Archive for RB

Apple, Google Picking Nortel 4G Bones

Apple, Google Picking Nortel 4G BonesUpdated 04-04-11 – Google has offered Nortel $900 million for its patent portfolio. According to the Google Blog, Nortel selected the Google bid as the “stalking-horse bid,” which is the starting point against which others will bid prior to the auction. They hope that the Nortel patent portfolio will “create a disincentive for others to sue Google.” I wrote about the litigation-happy nature of the mobile telecom market here.

Nortel NetworksBankrupt Canadian telecom giant Nortel Networks is auctioning off its patents to the highest bidder. The sale of the patents is the last gasp of a bankrupt networking giant. Nortel, which Reuters says had a market capitalization of more than $250 billion and more than 90,000 employees. The bones of the one-time king are scattered across the landscape.

But now Sweden-based network equipment maker Ericsson owns most of Nortel’s North American wireless operations, its multi-service switch business, and a Chinese joint venture. Ciena Corp. bought Nortel’s optical networking and carrier Ethernet business, while the Canadian government is taking over Nortel’s Ottawa campus.

Apple ComputersNortel had more than 4,000 patents, with a market valuation of about $1 billion. Nortel owns seven of the 105 patent families likely to be likely components of 4G wireless technologies to LTE and Service Architecture Evolution (SAE), research firm Fairfield Resources told Reuters. Apple (AAPL) and Google (GOOG) are both eying the patents in their escalating wireless wars, Reuters reported.

Research in Motion logoCiting unnamed sources. Von|Xchange says Research In Motion (RIMM) and Motorola (MOT) are also said to be eying the intellectual property.  Potential buyers will study how widely Nortel’s 4G-related patents have been licensed, since the company went into bankruptcy protection before 4G was commercially viable warns Reuters.

Google logoThe due diligence for the Nortel Wireless patent pursuers may not be necessary because the ITU has redefined 4G all the way back to HSPA+, rubber-stamping the marketing claims of the operators according to Connected Planet. The International Telecommunications Union (ITU) has changed its definitions of 4G, bringing not just WiMax and long-term evolution (LTE) under the umbrella of 4th generation, but also evolved 3G technologies like high-speed packet access plus (HSPA+).

Related articles

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

Paul Allen Internet Tax Collector

patents trollMicrosoft co-founder Paul Allen has reloaded in his attempt to sue the world for patent infringement. Allen’s Interval Licensing filed an amended patent infringement suit against most of the leading online tech companies. The first try (which I wrote about here) was tossed out by the judge because it failed to point out exactly how each firm stole Allen’s ideas.

Microsoft co-founder Paul AllenInterval’s amended, 35-page filing (PDF) claims that Apple (AAPL), Google (GOOG), Facebook, and eight other online companies use Allen’s patents whenever they use a browser for navigating through information, managing a user’s peripheral attention while using a device, and alerting users to items of current interest. The filing claims that features as Apple’s Dashboard software, the notifications interface in Google’s Android operating system, and Netflix’s (NFLX) viewing suggestions are infringing on Interval patents. It asks for unspecified damages from those companies as well as an injunction on them shipping any products with allegedly infringing features.

It looks like Google’s Android operating system is directly targeted by the lawsuit including its notification system for texts, Google Voice messages, e-mails, and other alerts display information “to a user of a mobile device in an unobtrusive manner that occupies the peripheral attention of the user.” As before, the suit doesn’t target Microsoft (MSFT) or Amazon (AMZN) (which pays rent to Allen’s Vulcan Real Estate), even though both company’s products would seem to infringe on the same patents.

Rob Pegoraro at the Washington Post writes:

the Interval claims continue to be insultingly generic. For instance, an allegation that AOL and Gmail’s spam-filtering software infringes on an Interval patent because it is “based at least in part on a comparison between the new email and other emails that have been received.” (Sure: Like nobody ever thought to make such a statistical comparison until Interval came along.) Later, it contends that when Netflix “generates a display of related content items” after “a user views a particular content item,” that infringes on an Interval patent too. (Right, because the concept of a store or a catalog suggesting a related item to a shopper didn’t exist until Interval scientists had a brainstorming session.)

Mr. Pegoraro continues:

Interval’s patents are junk. They describe general concepts that should have been obvious to anybody of ordinary skill in this field in the mid 1990s–and for which it shouldn’t be difficult to find “prior art” showing that other people had thought of the same thing years before. Had the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office provided the “high quality” examination of patent applications it promises, it’s hard to see how these patents would have been granted in the first place.

Mr. Pegoraro also cites PaidContent.org’s Joe Mullin in a commentary (emphasis in the original):

If patent claims on such basic ideas are found to be valid, there are surely hundreds of other potential defendants that could be sued by Interval Licensing. Paul Allen would be essentially a tax collector for the internet.

The firms named in the suit are:

Do you believe the U.S. Patent Office is still useful?

Does Paul Allen deserve to collect a tax from every Internet user?

Related articles

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

iPad Driving Wireless Networks

iPad Driving Wireless NetworksJuniper (JNPR) recently loosened up its purse-strings and bought Trapeeze Networks to fill the most obvious hole in its product line. Juniper purchased the WLAN vendor from Belden (BDC) for $152 million in cash. The Belden/Trapeeze relationship is something I never got, when I think Belden, I think cable, and connectors not wireless. NetworkWorld cites Gartner “…more than 60% of end-users purchased their WLAN solutions from the same vendors as their wired LANs, meaning that Juniper has likely been leaving a lot of opportunity on the table.”

David Yen, executive vice president, and general manager, Fabric and Switching Technologies, at Juniper (and owner of possibly the longest title in networking), told NetworkWorld that the industry is much more mobile, “it was time for us to include wireless.” GigaOm says that the purchase was a recognition by Juniper that the enterprise networks were going through a sea change, thanks in part because of a big upsurge in the number of mobile devices connecting to corporate networks. This proposition is backed up by a survey by BoxTone Mobile Service Management which found that 73% of the surveyed companies intend on deploying the Apple (AAPL) iPad as well as other iOS devices for use on their network within the next 12 months, with 25% of those companies set to deploy right away. More than 50% of those surveyed plan on deploying their own iPad app within the next 12 months, while 25% of those plan on deploying as many as three of their own iPad apps.

IT executives interviewed by WindowsITPro.com argue that the iPad isn’t for everyone, but is very well suited for users that consume more content than they produce, such as, e-mail and corporate documents. Another area where the iPad seems to be making inroads into corporate IT is as a device that displays content for cloud and software as a service (SaaS) business solutions.

Some of the iPad initiatives include:

  • Mercedes-Benz is using iPads on showroom floors according to ZDNET. MB uses the iPad to present and execute the various financing options for customers without having to go sit down in an office.
  • SAP the world’s largest business software developer has released an iPad app so that its customers can access their reports and corporate data with the iPad. ZDNET reports that SAP is also using and supporting iPads internally. Rob Enslin, the North American president at SAP, says that he now carries an iPad instead of a laptop when he travels. “It’s allowed me to almost run a paperless office,” said Mr. Enslin. He said that he uses the iPad to view business apps, briefing documents, customer information, and other corporate data.
  • ServiceMax has developed an iPad app for pushing the device as a modern solution for field service applications according to WindowsITPro.com
  • Rackspace has developed a configuration management tool for cloud data centers according to TechWorld

Dominic Orr, CEO of Aruba Networks (ARUN), told GigaOm that his firm expects to see future demand coming from corporations who are seeing a big shift in the way their networks are being used. “The network model has shifted from hotspots to ubiquitous and uniform networks access,” Orr said. Companies now want wireless access not only in boardrooms and hubs of productivity but also in stairwells, corridors, kitchens, and other areas. Why? Because the devices accessing the network are entirely different, he pointed out. “Our demand is being driven by smartphones and smartpads,” he said. In the past, laptops were used for wireless access, but it was difficult to walk around and use them as easily one can use a smartphone or an iPad. The smart devices, however, encourage anywhere computing, which, in turn, puts a different load on the networks.

Mr. Orr goes on to say that iPads and tablets are very multimedia-centric, which means folks are looking for good, solid, and even coverage across their entire campus, and not just in certain specific areas, Mr. Orr pointed out. “While netbooks and laptops have wired Ethernet built into them, the new smart devices can only access the Internet via mobile connections,” he added. “You either have 3G or Wi-Fi.” These demands for improved coverage have led the research firm Dell’Oro Group to estimates that the enterprise WLAN market will grow from $2.2 billion in 2010 to $3.4 billion in 2014.

Steve Jobs loves his iPad

rb-

The iPad, and many new and emerging consumer devices, only have Wi-Fi connections network teams are going to face many challenges in the face of iPad adoption. Wi-Fi networks are viewed as a utility by employees, who expect to connect any device to any network to get connected. Underscoring a major societal and cultural trend of the connected lifestyle, Enterprise adoption of the iPad is part of the larger trend of consumerization of IT (which I have written about here, here, and here) in which companies are allowing employees to choose which tools they use.  The negative consequences of not allowing users to choose the products they want to use themselves simply aren’t worth it, according to Karl Ageberg, CIO at Lund University in a PCWorld article. That movement will also open the door to competing products from a growing number of Android-based tablets and Research In Motion’s upcoming PlayBook.

Some of the ways  iPads will force changes:

  • Internal IT security to deliver secure access methods for all consumer devices in general.
  • Security policy changes, to offer secure and controlled access to corporate data.
  • Network and application security design, to provide secure and controlled access to corporate data.
  • Network management to make sure mission-critical devices and applications get the required QoS and SLA required.
  • Mobile device management platforms ability to control access and storage of sensitive corporate data on these devices.
  • Support for consumer devices, owned both by the organization or by individuals.

Has the iPad breached your IT walls?

How has the iPad changed how you do business?

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

Big Tech Increases Lobbying

Big Tech Increases LobbyingThe Business Insider has a great post that lays out the lobbying spending by most of the techs stalwarts. Arik Hesseldahl at All Things D compiled the data. The data says that the telecom’s spent the most on lobbying last year. The biggest spender was Verizon (VZ) which spent $3.83 million, an increase of nearly $1 million over last year. AT&T (T) spent $3.47 million on lobbying.

Hewlett-Packard (HPQ) spent $1.6 million on lobbying in 2010, which is nearly double what it spent last year. Microsoft (MSFT), Oracle (ORCL), Google (GOOG), IBM (IBM), and Yahoo (YHOO) also increased the dollars spent on lobbying from 2009 to 2010. Only Intel (INTC) decreased its lobbying spending in 2010.

Tech Spending on Lobbying 2010

The Business Insider points out that despite their incredible influence in the world of tech, Apple (AAPL) and Facebook are hardly spending anything on lobbying. The post speculates that while Apple is influential, it doesn’t dominate anything other than mp3 players, so the government has had little reason to mess with it. (Apple rules the tablet world, but that’s an 8-month-old market.) Also, Apple doesn’t do big blockbuster acquisitions that the government looks at.

Facebook spent the least of anyone with just $120,000. The author expects this will change soon as the company’s power is growing quickly, drawing the eye of regulators.

rb-

The telecom monoliths spent $7.3 million on lobbying, which is more than HP, MSFT, Google and IBM combined what are they up to? I wrote about AT&T’s activities previously, clearly, these firms expect something back from the politicians they bribe donate to. History has proven that the politicians on the receiving end of the bribes donations generate results for their largest contributors and not the SMB or end-user.

What do you think? What are these tech stalwarts getting for their money in Washington DC?

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

Happy New Year

 

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.