Tag Archive for AT&T

AT&T Tries Broadband over Powerline

AT&T Tries Broadband over PowerlineIt’s alive. It’s alive! BPL has risen from dead. Longtime readers of the Bach Seat, know the history of Broadband over Powerline. I covered it many years ago here, here, and here. Imagine my surprise when there were a number of articles popping up all over the interwebs touting mega-telecom AT&T’s (T) try at BPL 10 years after everybody else gave up on the technology.

Broadband over PowerlineComputerWorld described this latest incarnation of BPL from AT&T as a low-cost, high-speed wireless internet technology. This time Broadband over Powerline relies on plastic antennas positioned along medium-voltage power lines and not through the conductive materials inside the power lines. FierceTelecom says that AT&T will attach the plastic antennas to the power lines and serve as a mesh network to distribute signals to homes and businesses. The Project AirGig low-cost plastic antennas and devices will regenerate millimeter wave (mmWave) signals. Millimeter-wave technology relies on electromagnetic waves that are longer than x-rays but shorter than radio waves (they are found in the 10 mm to 1 mm range and are also known as extremely high-frequency waves according to New Atlas. The EHF waves can be used for 4G LTE and 5G multi-gigabit mobile and fixed deployments.

John Donovan, chief strategy officer and group president of AT&T technology and operations, told FierceTelecom that Project AirGig delivers last-mile access without any new FTTH technology and is flexible enough to be configured with small cells or distributed antenna systems.

Broadband over PowerlineTo test the technology, AT&T is looking for a place somewhere in the next year with a favorable regulatory environment, since the carrier would need to partner with an existing electric utility. John Donovan, chief strategy officer for AT&T said the trial could be in an area where existing broadband is expensive, even in the U.S.

The AirGig project relies on over 100 patents, according to an AT&T statement. There is no direct electrical connection to the power lines, although network components could receive their needed power through inductive wireless electricity from the near by power lines, AT&T Chief Technology Officer Andre Fuetsch explained to Computerworld.

ATT logoAT&T said the testing will decide what frequency AirGig will use for commercial deployment, which could occur sometime around 2020 after the carrier rolls out 5G wireless. The frequency AT&T uses will affect the range of the signal and the speed, as well as whether it is over a licensed or unlicensed band. This decision is important if AT&T plans to use BPL as another weapon in its fight with Google Fiber. Earlier versions of Broadband over Powerline were incapable of delivering the Google (GOOG) promised Gigabit of Internet access.

“It’s a transformative technology that delivers low-cost and multi-gigabit speeds using power lines,” AT&T’s Donovan said, “There’s no need for enhancements for new towers, and it’s over existing infrastructure.”

Google (GOOG) promised Gigabit of Internet accessAirGig has already been tested in outdoor locations on-campus settings. “We’ve had it up and running 4k video and cameras on campuses for quite some time,” Mr. Donovan said.

Besides using the AirGig technology as an alternative broadband service delivery option, for urban, rural, and under-served markets AT&T wants to convince the electrical utility industry to apply AirGig technology to their unique needs. ComputerWorld says utility companies would be able to use the technology to help spot problems on their power lines from something like a downed tree or cracks in the cable sheath.

rb-

New Atlas points out that earlier this year, a millimeter-wave technology system set a new world record for wireless data transmission by sending data at 6 Gbps. The technology is also showing up in other applications, including heart-rate monitors, car-safety systems, and luggage scanners.

AirGig could be profitable for AT&T. If they can make a deal with an electrical company, they can avoid expensive make ready. Which Google Fiber is struggling mightily with. By using power lines, AirGig avoids the cost of digging trenches to lay fiber optic cable.

Still, questions remain about how this version of Broadband over Powerline will do in the real world.

  • What impact will heavy rain, snow or ice have on the signal?
  • What if a tree branch falls on a power line or the lines are swinging in the wind?
  • Since mmWave transmissions need a direct line-of-sight between antennae, what happens when critters like birds or squirrels decide to perch on the antennae? Will that lead to an outage?

The ham radio lobby will likely be up in arms again when they find AT&T still likes the idea of BPL in the 30-300 GHz bands. The ARRL was a key player in killing BPL 1.0.

 

Related articles

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

T-Mobile Ordered to Turn Over Most Customer Info

T-MT-Mobile Ordered to Turn Over Most Customer Infoobile received the most government requests for subscriber data in 2014 according to a report from CNET. U.S. governments made nearly 351,940 requests for data from T-Mobile (TMUS) in 2014. The author, Roger Cheng states that the 351,940 government requests for data are the most out of any of the four national wireless carriers.

The number 4 U.S. carrier by subscriber base recently released its first transparency report. The article breaks down the government requests for T-Mobile information:

  • 177,549 criminal and civil subpoenas
  • 17,316 warrants
  • 3,000+ wiretap orders
  • Between 2,000 and 2,250 national security requests,
  • 8 requests from foreign governments.

These numbers represent an 11% increase in government demands for subscriber information over last 2013.

The article claims that Verizon and AT&T each have twice as many customers, but T-Mobile fielded more requests than its rivals.

  • Verizon (VZ) with 132 million subscribers in Q4 of 2014, saw 287,559 government requests.
  • AT&T (T), with nearly 121 million subscribers in Q4 of 2014, saw 263,755 government requests,
  • Sprint (S) with 55.5 million subscribers in Q4 of 2014, saw 308,937 government requests.
  • T-Mobile with just over 55 million subscribers in Q4 of 2014, saw 351,940 government requests.

Here is how the four wireless carriers’ government information requests compare.

CarrierSubscribersSupeanasWarrantsWireTap OrdersTotal Requests
Verizon132 million138,158`31,2141,433351,940
AT&T121 million201,75420,9852,420263,755
Sprint55.5 million308,93713,5403,772308,936
T-Mobile55 million177,43917,3163,087251,940
Totals358.5 million826,28883,05510,7121,176,571

surveillance programsTransparency reports have become increasingly popular over the past year as civil liberties groups, shareholder and consumer advocates have pressured companies to be more open about when they disclose customer information. The article claims T-Mobile was the last of the four national carriers to issue a transparency report, which comes amid continued scrutiny of surveillance programs run by U.S. three-letter agencies and friends— including the bulk collection of phone call data — that was revealed when former NSA contractor Edward Snowden leaked classified government documents.

The author notes that companies aren’t under a legal obligation to show the data in transparency reports, but have been willing to share with the hope that the reports will help repair their reputations, which have been damaged by the Snowden revelations of the past two years.

rb-

government demands for subscriber informationThis data only represents data requests where they bothered to follow U.S. laws to legally request data. How much more is there sitting in a data warehouse in the sky?  

Why is the T-Mobile number so high? Is it bad luck? Do they fight the requests the most? Are they playing ball with the TLA’s?  We may never know. VentureBeat speculates that the best way to measure how willing T-Mobile works with the government is by looking at the percentage of government requests to which T-Mobile delivered data. But T-Mobile refused to offer that information to VentureBeat.

“Regarding the additional question on breaking out the numbers further than what’s currently provided in the report, our systems were not designed to track the kind of detailed reporting that other companies engage in today,” a T-Mobile spokesperson wrote to VentureBeat.

Related articles

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

2Gbps Coming To Detroit

2Gbps Coming To DetroitNot so long ago, Comcast was leaving Detroit. Now, the embattled cable provider has announced a 2 Gbps fiber-to-the-home (FTTH) campaign in Motown. FierceTelecom reports that Comcast will bring its Gigabit Pro service to about 1.5 million homes in Michigan. The service will be offered to residential customers in Detroit, Flint, Grand Rapids, Jackson, and Lansing. Tim Collins, senior VP of Comcast’s Heartland Region, said in a release that the company’s move into Michigan is designed to address “tech-savvy residents who have a need for even faster speeds.

a need for even faster speedsSimilar to other markets, Detroit customers that live near Comcast’s fiber network will be eligible to get Gigabit Pro service. Comcast technicians will install an optical network terminal and related equipment at the customer’s home for the service. In addition to the metro-Detroit area, Comcast plans to offer the service in Benton Harbor and St. Joseph (as part of the Greater Chicago region).

Options in Detroit

Comcast has not yet disclosed what it will charge Detroiters for the Gigabit Pro offering. The author cites a DSL Reports article where Comcast was planning a $299 per month price tag for the service. That price would make it much more expensive than it competition. Google charge $70 per month for Google Fiber service or AT&T‘s (T) $120 per month charge for its gigabit services. However, it’s unclear if Comcast will adhere to that pricing when it does launch the service.

The article says today, Comcast charges $399.95 a month for its 505 Mbps tier. An Ars Technica report said Comcast’s 2 Gbps service will cost less than that. It also said that all 505 Mbps customers will be upgraded to the new Gigabit Pro service. As the MSO tries to work out pricing, it decided to delay the initial May release of the service in Detroit to a new, undetermined date.

rb-

Let’s be honest, the real hero here is Dan Gilbert and his Rocket Fiber project. As has been the case where Google Fiber has gone in, the other players suddenly show an interest in that market. I predict a win for RocketFiber, because Mr. Gilbert’s people understand customer service and Comcast hates its customers.

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

GOP Ordred to Gut FCC Over Net Neutrality

GOP Ordred to Gut FCC Over Net NeutralityThe courts turned down big Telecom’s demands to immediately kill Net Neutrality and somehow the Internet still works. But big Telecom’s House Republican stooges continue their war against consumers and the open Internet. The telecom lackeys have buried riders in a budget bill that would stop the FCC from enforcing the Net Neutrally regs until courts decide several challenges.

According to FierceCable, the GOP’s 2016 Financial Services and General Government Appropriations bill, unveiled recently, has three riders buried in the budget rules that:

  1. riders buried in the budgetPrevent the FCC from enforcing its net neutrality rules, pending what could be years of litigation.
  2. Cut the FCC budget by $73 million.
  3. Prohibits the FCC from regulating rates for both wireline and wireless Internet services.

Harold Feld, senior VP at Public Knowledge, in a responding statement told FierceCable:

Worst of all, the Appropriations Committee ban on FCC enforcement that ‘directly or indirectly’ regulates prices would prevent the FCC from ban on FCC enforcementperforming even the most basic consumer protection action, such as the recent FCC enforcement against wireless carriers requiring them to refund charges for services customers did not order or had discontinued.

Public Knowledge VP Feld concludes:

The Appropriations Committee would rather declare open season to rob American broadband subscribers with overcharges and ripoffs than allow the FCC to do its job.

Related articles

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

AT&T Already Profits from Net Neutrality

AT&T Already Profits from Net NeutralityIn further proof that no matter what – the huge corporations always win, AT&T (T), one of the most vocal opponents to net neutrality has already started to profit from it. FierceTelecom is reporting that AT&T’s new reclassification under Title II of the Communications Act as part of new net neutrality rules are working in the mega-Bell’s favor.

the huge corporations always winThe article says regulators cited Title II to justify a ruling for AT&T. The FCC ruling said AT&T should be awarded damages for being overcharged by two Michigan-based rural telcos for interstate access services. Now the FCC has to set how much money AT&T should receive from East Lansing-based Great Lakes Comnet (GLC) and Westphalia Telephone Company (WTC). The FCC wrote in its order, “We agree with AT&T.

Initially, AT&T asked for a $12 million refund and wants to avoid paying an extra $4.3 million that Westphalia and Great Lakes claim the telco owes them. The author explains that the FCC argued that AT&T was billed unlawfully because of Section 201(b) of the Communications Act. This is the part of Title II that says: “All charges, practices, classifications, and regulations for and in connection with such communication service, shall be just and reasonable, and any such charge, practice, classification, or regulation that is unjust or unreasonable is declared to be unlawful.

Verizon raised consumer phone rates to fund the broadband network they objected toIronically, during the run-up to the net neutrality decision,  AT&T, Verizon (VZ), Comcast (CMCSA), and other telcos claimed that regulation would hurt their profits, which seems like misinformation BS. The FierceTelecom article reports that the FCC said that it won’t set specific price caps or tell service providers what they can charge for service, consumers can complain to the FCC if their provider is overcharging them for service.

FierceTelecom also points to an Ars Technica report, that Verizon (VZ), another outspoken critic of applying Title II to broadband services, ironically used its common carrier status for POTS services to build its FiOS fiber-to-the-home (FTTH) network. Besides leveraging Title II to get access to utility poles and rights-of-way to string up fiber, Verizon raised consumer phone rates to fund the fiber build.

rb-

This could be written-off as unintended consequences or is it? Is the goobermnet in bed with the Telco’s and all the net neutrality hub-bub was just a show?

Quoting MLive

the leaders making our laws, writing our budgets, and setting the agenda are not widely seen as effective … there’s a serious and alarming lack of leadership …

Related articles

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.