Tag Archive for Apple

EDU- The Most Bot-Infested Sector

EDU- The Most Bot-Infested SectorDarkReading confirms, what I have pointed out to Bach Seat readers for a while, education people are terrible at IT security. The latest evidence comes from a BitSight report which concludes that the more bots in-house, the more a company is likely to have reported a data breach. The report finds that the education sector harbors the most botnet infections, according to a new study. The study highlights how bot infections correlate with a higher rate of data breaches.

education sector harbor the most botnet infectionsThe DarkReading article says BitSight, a security ratings firm, studied public breach disclosure data between March 2014 and March 2015 across the finance, retail, healthcare, utilities, and education industries. The study concluded that organizations with a botnet grade of B or below had experienced data breaches at a rate of 2.2 times more than organizations with an A grade. The report says there is a correlation between botnet infestations and data breaches; “This does not mean the infections were the cause of the breaches; rather, it means that the infections and breach incidents are correlated.

The education sector fared poorly. Only 23% of institutions got an A as their botnet grade, and 33% get an F. The main botnets dogging schools and universities:

  • Jadtre (59.2%) – Downloads other malware and steals info;
  • Flashback (22.1%) – The Java exploit targeting Apple OS X;
  • TDSS (8.3%) – Discovered in 2011 It infects the master boot record of the target machine among other things it deletes other malware;
  • Zeus (6%) – Financial credential-stealing malware, and
  • Sality (4.4%) One of the longest-lived botnets. It was first discovered in 2003. Sality is considered to be one of the most complex and formidable forms of malware to date.

Ed TechThe report notes Flashback is malware that targets Apple computers by taking advantage of a Java vulnerability. Mac computers are popular among younger generations and educational institutions, intensifying the proliferation of this malware in education. Although the Flashback botnet itself has largely been shut down, the large number of infections that still exist indicates that people are running machines that have not been updated; thus, they are still vulnerable to other forms of infection.

Other industries received better scores better than Education.
• 74% of Financial Services firms got an A
• 57% of Retailers receive an A grade
• 53% of healthcare received an A grade
• 50% of Utilities received an A

there is a correlation between botnet infestations and data breachesThe report concludes that organizations with bot-infected machines are more likely to report a data breach. “The implications for organizations across industries are that botnet infections cannot be ignored. Companies with poor botnet grades have been breached far more often than those with good grades, and actions should be taken to mitigate these risks.

rb-

Been there done that … EDU people don’t get IT security. They don’t understand how much PII they collect and randomly hang onto. Their systems send data in clear text across the inter-tubes to change schools.

Someone is going to get breached and sued and maybe they will learn.

Related articles

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

Banks Scramble to Fight Apple Pay Fraud

Banks Scramble to Fight Apple Pay FraudSearchFinancialSecurity reports that Apple Pay fraud is on the rise and banks are rushing to fix sloppy authentication processes. Sloppy bank authentication processes are at the heart of growing Apple Pay fraud and experts worry about potential fraud with other mobile payment systems.

Apple Pay logoWhen Apple Pay was first unveiled by Apple (AAPL) in October 2014, it was touted for its increased security thanks to tokenized Device Account Numbers and the Touch ID fingerprint system. eWeek.com provided a good overview of how Apple Pay’s approval process works:

  • The camera of an iPhone 6 or 6 Plus takes a photo of the credit or debit card
  • Apple Passbook software extracts the name and expiration date, then encrypts and transmits the data to Apple
  • If the photo doesn’t allow for extraction (poor quality or card is too worn), users are allowed to manually enter the card number
  • Apple checks to see if the card is already on file in iTunes, verifying it through a match
  • But most cards aren’t already in iTunes – so Apple sends card data, phone data, and iTunes account info to the card-issuing bank
  • If verified by the bank and approved, it’s added to Apple Pay and the Apple Passbook, and it’s ready to be used for purchasing

If this provisioning is successful, the bank will automatically accept (Green Path) the info and then beam an encrypted version of the card details to be stored.

criminals have set up iPhones with stolen cardl info from Target and Home Depot hacksAccording to reports, criminals have set up iPhones with stolen personal information, which has been tracked back to accounts compromised in Target’s big data breach at the end of 2013, the Home Depot hacking in 2014, and likely the Anthem breach of 2015. The criminals take the stolen PII and call banks to authenticate a victim’s card on the new device. This is so-called “Yellow Path” authentication, where a card isn’t or rejected (Red Path), but requires more provisioning by the bank to be added to Apple Pay.

When Yellow Path authentication is required, the bank may send a one-time authorization code to the customer’s email or mobile phone that must be entered into the Apple Pay set-up.  Other banks may ask the customer to call a toll-free number where a customer service representative will try to verify the person’s identity with a series of questions about recent purchases or a home address according to the WSJ.

If this provisioning is successful, the bank will then beam an encrypted version of the card details to be stored on the Secure Element of the phone (PDF). The author contends that the heart of the problem is that some banks have lax Yellow Path processes, only asking for the last four digits of a Social Security number, leading to criminals using stolen identities and credit/debit cards to buy high-priced goods, often from Apple Stores.

Avivah Litan, a VP at Gartner (IT) said that this kind of fraud is a fundamental flaw that will affect all mobile payment services. “This isn’t necessarily an Apple Pay problem. The responsibility ultimately lies with the card issuer who must be able to prove the Apple Pay cardholder is indeed a legitimate customer with a valid card,” Ms. Litan wrote in a blog post. “That always appeared to me to be the weakest link in mobile commerce — making sure you provide the app to the right person instead of a crook.”

rb-

With the iPhone 6’s NFC capabilities, the physical card may not be required for such “purchases.” Maybe someday this will keep merchants from holding card data but for now, seems like the banks need to get their act together.

Related articles

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

What the FREAK !

What the FREAK !Earlier this month news broke that Google, Apple, and Microsoft are vulnerable to a new bug poetically called – Factoring RSA Export Keys – FREAK. The cause of the FREAK bug is not new. In fact, the origin of the FREAK back goes back to the 1990s and government meddling.

weaker HTTPS encryptionPaul Dirkin at Sophos’ Naked Security blog explains that FREAK is a risk to all users. It is a risk because an attacker can trick you and the server into settling on a much weaker HTTPS encryption scheme than from the 1990s. Basically, the attacker gets you to use what’s called “export grade” RSA encryption. Export grade encryption is a ghost from an earlier U.S. Gooberment attempt to break encryption. In the ’90s the NSA required exported encryption to be deliberately weakened. The idea was that export grade keys were just about good enough for every day, not-so-secret use, but could be cracked by superpowers with supercomputers if national security should demand it.

No one should be using export-grade keys anymore – indeed, no one usually does. But many clients and servers still support them according to Sophos. Somehow, in 2015 it never seemed to matter that the 1990 code was still lying around.

U.S. Gooberment attempt to break encryptionIf attackers can watch the traffic flowing between vulnerable devices and websites they could inject code that forces both sides to use 512-bit encryption, which can be easily cracked. It took researchers seven months to crack the key In 1999, the article claims that the same crack takes about 12 hours and $100 using Amazon’s (AMZN) cloud in 2015. It would then be technically pretty straightforward to launch a MITM by pretending to be the official website.

Now that your security is compromised, an attacker can use a “man in the middle” attack (someone who can listen into and change the network traffic between you and your destination server).

FactoringAdditionally, the author says many servers use the same RSA key over and over again. This allows attackers to use the compromised export grade key to decrypt other sessions, using the same key. Another risk Sophos claims is that export-grade keys allow evil-doers to steal both the public and private keys by using a technique known as “factoring the modulus,”  With the critical private key, criminals can now sign traffic from an imposter website as though it came from a trusted third-party.

The author says the team that identified the original FREAK vulnerability claim to have used this bug to create a fake nsa dot gov. University of Michigan computer scientists J. Alex Halderman and Zakir Durumeric, told InfoSecurity that the vulnerability affects around 36% of all sites trusted by browsers and around 10% of the Alexa top one million domains.

The good news, according to Sophos: Users of Chromium/Chrome and Firefox are OK.

The bad news – the bug affects TLS/SSL, the security protocol that puts the S into HTTPS and is responsible for the padlock in your browser’s address bar. The bug is known to exist in:

  • OpenSSL‘s TLS implementation (before version 1.0.1k), which includes Google (GOOG) Android‘s “Browser” browser, and therefore probably Samsung‘s (005930) derived browser known as “Internet.”
  • Apple (AAPL) SecureTransport puts OS X software at risk, including Safari.
  • Microsoft (MSFT) Windows Schannel TLS library puts Windows software including Internet Explorer at risk.

You can check to see if your browser is vulnerable to the FREAK attack on a UMich page here.

You can also check on your favorite website on this UMich page.

rb-

“Export grade” encryption was largely abandoned by 2000 because it was a bad idea. silly idea. It hurt the US software industry and Americans who bought an inferior product. It is still a dumb idea in 2015. As the Gooberment wants to cripple the latest generation of encryption by putting backdoors into encrypted messaging. They seem to have won with Google. Google has dumped plans to encrypt communications by default in Android.

In the short term, if you are worried, use another browser Firefox or Chrome.

Related articles

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

Scary PII Numbers

Scary PII NumbersAs you may have heard by now, the second-largest health insurer Anthem gave away at least 80 million of their customers’ PII records to hackers. I say at least because these always grow as the experts dig through the wreckage. The WSJ reports the Indianapolis-based insured did not encrypt this data (I covered encryption here and here). That means customers’ social security numbers, phone numbers, and other PII were easy targets for Chinese hackers according to CNBC.

did not encrypt data

Anthem is just the latest. There are even larger targets out there. The Business Insider published some pretty scary numbers. BI reports that somehow the biggest tech companies have done a great job at convincing people that their services for sending/receiving payments and purchasing goods are trustworthy and worthwhile. The article estimates that Apple has somewhere around a billion iTunes accounts (with plenty of PII and credit cards) on file.

This chart from BI IntelligenceApple (AAPL) is nearing a billion iTunes accounts on file, and that number is likely to surge immensely. Customers in China can now link their UnionPay payment cards to their Apple IDs: For context, UnionPay is the largest card network in the world with more cards in circulation than Visa and MasterCard combined.

Amazon (AMZN) has approx. 300 million payment cards on file while PayPal has around 200 million payment cards on record.

Apple, Amazon, PayPal Payment Cards on File - Business Insider

A second BI article indicates that based on leaked Uber data charted analyzed by BI Intelligence, the ride-sharing firm has well over 12 million payment cards on file. Their closest competitor Hailo has 4.4 million payment cards on file.

Ride-Sharing Payment Cards on File - Business Insider

rb-

You have been warned. The next mega data breach could come from a tech firm like Apple or Amazon.

Data theftThe WSJ article argues that companies can use many techniques to secure their data, but those things slow companies down, sometimes to a degree they find unacceptable.

I think most victims of identity theft or credit fraud find that unacceptable.

Related articles

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

Windows 7 Reaches Middle Age

Windows 7 Reaches Middle AgeNow that you have almost eliminated Microsoft (MSFT) Windows XP from your network and settled on Windows 7 it should be time to catch your breath. But NOOO!! Windows 7 has reached the end of mainstream support.  That’s right we are already 5 years into the Windows 7 era. Repeat after me… Windows 7 still has five years left … Windows 7 still has five years left … Windows 7 still has five years left.

MMicrosoft Windows 7 logoicrosoft commits to 10 years of security fixes and 5 years of feature enhancements and bug fixes for each major OS release. Windows 7 has moved from mainstream support – free help for everyone – to extended support, which means Microsoft will charge for help with the software. That will end in 2020 when Microsoft turns out the lights on Windows 7 for good.

The recent techno-flops from the boys and girls in Redmond, Vista, and Windows 8 have taught enterprises to plan for a new desktop OS every other release. This puts businesses in a bind. MSFT’s track record prevents forward-looking firms from organically growing their desktop fleet into the next cycle. There are those that argue that until Microsoft separates consumer from commercial desktops, Microsoft commercial customers will continue to skip one or more iterations of Windows, their only real answer to the high costs and disruption of upgrading.

Gregg KeizerMirosoft update cycle at ComputerWorld cites research from Gartner (IT) which prognosticates that many enterprises cannot change their processes. Many organizations will go through the same machinations they did with XP. Or maybe even balk at dumping Windows 7 at the same pace as the venerable Windows XP, making things worse. Michael Silver of Gartner told ComputerWorld that having a plan could help organizations avoid a repeat of XP’s expensive end-of-support scramble. Gartner believes that the same EOL mad-scramble we saw with XP will occur again when time is up on Windows 7. Mr. Silver claims:

[A repeat of Windows XP] is certainly likely to happen … One of the big differences that’s been under-considered is that because Vista took five years to come out [after XP], there were eight years between XP and Windows 7. So Windows XP felt pretty old. … Windows 7 won’t feel that old to people…” 

Microsoft Windows 10 logoMr. Keizer argues that the failure of Windows 8 to win enterprise hearts and minds has created an oddity: Even though Windows 7 has made middle age, Microsoft continues to let OEMs sell PCs running the Windows 7 business edition.  Microsoft has yet to name an end date for OEM sales of machines powered by Windows 7 Professional. But because it has promised a 12-month notice, those PCs can still be sold at least until early January 2016, when the OS has but four years of life left.

But if you are just finishing your last migration, then you don’t have all that much time to start planning the next one.

rb-

If you don’t like the Redmond hamster wheel, consider your alternatives. Sophos compares the Windows upgrade schedule to some other options. 10 years might be the best option out there. For example:

  • Apple’s (AAPL) OS X is supported for mystery years,
  • Apple’s mobile iOS is supported for mystery years (3?)
  • Android seems to leave it up to you, but don’t expect Google (GOOG) to commit to securing it.
  • Ubuntu LTS is supported for around 5 years, and
  • Red Hat Enterprise 13 years (with extended support).
Related articles

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.