Archive for Cars

How The Global Chip Shortage Impacts You

How Global Chip Shortage Impacts YouBefore the Internet of Things (IoT) computer chips were only used in computers. Today, they power all kinds of devices. They are critical parts of cars, cell phones, IoT devices, and consumer electronics. Computer chips increased our efficiency. Our chip reliance when combined with the COVID-19 pandemic has led to a global computer chip shortage. As demand continues to outstrip supply, it’s only a matter of time before you feel the effects of the global chip shortage.

The global chip shortage

The global chip shortage is a direct result of the COVID-19 pandemic. The crisis has impacted automakers around the world. Modern vehicles use between 500 and 1,500 computer chips. The automotive industry needs tens of millions of computer chips annually. The pandemic led automotive suppliers to cut demand for chips because of the economic downturn that followed. As demand increased for cars, semiconductor manufacturers lacked the capacity to handle the increased demand for automotive chips as these manufacturers had shifted their lines to other industries that wanted to buy their chips.

Computers in carsPlants are idled

GM logoThe largest impact of the global chip shortage can be seen in the automotive industry. General Motors (GM) plans to temporarily idle nearly all its assembly plants in North America. GM will keep a handful of assembly plants online in Texas, Kentucky; and Michigan. GM spokesman Dan Flores told the Detroit Free Press, “All the announcements we made today are related to the chips shortage …” 

GM is not the only manufacturer impacted. The Ford Motor Company (F) announced that its profit for the second quarter fell to $561 million, about 50% less than what the company achieved last year, due to the crippling chip shortage. Ford paused production of its F-150 pickup trucks and other SUVs at its Kansas City assembly plant and cut shifts at truck plants in Michigan and Kentucky. The company also had to slow production of its Mustang Mach-E, its electric model of the classic muscle car.

Ford logoOther carmakers were also impacted. In the summer, several automakers warned about delays in production due to the chip shortage including:

The European manufacturers are not exempt from the shortage.

  • Stellantis suspended production in plants in Mexico and the U.S.
  • Volkswagen was hit hard and had reportedly sharply cut production since December.

The root cause

The root cause of the automotive chip shortage is the COVID-19 pandemic. Not only did consumers and workers have to stay at home, but this caused numerous companies to cut back or stop production temporarily. When this happened, consumer electronics, computer, and automotive vendors all cut demand due to the uncertainty of the situation.

The post-lockdown recovery happened in the consumer and computer markets first. The car OEMs were slower to react. They wanted to make sure demand was back before orders were sent, according to Phil Amsrud, senior principal analyst for automotive at IHS Markit.

Chip demandWhen the automotive suppliers surprisingly saw demand return they put orders back into the supply chain. It was too late. Semiconductor manufacturers were already fully booked producing chips for other sectors. There was no capacity left for auto chips, which caused the shortage. Maite Bezerra, automotive research analyst at ABI Research commented, “… carmakers … rely on just-in-time production, they did not have a large stock of chipsets, so the shortage is already affecting production, … vehicles with sophisticated ADAS and infotainment systems that require a higher amount of chips.” Automotive microprocessor lead times grew to 30+ weeks.

Mr. Amsrud said that without any surprises the chip shortage may have resolved itself. However, the winter storm that hit the southern parts of the U.S. put pressure on all supply lines including the automotive side. 

Causes of the Current Chip Shortage

1. Industry Missteps – The semiconductor industry failed to predict a sharp rise in chip demand. Intel (INTC), experienced problems developing its products. There were delays in shipping its 10nm chips in 2018 and 7nm chips in 2020. This situation forced more customers to buy AMD chips, which placed a strain on the entire supply chain.

2. New Technologies – In the past, the chip industry could count on a steady demand for years. However, emerging technologies like IoT, cloud computing, 5G, self-driving cars, and AI have made demand unpredictable. Additionally, most of these technologies require compatibility with smartphones. The mobile phone industry must continually upgrade its chips to meet these fast-evolving requirements.

US-China Tech War3. US-China Tech WarTrade squabbles between the U.S. and China during Trump’s administration grew. They used national security concerns to apply sanctions on Huawei and SMIC. The sanctions sent their supply chain into a panic. These companies stockpiled on chips before the sanctions came into effect, which exacerbated the global shortage.

4. Crypto Mining – Bitcoin’s recent bullish run made crypto mining a lucrative venture. Bitcoin mining requires massive computing resources, which also include chips. The more valuable bitcoin becomes the more computer chips bitcoin miners use.

When will it recover?

IHS Markit’s Amsrud, predicts that the third quarter will likely experience improvements, but will not be able to keep up with demand, while Q4 will meet demand but will not be able to catch up with lagging supplies. Only in the first quarter of 2022 will the industry make a dent in what is lagging.

However, not everyone agrees. Chipmaker ON Semiconductor CEO Hassan El-Khoury told CNBC the company sees the bottleneck in the automotive chip industry being relieved in the third quarter of 2021 as companies rush to expand capacity in semiconductor manufacturing plants.

Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger told the BBC it will be a year or two before the chip manufacturers can meet the demand for computer chips.

How the Chip Shortage May Affect You

Inadequate chip supplies mean you’ll have to wait longer for your desired electronic product or settle on a slower model. The shortage has also raised the prices of available chips significantly. These costs ultimately pass on to the consumer.

You can no longer assume that the product you want will always be in stock. As the chip shortage continues to wrack the globe — and it’s finally coming for the iPhone. Apple CEO Tim Cook said that silicon “supply constraints” will start affecting iPhone sales in the coming months. The worldwide shortage of semiconductors had already been delaying production of the company’s MacBooks and iPad, Cook said.

Stay safe out there!

Related article

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

Tesla Teams with Hot Wheels for RC Toy Cybertruck

Tesla Teams with Hot Wheels for RC Toy CybertruckTesla’s electric pickup – Cybertruck will cost you nearly $40,000 when it goes on sale. Thankfully, Hot Wheels has teamed with Tesla to make a radio-controlled Cybertruck for the rest of us. The Mattel (MAT) versions include a deluxe and a smaller HotWheels version.

Tesla CybertruckThe deluxe Cybertruck version is a limited-edition 1:10 scale model. This model features, functioning headlights and taillights, a tonneau cover, and a telescopic tailgate that fold out as a loading ramp. It has a pistol-style remote to control the all-wheel drive with “Chill” or “Sport” driving modes that can get up to 250 mph scale speed.

Deluxe Cybertruck

The 1:10 model even comes with a reusable “cracked window vinyl sticker” that mocks the fail at the launch event. It also includes a plastic body that can be removed to see the model’s interior, the battery, and the drivetrain. The large truck has a 9.9-v, 3300-mAh rechargeable battery, and the run-to-charge time is 1:1. The deluxe Mattel version is 1/100th of the cost of the full-sized Telsa version at $400.

Mattel logoThe traditional scale HotWheels version of the Tesla Cybertruck fits on the classic orange Hot track. The 1/64th scale RC car has a gaming-style remote control, two-wheel drive but has Chill or Sport driving modes. Hot Wheels says the 1:64 car can get up to 500 mph scale speed. This version will cost you $20.

How to order a Cybertruck

Hot Wheels already offers the Tesla Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, and Roadster as traditional Hot Wheels, so it no surprise that they added the CyberTruck to the stable. Just like real Tesla’s, the time between order and actually taking delivery of the purchased product is extremely long. Mattel says not to expect deliveries until mid-December 2020. The 1/10 version can be pre-ordered here and the 1/64 version can be per-ordered here.

Related article

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

Motor City v. Silicon Valley

– Updated 03-30-2018 – Business Insider reports that Silicon Valley darling Tesla shares have collapsed almost 6% since January 1 on a string of critical reports about the company’s ability to keep up healthy production levels and meet delivery expectations for its new mass-market Model 3 sedan.

Motor City v. Silicon ValleyBack in April, the tech sector was leaping for joy when Tesla’s stock market valuation passed Ford and GM. Rumors abound in Silicon Valley that Tesla is the future of transportation and Elon Musk is the king of cars because they took more orders for cars that did not burn up or crash out of control. In 2016 Tesla delivered only 76,000 vehicles. Ford sold nearly 1 million F-Series trucks in 2016.

Ford and GMDespite the happy dances in Silicon Valley, which fancy itself as the logical successor to Detroit as the capital of American innovation new research says not so fast. The west coast upstartsUber, Google (GOOG), and Tesla (TLSA) — still have a lot of catching up to do when it comes to outpacing Michigan manufacturers. The Verge points us to Navigant Research, whose newly released “leaderboard” report ranks autonomous vehicle players not just on their ability to make a car drive itself, but on their ability to bring that car to the mass market. 

Navigant Research scored 18 companies working on self-driving technology on 10 different criteria related to strategy, manufacturing, and execution. The report combined all that into an overall score to get a sense of who’s ahead and who’s not. General Motors (GM) and Ford (F) are currently leading the pack, with Daimler and Renault-Nissan close behind. Those four companies make up Navigant’s “leader” category. In other words, when you climb into your first self-driving car in 2021, it will almost certainly be built by one of those four companies.
Navigant Research Leaderboard: Automated Driving Vehicles

Most everyone else is in the “contender” category. This includes car companies like BMW, PSA, Hyundai, Toyota, Tesla, and Volkswagen; suppliers like Delphi and ZF; and tech firms like Alphabet’s Waymo. Further down the list, in the “challengers” category, are companies like Honda, nuTonomy, Baidu, and Uber.

Detroit is beating Silicon ValleyGM Assembly line

Sam Abuelsamid, a senior research analyst at Navigant and one of the authors of the report, told the Verge the reason Detroit beating Silicon Valley so badly in this all-too-crucial race to get autonomous vehicles on the road is because of experience. He says, Silicon Valley, “ …. will have to do deals with someone to get actual vehicles.”

Alphabet’s Waymo, scores top marks for technology but drags in the production strategy and sales, marketing, and distribution buckets. The company plans to work with legacy automakers to put its tech in cars, but has not yet struck any major deals. Mr. Abuelsamid detailed on an email with the Verge that Waymo is in the best position of the contenders.

Waymo logoThey have almost every piece of this—except the product strategy … Waymo has what is arguably the best technology right now, although they probably aren’t that far ahead of the leading [original equipment manufacturers] but they will have to do deals with someone to get actual vehicles”

Despite Uber’s high profile, a recent study showed that only 15% of U.S. consumers have tried a ride-hailing app like Uber. Uber also has a safety problem – Uber drivers have been charged with murder and violent crimes against their customers.  In the Navigant research, Uber wallows near last place thanks to low grades for distribution, product portfolio, and staying power—and because makes Uber makes neither cars nor money. In fact, its key strength—that it already operates a global fleet of shared vehicles—may not be enough here. “It’s a lot easier for the company that actually has the infrastructure to create vehicles to recreate what Uber’s done, than the other way around,” Mr. Abuelsamid says.

Scale matters in the auto industry.

The Navigant analyst explained scale matters in the auto industry.

All the little [Silicon Valley] startups may have some interesting ideas, but they don’t have the resources to produce something sufficiently robust to be commercially viable. If they have something good to offer, their best bet is an acquisition

Mergers and acquistionsThe “legacy automakers” have engaged in mergers and acquisitions and early maneuvering in the autonomous vehicle arena as Mr. Abuelsamid stated. The report predicts that big companies will buy little startups to leverage their technology and expertise to round out the much larger-scale enterprise of developing, testing, validating, producing, and distributing self-driving cars.

Wired says Ford and GM both score in the low to mid 80s on the technology front; it’s their old-school skills that float them to first and second place. They’ve each spent more than a century developing, testing, producing, marketing, distributing, and selling cars. Plus, each has made strategic moves to bolster weak points.

Chevy BoltGM recently acquired Cruise Automation, a San Francisco-based autonomous vehicle technology maker in a deal valued at more than $1 billion. GM said the acquisition will allow it to “accelerate” its autonomous vehicle development efforts.

Ford has announced an investment of $1 billion over the next five years in Argo AI, a startup run by Carnegie Mellon roboticists and engineers who really know their artificial intelligence stuff.

Waymo Chryslet PacificaFiat Chrysler has partnered with Alphabet to jointly test autonomous technology in Pacifica minivans, and Alphabet is opening a 53,000 square foot self-driving car development center near Detroit in Novi, MI.

GM has invested $500 million in ride-sharing provider Lyft to beef up its ridesharing service. In the “long-term strategic alliance,” the companies will work on what they call “on-demand autonomous vehicles.” For now, the deal means GM cars will be the “preferred” vehicle used by Lyft drivers who rent their cars in various U.S. cities. Those vehicles will tap into GM’s OnStar service, while GM and Lyft promised “personalized mobility services and experiences,” but did not elaborate.

Ford invested $75 million iin LiDAR maker VelodyneFord, meanwhile, recently announced a $75 million investment in LiDAR maker Velodyne, to “quickly mass-produce a more affordable automotive LiDAR sensor” so the company can launch a fleet of self-driving ride-sharing cars by 2021

Ford has also acquired SAIPS, an Israeli machine learning firm to further strengthen its ability in artificial intelligence and computer vision. SAIPS has developed algorithmic solutions in image and video processing, deep learning, signal processing and classification. This expertise will help Ford autonomous vehicles learn and adapt to the surroundings of their environment

Ford announced that it would take part in a $6.6 million seed funding round for Civil Maps to further develop high-resolution 3D mapping capabilities. This provides Ford another way to develop high-resolution 3D maps of autonomous vehicle environments. Ford has also agreed to acquire Chariot, an on-demand shuttle service based in San Francisco.

Mr. Abuelsamid predicts that early on,  you probably won’t be buying a self-driving car at a dealership, but rather riding in one that you hail through an app-based service like Uber or Lyft. These vehicles will be part of a fleet owned by a manufacturer, like Ford or GM. Fleet ownership will help manufacturers manage the issues self-driving vehicles are likely to encounter early on, like insurance for the inevitable accidents. Navigant’s Abuelsamid says

With all of that in mind, it’s far easier for a manufacturer to replicate the sort of logistics platform that Uber or Lyft have than it is for those companies to invest in and create the development, manufacturing, and service infrastructure that [original equipment manufacturers] have

Mr. Abuelsamid noted that Tesla ranked pretty far down the “contender” because Elon Musk’s company is “lacking in quality, distribution, financial stability, and their [Autopilot] 2.0 hardware will never be more than limited Level 4-capable (PDF) at best.” In other words, Musk would be advised not to start gloating about his company being valued higher than the OG’s Ford and GM quite yet.

Related articles

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

Slam the Door on Hackers

Slam the Door on HackersLast year two white-hat hackers Charlie Miller and Chris Valasek, remotely compromised a Jeep Cherokee. The cybersecurity researchers used  existing functionality in the car to take control.  They were able to disable the car’s transmission and brakes, while the vehicle was in reverse, and take over the steering wheel.

Karamba SecurityThe Verge reports the researchers are back and have compromised their Jeep Cherokee, fooling the car into doing dangerous things. Things like turning the steering wheel or activating the parking brake at highway speeds. This year’s attack requires physical access to the car.

Hackers use the diagnostic port

The team used a laptop connected to the OBD II engine diagnostic port to control even more vehicle systems. The Verge says the researchers were able to update the electronic control unit. This allowed them to take control of the steering at any time. They could turn the steering wheel at any speed, activate the parking brake, or adjust the cruise control settings.

Electronic control unit

Most operations in a car have their own designated electronic control unit (ECU) controller. Some ECU’s manage things like a car’s navigation and entertainment systems. Others manage more critical systems like braking and fuel injection.

Radio are a gateway for attackersA connected car’s ECUs all operate on one network, self-contained within the vehicle. Tel Aviv start-up Karamba co-founder David Barzilai, warns. “If hackers gain access to just one of these controllers, they can get to all of them.

Harden ECU

The Israeli company hopes to sell Carwall Detroit automakers. Carwall is a tool that installs anti-hacking technology into chip-bearing auto parts before they hit the assembly line. Rgis could prevent hackers from crashing your new connected car. Mr. Barzilai told TechCrunch the startup’s technology can head off hackers at the pass. Carwall “hardens” the controllers, or small computers, within a vehicle that are externally connected.

Carwell, a tool that installs anti-hacking technologyKaramba’s Carwall is installed on the controllers, either as a retrofit or before the controllers are built into new cars. The software locks in the factory settings, and prevents any foreign code or banned behaviors from running on them. This essentially blocks a hackers ability to reach into a car’s CAN Bus, and mess with the car’s critical functions.

If indeed we are successful – if all hacks are blocked – then [you] don’t have to worry,” said Karamba’s Barzilai. “A hack that crashes your software is bad enough. A hack that crashes your car takes it to a whole new level.

Karamba’s technology is designed to monitor every bit of code that tries to run on the ECUs and to make sure it comes from legitimate sources. “We are the gatekeepers,” Mr. Barzilai told MiTechNews.

Out of stealth mode

monitor every bit of code that tries to runTechCrunch says Karamba has not yet scored a contract with top automotive suppliers that make ECU’s. They are targeting firms like Continental, Robert Bosch, Delphi Automotive, or Panasonic. But it has only just emerged from stealth and begun to shop its security software around.

YL Ventures has invested $2.5 million to fund Karamba’s growth, MiTechNews reported. Compared with the funding that some Silicon Valley security companies pick up, that’s not a huge amount. But it’s enough to move CEO Ami Dotan to Ann Arbor, where he’ll start making sales calls.

Karamba isn’t alone in attacking car security. Symantec (SYMC), the old school antivirus firm is working on auto security within its “internet of things” unit. Symantec recently released a  white paper “Building Comprehensive Security into Cars,” (PDF) detailing the many electronics and sensors that have to be protected.

rb-

Chrysler is doing a small part to reduce connected car hacking. They recently launched a bug bounty program with Bugcrowd that will pay out as much as $1,500 per bug found. On the other hand, Apple is offering a bug bounty of up to $200,000 for bugs that won’t kill you.

Related articles

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

Online Security in Era of Connected Cars

Online Security in Era of Connected CarsKarl-Thomas Neumann, CEO of General Motors (GM) European Opel brand announced that GM would launch OnStar telematics service in vehicles sold in Europe in late 2015. The Opel CEO declared the new technology, “transforms the car into a true part of the Internet of things.” The Detroit Bureau says it raises some of the same concerns consumers face on the Internet, including how to protect their privacy in highly connected cars.

App controlled carEven though a growing number of consumers have embraced the idea of having mobile access to smartphone apps, built-in Wi-Fi, and the safety and security promised by systems like OnStar issues loom that consumers, manufacturers, and regulators need to address. At the 2014 Consumer Electronics Show, Jim Farley,  then the top marketing executive at Ford Motor Company (F),  told an audience that the automaker “know(s) everyone who breaks the law, we know when you’re doing it,” thanks to the data collected by its OnBoard Sync technology system.

Despite a quick backtrack by Mr. Farley, the article says he was being truthful. The fact is, the onboard black boxes in most cars are now equipped with two-way capabilities. Privacy has become “a big issue,” according to Jon Allen, a principal with consulting firm Booz Allen Hamilton who focuses on security issues. Precisely what makes such technology so compelling is why it is also so worrisome. Mr. Allen told The Detroit Bureau,

Connected products provide customization and convenience because of the data they track. Part of the great opportunity to improve the customer experience is producing a vehicle that ‘learns’ your habits and preferences. But that information must be protected.

Data privacyThe EU takes privacy seriously and these types of tracking technology have drawn the attention of regulators in Europe and to a lesser extent, in the U.S. The article describes a measure of just how strongly Europeans feel about the issue that came during Opel chief Neumann’s news conference. Unlike the U.S. version of OnStar, the European system will include a “Privacy” button to let a user “choose whether they want to provide location information or not.”

That choice would only be over-ridden after a crash severe enough to trigger OnStar’s emergency call system, CEO Neumann explained. It’s designed to call rescue crews in the event of an accident severe enough passengers might be disabled.

Don't panicThere have been experiments with marketing that could target motorists much as Google today can toss ads at a web viewer based on information revealed by hidden “cookies.” Imagine, they suggest, being able to send a McDonald’s ad and virtual coupon to a car driving near one of its restaurants around lunchtime.

While some drivers might embrace that possibility, others are appalled. The Detroit Bureau reports the potential to reveal more detailed personal information, as well as allowing a vehicle to be tracked, is raising flags on both sides of the Atlantic.

Digtal trackingIn the U.S., an auto industry alliance recently agreed on an approach called “Privacy Principles for Vehicle Technologies and Services.” (rb- Which I covered here) Meanwhile, both the U.S. Federal Trade Commission and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration are exploring the issues – though in some cases, they are actually encouraging greater access, noted analyst Allen.

The issue is further complicated by the threat of cyber-criminals exploiting vulnerabilities in-vehicle communications systems.

rb-

I first covered this threat in 2011 here and here. And the theoretical became real in 2015 when researchers demonstrated they could use online systems to take over a Jeep Grand Cherokee.

The threat to personal freedom and privacy in your car has accelerated as Apple (AAPL) and Google (GOOG) join Microsoft (MSFT) in the battle to rule the car. Apple’s automotive ambition does not stop at CarPlay, they are also focused on developing an iCar. Google’s Autonomous Cars ambitions are well known, but their efforts to take over the car cockpit are also taking off with Android Auto.

The government is contributing to the connected car conundrum. The Feds are abetting the Autos by trying to prevent security researchers from doing testing and reverse engineering that could improve security and safety for all of us according to Naked Security.

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.