Tag Archive for LTE

What is 5G ?

What is 5G ?Updated 07/16/2019 – Qualcomm released the Snapdragon 855 Plus. It features a Kryo 486 CPU Prime core with a clock speed of 2.96 GHz and a 15% faster Adreno 640 GPU. Qualcomm claimed in a presser, the 855 Plus would deliver better coverage and all-day battery life in 5G devices.

AT&T (T), Verizon (VZ), Sprint (S), and other carriers are hyping 5G. But what exactly is 5G? If you believe the hype, it is the greatest thing since sliced bread. 5G will improve our homes, make our cities safer, our machines smarter, our cars driverless, our entertainment mobile and our phones faster. So what is the tech behind the hype?

When 5G really gets here will bring three improvements to current wireless: greater speed, lower latency, and more connections.  The real advantages of 5G will come in massive capacity and lower latency. The standards bodies involved are aiming at 20Gbps speeds and 1ms latency.

Work on 5G started 10-15 years before anything went commercial. Marcus Weldon, CTO, and president of Nokia Bell Labs told FierceWireless. Finally, in 2017, the 3rd Generation Partnership Project, the standards body that writes the rules for wireless connectivity, agreed on the first specification for 5G. The Non-Standalone Specification of 5G New Radio standard covers 600 and 700 MHz bands and the 50 GHz millimeter-wave end of the spectrum. But, as followers of the Bach Seat know, a standard doesn’t mean that it will work the same, or what applications it will enable.

The G in this 5G means it's a generation of wireless technologyThe G in this 5G means it’s a generation of wireless technology. PC Magazine says, most wireless generations have technically been defined by their data transmission speeds, each has also been marked by a break in encoding methods, or “air interfaces,” that make it incompatible with the previous generation. The earlier G’s were:

  • 1G was analog cellular.
  • 2G technologies, such as CDMA, GSM, and TDMA, were launched in 1991 the first generation of digital cellular technologies without much concern for data transmission or the mobile Web.
  • 3G technologies, such as EVDO, HSPA, and UMTS, brought speeds from 200kbps to a few megabits per second. It focused on applications in voice telephony, mobile Internet, video calls, and mobile TV.
  • 4G technologies, such as WiMAX and LTE, were the next incompatible leap forward, and they are now scaling up to hundreds of megabits and even gigabit-level speeds. 4G was designed to better support IP telephony, video conferencing, and cloud computing, as well as video streaming and online gaming.

The actual 5G radio system, known as 5G-NR, isn’t compatible with 4G. But for the foreseeable future, all US 5G devices will need 4G to set up 5G connections where it’s available. That’s technically known as a non-standalone,” or NSA, network. Later 5G networks will become “standalone,” or SA, not requiring 4G coverage to work.

Like other cellular networks, 5G networks use a system of cell sites that divide their territory into sectors and send encoded data through radio waves according to PCMag. Each cell site requires a network backbone connection, whether through a wired or wireless backhaul connection. 5G networks use a type of encoding called OFDM.

5G is designed to carry higher speeds by using much larger channels than 4G. While most 4G channels are 20MHz, bonded together into up to 160MHz at a time, 5G channels can be up to 100MHz, with Verizon using as much as 800MHz at a time. That’s a much broader highway, but it also requires larger, clear blocks of airwaves than were available for 4G. PCMag cites Qualcomm (QCOM) claims that 5G will be able to boost capacity by four times over current systems by leveraging wider bandwidths and advanced antenna technologies.

5G primarily runs in two kinds of airwaves: below and above 6GHz. Low-frequency 5G networks, which use existing cellular and Wi-Fi bands, take advantage of more flexible encoding and bigger channel sizes to achieve speeds 25 to 50 percent better than LTE, according to a presentation by T-Mobile (TMUS) exec Karri Kuoppamaki.

Those networks can cover the same distances as existing cellular networks and generally won’t need more cell sites.  Rural networks will likely be stuck with low-band 5G, because low-frequency bands have a great range from cell towers.

To get super-high, multi-gigabit speeds, carriers are turning to newer, much higher frequencies, known as millimeter wave (mmWave). In the existing cellular bands, only relatively narrow channels are available because that spectrum is so busy and heavily used. But up at 28GHz and 39GHz, there are big, broad swathes of spectrum available to create big channels for very high speeds.

The 28GHz and 39GHz bands have previously only been used for backhaul. But they haven’t been used for consumer devices before, because the handheld processing power and miniaturized antennas weren’t available. Millimeter wave signals also drop off faster with distance than lower-frequencies, and the massive amount of data they transfer will need more connections to landline internet. So cellular providers will have to use many smaller, lower-power base stations rather than fewer, more powerful macrocells to offer the multi-gigabit speeds that millimeter wave networks promise.

There’s a third set of 5G airwaves being used overseas. These frequencies, ranging from 3.5GHz to 7GHz. These are slightly above current cellular bands but have quantities of the spectrum (speed) that approaches mmWave. The US is falling behind other countries in the mid-band spectrum because over here, it’s being used for satellite communications and the Navy.

Bell Labs’ Weldon, described his idea of a true 5G network for FierceWireless;

you need a low band that gives you nationwide coverage—higher efficiency on it; a mid-band for high-capacity, relatively locally; and millimeter-wave for super high-capacity, extremely locally, and if you blend all those together, you’ve got a network that really is significant.

Some believe that mmWave 5G will not work. T-Mobile CTO Neville Ray wrote that millimeter-wave won’t be able to deliver on the promise of 5G because it doesn’t travel far. Jeffrey Moore, principal analyst at Wave7 Research told FierceWireless. “…there are definitely some concerns about the economics of 5G.”

rb-

5G is an investment for the next decade. It is unlikely that the next big application will drop in 5G until 2021 or 2022. It is likely that a true 5G iPhone won’t appear until later 2020 and Qualcomm will not release its second-generation Snapdragon X55 5G modem until late 2019. The new chip will support all major spectrum types and bands. Qualcomm claims it is capable of 7Gbps downloads. Until then, the wireless carriers will jockey for customers and mind share.

The providers desperately need 5G to boost smartphone sales. The smartphone market is saturated. Deloitte found (PDF) that 80% of people in developed nations now own a smartphone and wait up to 4 years to replace their device – a significant increase from the 2-year refresh rate in 2011-12.

Related articles

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

Who Owns Ruckus Today?

Updated December 05, 2017 – As predicated below, cable box maker, ARRIS International completed its acquisition of Ruckus Wireless from Broadcom in December 2017. According to reports, “Ruckus Networks, an ARRIS company,” will operate as a dedicated business under the ARRIS Enterprise Networks business segment.

Who Owns Ruckus Today?Ruckus Wireless was founded in 2004 and supplied Wi-Fi services and equipment to enterprises and service providers. At its peak, it had annual revenues of almost $400 million and more than 1,000 employees. Ruckus was the first firm to roll out enterprise 802.11ac Wave 2 AP. The company’s products powered high-profile public Wi-Fi installations, such as New York City’s LinkNYC.

Ruckus WirelessIn April 2016, San Jose, CA-based Brocade purchased Ruckus Wireless in a deal worth about $1.5 billion. Brocade is most famous for data center SAN switches and a player on the NFV and SDN scene. Brocade planned to add Ruckus’s Wi-Fi products to its enterprise networking business.

At the time of the purchase, Brocade CEO Lloyd Carney said, “The acquisition will strengthen Brocade’s ability to pursue emerging market opportunities around 5G mobile services, Internet of Things (IoT), Smart Cities, OpenG technology for in-building wireless, and LTE/Wi-Fi convergence.

Brocade Networks logoRuckus changed hands. Irvine, CA-based chipmaker Broadcom (AVGO), which supplies to phone vendors purchased Brocade for $5.9 billion. But the chipmaker said it plans to divest the Brocade IP networking business that consists of wireless networking, data center switching, and software networking offerings.

Brocade CEO Lloyd Carney wrote on the company’s website. “In terms of our IP Networking business, due to competitive overlap with some of Broadcom’s most important customers, Broadcom will seek a buyer for the business.” The Ruckus product line competes with industry titans like Cisco and Apple.

BroadcomBroadcom logo CEO Hock Tan said in a press release, “… we will find a great home for Brocade’s valuable IP networking business that will best position that business for its next phase of growth.” It seems Broadcom has found a firm willing to take Ruckus off their hands.

FierceCable is reporting that cable set-top box manufacturer Arris (ARRS) is in talks with Broadcom to pay around $1 billion for Brocade’s wireless network edge business – i.e Ruckus Wireless. The article says Arris CFO David Potts told investors that the vendor might transition into serving the wireless needs of its customers. Arris client, Comcast is developing a wireless service based on its MVNO relationship with Verizon.

Arris logoReports are that Arris does not want to buy other parts of the business being divested by Brocade. Brocade is reportedly looking for a buyer for the rest of its IP portfolio, which includes data centers, switching, and software.

Related articles

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

Ford Studies Space Bots for Better Cars

IFord Studies Space Bots for Better Carsn its efforts to build a better, connected carFord (F) is doing research in a rather odd place the International Space Station. at GigaOM is reporting that the Dearborn, Michigan-based automaker is entering into a three-year project with St. Petersburg Polytechnic University to study how space-based research and exploration robots communicate through telematics networks.

Ford logoWhat do space robots have to do with cars? The article explains that the next generation of space-based robots will be some of the most hyper-connected machines in the universe, relying on multiple radio technologies to communicate with the space station, the astronauts they’re meant to help, and human controllers back on Earth. Though robots will be able to act with some autonomy, they’ll constantly be coordinating with computers and maybe even other robots.

Ford believes that the future connected car will function much the same way, acting semi-autonomously while coordinating its activities with cloud traffic management systems as well as the highway infrastructure and vehicles around them. Just as robots use multiple radio technologies to keep up those different “tethers” to mission control, future cars will come outfitted with multiple network links, from LTE to dedicated short-range communications (DSRC) to Wi-Fi mesh.

Robonaut 2What Ford is particularly interested in are the redundancies that St. Petersburg Polytechnic is developing for its robot telematics networks. As you can imagine, having your control link to a robot cut isn’t something any astronaut wants to deal with — in the hazardous environment of space or in the limited confines of a space station, retrieving your suddenly unresponsive robot is a lot harder than it sounds.

But that broken control link could then be routed over different networks. They could use a wireless local area network intended for internet access, or a direct radio link to another robot. The guy with the joystick in his hand may have to take a more circuitous route to communicate with his metallic friend, but he’ll still be able to communicate.

DLR Justin humanoid robotThe blog says that the same principle applies to the connected car. As cars become more intelligent and autonomous, they’ll depend on an array of sensors and network connections to feed them information. Cars will form vast constantly shifting ad hoc networks, transmitting information to one another about their acceleration, braking, lane changes, and even eventual destinations, which in turn will allow them to coordinate their driving. Vehicles will also communicate with highway infrastructure around them and connect to the internet through cellular connections. According to Ford technical leader in systems analytics Oleg Gusikhin:

“We are analyzing the data to research which networks are the most robust and reliable for certain types of messages, as well as fallback options if networks were to fail in a particular scenario. In a crash, for example, a vehicle could have the option to communicate an emergency though a DSRC, LTE or a mesh network based on the type of signal, speed and robustness required to reach emergency responders as quickly as possible.”

Though Ford’s initial focus is on using telematics redundancy to route emergency communications, GigaOM concludes that it is it’s easy to see how these multi-node networks could be used in other scenarios.

SateliteMr. Fitchard argues that If the vehicle-to-vehicle radios in your car were to suddenly go down, chances are you’d want to take direct control of the wheel, but that doesn’t mean your car has to go off-grid. Other radios could communicate with the vehicle-to-infrastructure network or even the cloud through a cellular connection, which could then pass on your car’s sensor data to other vehicles around you. Those other vehicles could in turn use the same channels to pass key information back to your car, for instance, warning you of accidents or traffic jams ahead.

If vehicles were able to securely share their connections, we could always communicate with the internet and critical transportation systems by the most efficient – and often cheapest — means possible. So say instead of streaming high-quality audio over an expensive LTE connection, cars could use their vehicular mesh to pass the stream along from a highway access point car to car until it reached your dashboard.

Ford’s project with St. Petersburg Polytechnic will focus on multiple robots, including the General Motors (GM) – NASA-designed Robonaut 2, which is already aboard the ISS; the European Space Agency’s Eurobot Ground Prototype, a robotic assistant designed to aid astronauts on a planet’s surface, and Justin, a humanoid robot designed by Germany’s DLR for fine-grained manipulation of objects

rb-

I covered GM’s Robonaut earlier as well as connected cars, here and here.

Related article
  • Ford pioneering the use of robotic test drivers (kbb.com)

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

iDEN Shutdown is a Massive Recycling Project

Sprint iDEN Shutdown Makes Massive Recycling ProjectSprint Nextel (S) is set to shut down its Nextel iDEN network to make room for LTE. The shutdown will result in nearly 30,000 iDEN installations being taken off the air. All of that ewaste needs to be part of a recycling Project.

FierceBroadbandWireless explains that Sprint has deployed FDD-LTE using the 1900 MHz Band 25 spectrum. Sprint holds two 5 MHz channels in the G band adjacent to the PCS spectrum. The carrier’s Band 26 800 MHz spectrum is currently used for CDMA as well as end-of-life iDEN service. Sprint will gain another two 5 MHz channels for LTE once it shutters its iDEN network on June 30 and re-purposes that 800 MHz spectrum for LTE.

Sprint without Nextel logoAccording to Sprint, its last full day of iDEN service will be June 29. Sprint said it will close switch locations “in rapid succession on June 30.” After the shutdown equipment will be powered down and backhaul at each cell site will be eliminated. Tens of thousands of iDEN cell sites will be deconstructed and taken off the air. Sites, where CDMA and LTE equipment are colocated, will be left intact, minus the iDEN gear, said Sprint.

100 million pounds of recycling

The shutdown will generate over 100 million pounds of leftover iDEN network gear. The equipment and materials include cables, batteries, radios, server racks, antennas, air conditioners, and other equipment. Much of the equipment s being staged for recycling vendors. Most concrete shelters housing iDEN cell sites will be crushed and turned into a composite for roads and bridges, said Sprint.

Recycling a nationwide wireless network is a huge undertakingThe iDEN recycling project is expected to continue into early 2014. “Recycling a nationwide wireless network is a huge undertaking, but one that we’re committed to,” said Bob Azzi, senior vice president-network. “The company has earned a reputation for environmental stewardship. The iDEN recycling effort extends our commitment.

The market for used iDen equipment is pretty limited. GigaOm points out that iDEN is a dying technology, and Nextel was the world’s largest iDEN carrier. iDEN’s sole manufacturer, Motorola Solutions, still supports the technology, and a handful of operators in North and South America, as well as Asia, still use it.

make money from recyclingThe recycling and reusing move isn’t just about PR. GigaOm says that Sprint can save significant money by reusing its tech. They could make money from recycling if it sells the scrap to a waste vendor. There are also some state laws that require the recycling of certain types of e-waste, particularly substances that could be hazardous material that could seep into a landfill.

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

What is 4G Mobile Wireless

What is 4G Mobile WirelessWireless operators continue to roll out mobile networks built with acronym-heavy standards such as 4G, Long Term Evolution (LTE), IEEE 802.16 (WiMAX), or HSPA+. Stacey Higginbotham at GigaOM says it’s hardly a surprise that every press release is touting 4G, which presumably stands for the fourth generation wireless network. Only, according to InfoWorld, the truth is, neither WiMax nor LTE qualify as 4G technologies, according to the International Telecommunications Union Radiocommunication Sector (ITU-R). For a service to be called 4G by the ITU-R carriers will have to use one of two future mobile wireless technologies.

GigaOM reports that in October 2009, the ITU fielded 6 candidates that could meet the true definition of 4G mobile wireless. The main criteria required speed boosts, but more importantly, new technologies that make more efficient use of spectrum, as well as an ability to work with other radio access systems and fixed wireline networks. The standard also requires that equipment makers offer features that will help guarantee the quality of service on wireless networks. Of the 6 candidates, the ITU declared the upcoming called LTE-Advanced and WirelessMAN-Advanced – also known as IEEE 802.16m the only true 4G mobile wireless technologies.

True 4G wireless calls for peak speeds of 100 Mbps for mobile applications and 1 Gigabit per second for fixed networks. To do such speeds, operators will need five to ten times as much spectrum as most are using now to deploy LTE, as well as complex antenna configurations. The new 8×8 MIMO will need some new antennas at the tower and inside the mobile devices. Some operators won’t ever get to that point. Others might, but it’s going to take four or five years before people start rolling out anything like the ITU’s version of 4G mobile wireless according to the GigaOm article.

IEEE logoThe faux 4G we are getting now, comes in three flavors thanks to a bold marketing effort by T-Mobile writes Ms. Higginbotham. T-Mobile’s HSPA+ network is most assuredly 3G (or maybe 3.5G for some) but as its CTO, Neville Ray, argued with GigaOM founder Om Malik, its real-world mobile wireless speeds are better than those offered by WiMAX and are comparable to the real-world expectations of Verizon’s LTE network. The key to T-Mo’s experience lies in its spectrum resources. As a general rule, the more spectrum an operator has, the more lanes in its highway it can cram bits into. The blog says T-Mobile can use that spectrum to increase capacity or increase speeds. With plans to move from 21 Mbps to 42 Mbps speeds using HSPA+, T-Mo is going for speed to keep up with the wireless mobile Jones.

Laptop reports that other mobile wireless operators do not qualify as 4G either. “… Sprint and Clearwire’s Mobile WiMax (3 to 6 Mbps), T-Mobile’s HSPA+ (5 to 8 Mbps), and even Verizon Wireless’ LTE network (5 to 12 Mbps) don’t even come close to deserving the 4G moniker.

After all, marketers pushing LTE first starting waving the 4G mobile wireless flag several years ago, despite the ITU hadn’t yet decided if LTE was 4G. The first releases weren’t. We’ll have to wait for LTE-Advanced in about four or five years for true 4G. By then, it’s possible we’ll be dealing with 5G mobile wireless networks or something even better the marketers dream up. In the meantime, consumers will buy their faux 4G mobile wireless phones for their faux 4G mobile wireless networks and never sweat the difference GigaOm speculates.

The faux 4G networks are incremental improvements over 3G. As Tolaga Research analyst Phil Marshall told InfoWorld, these wireless mobile networks were designed from day 1 for data, and are all Internet protocol (IP) from end to end. That’s a huge improvement over 3G and it’s a marked change. Despite the improved architecture, Wi-Fi Net News asks if the spectrum is available to meet the 2015 rollout for real 4G. “It looks like the maximum speeds being discussed require extremely wide channels, like 100 MHz. That’s not impossible, but no U.S. carrier has 100 MHz in a chunk that it materializes. The FCC white-spaces rulemaking frees up a bunch of 6 MHz pieces, and that’s the last major realignment after DTV 700 MHz spectrum that I’m aware of. The definition of 4G may now be set, but the ability to roll out 4G at anything like the minimum speeds promised seems highly problematic even in five years.”

Related articles

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.