Discover how mastering email communication can boost business efficiency, avoid common pitfalls, and ensure secure, respectful online interactions.
Turkey Revenge
The turkeys are pissed this Thanksgiving they are seeking revenge.
Germs Infest 60% of Americas Phones
60% of Americans sleep with their phones, harboring germs. Cleaning regularly with UV sanitizer or alcohol wipes can help keep your phone and bed germ-free.
Smartphone Sanitizing: A Practical Guide
Securely erase personal data from your old smartphone before recycling. Protect your identity from hackers—easy steps to follow.
Why Soft Skills Matter in Today’s Job Market
Boost your career with essential soft skills like communication, teamwork, and emotional intelligence. Learn why they’re crucial for workplace success.
IPv4 Doomsday Pushed Back
The American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN) announced (10-20-2010) that Interop returned its unneeded Internet Protocol version 4 (IPv4) address space. The ARIN Press Release explains that Interop was originally allocated a /8 before ARIN’s existence and the availability of smaller address blocks.
Another press release indicates that Interop founder Dan Lynch acquired the addresses block to allow for unfettered Interoperability Testing between TCP/IP equipment vendors in the formative years of the Internet. Interop will continue to use a small part of the original grant to continue Interop’s 25-year mission to foster industry-wide interoperability while returning the rest of the address block to ARIN for the greater good of the Internet community. The organization recently realized it was only using a small part of its address block and that returning the rest to ARIN would be for the greater good of the Internet community.
ARIN will accept the returned space and not reissue it for a short period, per existing operational procedure. After the hold period, ARIN will follow global policy at that time and return it to the global free pool or distribute the space to those organizations in the ARIN region with documented need, as appropriate.
With less than 5% of the IPv4 address space left in the global free pool, ARIN warns that Interop’s return will not significantly extend the life of IPv4. ARIN continues to emphasize the need for all Internet stakeholders to adopt the next generation of Internet Protocol, IPv6.
rb-
As the original poster at Slashdot points out, if any of the other IPv4 /8 address holders return their unused addresses, the IPv4 exhaustion date would be pushed back even further. I wonder what some of these companies plan on doing with all of these IP addresses?
- HP has 32 million publicly routable addresses (16 million of its own and 16 million from DEC which HP acquired when it ingested Compaq) most of which seem to be used to handle VoIP calls to India for sales and support calls.
- Is Ford going to install a IPv4/IPv6 gateway on all the cars with My Ford Touch, an upgrade of Sync, its in-car Internet service with Microsoft?
- How is the USPS using it 16 million IP addresses?
Some IPv4 /8 Address Holders
| Prefix | Designation | Date |
|---|---|---|
| 003/8 | General Electric Company | 1994-05 |
| 004/8 | Level 3 Communications, Inc. | 1992-12 |
| 008/8 | Level 3 Communications, Inc. | 1992-12 |
| 009/8 | IBM | 1992-08 |
| 012/8 | AT&T Bell Laboratories | 1995-06 |
| 013/8 | Xerox Corporation | 1991-09 |
| 015/8 | Hewlett-Packard Company | 1994-07 |
| 016/8 | Digital Equipment Corporation | 1994-11 |
| 017/8 | Apple Computer Inc. | 1992-07 |
| 018/8 | MIT | 1994-01 |
| 019/8 | Ford Motor Company | 1995-05 |
| 034/8 | Halliburton Company | 1993-03 |
| 035/8 | MERIT Computer Network | 1994-04 |
| 040/8 | Eli Lily & Company | 1994-06 |
| 048/8 | Prudential Securities Inc. | 1995-05 |
| 054/8 | Merck and Co., Inc. | 1992-03 |
| 056/8 | US Postal Service | 1994-06 |
This gadget was developed by Takashi Arano, Intec NetCore
Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedIn, Facebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.
Apple Wants to Patent Spyware
The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) is reporting that Apple, Inc., (AAPL) has filed a patent application for a “Systems and Methods for Identifying Unauthorized Users of an Electronic Device. ” The patent is for a device to investigate a user’s identity to decide if that user is “unauthorized.”
Information Apple plans to collect
The system can take a picture of the user’s face, “without a flash, any noise, or any indication that a picture is being taken to prevent the current user from knowing he is being photographed“;- The system can record the user’s voice, whether or not a phone call is even being made;
- The system can determine the user’s unique individual heartbeat “signature”;
- To decide if the device has been hacked, the device can watch for “a sudden increase in memory usage of the electronic device“;
- The user’s “Internet activity can be monitored or any communication packets that are served to the electronic device can be recorded“; and
- The device can take a photograph of the surrounding location to find where it is being used.
Who is the responsible party
The EFF believes that as a result of this new technology, Apple will know who you are, where you are, and what you are doing and saying, and even how fast your heart is beating. In some embodiments of Apple’s “invention,” this information “can be gathered every time the electronic device is turned on, unlocked, or used.” When an “unauthorized use” is detected, Apple can contact a “responsible party.” A “responsible party” may be the device’s owner or as the EFF points out the “responsible party may also be “proper authorities or the police.” Once an unauthorized user is identified, Apple could wipe the device and remotely store the user’s “sensitive data.” Apple’s patent application suggests it may use the technology not just to limit “unauthorized” uses of its phones but also to shut down a stolen phone.
However, the EFF says Apple’s new technology would do much more. The EFF believes that this patented device enables Apple to secretly collect, store, and potentially use sensitive biometric information about the user. This is dangerous in two ways according to the EFF:
- It is far more than what is needed just to protect you against a lost or stolen phone. It’s extremely privacy-invasive and it puts you at great risk if Apple’s data on you are compromised. But it’s not only the biometric data that are a concern.
- Apple does not explain what it will do with all of this collected information on its users, how long it will keep this information, how it will use this information, or if it will share this information with other third parties. We know based on long experience that if Apple collects this information, law enforcement will come for it, and may even order Apple to turn it on for reasons other than simply returning a lost phone to its owner.
- Apple’s technology includes various types of usage monitoring — also very privacy-invasive. This patented process could be used to retaliate against users who jailbreak or tinker with their device in ways that Apple views as “unauthorized” even if it is perfectly legal under copyright law.
rb-
The EFF says this is a new business opportunity: spyware and what they are calling “traitorware.” The patent would allow Apple to find and punish users who tinker with their devices. The EFF says it’s not just spyware, it’s “traitorware,” since it is designed to allow Apple to retaliate against customers who do something Apple doesn’t like.
This patent is downright creepy and invasive — certainly far more than would be needed to respond to the possible loss of a phone. Spyware, and its new cousin traitorware, will hurt customers and companies alike — Apple should shelve this idea before it backfires on both it and its customers.
Related articles
Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedIn, Facebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.
5 Billion Mobile Phones
The market research firm iSuppli predicts that 73.4% of Earth’s population now owns a mobile phone. Thanks to demand in the emerging economies, analysts at iSuppli are predicting that there are now 5 billion mobile subscriptions. That works out to nearly 3 out of every 4 people on this planet will own a mobile phone.
Dr. Jagdish Rebello, iSuppli senior director, and principal wireless analyst believes that mobile phones are driving the tech industry. Rebello says “… the proliferation of wireless communications stands out as one of the most significant phenomena in the history of technology.” He says that wireless communication is now. “ … a basic staple like food, clothing, and shelter.”
“Wireless now represents the biggest stage that any technology market has ever played on, offering unlimited opportunities for members of the mobile communications supply chain,” Rebello said in a press release. “Because of the prevalence of mobile communications, the focus of the global technology supply chain has shifted away from the slower-growing computer market toward fast-expanding wireless-oriented platforms he says, ”The vast size of the installed base means wireless delivers greater opportunities for content and service developers to reach a large part of the population. Furthermore, the evolution of mobile handsets into smartphones is leading to the deployment of more value-added services, software, and components.”
Wireless subscriptions vary widely by region
iSuppli says wireless subscriptions vary widely by region. At the low-end is the combined Africa and Middle East region at 50% to 157.6% in Western Europe. The global installed base of wireless devices will amount to 4.9 billion at the end of 2010. The remaining subscribers will be accounted for by added Subscriber Identification (SIM) modules used in mobile handsets and services to Machine-to-Machine (M2M) communications systems. IntoMobile points out that 47.6 million subscriptions were added per month since December 2008 to reach current levels.
Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedIn, Facebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.
Dell Number 2 again
I wrote about Dell losing its #2 role in the PC market but now iSuppli reports that Dell (DELL) has regained its customary rank in the global PC market behind HP. After nine months in third place, the Texas-based OEM retook the number 2 place from Taiwan-based Acer (ACID) in the second quarter of 2010. The change is primarily due to decreased Acer sales and not improved sales for Dell.
In the second quarter shipped Dell shipped 10.5 million units worldwide, down a negligible 1.2 percent from 10.7 million units in the first quarter. This gave Dell a 12.8 percent share of global shipments, down from 13.1 percent in the first quarter according to iSuppli.
However, iSuppli says Acer experienced a 6.2 percent shipment decline in the second quarter, with its shipments falling to 10.2 million units, down from 10.9 million in the first quarter. As a result, Acer’s share declined to 12.4 percent, down from 13.3 percent in the first quarter. Acer’s decline was notable given the global PC market’s 1.1% sequential rise in the second quarter, with shipments amounting to 82.5 million units, up from 81.6 million in the first quarter.
“With its product line heavily focused on mobile PCs, Acer’s sequential decline in notebook shipments affected its position at the total PC level more than its competitors, which were able to draw on the upswing in desktop shipments to bolster their total shipments,” said Matthew Wilkins, principal analyst, compute platforms research for iSuppli.
Dell’s share of the global PC market had been steadily declining since the second quarter of 2008. At that time the company accounted for 16% of worldwide shipments and held a 6.5% point lead over Acer. However, by the third quarter of 2009, Dell’s share had dwindled to 12.9 percent, allowing Acer to slip past and take the world’s No. 2 position.
“The second-quarter results show the market-share battle between Dell and Acer is not over and that it will continue to rage,” Wilkins said.
The second quarter marked HP’s 16th consecutive quarter as the No. 1 worldwide PC brand, with a market share of 18.1 percent.
Top 5 PC OEM Ranking Q2 2010
| Q2 2010 Rank | OEM | Q2 2010 Shipments | Q2 2010 Share | Q1 2010 Shipments | Q1 2010 Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hewlett-Packard | 14,995 | 18.1% | 15,965 | 19.6% |
| 2 | Dell | 10,541 | 12.8% | 10,668 | 13.1% |
| 3 | Acer | 10,191 | 12.4% | 10,870 | 13.2% |
| 4 | Lenovo | 8,327 | 10.1% | 7,020 | 8.6% |
| 5 | Toshiba | 4,456 | 5.4% | 4,575 | 5.6% |
| Others | 34,020 | 41.2% | 32,499 | 39.8% | |
| TOTAL | 82,490 | 100% | 81,596 | 100% |
Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedIn, Facebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.


The expedition had four points plotted to the west of the well to investigate the main path of oil after the April accident that led to a massive release of crude oil. They concluded that the dissolved oxygen level was not as low as scientists would have expected if a greater proportion of oil and gas had dissolved in the water.
