Discover how mastering email communication can boost business efficiency, avoid common pitfalls, and ensure secure, respectful online interactions.
Turkey Revenge
The turkeys are pissed this Thanksgiving they are seeking revenge.
Germs Infest 60% of Americas Phones
60% of Americans sleep with their phones, harboring germs. Cleaning regularly with UV sanitizer or alcohol wipes can help keep your phone and bed germ-free.
Smartphone Sanitizing: A Practical Guide
Securely erase personal data from your old smartphone before recycling. Protect your identity from hackers—easy steps to follow.
Why Soft Skills Matter in Today’s Job Market
Boost your career with essential soft skills like communication, teamwork, and emotional intelligence. Learn why they’re crucial for workplace success.
Who Rules the Internet?

Singapore-based ISP Vodien published an infographic that lists the 100 highest-ranking websites in the U.S. by traffic, according to website analytics company Alexa. There are over 1.1 billion websites on the Internet, but the majority of all traffic actually goes to a very small number of firms. Seven companies control 30% of the top 100 websites and the related web traffic.
Not surprisingly Alphabet controls the most popular sites on the web, Google and YouTube. Surprisingly, Microsoft controls the most sites in the top 100. Redmond controls seven of the top web properties including recently purchased LinkedIn, Bing, and Microsoft.com. For a long time, MSFT’s online efforts were a disaster. That seems to have changed with Azure, but I still hate Bing. According to the Vodien infographic Alphabet controls four of the most popular sites.
The Visual Capitalist points out that Google.com gets an astounding 28 billion visits per month. The next closest is also a Google-owned property, YouTube, which brings in 20.5 billion visits.
Facebook (FB) controls two of the most popular websites; Facebook (#3) and Instagram (#13).
Jeff Bezo’s firm Amazon (AMZN) directs four popular websites;
- Amazon.com (#4),
- Imdb (#29),
- Twitch (#40),
- Washington Post (#54), and
- Amazon Web Services (#68).
The infographic says Verizon (VZ) now controls the Huffington Post (#49) and AOL (#59) and will control Yahoo (#5) and Tumlr (#12) if the deal closes in 2017 Q2.
Reddit.com comes in at #7 and Reddituploads.com is #61.
Online retailer eBay comes in as the #8 website.
POTUS favorite Twitter (TWTR) is the 9th ranked website and t.co is #25.
Video streamer Netflix comes in ranked #10 by Vodien.
Microsoft (MSFT) controls 7 of the top 100 websites with recently purchased LinkedIn at #11, Live.com #14. so-so search engine Bing is #17, followed by Office.com (#23), Microsoft Online Services (#24), MSN (#37), and Microsoft.com (#41).
rb-
The consolidation of all of this web traffic is troubling. The current administration is going to allow online firms to sell all the personal information they collect to the government, data aggregators or anybody else to make a buck.
Related articles
- The 25 Most Popular Digital Properties in 4Q16 (marketingprofs.com)
Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedIn, Facebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.
How Much Code Does It Take?
David McCandless from Information is Beautiful tries to answer the question of how many millions of lines of code does it take to? For reference, the Visual Capitalist calculates that a million lines of code (MLOC), if printed, would be about 18,000 pages of text. That’s 14x the length of Leo Tolstoy’s War and Peace. The total lines of code to run systems vary widely as Mr. McCandless shows in the infographic.
It took less than a million lines of code to run the NASA Space Shuttle.
• The Mars Rover Curiosity takes less than 5 million lines of code to run.
• The latest version of the Firefox web browser includes just under 10 million lines of code.
• General Motors’ (GM) Chevy Volt requires just over 10 million lines of code.
• Microsoft (MSFT) Office 2008 for the Apple (AAPL) Mac consists of over 35 million lines of code.
• And it took 50 million lines of code to bring us Microsoft Vista.
• Finally, all Google (GOOG) services combine for a whopping 2 billion lines – that means it would take 36 million pages to “print out” all of the code behind all Google services. That would be a stack of paper 2.2 miles high!

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedIn, Facebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.
What to Think About Before You Click
Readers of the Bach Seat know that the Internet can be a risky place. The typical advice to stay safe on the Intertubes is to think before you click. But why should you care and what should you think about before you click on a link in your email or on Facebook? Email is the leading source of attacks at home and at work.
Kaspersky reports that over 2/3 of emails sent in 2014 were SPAM. Merely clicking on a SPAM link can lead to password and data theft, and even “drive-by” malware downloads. In order to stay safe at work and at home ESet wants you to ask yourself these questions before you click on any link:
1.
Do you trust the person sending or posting the link? People have gotten better at distinguishing good emails and links from bad. Nonetheless, you still need to be alert, so the first question to ask yourself is:
- Do I trust the person sending or sharing this link? If you don’t recognize the name, the email account, or the content, delete it.
2. Do you trust the platform? Here’s what we mean by “platform”: A link shared on your company’s private Intranet is likely to be safe. But anybody can send you an email — so be skeptical.
Pay special attention to Twitter (TWTR) and Facebook (FB), as both social media sites have been hit by copious amounts of spam. Online security experts have found that many social media accounts are fake and pose a risk to anyone they come in contact with.
- Researchers say that an average of 40% of Facebook and 20% of Twitter accounts claiming to represent a Fortune 100 brand are fake. 99% of malicious URLs posted on social media channels led to malware or phishing attacks.
3. Does this link coincide with a major world event? Cybercriminals seize any opportunity to get someone to click a link. They commonly use news events like natural disasters, Olympics, and World Cups to lure victims to identity theft or malware sites.
4. Do you trust the destination? Look at the link that has been shared. Does it go to a website you recognize? If you don’t trust or don’t know, the destination, don’t click the link.
5. Is it a shortened link? The rise of social media, especially Twitter, has prompted people to shorten links for convenience. Bad guys can easily shorten scam links, making them harder to spot.
- With shortened links, the advice is clear; ask yourself the above four questions and if you’re unsure still, use LongURL and CheckShortURL, to restore the shortened link to its original length.
rb-
Even if you follow this advice, you still need to be alert. If for whatever reason, you’re unsure, you could pick up a phone and call them (Did you remember that you can talk to people on phones?) to verify that they did indeed send that information and maybe talk about something else too.
Related articles
- Is Social Media Changing the “Truth?” How To Make Sure Your Information Is Reliable (maketecheasier.com)
Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedIn, Facebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.
Chatbots Are Evolving
The momentum behind chatbots is growing. American Banker reports that major banks are actively experimenting with chatbots. Chatbots is short for chat robot, a computer program that simulates human conversation, or chat, through artificial intelligence. Typically, a chatbot will communicate with a real person, but applications are being developed in which two chatbots can communicate with each other. Chatbots are used in applications such as e-commerce customer service and call centers.
Banks trying to decide how to use chatbots include Ally, BBVA, Bank of America, Barclays, Capital One, Societe General/a>, and USAA. A survey conducted by Personetics found that 87% of bankers say they plan to do something with chatbots by 2020.
Penny Crosman, the author reports that a growing number of vendors are offering prefab chatbots trained with documents, data, and conversations about financial products and topics. Some are intended to replicate the interaction with a human, while others are styled more like workhorses. The author describes four types of chatbots being used today.
Types of chatbots
The conversationalist – Kai is the Chatbot from Kasisto. Kasisto is a spinoff of the research lab, SRI International. SRI developed the first public Artificial Intelligence (AI) Siri, which Apple purchased in 2010 for use in the iPhone.
SearchCIO defines AI as the simulation of human intelligence processes by machines, especially computer systems. These processes include learning, reasoning, and self-correction. Particular applications of AI include expert systems, speech recognition, and machine vision.
“Siri knows a lot — it’s very broad but very shallow,” Zor Gorelov, CEO and co-founder of Kasisto. A group of SRI researchers realized a financial services chatbot would have to be narrow and deep and started working on one. BBVA approached the group in 2009. BBVA was looking for human-like interactions from a chatbot, and the two organizations partnered to create a virtual banking assistant. Mr. Gorelov said the SRI researchers “interviewed people across the banking universe at BBVA … transcribed tens of thousands of calls.”
A staff of full-time writers called “artificial intelligence interaction designers” produces dialogues for Kai. American Banker says they also constantly monitor the behavior and user interactions. General banking knowledge has also been embedded. “You can ask Kai questions about CDs, IRAs, credit scores — it’s the smartest banker you can imagine from a customer onboarding point of view: how do I open an account, what document do I need?” Kasisto’s Gorelov says there are 10 to 11 messages exchanged between Kai and users during an average session,
The article noted that Kai is used by digibank, a mobile-only bank launched in India by DBS Bank in Singapore, and it’s being piloted by the Royal Bank of Canada.
The Doer – Personetics has built a library of customer insights for its chatbots. Its builders fed the chatbot technology financial services information for five years and fueled it with unsupervised and supervised machine learning, natural language understanding, logic inference, and associative knowledge according to AB.
While other chatbots might aim to simulate a real conversation, Personetics tries to make it clear the customer is not dealing with a human to avoid potential confusion.
Eran Livneh, vice president of Personetics explained the chatbot is akin to an employee who understands banking and serving customers really well. The chatbots can walk customers through steps, provide predictive messages and behavior insights, and automatically perform tasks like money management.
So though they can “chat” with customers, they’re primarily designed to actually do things for them. Ally Bank and Societe Generale use chatbots by Personetics.
The linguist – Montreal-based software company North Side, specializes in giving its chatbot, VerbalAccess, a precise understanding of language, whether spoken or typed, through natural language processing technology.
The article notes that North Side didn’t start out in banking. Originally it created a video game that lets players communicate with characters. “That’s how we made our natural language understanding pipeline robust,” said Eugene Joseph, North Side’s CEO.
North Side doesn’t try to glean insights from analyzing customer behavior. Instead, it takes commands and acts on them, such as making a payment or displaying a transaction. If a user asks, “What have I spent on coffee in the last month?” North Side’s chatbot will understand the question and translate it to an API call that will extract the answer automatically. It would make the same calls that might be made by a mobile banking app or online banking site, but with the added ability to translate from the imprecise way a human might ask something to language the software can understand..
The chatbot is trained to clarify users’ questions. “If what is said is incomplete, it will elicit the missing information,” Mr.Joseph said. “That’s very important because people speak in an incomplete way. We know what to ask for.”
The Teller – Sidharth Garg began working on his chatbot, Teller, while at Columbia Business School. He told AB, “I wanted to use the recent advances in natural language processing and the opening of messaging platforms to help people learn the basics of personal finance.”
To feed Teller the information to answer customers’ questions, he went through blogs and personal finance books, attempting to answer every general personal finance question he could think of. Mr. Garg explained the goal was to make retirement options easy to understand. He “…put together Buzzfeed-style graphics that explain the different types of retirement accounts into something someone could understand on their mobile device.”
He decided to focus on the business-to-consumer market. “People are more inclined to chat with a banking assistant that comes from an institution they already trust,” Mr. Garg told the author. “They already have a captive audience of customers and they would also allow for easy integration with their bank accounts.”
Recently, he’s been running a pilot program with Brooklyn Cooperative Federal Credit Union that has provided more real-world data to train the chatbot. For now, the bot is answering only the most general questions for the credit union’s customers. Eventually, the plan is to integrate the chatbot with the credit union’s back-end system, to let it answer questions specific to customers’ accounts.
rb-
I have written about chatbots a couple of times on the Bach Seat. Google, Facebook, Microsoft, and even Pizza Hut are experimenting with bot-to-human interactions. Chatbots will get smarter as more people keep using them, and as developers perfect the tools to turn the software into what people want and need. Like Personetics’ Livneh said, “Customers generally like things that help them with the day-to-day activities.” Chatbots will also cost jobs.
Related articles
- What the AI? Trends in Artificial Intelligence, and What’s to Come (business2community.com)
Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedIn, Facebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.
Your Bad Password Habits
Yet more proof that passwords suck. Kaspersky Lab has published new data that reinforce the fact that passwords suck. Kaspersky found that Internet users around the world have bad password habits. Most users have not mastered how to use passwords effectively to protect themselves online.
The Kaspersky research has shown that people are putting their online safety at risk by making bad password decisions and simple password mistakes that may have far-reaching consequences. The research outlined in Networks Asia unearthed three common bad password habits that are putting many Internet users at risk. Internet users:
Common bad password habits
- Use the same password for multiple accounts, meaning that if one password is leaked, several accounts can be hacked.
- Use weak passwords that are easy to crack.
- Store their passwords insecurely, defeating the point of having passwords at all.
Andrei Mochola, Head of Consumer Business at Kaspersky Lab said, “Considering the amount of private and sensitive information that we store online today, people should be taking better care to protect themselves with effective password protection.”
Password research
- 10% of people use the same password for all their online accounts. Should one password be leaked, these people are at risk of having every account
hacked and exploited. - 18% have faced an account hacking attempt but few have effective and cyber-savvy password security in place.
- Only 30% of Internet users create new passwords for different online accounts
Additionally, Kaspersky found that people are not creating passwords that are strong enough to protect them from hacking and extortion. Despite that users think their online banking (51%), email (39%), and online shopping accounts (37%) need strong passwords, only;
- 47% use a combination of upper and lowercase letters in their passwords,
- 64% use a mixture of letters and numbers.
Kaspersky’s Mochola observed, “This seems obvious, but many might not realize that they are falling into the trap of making simple password management mistakes. These mistakes, in turn, are effectively like leaving the front door open to emails, bank accounts, personal files, and more.”
Mistreating their passwords
According to the article, the study found that people’s bad password habits include sharing them with others and using insecure methods to remember them.
- 28% have shared a password with a close family member.
- 22% have admitted to writing their passwords down in a notepad to help remember them. Even if a password is strong, this leaves the user vulnerable because other people may see and use it.
- 11% have shared a password with friends, making it possible for passwords to be unintentionally leaked.
Mr. Mochola described good password practices, “The best passwords cannot be found in the dictionary. They are long, with upper and lowercase letters, numbers, and punctuation marks. However, with people having so many online accounts today, it’s not easy to remember a secure password for everything. Using a password management solution can help people remember and generate strong passwords to minimize the risk of account hacking online.”
rb-
Great advice from Kaspersky, but as followers of the Bach Seat know, humans suck at passwords they use the same bad password habits here.
Related articles
Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedIn, Facebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.
