Tag Archive for Advertising

Pop-Up Ads – Tripod’s Revenge

Pop-Up Ads - Tripod's RevengeDo you remember Tripod? Founded in 1995, Tripod was a pioneer in the user-generated content market, now dominated by Mark Zuckerberg and Facebook. When you signed up for a Tripod account you could create a free website with all kinds of totally cool HTML 2.0 tricks like blink and marquee and it introduced pop-up ads.

Tripod was one of the original web destinations, including GeoCities and Angelfire trying to build online communities. Like all web properties, the site struggled to monetize the site. At first, the site relied on banner ads to fund the site. Banner ads were pioneered in 1994 by Hotwired (a long-gone online addition to Wired magazine). Even in the 1990s, online advertising was not popular.

Tripod site

The banner ads got in the way of the content. Advertisers were not always happy with the pages their banners appeared on. Tripod’s advertising methods changed when, as internet lore recalls, a big car manufacturer was not happy about their ad displaying on a page about sodomy that Tripod was hosting.

Tripod invented pop-up ads

code that would open the ad in a separate window

Ethan Zuckerman, one of the original Tripod employees, came up with a solution. He hacked together some code that would open the ad in a separate window. In 1996 he designed a vertically-oriented pop-up window that included navigation tools and an ad for inclusion on web pages.

The separate window would pop up and display promotional content in a new individual browser window that appeared on top of the active browser window. Mr. Zuckerman’s pop-up ad has been adapted and used across all OS’s screens. Mr. Zuckerman says his hack was intended to be less intrusive than inserting an ad into the middle of a user’s homepage.

The “innovation” took off. Pop-ups became one of the most hated forms of online advertisement. Occasionally pop-up ads can be useful – most of the time they are annoying, Some pop-up ads can be dangerous. No matter what the marketers call them, pop-up, pop-under, exit-overlays, exit-intent, click-activated, etc. – nearly 3/4’s of users told Hubspot they dislike “Online pop-ups.”

People’s hate pf pop-ups lead to the development of pop-up blockers. In 2002 Henrik Sørensen published the first pop-up blocker Adblock. The EFF reports that as of the end of 2018, ad blocking software had roughly 200 million daily active users.

Mr. Zuckerman, now at MIT, offered an apology for his role in what the pop-up has become. He wrote, “I’m sorry. Our intentions were good”. He believes that “advertising is the original sin of the web.”

rb-

Website marketers are preventing their customers from viewing content if they're using an ad blocker.

The pop-up battle which started in 1996 is escalating. Website marketers are fighting back. They are preventing their customers from viewing content if they’re using an ad blocker. Despite reports that 74% of AdBlock users say that they leave websites when they encounter such an ad block wall.

Stay safe out there!

Related article

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

1983 Mobile Device

Commodore EXECUTIVE 64 ad from Australia, could be the first mobile device. It was advertised as the first “portable” full-color computer. The Commodore EXECUTIVE 64 was introduced in 1983 and had a retail of $1,000.

Commodore EXECUTIVE 64 1983 Mobile Device

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

What a Deal

From BYTE in 1980

What a Deal

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

LinkedIn Pulls A Facebook

LinkedIn Pulls A FacebookBusiness social networking firm LinkedIn made me get out of my Bach Seat and jump up and down this morning, LinkedIn (LNKD) pulled a Facebook and made a sneaky change to the terms of service that made user’s names and photographs available to advertisers if they want to use them.

Thankfully BrandImpact tells how to keep up your privacy.

  1. LinkedIn logogClick on your name on your LinkedIn homepage in the upper right corner. From the drop-down menu, select “Settings.”
  2. In the “Settings” page, select “Account.”
  3. In the column next to “Account,” click “Manage Social Advertising.”
  4. Uncheck the box next to “LinkedIn may use my name, photo in social advertising.”
  5. Now check the new default settings under “E-mail Preferences” and “Groups, Companies & Applications.” Make sure to opt-out of “Data Sharing with 3rd-party applications” as well.

In the face of negative user reactions and a growing media firestorm, LinkedIn has decided to make a change in the policy. That’s a step in the right direction. I have written about social networking’s assault on privacy here, here, and here.

rb-

Even though LinkedIn has backtracked on this it still irks me. I believe that most people on LinkedIn are working on their professional brand and do not want to be associated with ads. Facebook is for kids who don’t care, LinkedIn was for professionals. This seems like LinkedIn is wasting the goodwill they’ve built up over the years as it tries to justify its $9 billion IPO valuation. This is not a good sign for LinkedIn, I doubt they can beat Facebook in the teenie-bopper social network segment.

What do you think?

Are you concerned about your privacy on Facebook?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Related articles

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

Techs Add Ads In Everything

The New York Times is reporting that Apple Computers has filed an application with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office to patent to puts ads in everything. They  are working on a technology called “Advertisement in Operating System.” Advertisement in Operating System will display advertising on almost anything that has a screen of some kind: computers, phones, televisions, media players, game devices, and other consumer electronics.

The patent application claims the distinctive feature of the patent is it that doesn’t simply invite a user to pay attention to an ad — it also compels attentionApple’s (AAPL) technology, according to the NYT, can freeze the device until the user clicks a button or answers a test question to prove that he or she has dutifully noticed the commercial message. Because this technology would be embedded in the innermost core of the device, the ads could appear on the screen at any time, no matter what one is doing.

Within this new technology, Apple has developed what it calls an “enforcement routine” that makes people watch ads they may not want to watch. What the application calls the “enforcement routine” entails administering periodic tests, like displaying on top of an ad a pop-up box with a response button that must be pressed within five seconds before disappearing to confirm that the user is paying attention.

These tests “can be made progressively more aggressive if the user has failed a previous test,” the application says. One option makes the response box smaller and smaller, requiring more concentration to find and banish. According to the NYT,  the system can require that the user press varying keyboard combinations, the current date, or the name of the advertiser upon command, again demonstrating “the presence of an attentive user.” The system also has a version for music players, inserting commercials that come with an audible prompt to press a particular button to verify the listener’s attentiveness.

The Apple inventors, including Apple CEO Steve Jobs, whose name is the first listed on the application, say the advertising would enable computers and other consumer electronics products to be offered to customers free or at a reduced price. In exchange, recipients would agree to view the ads (rb- and give their personal data). If down the road, users found the advertisements and the attentiveness tests unendurable, they could pay to make the device “ad-free” on a temporary or permanent basis.

Google logoThe Download Squad points out that over at Google (GOOG), a “highly praised” feature of the newly announced Chrome OS‘s “totally new” approach to security sounds similar to Apple’s plan for forced ads. Chrome OS is reported to be self-healing. If the OS detects something it does not like, a “verified boot” will restore files to their previous state as if nothing ever happened. Since it is Google’s OS they get to decide what is or isn’t malicious. It is easy to imagine that anything which interferes with the delivery of Google-powered content would be considered malicious. Applications like AdBlock or AdSweep which block Google ads may not be allowed. Chrome OS will put Google in complete control over the delivery platform its audience is using.

Microsoft logoMicrosoft (MSFT) has experimented with ads in software since June 2007 with Microsoft Works. Now Microsoft is working on placing advertisements in a more conspicuous location next year with a free version of Office. Office Starter 2010 is a free version of Office that is pre-installed on some PCs. It will include a small Microsoft display ad in the lower-right corner of the screen and offers versions of Word and Excel with fewer functions than the regular paid ones.

In Office Starter 2010, Microsoft is not seeking revenue from advertising. They are using the ads only to promote the full-featured, commercial versions of Office. The company plans to take customers “along a journey to educate them about the product,” said Bryson Gordon, a director on Microsoft’s Office team said in the NYT piece. Microsoft will use a gentle approach to the up-sell. Customers can ignore the ads, which will sit passively in the corner of the screen,

rb-

The tech world is moving backward taking cues from Free-PC and ZapMe because the public is cheap. Apple, Google and MSFT are counting on the fact their product are so “insanely great” and integrated into our lives that we as consumers can’t live without Gmail or iTunes. Now that we are all junkies of cheap tech, the tech firms are going to exploit this. The price of free starts with a text ad then it will be a banner ad then a pop-up and then a full video where you have to interact with the device to use it.

MSFT, Apple, and Google have huge organizations to run, CEO’s and Wall $treet bankers that need their bonuses so the move to monetize all their services has just begun. The big question is how far will this go? Will the pillars of tech add so many clicks, surveys, ads, and forced interactions to eventually make their products unwieldy and useless. Look where FreePC and ZapMe are today.

Forced advertising is not some new idea lots of malware force their victims to view web pages they did not request.

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.