Tag Archive for Apple

Apple favors IPv6 as IPv4 Dries Up

Apple favors IPv6 as IPv4 Dries UpThe American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN) has reported that the IPv4 well is just about dry in North America. On 01 July 2015, ARIN had to refuse a request for a block of IPv4 addresses. The ARIN statement says that there are still a few IPv4 numbers available in smaller block sizes. But for all intents and purposes, there are no more unassigned public IPv4 addresses. As of July 18, 2015, the ARIN IPv4 Deletion page reports only 335 /24 IPv4 address ranges are available. It is time to start looking at IPv6.

Will have an impact on the large enterprisesThe good news, according to FierceEnterpriseCommunications, is the IPv4 drought isn’t yet affecting most of the internal networks of enterprises. But it’s just a matter of time before it starts to have a greater impact on the largest of enterprises. Microsoft (MSFT), for instance, found it was out of IPv4 addresses a few weeks ago. And for the first time in ARIN’s history, they denied a company that requested a large block of IPv4 addresses. Tom Coffeen, chief IPv6 evangelist at Infoblox, in a statement to FierceEnterpriseCommunications explained:

Though the IPv4 well has run dry and threatens service providers, the sky hasn’t yet landed on enterprise networks … Most enterprises still rely on private IPv4 for their internal networks. The small number of public, routable IPv4 addresses required to connect enterprise networks to the Internet is typically provided by the ISP, making IPv4 much more critical for Internet services providers.

IPv6One company that is reacting to IPv4 scarcity is Apple (AAPL). Apple’s latest operating systems – iOS 9 for iPhones and iPads and OS X El Capitan for Macs are designed to take advantage of IPv6. The new operating systems select the fastest connection with the lowest latency, whether IPv4 or IPv6, using the Happy Eyeballs algorithm, explained David Schinazi, the CoreOS networking engineer at Apple. Devices use the Happy Eyeballs algorithm to decide which protocol to use, as many applications use a “dual-stack” approach to networking, making available both IPv4 and IPv6 connections.

FierceMobileIT says this worked out to be a 50/50 split between IPv4 and iPv6 in iOS 8 and OS X Yosemite, but for the new OSes, IPv6 will be chosen by the algorithm around 99 percent of the time, according to Apple beta testing. Apple’s Schinazi wrote in a post on the Internet Engineering Task Force mailing list that Apple considers IPv6 mainstream.

IPv6 is now mainstream instead of being an exception, there are less broken IPv6 tunnels, IPv4 carrier-grade NATs [network address translations] are increasing in numbers, and throughput may even be better on average over IPv6

The author reports that testing performed by Apple shows that the new OSes should use IPv6 addresses around 99 percent of the time. Apple operating systems have supported IPv6 by default for Mac users as part of the OS X 10.2 Jaguar release in May 2002.

Mr, Schinazi cautioned that both OSes are in beta so things might change for the final versions. “If this behavior proves successful during the beta period, you should expect more IPv6 traffic from Apple products in the future,” he added.

Related articles

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

Another Hole in Internet Armor

Another Hole in Internet ArmorAnother hole in our Internet armor has been discovered. The hole is in the Diffie-Hellman key exchange, a popular cryptographic algorithm that allows Internet protocols to agree on a shared key and negotiate a secure connection. It is fundamental to many protocols including HTTPS, SSH, IPsec, SMTPS, and protocols that rely on TLS.

Diffie-Hellman key exchangeResearchers from the University of Michigan, Inria, Microsoft Research, Johns Hopkins University, and the University of Pennsylvania have uncovered several weaknesses in how Diffie-Hellman key exchange has been deployed. In what they are calling the Logjam attack the DF flaw allows a man-in-the-middle attacker to downgrade vulnerable TLS connections to 512-bit export-grade cryptography. This allows the attacker to read and change any data passed over the connection.

The problem, according to the researchers, is that millions of HTTPS, SSH, and VPN servers all use the same prime numbers for Diffie-Hellman key exchange. Practitioners believed this was safe as long as new key exchange messages were generated for every connection. However, the first step in the number field sieve—the most efficient algorithm for breaking a Diffie-Hellman connection—is dependent only on this prime. After this first step, an attacker can quickly break individual connections.

prime numberTo prove this hypothesis, the researchers carried out this computation against the most common 512-bit prime number used for TLS and demonstrated that the Logjam attack can be used to downgrade connections to 80% of TLS servers supporting DHEEXPORT.

They also estimated that an academic team can break a 768-bit prime and that a nation-state can break a 1024-bit prime. Breaking the single, most common 1024-bit prime used by web servers would allow passive eavesdropping on connections to 18% of the Top 1 Million HTTPS domains. A second prime would allow passive decryption of connections to 66% of VPN servers and 26% of SSH servers.

VPN attackThere is speculation that this “flaw” was being exploited by nation-state bad actors. A close reading of published NSA leaks shows that the agency’s attacks on VPNs are consistent with having created, exploited, harnessed the Logjam vulnerability.

What should you do?

1 – Go to the researcher’s website https://weakdh.org/ to see if your browser is secure from the Logjam flaw. (It reported that Google Chrome Version 43.0.2357.81 (64-bit) on OSX 10.10.3 was not secure}

2 – Microsoft (MSFT) patched the Logjam flaw on May 12 with security bulletin MS15-055. A Microsoft spokesperson told eWEEK;

Customers who apply the update, or have automatic updates enabled, will be protected. We encourage all customers to apply the update to help stay protected.

3 – Google (GOOG) fixed the issue with the Chrome 42 update, which debuted on April 15. Google engineer Adam Langley wrote;

We disabled TLS False-Start with Diffie-Hellman (DHE) in Chrome 42, which has been the stable version for many weeks now.

patch for Firefox4 – Mozilla’s patch for Firefox isn’t out yet, but “we expect it to be published in the next few days,” Richard Barnes, cryptographic engineering manager at Mozilla, told eWEEK.

5 – DarkReading reports that on the server-side, organizations such as Apache, Oracle (ORCL), IBM (IBM), Cisco (CSCO), and various hosting providers have been informed of the issue. There has been no response from these tech titans.

The researchers have also provided guidance:

  1. If you have a web or mail server, they recommend  – disable support for export cipher suites and generate a unique 2048-bit Diffie-Hellman group. They have published a Guide to Deploying Diffie-Hellman for TLS with step-by-step instructions.
  2. If you use SSH, you should upgrade both your server and client installations to the most recent version of OpenSSH, which prefers the Elliptic-Curve Diffie-Hellman Key Exchange.
  3. If you’re a sysadmin or developer, make sure any TLS libraries you use are up-to-date, that servers you support use 2048-bit or larger primes, and that clients you maintain reject Diffie-Hellman primes smaller than 1024-bit.

rb-

Finally, get involved. Write someone, your representative, senator, your favorite bureaucrat, the president, your candidate, and tell them to get out of the way. 

Ars Technica notes that Logjam is partly caused by export restrictions put in place by the US government in the 1990s, to allow government agencies the ability to break the encryption used in other countries. “Logjam shows us once again why it’s a terrible idea to deliberately weaken cryptography, as the FBI and some in law enforcement are now calling for,” said Michigan’s J. Alex Halderman to the report. “Today that backdoor is wide open.”

 

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

Mobile Malware FUD?

Mobile Malware FUD?Just last week, I wondered out loud from my Bach Seat if all the hype around mobile malware was real or just more FUD. Looks like I am not alone, TechCo recently asked a similar question, “Are We Overstating the Threats from Mobile Devices?

mobile threatsThe author cites several recent reports that back up the claim that the actual mobile threats that mobile devices introduce into the enterprise are overstated. The data indicates that the mobile malware threat is statistically small and has even decreased since 2012.

• A McAfee report shows out of all the malware now out there, only 1.9% of it is mobile malware. The author equates the mobile threat to 4 million / 195 million McAfee knows about.
• Another report (PDF) from Verizon (VZ) shows even lower numbers, with only 0.03 percent of smartphones being infected with what is called “higher grade malicious code.”
hit by lighting• But some numbers go even lower than that. Damballa, a mobile security vendor that monitors roughly half of mobile data traffic, recently released a report that claims you have a better chance of getting hit by lightning than by mobile malware. Dramballa found only 9,688 smartphones out of more than 150 million showed signs of malware infection. If you do the math, that comes out to an infection rate of 0.0064 percent.

Even more interesting is that despite the increase in mobile devices, Damballa found the infection rate had declined by half compared to 2012.

Walled gardenThese reports may show mobile threats aren’t as big of a problem as previously thought, but the author asks, why the numbers are so low at all. After all, cybercriminals like to target new platforms and exploit security weaknesses. Why do they seem to be avoiding mobile devices?

The truth of the matter is that mobile users tend to get their apps from high-quality app stores. The stores from Google (GOOG) and Apple (AAPL) work to filter out suspicious apps. If malware is found in apps after they’ve already been on the market for a while, app stores can also execute a kill switch, which takes the app off the store and the devices where they were downloaded. This limits malware’s ability to spread.

remotely wipe devicesThe article concludes that companies that adopt BYOD should just ignore BYOD security; they just don’t have to go all-out as many businesses have done. Most mobile security experts say a mobile device management system remains a good investment to make sure mobile devices are handled appropriately. MDM systems also allow an organization to remotely wipe devices, thus keeping sensitive data safe in the event a device is lost or stolen. But malware really isn’t a factor in those cases, so the overall message from these recent reports is that getting worked up over mobile threats is not necessary. A company can still gain all the benefits of BYOD without having to worry incessantly over what they’re doing to protect every device that connects to their network.

rb-

What do you think?

Is mobile malware over-hyped FUD?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

 

Related articles
  • Your BYOD implementation checklist (powermore.dell.com)

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

iPads Stalled

iPads StalledReaders of Bach Seat know that I have been a skeptic of the iPads role as the leader of the “post-PC” era. The Verge looks back nostalgically to 2010 when Apple (AAPL) first introduced the iPad. Steve Jobs heralded the iPad as a “magical and revolutionary iDevice.” It was predicted to play a part in the “post-PC” era of devices. In the subsequent years since the launch of the iPad, many have debated whether the laptop is dead and the PC era over. That hasn’t quite happened yet.

Post-PC era?

Apple now earns more money from Macs than iPadsThe latest financial figures from Apple seem to have gotten this “post-pc” epoch upside-down. Apple now earns more money from Macs than it does from iPads. According to The Verge, Apple made $5.6 billion in revenue from its Mac sales in the most recent quarter and $5.4 billion in iPad revenue. The surprise revenue turnaround casts some doubt on Apple’s “post-PC revolution.” Apple’s iPad sales have been decreasing consistently in recent quarters. Apple doesn’t have an answer to counter the trend.

Tim CookRumors of an iPad Pro with a stylus have surfaced over the past year. Sadly, Apple has only chosen to refresh its line with very few improvements. The decrease in iPad sales is likely related to several factors. Consumers not refreshing tablets as much. The lack of big improvements to the iPad. Smartphones are still revolutionizing the industry more than tablets.

Macs out-selling iPads

Apple CEO Tim Cook famously rejoiced at iPad sales beating rival manufacturer’s PC sales, at the peak of iPad popularity. It’s no longer beating Apple’s own PC sales revenue. Without a major change to the iPad, this could be a trend that continues.

BI - iPad SalesApple is seeing impressive growth on the Mac side. A 10 percent increase year-over-year in Mac sales has helped push revenues past the iPad level, and Apple has been consistently bucking the trend of a PC market in decline.  As for CEO Cook, he still believes in the iPad. “It is what it is. It will play out, and at some point, it will stabilize,” Cook told analysts when asked about the lackluster iPad sales. “I am not sure precisely when, but I’m pretty confident it will.”

Broken iPadsCEO Cooks’s confidence may be misplaced. As far back as March 2015 people were saying the iPad had no clothes. The Business Insider pointed out that sales of the iPad hit a wall. They cite Credit Suisse analyst Kulbinder Garcha who believes and has the data to prove it that phablets are eating the iPad for lunch.

phablets are eating the iPad for lunch.

rb-

Credit Suisse’s Garcha is right when he speculates why would you buy an iPad when you can buy a big phone that does everything the tablet does, and more?

Related articles
  • Unreleased Apple iPad Prototype Stolen In Kidnapping (valuewalk.com)

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

iPad Deal Haunts LAUSD

iPad Deal Haunts LAUSDReaders of Bach Seat should remember the botched $1.3 Billion iPad deal the USA’s second-largest school district made with Apple (AAPL). rb- I covered the massive failure here and here. Well, it seems that buyer remorse has finally set in.

The LA Times is reporting that the Los Angeles Unified School District is now demanding a multi-million dollar refund from Apple or they may sue their former partner. In a letter obtained by LA public radio KPCC, to Apple’s general counsel, David Holmquist, LAUSD attorney wrote,

While Apple and Pearson promised a state-of-the-art technological solution for ITI  implementation, they have yet to deliver it …  the vast majority of students are still unable to access the Pearson curriculum on iPads … will not accept or compensate Apple for new deliveries of [Pearson] curriculum.

Others have called this deal an incompetent, unconscionable betrayal of LA by people who are so ignorant about technology it’s scary to imagine them responsible for anyone’s education.

Margot Douaihy documents the shameful history, which has included firings, resignations, an FBI investigation, an SEC investigation, and the $22 million “d’oh” moment when district officials realized for the very first time that iPads don’t come with keyboards.

incompetent, unconscionable betrayalThe LA Times also reports that a top lieutenant of former LAUSD Supt. John Deasy and architect of the district’s flawed and now-abandoned $1.3 billion iPads-for-all and new online student records system is now taking the helm of the Burbank school district at $241,000 a year. Why?—because Burbank BoE believes they need someone with business savvy to sort out their technology.

rb-

If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck while the FBI and SEC are investigating, it is probably a politician.

 

Related articles

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.