Tag Archive for Angry Birds

Mobile Device Info

Mobile Device InfoIn case there was any doubt that mobile devices are the real deal, here are some stats from Digby. Globally, 80% of consumers have used computers to get access to the Web within the previous seven days. Sixty percent used their mobile devices to do so. 25% of US mobile web users only access the web from their mobile phones.

Angry Birds know where you live

Angry Birds know where you live75% of the public may be giving away their physical location when downloading smartphone applications, according to mobile security vendor AdaptiveMobile. 69% of smartphone users say such privacy breaches are unacceptable, yet Help Net Security reports that 75% fail to read the terms and conditions, which include access to data such as their physical location.

Consumers are outraged that their data may not be secure but are unwilling to protect themselves,” AdaptiveMobile VP of Handset Security, Ciaran Bradley says in the article. “We are downloading more apps than ever before, but people are unaware that their location and other information can be harvested by applications.

AdaptiveMobile research has shown that common applications including Angry Birds, Jaws, and Paper Toss have access to information including location coordinates and owner’s name, which can be shared with up to 17 different external domains including advertisers.

Consumers and the wider mobile industry need to become savvier about the information which is shared by apps,” Mike Hawkes, Chairman of The Mobile Data Association told Help Net Security. “It is becoming commonplace that personal information is shared with advertisers and developers.”

Mr. Bradley told Help Net Security that iPhone users are the most careless, with 65% completely unaware that free applications may compromise their privacy. Windows Phone users are more responsible, with 29% promising to stop downloading free applications if they had any doubt that their personal information was not safe. Windows Phone users are generally cautious, 95% of them are ‘quite’ or ‘very’ concerned about privacy infringements.

If we are to slow the rise in cybercrime, consumers need to become more aware of the need for phone security” concluded Mr. Bradley. “Not only will this frustrate hackers and other cybercriminals, but also ensure that consumers can have a safe mobile experience.”

rb-

I wrote about mobile apps stealing PII here and here.

Related articles

Cisco’s Tablets Are Doing So Well, They’re Planning At Least Two More Models For Next Year

Cisco Cius tabletThe Cisco Cius tablet for enterprises sounded like a hard sell when Cisco introduced it. But the company is apparently proving experts wrong, including me (I wrote about the Cius here and here) because Cisco‘s (CSCO) tablets are doing well enough that the company plans to release two new form factors next year, including a 10-inch version according to the BusinessInsider

Product manager Chuck Fontana told the BusinessInsider that 1,000 companies have already bought the tablet, He wouldn’t share device unit sales, but some deployments are in the hundreds, and one company plans to buy 1,500 for its mobile sales force. The tablets are sold as part of a broader communications package and include Cisco’s teleconferencing and collaboration services.

But underneath they’re straight Google (GOOG) Android tablets and can run any Android app. To prevent employees from downloading malware-infested or low-quality apps, Cisco has rolled out a custom app store called AppHQ, where every app is vetted.

The BusinessInsider says the Cius is an interesting demonstration of how the relative openness of Android versus iOS is helping it gain traction in surprising places. Cisco didn’t go to quite the lengths that Amazon (AMZN) did with the Kindle Fire, where it basically forked Android and created a custom OS. But Android is open enough that Cisco could build its own app store and ship it with its own apps front and center.

That couldn’t have worked with the iPad, where Apple (AAPL) controls the experience.

So would Cisco consider offering a Windows tablet instead once Microsoft (MSFT) Windows 8 comes out?  “No,” said Fontana, “we’re not looking to do anything from a Windows perspective. Our core approach remains on Android.

Related articles

People Are Losing Interest In The Microsoft Tablet, And It’s Not Even Out Yet

Microsoft TabletApple‘s (AAPL) iPad has already taken about 11% of the PC market, and by the time Microsoft (MSFT) and its partners get around to releasing a real competitor next year, it may be too late according to a new study from Forrester Research (FORR) in the BusinessInsider.

Near the beginning of 2011 according to the article Forrester surveyed 3,835 consumers who were considering buying a tablet. When asked which operating system they’d like on it, 48% said Windows, well ahead of iOS (16%) and Google’s (GOOG) Android (9%). The second most popular choice was “undecided” with 16%.

In September, Forrester asked the same question of a different group of 2,229 consumers. This time, iOS came in number one with 28% of the vote. Windows had only 25%, and Android was at 18%. A whole 24% were still undecided.

Overall, interest in Windows tablets dropped 21 percentage points in six months.

The BusinessInsider says the study is probably a bit skewed but says the data shows a real perception shift: consumers are thinking of tablets more like smartphones and less like PCs. That perception could carry through to the next time they’re thinking of buying a new computing device.

Related articles

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

Mobile Apps Sending User Data

Mobile Apps Sending User DataThe Wall Street Journal has continued its excellent work on data privacy. The WSJ is reporting that like many Facebook applications, many popular mobile apps are sending user data from phones to third parties. They found that most of the popular apps running on Apple (AAPL) iPhone‘s and Google (GOOG) Android systems, had sent the phone’s unique device ID to other firms without asking the user’s permission.

Big Brother WatchTechEye says that the iPhone was much worse than Google’s Android, although both Apple and Google have promised not to let such practices take place. Michael Becker of the Mobile Marketing Association told TechEye there is no anonymity. Alex Deane, director for Big Brother Watch, said  “This is alarming news. Most users of these apps don’t know this is happening and many of them wouldn’t use the app if they did know,” Mr. Deane told IT PRO. “Importantly, lots of these apps are mainstream ‘normal’ apps. It’s not just shady operators doing this

The WSJ reports that mainstream mobile productivity, games, and music apps are sending user data elsewhere. The data is mostly sent to ad companies so they can tailor ads to the user’s history for better results. The paper found that 56 of the apps in the investigation sent unique information to other companies without the user knowing or agreeing to the sharing. 47 of the apps sent the mobile phone’s location to third parties, and five of the apps sent age, gender, and personal details to outsiders. Eighteen of the 51 iPhone apps sent information to Apple.

The Journal found:

  • iPhone appThe app that shares the most personal info is an iPhone app called TextPlus 4. The app sent the unique ID of the device to eight ad companies and sent the zip code, user’s age, and gender to two more firms.
  • The free and paid versions of the wildly popular Angry Birds app on an iPhone. The apps sent the phone’s UDID and location to the Chillingo unit of Electronic Arts Inc., which markets the games.
  • The popular music site Pandora was a big offender,  sending age, gender, location, and phone identifier to various ad networks.
  • Google AndroidBoth Android and iPhone versions version of Paper Toss sent the phone ID number to at least five ad companies.
  • The Android app for social networking site MySpace sent age and gender, device ID, user’s income, ethnicity, and parental status to Millennial Media, a big ad network.

Among all the mobile apps tested by the WSJ, the most widely shared detail was the unique ID number assigned to every mobilephone. It is effectively a “supercookie,” says Vishal Gurbuxani, co-founder of Mobclix Inc., an exchange for mobile advertisers. The “UDID,” or Unique Device Identifier is set by the phone makers, carriers or makers of the operating system and typically can’t be blocked or deleted.

The WSJ has released a short video explaining its investigation,

Super CookiesThe great thing about mobile is you can’t clear a UDID like you can a cookie,” Meghan O’Holleran of Traffic Marketplace told the WSJ. Traffic Marketplace which is an Internet ad network that is expanding into mobile apps uses UDID’s, “That’s how we track everything.” Ms. O’Holleran told the WSJ that Traffic Marketplace monitors smartphone users whenever it can. “We watch what apps you download, how frequently you use them, how much time you spend on them, how deep into the app you go,” she says.

According to the WSJ, Mobclix matches more than 25 ad networks with 15,000 apps seeking advertisers. The company collects mobile phone IDs, encodes them, and assigns them to interest categories based on what apps people download and how much time they spend using an app, among other factors. By tracking a phone’s location, Mobclix also makes a “best guess” of where a person lives, says Mr. Gurbuxani, the Mobclix executive. Mobclix then matches that location with spending and demographic data from Nielsen Co.

Mobclix logoMobclix uses the data to place a user in one of 150 “segments” it offers to advertisers, from “green enthusiasts” to “soccer moms “to “die-hard gamers.”  “Die-hard gamers” are 15-to-25-year-old men with more than 20 apps on their phones who use an app for more than 20 minutes at a time. “It’s about how you track people better,” Mr. Gurbuxani told the WSJ.

Google was the biggest data recipient in the WSJ tests. Its AdMob, AdSense, Analytics, and DoubleClick units collectively heard from 38 of the 101 apps. Google’s main mobile ad network, AdMob lets advertisers target phone users by location, type of device and “demographic data,” including gender or age group. Google, whose ad units work on both iPhones and Android phones, says it doesn’t mix data received by these units.

Google AdmobApple operates its iAd network only on the iPhone. Apple targets ads to phone users based largely on what it knows about them through its App Store and iTunes music service according to the WSJ article. The targeting criteria can include the types of songs, videos, and apps a person downloads, according to an Apple ad presentation reviewed by the Journal. The presentation named 103 targeting categories, including karaoke, Christian/gospel music, anime, business news, health apps, games, and horror movies.

According to the WSJ, the ad networks offer software “kits” that automatically insert ads into an app. The kits track where users spend time inside the app. A developer quoted in the WSJ article says ads targeted by location bring in two to five times as much money as untargeted ads. In its software-kit instructions, Millennial Media lists 11 types of information about users that developers may send to “help Millennials provide more relevant ads.” They include age, gender, income, ethnicity, sexual orientation, and political views.

Apple iAd networkThe WSJ also claims that most of the apps don’t have written privacy policies. Forty-five of the 101 apps didn’t offer privacy policies on their websites or inside the apps at the time of testing. Neither Apple nor Google requires app privacy policies. Both Google and Apple say that they require apps to ask permission to send information to third parties. However, many app developers skirt the rules the WSJ reports.

Apple says iPhone apps “cannot transmit data about a user without obtaining the user’s prior permission and providing the user with access to information about how and where the data will be used.” Many apps tested by the Journal appeared to violate that rule, by sending a user’s location to ad networks, without informing users. Apple declined to discuss with the WSJ how it interprets or enforces the policy.

Millennial MediaGoogle doesn’t check the apps running on Google’s Android operating system because third parties build the phones. Google requires that before users download Android apps that the developer identifies the data sources the app intends to use. Possible sources include the phone’s camera, memory, contact list, and more than 100 others. If users don’t like what a particular app wants to access, they can choose not to install the app, Google says. Google told the WSJ that app makers “bear the responsibility for how they handle user information.” “Our focus is making sure that users have control over what apps they install, and notice of what information the app accesses,” a Google spokesperson says.

rb-

The trade in your personal information grows as technology evolves. The WSJ says that Apple has recently filed a patent for a system for placing and pricing ads based on a person’s “web history or search history” and “the contents of a media library.” For example, home-improvement advertisers might pay more to reach a person who downloaded do-it-yourself TV shows, the document says. The patent application also lists another possible way to target people with ads: the contents of a friend’s media library.

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.