Electronics Show that the automaker is tracking their travels thanks to their in-car navigation systems. He told the crowd in Las Vegas that the automaker tracks driver behavior, “We know everyone who breaks the law, we know when you’re doing it.

automaker are tracking travelsThe auto manufacturers have installed “black boxes” on most modern cars. The black boxes are capable of tracking, gathering, and storing vehicle information. In fact, the Fed has proposed that such tracking technology become standard equipment on all cars.

Privacy firestorm

Even though Ford quickly backed down from Mr. Farley’s claims, the comments created a privacy firestorm. As a result, TheDetroitBureau.com reports that privacy advocates accelerated increased pressure on manufacturers to reveal what info that collects on “black box’s” they’re doing with the personal data they do collect – and put limits on how it can be used.

black-boxes are capable of tracking, gathering and storing vehicle information.

In response, a group of 19 automakers has gotten together to lay down some ground rules, which they hope will assuage fears about the accessibility and use of the material. According to the article, the makers say the information won’t be given to government officials or law enforcement agencies without a court order, sold to insurance companies or other companies without their permission.

The automakers agreeing to the “rules,” which they submitted to the Federal Trade Commission, include Aston Martin, BMW, Chrysler (STLA),  Ferrari, Ford, General Motors (GM), Honda (HMC) Hyundai, Kia, Maserati, Mazda, Mercedes-Benz, Mitsubishi, Nissan, Porsche, Subaru, Toyota, Volkswagen, and Volvo.

Self-imposed data collection “rules”

Future carThe author speculates that the automakers are willing to abide by the self-imposed “rules” because they believe actual laws could become onerous. Sen. Edward Markey, D-MA is skeptical of the impact of the “rules.” He called them “an important first step,” but said it remains unclear “how auto companies will make their data collection practices transparent beyond including the information in vehicle manuals.”

Senator Markey noted that the automakers did not offer consumers an opt-out option for whether sensitive information is collected in the first place. He plans to legislate an answer. He said in a statement, “I will call for clear rules — not voluntary commitments — to ensure the privacy and safety of American drivers is protected,” Markey said in a statement.

The automakers also committed to “implement reasonable measures” to protect personal information from unauthorized access. Privacy experts are concerned that in recent years many vehicles have had a variety of GPS and mobile communications technology built into them.

Cloud securityThe TheDetroitBureau explains these devices record and sends all types of information which privacy advocates are afraid the data could be used by the government against the owners of vehicles. Some worry that many three-letter agencies and law enforcement will use data from the device to track citizens. Marc Rotenberg, executive director of the Electronic Privacy Information Center said that legislation is needed to ensure automakers don’t back off their self-imposed “rules” when they become inconvenient. He said,

You just don’t want your car spying on you. That’s the practical consequence of a lot of the new technologies that are being built into cars.

Pop-up ads on in-car touch screens

The black boxes now installed in new vehicles could also be a safety issue for drivers. The article speculates that the rising level of interactivity of cars could open the door for pop-up ads in cars. These automakers’ “rules” do not end the possibility that Pop-up ads could appear on the touch screens of cars, trucks, and SUVs as folks are motoring down the road.

One loophole in the guidelines identified in the blog, if customers agree at the time they buy the car, they could receive messages from advertisers who want to target motorists based on their location and other personal data according to the author. Some safety advocates are concerned about pop-up ads possibly popping up on in-car touch screens while drivers are behind the wheel. Henry Jasny of Advocates for Highway and Auto Safety warned the Associated Press.

There is going to be a huge amount of metadata that companies would like to mine to send advertisements to you in your vehicle … We don’t want pop-up ads to become a distraction.

rb-

Who is listeningThe road to hell is paved with good intentions and full of pot-holes. I covered Cisco’s try at monetizing driver data here. Industry officials say they want to assure their customers that the information that their cars stream from the vehicle’s computers to automakers (or Feds) via OnStar. Sync, Automatic, In-Drive, or Car-Net won’t be handed over to authorities without a court order, sold to insurance companies, or used to bombard them with ads for pizza, gas stations, or other businesses they drive past, without their permission.

Related articles

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

How Amazon Delivers

How Amazon DeliversNow much did you spend with Amazon (AMZN) this Cyber-Monday? Here is how they process all of those orders. CNet says, customers ordered more than 36.8 million items globally or 426 items per second from the online giant. They use robots like these…

.

The 10 Amazon fulfillment centers in California, Texas, New Jersey, Washington, and Florida use:

  • More than 15,000 Kiva robots.
  • Robo-Stow, one of the largest robotic arms on Earth for moving large quantities of inventory for customer order fulfillment.
  • New vision systems for enabling the unloading and receipt of an entire trailer of inventory in as little as 30 minutes instead of hours.
  • High-end graphically oriented computer systems for employees to use while fulfilling orders for customers.

Kiva robotUSA Today reports the Kiva robots are about a foot tall and weigh about 350 pounds and can lift 700 pounds. They can travel at 5 mph. The Kiva software determines which items each human packer needs and in what order and sends instructions to the robots.

The Kiva-bots follow bar-coded stickers on the floor, to bring a line of shelving units to the human packers, stopping just long enough for the correct item to be plucked from the shelf. Then the Kiva robot carries the whole unit back to its place and goes to get another one.

rb-

Despite the robotic army, AMZN says they plan to hire 80,000 seasonal employees this year, a 14 percent increase from last year. They also claim to retain thousands of those new employees in regular, full-time roles after Christmas. We will see about the jobs.

Related articles

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

Happy Thanksgiving

Happy Thanksgiving

 

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

Encryption on the Internet Primer

Encryption on the Internet PrimerI spoke to several of my mother’s friends the other day. They were all worried about being on the web. Kudos to these ladies for being connected at all (they are in their 70’s and 80’s), They also get a gold star for being alert enough to recognize that something on the ol’ Intertubes has changed recently.

Data theftThey hear that their information is being stolen at the banks and stores they frequent. One neighbor lady even said she was worried but the government stealing her data. I explained to the group that I too am concerned about how it seems everyone on the web is under attack lately.

I gave them the usual pointers. Don’t trust anything on the web.  Have someone (not me!) help keep their anti-malware and systems up to date. And use encryption if possible.

Navajo Code Talkers

Of course, none of my mother’s neighbors had heard of encryption. I explained to the ladies that encryption means changing a message so that anybody who heard the message would not understand it unless they knew how the message was changed. I used the example of Ig-pay Atin-lay.

  • An-cay ou-yay eak-spay Ig-pay Atin-lay? = Can you speak Pig Latin?
  • I-way ave-hay a-way ecret-say = I have a secret.

 

Then of course I was outsmarted. One of the wNavajo Code Talkers during World War IIomen chimed out, Oh like the Navajo Code Talkers during World War II. (Next time I will start with the smart answer and then go to the Pig-Latin.)  These ladies lived through the shhesh,

So that got me thinking, what does the end-user really need to know about encryption? Sure there are PKI’s, Salted hashes, Block-ciphers, and …. none of which mean anything to the end-user.

What users need to know about encryption

Miguel Leiva-Gomez at MakeTechEasier.com recently explained what beginners need to know about encryption. He says that encryption is a practice in cryptography where a piece of data is obfuscated (manipulated) in a mathematically predictable way. The manipulation makes it very difficult to recover its contents. The author says it is like my pig-Latin example, but much more complex. The mathematical equations used to encrypt (and decrypt/decode) things are called cryptographic algorithms.

These cryptographic algorithms are needed because hackers are getting smarter and sneakier. They’re compromising databases left and right. To protect your data from attacks system owners should use these algorithms to mathematically jumble up all your personal data Jumbling the data (encrypting) making it difficult (if not completely impossible) for a hacker to steal your data from that database. Mr. Gomez claims that encryption basically protects you from intrusion. If a hacker manages to break into a database and take your passwords, it would be reading something like “EAFC49BF4B496090EA2B7CA51674589” instead of “Mary_$mith.”

The article calls the jumbled-up text like “EAFC49BF4B496090EA2B7CA51674589” at the end of every algorithm is called a ciphertext. The decrypted equivalent is known as plaintext. These are very important words to remember when discussing cryptography.

The author explains that there are two ways that the plaintext “Mary_$mith” gets turned into the ciphertext to “EAFC49BF4B496090EA2B7CA51674589” and then back to plaintext “Mary_$mith.” The first method is called a symmetric algorithm:

Symmetric algorithms use a key to Symmetric algorithm:encrypt and decrypt data. The key is basically the “x” that will solve for “y” in the mathematical algorithm. The length of the key and some other properties of the algorithm determine its “difficulty.” The more difficult an algorithm is, the more difficult it is to crack it. A difficult algorithm requires immense amounts of computing power to crack. The kind of horsepower that is usually out of reach from run-of-the-mill hackers. More sophisticated attacks might use computer clusters to decipher your data. Even then, some symmetric algorithms might thwart these attacks.

Asymmetric (public key) algorithms.The second-way plaintext gets turned into the ciphertext and then back to plaintext are called Asymmetric (public key) algorithms. Asymmetric algorithms split the key into two pieces. The first is a public one (usually stored in the server). The second piece is a private one (usually stored in your computer by software). Mr. Gomez writes that asymmetric algorithms get their strength from this particular technique since a hacker will not be able to read the contents of your data even if he gets his hands on the public key (it’s only half the key).

rb-

In the end, no algorithm is created equally. All of them have some flaw or another that will be discovered in the future, so it’s difficult to know what services you should rely on.

The best advice is still the oldest advice. Look for URLs that start with HTTPS and have a little green lock in the URL line. This means some part of the connection is encrypted with Secure Socket Layer (SSL) an Asymmetric (public key) algorithm. The Internet is on the verge of a move to a more secure Asymmetric algorithm called Transport Layer Security (TLS) 

That’s why the age-old advice to keep your PC up to date is critical for keeping your personal data safe.

Related articles
  • Navajo, Pawnee Code Talkers remembered on Veterans Day (KOB.com)

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.