Archive for RB

Microsoft Struggles – Exchange Next Cash Cow?

Microsoft Struggles - Exchange Next Cash Cow?The Royal Pingdom reports that Microsoft’s Windows 7 has just overtaken Windows XP as the top operating system in the US. The article cites stats from StatCounter that say as of April 7, Microsoft Windows 7 reached a 31.71% of share, while Windows XP held a 31.56% share.

On a global scale, StatCounter reports that Windows XP still enjoys a significant advantage of 16.1% over Windows 7.Windows 7 takes the lead

The Business Insider noted that investor Roger McNamee a man who Bill Gates credited as a sounding board for his 1994 book “The Road Ahead” told CNBC that Microsoft’s Windows is a dying business.

I think Microsoft Windows, this is the cycle where it stops growing… The availability of iPads and smartphones is allowing corporations to trade down and eliminate the thousand dollars per year of supporting a Windows desktop. And this is the year where Windows has fallen below 50% of internet connected device down from 97% a few years ago.

Despite this, Mr. McNamee would still buy Microsoft (MSFT) because of the company’s strong position in an email.

When you’re a monopolist in an important category — and they are for sure a monopolist relative to email with Exchange — they’re going to be able to crank prices on Exchange. I actually think Microsoft is a buy.

Mr. McNamee is a smart guy who took an early huge stake in Facebook for Elevation Partners. However, the Business Insider thinks that Exchange as a replacement for the Microsoft Windows business is bizarre for a bunch of reasons:

  • Market share. Exchange Server has the majority market share — most estimates put it above 70% and higher in larger enterprises. But it doesn’t have the 90%+ share that Microsoft has enjoyed with Windows for the last 20-plus years.
  • Sales. Windows had about $18 billion in sales last year. The last time Microsoft revealed Exchange numbers was FY’07 when it had sales of $1.5 billion projecting forward, Exchange would have had $2.8 billion in sales in FY’10.
  • Margins. Windows has one of the greatest operating margins of any legal business in history – up to 80%. Exchange sells in lower volumes, faces more competition, and requires longer and more personalized sales cycles, which almost certainly means it’s got lower margins.
  • Competition. Older messaging systems like Lotus are slowly dying, but Exchange faces serious price pressure from Web-based email providers, particularly Google’s Gmail. Microsoft has responded with Exchange Online, its own hosted service, but it’s already had to lower prices on the service once.
  • Strategy. Windows pulls through sales of Office and other desktop software, which in turn pulls through sales of business servers (including Exchange). Its ubiquity helps Microsoft sell Windows Server and other enterprise software. Its huge margins allow Microsoft to pour money into projects like search and Xbox, which pressure the competition.
  • If Windows dies, Microsoft will have to do a lot more than monopolize email to replace it.

rb-

Bill and Steve chat

But Mr. Gates Sir, If I could just get my hands on Jobs, I’d…

Microsoft has had a long struggle to get Windows XP out of the enterprise, and with PC sales dipping the MSFT recovery will be harder thanks to the rise of the iPad. I would rather put my money on the Ballmer Boys to stage a spectacular comeback with Windows Phone Windows 8 than to turn Exchange into a cash cow like Windows.

What do you think?

Will Microsoft be able to continue its hold on the corporate desktop?

Can Exchange become the next great money-maker for MSFT?

Related articles

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

Asia out of IPv4 addresses

Asia out of IPv4 addressesThe Asia Pacific Network Information Center (APNIC) has run out of free IPv4 addresses.  APNIC is the first of the Internet’s five regional Internet registries to deplete its free pool of IPv4 address space according to reports from Networks Asia. (I wrote about China’s IPv4 struggles here.)

APNIC’s news is another sign that CIOs and other IT executives need to begin migrating to IPv6.”For anybody who hasn’t figured out that it’s time to do IPv6, this is another wake-up call for them,”  Owen DeLong, an IPv6 evangelist at Hurricane Electric and a member of the board of ARIN told Networks Asia. Any CIO who isn’t planning for IPv6 is “driving toward a brick wall and closing your eyes and hoping that it’s going to disappear before you get there,” Mr. DeLong says ignoring IPv6 “is not the best strategy.”

Paul Wilson, Director General of APNIC tells Networks Asia that, if a business is thinking of doing on the Internet, they need to have a plan to transition to IPv6 in place. “If you want to do business with China in the future for example, you will be to be on IPv6 or you won’t be able to reach your customers,” Mr. Wilson said.

The Asia-Pacific region has been gobbling up the most IPv4 address space in recent years; APNIC has apparently distributed more than 32 million IPv4 addresses to network operators in this region in the last two months alone. APNIC has depleted its IPv4 address space “dramatically faster than people expected,” Mr. DeLong says. “My guess is that a lot of operators in the Asia-Pacific region realized the time of IPv4 depletion was drawing near and they rushed to get their applications in.” But countries in the region are doing well with their IPv6 transition plans Mr. Wilson said.

But counties with developing markets also had the advantage where they could leapfrog any potential problems and move straight to greenfield IPv6 infrastructure Wilson said. APNIC is holding 16.7 million IPv4 addresses (a /8 in network engineering terms) in reserve to distribute in tiny allotments of around 1,000 addresses each to new and emerging IPv6-based networks so they can continue to communicate with the largely IPv4-based Internet infrastructure.

RIPE [the European Internet registry] is going to be the next one to run out. I wouldn’t count on them making it until July[2011],” DeLong says. “I think ARIN (which doles out IPv4 and IPv6 address space to companies operating in North America,)  will make it to the end of this year; maybe we’ll run out in October or November[2011].

Upgrading to IPV6

Spock – the router is under here

According to Mr. Wilson, the move to IPv6 should be the last we will experience. “We should be afraid of a situation where we exhaust IPv6. If the move from Ipv4 was difficult, the next will be a disaster,” he said.

rb-

The regional Internet registries will have handed out most IPv4 address space by the end of 2011. Lots of organizations need to get on their transition plan. I have noted the need for IPv6 planning here, here, and here.

Related articles:

What do you think?

  • Is IPv6 a real topic in your organization?
  • Has your organization even formed a team to discuss IPv6 addresses?

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

Wall Street Investing Like It’s 1999

Wall Street Investing Like It’s 1999 The New York Times reports that banks are pouring money into technology funds, wealthy clients and institutions are clamoring to get pieces of start-ups, expectations of stock market debuts building. As the Wall Street machinery kicks into second gear, some investors with memories of the Internet bust a decade earlier are wondering whether this sudden burst of activity spells danger for the industry once again.

With all this exuberance, valuations are soaring. Investments in Facebook and Zynga have more than quintupled the implied worth of each company in the last two years. The social shopping site Groupon is considering an initial public offering that would value the company at $25 billion. Less than a year ago, the company was valued at $1.4 billion.

I worry that investors think every social company will be as good as Facebook,” said Roger McNamee, a managing director of Elevation Partners and an investor in Facebook, who co-founded the private equity fund Silver Lake Partners in 1999 at the height of the boom. “You have an attractive set of companies right now, but it would be surprising if the next wave of social companies had as much impact as the first.

WebvanThe NYT points out the example of the online grocer, Webvan. WebVan was one of the most highly anticipated I.P.O.s of the dot-com era. The business had raised nearly $1 billion in start-up capital from institutions like Softbank of Japan, Sequoia Capital, and Goldman Sachs. Goldman, its lead underwriter, invested about $100 million. On its first day, investors cheered as Webvan’s market value soared, rising 65 percent to about $8 billion at the close. Less than two years later, Webvan was bankrupt.

Thomas Weisel, the founder of an investment bank called the Thomas Weisel Partners Group that prospered in the first Internet boom, says he is “astounded” by the amount of money now flooding the markets. “I think it’s much greater today,” he told the NYT. “The pools of capital that are looking at these Internet companies are far greater today than what you had in 2000.”

Yet there are notable differences between the turn-of-the-century dot-com boom and now. For one, the tech start-ups that have attracted so much interest from investors have real businesses — not just eyeballs and clicks. Companies like Facebook have fast-growing revenue. Groupon, which has been profitable since June 2009, is on track to take in billions in revenue this year reports the paper. And since 1999, when 248 million people were online (less than 5 percent of the world’s population), broadband Internet and personal computing have become mainstream. About one in three people are online, or roughly two billion users, according to data from Internet World Stats, a Web site that compiles such numbers.

Today, the collective amount of money that Wall Street banks are pumping into Internet start-ups, on top of the surging cash piles from venture capital groups, hedge funds, and private equity, is a major concern for some investors.

Over the last five months, the NYT says many venture capital players have raised giant amounts of capital. One Facebook investor, Accel Partners, is about to raise $2 billion for investments in China and the United States, while Bessemer Venture Partners will be closing in on $1.5 billion for a new fund. Greylock Partners, Sequoia Capital, Andreessen Horowitz, and Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers have collectively raised more than $3 billion in the last six months.

rb-

I can do my job without the social networker, I think the infographic above show that the VCs are no better than Wall Street, moving in a herd to Facebook. At least in 1999, the VCs were all over the place now they have settled on 5 firms.

They certainly have not made it easy for any other new ideas to get funded. The VC community has also concentrated its risk on these firms. All of these firms may be sexy on the coasts, but the only one that is relevant to me in Detroit is LinkedIn.

What do you think?

Is it 1999 again?

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

iPad Users Likely to Transfer Sensitive Data

iPad Users Likely to Transfer Sensitive Data

Tablets, mostly Apple (AAPL) iPad is organizations into the consumerization of IT.  Tablets are forcing IT managers to accept the idea of supporting employee-owned devices. Many organizations are struggling with how to secure the data on these consumer devices. eWeek recently pointed out data from Harris Interactive and Fuzebox which says that tablet users are transferring sensitive information at a greater rate than even smartphone owners.

Harris Interactive polled 2,300-plus adults polled in late January 2011. Almost half (48%) of tablet owners in the survey admitted to using their tablets to transfer sensitive data.

  • 42% of the surveyed said they transfer sensitive personal data on their tablets
  • 20% of tablet owners said they transfer sensitive data for business use,

According to Harris, the survey found that confidence in the security of the data transferred over their mobile devices is skewed according to age and gender.

  • 47% of men are confident
  • 34% of are women are confident

Younger adults are more likely to transfer sensitive data via a tablet:

  • Apple logo61% of respondents 18-34 transfer sensitive data on their tablet;
  • 56% of those surveyed ages 35-44;
  • 33% of those surveyed ages 45-5 4;
  • 20% of those 55+ (20%) to use it to transfer sensitive data.

Not many users are confident in mobile security

  • 18% are extremely/very confident in the security of the data transferred over their device(s).
  • 15% are not at all confident in the security of the data transferred over their device(s).

While the Apple iPad controls the bulk of the tablet market where security is a concern, the advantage may go to Research In Motion (RIMM) says eWeek. The article cites data from Technology Business Research which is also studying enterprise use of tablets, and some of the initial findings show that these users continue to believe that RIM devices are the most secure.

Research In Motion logoThe news could be a boon for RIM according to the author, at least in the short term. The BlackBerry maker is expected to release its PlayBook tablet by the summer and is aiming it at the enterprise. However, lurking in the background is Apple, which dominates the tablet space with its iPad and is growing its reputation for secure products.”IT departments like the ability to manage the devices and data on the devices remotely, including the ability to control access and to securely wipe the devices if they’re lost or stolen,” TBR analyst Ken Hyers told eWEEK. “RIM has succeeded in establishing a high threshold in what is expected from an enterprise-class device in terms of security.

Mr. Hyers added, “RIM’s reputation for security will give it a near-term advantage and help it sell more PlayBooks directly to the enterprise … But over time that advantage will steadily erode.”

From a smartphone vendor standpoint, Apple is establishing its own reputation as a secure device, though not up to the level of RIM,” Mr. Hyers told eWeek. “Apple (and Android mobile devices) also have a distinct edge in usability and appeal; they’re simply easier to use and more fun to use.” Where this becomes a problem for RIM is when businesses let their employees choose the mobile devices they use, as they tend to go for the “sexier” ones, he explained.

rb-

I have been a Blackberry user for 7+ years, but I have wonder if RIMM gets “it” anymore. Is RIMM going to turn into the Novell of the mobile market? A technically better product, but never able to close the deal, getting left in the wake of pretty shiny objects over substance. Given the increasingly crowded market RIMM operates in, the company is facing the same challenges as Novell.

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

Earth Worth $4,800 Trillion

SEarth Worth $4,800 Trillionome people believe – everything in this world has a price. Now the world has a price as well. Earth is worth $4,800 trillion according to UC-Santa Cruz Astrophysicist Greg Laughlin. Professor Laughlin developed the value for NASA to evaluate the discoveries made by NASA’s planet-hunting Kepler spacecraft. He came up with the figure by calculating the sum of the planet’s age, size, temperature, mass and other vital statistics.

What planets are worth studying

Professor Laughlin told the UK’s Daily Mail , “I’ve just always thought that the concept of an ‘Earth-like planet in the habitable zone’ was pretty vaguely defined, and I wanted a metric that I could plug a planet into to see whether its value was high enough to warrant media hype.” The professor’s equation shows whether planets are worth studying, anything worth less than $97 million just isn’t worth the hassle. The astrophysicist told the Daily Mail, “The formula makes you realize just how precious Earth is and I hope it will help us as a society safeguard what we have.”

Earth’s competition

There are about 1,235 known similar planets in the universe. Most planets weren’t given a high price tag because of their inhospitable climates. The Daily Mail says Mars is worth only $16,361 and Venus is worth less than a penny. Prior to Dr. Laughlin’s work, the most Earth-like world known to scientists, was the exoplanet Gilese 581 c. However, the professor’s equation valued it at just $160.

The next Earth-ly object, KOI 326.01 is worth $223,099.93 (KOI stands for “Kepler Object of Interest”). “This is just a way for me to be able to quantify how excited I should be about any particular planet,” he told TechEye.

rb-

I wonder if the professor discounted the value of planet Earth as damaged goods as British Petroleum destroys the Gulf of Mexico and nuclear reactors melt-down in Japan, etc..

What do you think?

How do you value planet Earth?

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him at LinkedInFacebook and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.