Discover how mastering email communication can boost business efficiency, avoid common pitfalls, and ensure secure, respectful online interactions.
Turkey Revenge
The turkeys are pissed this Thanksgiving they are seeking revenge.
Germs Infest 60% of Americas Phones
60% of Americans sleep with their phones, harboring germs. Cleaning regularly with UV sanitizer or alcohol wipes can help keep your phone and bed germ-free.
Smartphone Sanitizing: A Practical Guide
Securely erase personal data from your old smartphone before recycling. Protect your identity from hackers—easy steps to follow.
Why Soft Skills Matter in Today’s Job Market
Boost your career with essential soft skills like communication, teamwork, and emotional intelligence. Learn why they’re crucial for workplace success.
Ford Studies Space Bots for Better Cars
I
n its efforts to build a better, connected car, Ford (F) is doing research in a rather odd place the International Space Station. Kevin Fitchard at GigaOM is reporting that the Dearborn, Michigan-based automaker is entering into a three-year project with St. Petersburg Polytechnic University to study how space-based research and exploration robots communicate through telematics networks.
What do space robots have to do with cars? The article explains that the next generation of space-based robots will be some of the most hyper-connected machines in the universe, relying on multiple radio technologies to communicate with the space station, the astronauts they’re meant to help, and human controllers back on Earth. Though robots will be able to act with some autonomy, they’ll constantly be coordinating with computers and maybe even other robots.
Ford believes that the future connected car will function much the same way, acting semi-autonomously while coordinating its activities with cloud traffic management systems as well as the highway infrastructure and vehicles around them. Just as robots use multiple radio technologies to keep up those different “tethers” to mission control, future cars will come outfitted with multiple network links, from LTE to dedicated short-range communications (DSRC) to Wi-Fi mesh.
What Ford is particularly interested in are the redundancies that St. Petersburg Polytechnic is developing for its robot telematics networks. As you can imagine, having your control link to a robot cut isn’t something any astronaut wants to deal with — in the hazardous environment of space or in the limited confines of a space station, retrieving your suddenly unresponsive robot is a lot harder than it sounds.
But that broken control link could then be routed over different networks. They could use a wireless local area network intended for internet access, or a direct radio link to another robot. The guy with the joystick in his hand may have to take a more circuitous route to communicate with his metallic friend, but he’ll still be able to communicate.
The blog says that the same principle applies to the connected car. As cars become more intelligent and autonomous, they’ll depend on an array of sensors and network connections to feed them information. Cars will form vast constantly shifting ad hoc networks, transmitting information to one another about their acceleration, braking, lane changes, and even eventual destinations, which in turn will allow them to coordinate their driving. Vehicles will also communicate with highway infrastructure around them and connect to the internet through cellular connections. According to Ford technical leader in systems analytics Oleg Gusikhin:
“We are analyzing the data to research which networks are the most robust and reliable for certain types of messages, as well as fallback options if networks were to fail in a particular scenario. In a crash, for example, a vehicle could have the option to communicate an emergency though a DSRC, LTE or a mesh network based on the type of signal, speed and robustness required to reach emergency responders as quickly as possible.”
Though Ford’s initial focus is on using telematics redundancy to route emergency communications, GigaOM concludes that it is it’s easy to see how these multi-node networks could be used in other scenarios.
Mr. Fitchard argues that If the vehicle-to-vehicle radios in your car were to suddenly go down, chances are you’d want to take direct control of the wheel, but that doesn’t mean your car has to go off-grid. Other radios could communicate with the vehicle-to-infrastructure network or even the cloud through a cellular connection, which could then pass on your car’s sensor data to other vehicles around you. Those other vehicles could in turn use the same channels to pass key information back to your car, for instance, warning you of accidents or traffic jams ahead.
If vehicles were able to securely share their connections, we could always communicate with the internet and critical transportation systems by the most efficient – and often cheapest — means possible. So say instead of streaming high-quality audio over an expensive LTE connection, cars could use their vehicular mesh to pass the stream along from a highway access point car to car until it reached your dashboard.
Ford’s project with St. Petersburg Polytechnic will focus on multiple robots, including the General Motors (GM) – NASA-designed Robonaut 2, which is already aboard the ISS; the European Space Agency’s Eurobot Ground Prototype, a robotic assistant designed to aid astronauts on a planet’s surface, and Justin, a humanoid robot designed by Germany’s DLR for fine-grained manipulation of objects
rb-
I covered GM’s Robonaut earlier as well as connected cars, here and here.
Related article
- Ford pioneering the use of robotic test drivers (kbb.com)
Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedIn, Facebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.
NVIDIA Comes to Detroit
Automakers have made a beeline for Central California in recent years. They are setting up research and engineering facilities in the shadows of consumer electronics giants Google (GOOG) and Apple (AAPL). The Detroit Bureau asks if the migration be turning around? A major Silicon Valley firm, NVIDIA (NVDA), is reversing the trend by setting up a technical center in Ann Arbor.
AnnArbor.com reports the tech center will initially support about 20 employees. They will be primarily dedicated to working with the local automotive community. Danny Shapiro, director of automotive for Santa Clara, CA, based NVIDIA said that more work will likely be done at the center with supercomputing and graphics development. NVIDIA VP for worldwide automotive sales and Ann Arbor site leader Phil Hughes said. “We’re going to have software engineers, hardware engineers and field application engineers working here as well as people on the business and marketing side.”
Who uses NVIDIA
Mr. Shapiro said the new facility will help the company’s growing team of Michigan-based engineers and executives work with automakers and suppliers. The Michigan team will develop the next generation of infotainment, navigation, and driver assistance programs. NVIDIA points out that Chrysler, Ford (F), General Motors (GM), and Volkswagen are already using NVIDIA products in their designs. NVIDIA believes having a technology center near the heart of the auto manufacturing community in Michigan makes sense.
“Silicon Valley is the future, Detroit is the past,” said NVIDIA’s Shapiro. “That’s the conventional wisdom. Well, the conventional wisdom isn’t quite right. We’ve been investing in Michigan for years and we’re accelerating these efforts by opening the Nvidia Technology Center.”
Detroit Bureau points out that NVIDIA isn’t alone. Other high-tech firms opening centers in Southeast Michigan are Microsoft (MSFT) and Google, Mr. Shapiro noted. “This is where consumer electronics and safety advancements are being made that will change the driving experience for all of us,” the executive told the Detroit Bureau. “Nvidia has been fueling this trend for years. A number of our employees live in the area and are working closely with car companies.”
High-tech start-ups
While there’s a small but growing presence of high-tech start-ups within the Motor City itself, many of the firms setting up shop in Michigan have chosen to go to Ann Arbor the home of the University of Michigan. “All of this activity has helped make Ann Arbor a high-tech hub and not just for the Detroit area,” Shapiro noted.
Michael Finney, president of the Michigan Economic Development Corp., said Nvidia already powers in-dash instrument clusters as well as navigation and information displays in more than 4 million vehicles from automakers such as Audi, Bentley, BMW, Lamborghini, Maserati, Rolls Royce, Tesla, and Volkswagen.
rb-
I have covered the new blood moving into the neighborhood, including SAIC, and Bill Ford’s plans to make Detroit the Silicon Valley of Mobility.
Related article
Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedIn, Facebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.
From Madison to PRISM
The folks at Whocalledmyphone.net have given us this excellent infographic. It traces the battle between the right to privacy and the prying eyes of the government. The infographic follows the erosion of privacy from the Bill of Rights to Prism. For more details, you can also check out the EFF page Timeline of NSA Domestic Spying.

Image compliments of Who Called My Phone
Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedIn, Facebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.
US Internet Laws Unequally Enforced
The Internet Society (ISOC) provides a summary of a report from the Fordham Center on Law and Information Policy (CLIP), entitled “Internet Jurisdiction: A Survey of Legal Scholarship Published in English and United States Case Law” (PDF) examining the case-law and legal literature analyzing jurisdiction for claims arising out of Internet activity in the United States. The report finds that despite definitive case law, the practice of U.S. courts “lacks uniformity”.
The report concludes that U.S. Internet law jurisdictions are typically set by the Second and Ninth Circuit Courts. The Second Court covers New York, Vermont, and Connecticut. The Ninth Court covers the west coast of the US from Alaska to California and from Hawaii to Montana.
The CLIP research found that the most frequent Internet jurisdiction issues addressed by the courts are intellectual property and defamation cases. According to Wikipedia, Intellectual property (IP) is a legal concept that refers to creations of the mind for which exclusive rights are recognized. Under IP law, owners are granted certain exclusive rights to a variety of intangible assets, such as musical, discoveries and inventions; and words, symbols, and designs. Common types of intellectual property rights include copyright, trademarks, patents, and in some jurisdictions trade secrets. (rb- I have written a great deal about IP in my Patent Trolling articles.)
The researchers found that 62% of Internet jurisdiction cases centered on disputes about intellectual property. Specifically, 43% of the cases related to trademarks; 20% related to copyright; and 9% related to patents.
Within the Fordham data. There were also 35 defamation cases studied with 23% of these cases related to the intentional tort. Wikipedia defines defamation as communicating a false statement that harms an individual, business, product, group, government, religion, or nations’ reputation. Under common law, to constitute defamation, a claim must generally be false and made to someone other than the person defamed.’
According to the Fordham research, there are two primary cases the courts use to address most Internet jurisdiction cases, The first is Zippo Manufacturing Co. v. Zippo Dot Com, Inc. IT Law Wiki explains that Zippo created a three-prong test for determining whether a court has jurisdiction over a website. Under this test, there are three types of websites: Commercial, Passive, and Interactive.
Interactive websites allow the exchange of information between the website owner and visitors, may be subject to the jurisdiction, depending on the website’s level of interactivity and commerciality, and the number of contacts which the website owner has developed with the forum due to the availability of the website within the jurisdiction.
The other key case that Fordham found was Calder v. Jones. IT Law Wiki writes that this case resulted in the “effects test.” The article asserts, “… virtually every jurisdiction has held that the Calder effects test requires intentional conduct expressly aimed at or targeting the forum state in addition to the defendant’s knowledge that his intentional conduct would cause harm in the forum.
The article concludes that the Zippo and Calder tests remain the dominant ones applied, but that these tests are not mutually exclusive. Although Zippo is most often applied in matters of specific jurisdiction, there exists a varied and, at times, a blurred framework that incorporates the Zippo sliding scale and Calder’s effects test, as well as traditional standards for personal jurisdiction. Therefore, although the landscape for Internet jurisdiction matters has clear, predominant legal standards and tests, on the whole, when and how these are applied by U.S. courts lacks uniformity.
rb-
I am not a lawyer, and of course, you should seek the advice of an attorney.
While I am not a lawyer, I do have common sense and how is it possible for different courts to rule in different ways on the same topic when they have InnerTubes to rule consistently?
I believe this shows how out of touch the law is from technology.
Some of this could be due to the basic conservative nature of the legal profession.
I also believe that there is money in it for the politicians to make laws that are so confusing that lawyers are needed to understand the law. After all most Senators are lawyers.
Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedIn, Facebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.
Bach Seat Changes
Due to some recent problems with Bach Seat, I have deleted all subscribers and turned off subscriber’s rights to post. You can still follow me with the RSS feeds options on the sidebar over there ->
You will have to be a registered user to post here.
Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedIn, Facebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.
