Tag Archive for Botnet

EDU- The Most Bot-Infested Sector

EDU- The Most Bot-Infested SectorDarkReading confirms, what I have pointed out to Bach Seat readers for a while, education people are terrible at IT security. The latest evidence comes from a BitSight report which concludes that the more bots in-house, the more a company is likely to have reported a data breach. The report finds that the education sector harbors the most botnet infections, according to a new study. The study highlights how bot infections correlate with a higher rate of data breaches.

education sector harbor the most botnet infectionsThe DarkReading article says BitSight, a security ratings firm, studied public breach disclosure data between March 2014 and March 2015 across the finance, retail, healthcare, utilities, and education industries. The study concluded that organizations with a botnet grade of B or below had experienced data breaches at a rate of 2.2 times more than organizations with an A grade. The report says there is a correlation between botnet infestations and data breaches; “This does not mean the infections were the cause of the breaches; rather, it means that the infections and breach incidents are correlated.

The education sector fared poorly. Only 23% of institutions got an A as their botnet grade, and 33% get an F. The main botnets dogging schools and universities:

  • Jadtre (59.2%) – Downloads other malware and steals info;
  • Flashback (22.1%) – The Java exploit targeting Apple OS X;
  • TDSS (8.3%) – Discovered in 2011 It infects the master boot record of the target machine among other things it deletes other malware;
  • Zeus (6%) – Financial credential-stealing malware, and
  • Sality (4.4%) One of the longest-lived botnets. It was first discovered in 2003. Sality is considered to be one of the most complex and formidable forms of malware to date.

Ed TechThe report notes Flashback is malware that targets Apple computers by taking advantage of a Java vulnerability. Mac computers are popular among younger generations and educational institutions, intensifying the proliferation of this malware in education. Although the Flashback botnet itself has largely been shut down, the large number of infections that still exist indicates that people are running machines that have not been updated; thus, they are still vulnerable to other forms of infection.

Other industries received better scores better than Education.
• 74% of Financial Services firms got an A
• 57% of Retailers receive an A grade
• 53% of healthcare received an A grade
• 50% of Utilities received an A

there is a correlation between botnet infestations and data breachesThe report concludes that organizations with bot-infected machines are more likely to report a data breach. “The implications for organizations across industries are that botnet infections cannot be ignored. Companies with poor botnet grades have been breached far more often than those with good grades, and actions should be taken to mitigate these risks.

rb-

Been there done that … EDU people don’t get IT security. They don’t understand how much PII they collect and randomly hang onto. Their systems send data in clear text across the inter-tubes to change schools.

Someone is going to get breached and sued and maybe they will learn.

Related articles

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

SmartPhone Zombie Apocalypse

SmartPhone Zombie ApocalypseIf you have a smartphone, online criminals may soon have your number. Smartphone malware is getting increasingly sophisticated, and MIT‘s Technology Review reports that a security researcher has created software that turns a smartphone into a “zombie” that can be controlled remotely. The blog says Georgia Weidman created the program, which controls a Google (GOOG) Android phone via short message service (SMS) to bring about a smartphone zombie apocalypse.

malicious software on mobile phonesOnce only theoretical, real-world cell-phone viruses are becoming more common. The article reports the most famous was a scam in Russia that tricked users into installing malicious software on Android phones and using the SMS functionality to send messages to a number that charged a premium fee. In late 2010, a Chinese virus for Android devices stole personal data according to the article.

Botnets have become a staple of Internet crime. They can be used to attack other systems, host attack tools, send spam, or just steal data. The blog says this type of attack has been rare with mobile devices, but that seems to be changing. “We have been taking down Internet botnets for years now, but there is not as much understanding [of telecom networking],” Ms. Weidman says. “I definitely see criminals going more and more toward using the telco’s network.”

zombie nodes of a botnetTR explains that Ms. Weidman’s program is one of the first known to turn smartphones into zombie nodes of a botnet. Her attack works like this: After infecting a phone with a rootkit, she uses that phone to send spam text messages, takes part in a denial-of-service, or degrade the communications of the phone—all without the user knowing. The techniques apply to any smartphone, Weidman says.

Today’s smartphones have multiple layers of defense. For one, they can block malicious applications. They also have managed channels, such as the Apple (AAPL) App Store and Google’s Android Marketplace, for applications.

botnet controlAs a result, Weidman says, infecting a smartphone is not easy. “The hurdle with any malware is infecting the phone,” she told Technology Review, noting that the methods used by cybercriminals usually do not work. “More of what you see of malware is people downloading applications for their phone that are infected,” she says.

The problem of cyber-criminals targeting consumers’ phones will only get worse Kevin Mahaffey, chief technology officer of mobile-security startup Lookout told the author. Because the control of phones is so easy to turn into cash via premium text messages, criminals will be drawn to attack the devices.

Lookout logo“I always tend to look at the economics of the problem to ask myself whether it will continue in the future,” the CTO explained. “And because there is an incentive for attackers to compromise mobile phones, and the cost of compromising is not that high, that says it will become more prevalent in the future.”

Using the telecommunications network, rather than the Internet, for botnet control allows attackers to hide their actions from users. When the attacker does it using malicious software, the user has little chance of detecting it, says Weidman.

smartphone botnet zombie“When I infected a phone in my botnet—my lab botnet—with malware, the smartphone would receive a message through SMS and I would check to see if it has botnet instructions in it,” she says. “If it does, it would perform the functionality requests, and then it would swallow the message, so the user does not know that there was a message at all.”

While phones do not have the computing power of more traditional computers, they are hefty enough to handle many of the tasks that cyber-criminals desire, she says. She adds that the sheer number of smartphones means that any botnet could be “a real threat” to create a smartphone zombie apocalypse.

Related articles

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

What is Malware?

MalwareMost users I talk to about malware seem to use the following terms interchangeably; malware, virus, trojan, keylogger, worm, backdoor, bot, rootkit, ransomware, adware, spyware, and dialer. Raymond.cc offers some standard definitions to clarify the conversations.

MalwareMalware is short for Malicious Software where all the terms above fall into this category because they are all malicious. The different term being used instead of just plain virus is to categorize what the malicious software is capable of doing.

Virus spreads on its own by smuggling its code into application software. The name is in analogy to its biological archetype. Not only does a computer virus spread many times and make the host software unusable, but also runs malicious routines.

Trojan horseTrojan horse/Trojan is a type of malware disguised as useful software. The aim is that the user executes the Trojan, which gives it full control of your PC and the possibility to use it for its own purposes. Most of the time, more malware will be installed in your system, such as backdoors or key loggers.

Worms are malicious software that aims at spreading as fast as possible once your PC has been infected. Unlike viruses, it is not other programs that are used to spread the worms, but storage devices such as USB sticks, communication media such as e-mail, or vulnerabilities in your OS. Their propagation slows down the performance of PCs and networks, or direct malicious routines will be implemented.

Key loggerKey loggers log any keyboard input without you even noticing, which enables pirates to get their hands on passwords or other important data such as online banking details.

Dialers are relics from a time when modems or ISDN were still used to go online. They dialed expensive premium-rates numbers and thus caused your telephone bill to reach astronomic amounts. Dialers have no effect on ADSL or cable connections, but they are making a comeback with mobile devices and QR codes (I covered Attaging here).

BotnetBackdoor / Bots is usually a piece of software implemented by the authors themselves that enable access to your PC or any kind of protected function of a computer program. Backdoors are often installed once Trojans have been executed, so whoever attacks your PC will gain direct access to your PC. The infected PC, also called “bot”, will become part of a botnet.

Exploits are used to systematically exploit vulnerabilities of a computer program. Whoever attacks your PC will gain control of your PC or at least parts of it.

Spyware is software that spies on you, i.e. collect different user data from your PC without you even noticing.

AdwareAdware is derived from “advertisement”. Besides the actual function of the software, the user will see advertisements. Adware itself is not dangerous, but tons of displayed adverts are considered a nuisance and thus are detected by good anti-malware solutions.

Rootkit mostly consists of several parts that will grant unauthorized access to your PC. Plus, processes and program parts will be hidden. They can be installed, for instance, through an exploit or a Trojan.

Rogues / Scareware are also know as “Rogue Anti-Spyware” or “Rogue Anti-Virus”, rogues pretend to be security software. Often, fake warnings are used to make you buy the security software, which the pirates profit from.

RansomwareRansomware “Ransom” is just what you think it is. Ransomware will encrypt personal user data or block your entire PC. Once you have paid the “ransom” through an anonymous service, your PC will be unblocked.

There are different categories of malware the author says that most of the malware today combines different kinds of malware to achieve a higher rate of infection and giving more control to the hacker. Most malware is invisible that runs silently without your knowledge to avoid detection except for ransomware and adware.

Using “virus” as a catch-all phrase to include all types of malware is no longer right. The correct word to use should be malware. However, don’t expect the big anti-virus companies to rebrand their products to Kaspersky Anti-Malware or Bitdefender Anti-Malware because doing that may risk losing their brand identity even if they do offer a complete anti-malware solution.

The blog says it doesn’t mean that you’re safe if you don’t see it so it is important to run an anti-virus software from reputable brands such as Kaspersky, ESET, Avast, Avira, AVG (at one time AVG was installing a Yahoo toolbar without notice) MSE together with a second opinion anti-malware such as HitmanPro, Malwarebytes Anti-Malware, and SUPERAntiSpyware. As for Emsisoft Anti-Malware, it comes with its own Anti-Malware engine and Ikarus Anti-Virus Engine.

Related articles

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

40 Years of Malware – Part 4

40 Years of Malware - Part 42011 marks the 40th anniversary of the computer virus. Help Net Security notes that over the last four decades, malware instances have grown from 1,300 in 1990, to 50,000 in 2000, to over 200 million in 2010. Fortinet (FTNT) marks this dubious milestone with an article that counts down some of the malware evolution low-lights.

The Sunnyvale, CA network security firm says that viruses evolved from academic proof of concepts to geek pranks which have evolved into cybercriminal tools. By 2005, the virus scene had been monetized, and almost all viruses developed for the sole purpose of making money via more or less complex business models. According to FortiGuard Labs, the most significant computer viruses over the last 40 years are:

See Part 1 Here  – See Part 2 Here  – See Part 3 Here  – See Part 4 Here

Botnets2007 – By 2007, Botnets have infected millions worldwide using Zombie systems to send spam to generate Denial of Service (DoS) attacks, compromised passwords, and data. By 2007 cybercriminals had developed a lucrative business model they were protecting. The attackers became more concerned about protecting their zombie computers. Until 2007, botnets lacked robustness, by neutralizing its unique Control Center (PDF), a botnet could be taken down because Zombies didn’t have anyone to report to (and take commands from) anymore. The Storm botnet was the first to feature a peer-to-peer architecture (PDF) to decentralize its command and control functions. At the peak of the outbreak, the Storm Botnet was more powerful than many supercomputers and accounted for 8% of all malware running in the world according to FortiGuard.

Koobface2008Koobface (an anagram for Facebook) spreads by pretending to be the infected user on social networks, prompting friends to download an update to their Flash player to view a video. The update is a copy of the virus. Once infected, users would serve as both vectors of infection for other social network contacts and as human robots to solve CAPTCHA challenges for cyber-criminals, among other things. Koobface is also the first botnet to recruit its Zombie computers across multiple social networks (Facebook, MySpace, hi5, Bebo, Friendster, etc). FortiGuard estimates that over 500,000 Koobface zombies are online at the same time.

Conficker2009Conficker (aka Downadup) is a particularly sophisticated and long-lived virus, as it’s both a worm, much like Sasser, and an ultra-resilient botnet, which downloads destructive code from a random Internet server. (We still see it pop-up from time to time at work). Conficker targeted the Microsoft Windows OS and used Windows flaws and Dictionary attacks on admin passwords to crack machines and link them to a computer under the control of the attacker. Conficker’s weakness is its propagation algorithm is poorly calibrated, causing it to be discovered more often according to Fortinet. In 2009 some networks were so saturated by Conficker, that it caused planes to be grounded, hospitals and military bases were impacted. Conficker infected bout 7 million systems worldwide.

Advanced Persistent ThreatAdvanced Persistent Threat (aka APT, Operation Aurora) was a cyber attack that began in mid-2009 and continued through December 2009. The attack was first publicly disclosed by Google (GOOG) on January 12, 2010, in a blog post. In the blog post, Google said the attack originated in China and was both sophisticated and well resourced and consistent with an advanced persistent threat attack. According to Wikipedia the attack also included Adobe (ADBE), Dow Chemical (DOW), Juniper Networks (JNPR), Morgan Stanley (MS), Northrop Grumman,(NOC), Rackspace (RAX), Symantec (SYMC), and Yahoo (YHOO). There is speculation that the primary goal of the attack was to gain access to and potentially change source code repositories at these high-tech, security, and defense contractor companies.

The definition of an Advanced Persistent Threat depends on who you ask, Greg Hoglund, CEO at HBGary told Network World an Advanced Persistent Threat is a nice way for the Air Force and DoD to not have to keep saying “Chinese state-sponsored threat.” He says,” APT is “the Chinese government’s state-sponsored espionage that’s been going on for 20 years,” Mr. Hoglund told Network World.

Stuxnet USB2010 Stuxnet‘s discovery in September 2010 ushered in the era of cyberwar. According to most threat researchers today, only governments have the necessary resources to design and implement a virus of such complexity. Stuxnet is the first piece of malware specifically designed to sabotage nuclear power plants. It can be regarded as the first advanced tool of cyber-warfare. Stuxnet was almost certainly a joint U.S. / Israeli creation for damaging the Iranian nuclear weapons program, which it did, by destroying a thousand centrifuges used for uranium enrichment.

To spread, Stuxnet exploited several critical vulnerabilities in Microsoft (MSFT) Windows, which, until then, were unknown, including one guaranteeing its execution when inserting an infected USB key into the target system, even if a systems autorun capabilities were disabled. From the infected system, Stuxnet was then able to spread into an internal network, until it reached its target: a Siemens industrial software system that run Iran’s Bushehr nuclear reactor and most likely intended to destroy or neutralize the industrial system.

Duqu2011Duqu is the current star in the world of malware but, as history shows, that fame will be short-lived. Just like fashion models, modern malware has a lifespan in the media eye of a couple of weeks to a couple of months, tops. They then fade into the shadow of more dangerous and advanced tools, according to Help Net Security.

Gary Warner, director of Research in Computer Forensics in the UAB College of Arts and Sciences blogged that Duqu is a data-stealing program that shares several blocks of code with Stuxnet. In fact, one of the two pieces of malware we’ve seen that is described as being Duqu is also detected as Stuxnet by some AV vendors.

Symantec disclosed in their report that one of the infections they were analyzing was infected via a Word Document that exploited the system using a previously unknown 0-day attack.

On November 3, 2011, Microsoft released a Microsoft Security Advisory (2639658) Vulnerability in TrueType Font Parsing Could Allow Elevation of Privilege. The advisory starts with an executive summary which says, in part:

Microsoft is investigating a vulnerability in a Microsoft Windows component, the Win32k TrueType font parsing engine. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could run arbitrary code in kernel mode. The attacker could then install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights. We are aware of targeted attacks that try to use the reported vulnerability; overall, we see low customer impact at this time. This vulnerability is related to the Duqu malware.

rb-

Every couple of years a new malware is crowned the most innovative or dangerous cyber threat in the wild. The anti-malware industry is built on a game of chicken between malware creators and anti-malware creators, with end users stuck squarely in the middle. As this series of articles has shown this game has gone on for 40 years since computers were bigger than many houses and were as user-friendly as the DMV.

 

Related articles

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

Staff End Runs Security

When I am reclining in my Bach Seat, contemplating sharing tech services, my mind wanders to the consumerization of IT. The iPads have made an official beachhead and Skype has made it inside the perimeter. So I should not feel alone being concerned about security according to recent reports from Trend Micro and Cisco (CSCO).

employees bypass security roadblocks to engage in social networkingHelp Net Security reports that despite more workplaces regulating social networking site access, employees bypass security roadblocks to engage in social networking. The research by Trend Micro says that employees are finding ways around security roadblocks, making social networking a way of office life around the world. Trend Micro’s 2010 corporate end-user survey, found that globally, social networking at the workplace steadily rose from 19 percent in 2008 to 24 percent in 2010.

The survey also found that laptop users are much more likely than desktop users to visit social networking sites. Globally, social networking usage via laptops went up by 8 percent from 2008 to 2010. In the U.S., it increased by 10 percent In 2010, 29 percent of laptop users versus 18 percent of desktop users surveyed said they frequented these sites at work.

social networking is one of their organization's three greatest security risksThe survey also found that laptop users who can connect to the Internet outside of the company network are more likely to share confidential information via instant messenger, Webmail, and social media applications than those who are always connected to a company’s network.

A 2010 Cisco survey, which looked at the security impact of personal gadgets and social networking in the workplace, found that employees are consistently (Cisco’s words) finding ways around security policies. 68 percent of those surveyed by Cisco said that employees use unsupported social networking applications. Heavy use of unsupported collaboration, P2P, and cloud applications were also reported. More than half said social networking is one of their organization’s three greatest security risks. More than a third reported that their company lost data or experienced a breach because of employees using unsupported devices.

rb-

So why is Facebook such a problem for enterprises? For one, it is a huge time waster. Datacenter Knowledge reports that Facebook users spend a total of more than 16 billion minutes on social networking site Facebook per day. Facebook VP of Technical Operations Jonathan Heiliger stated that 3 billion photos are uploaded to Facebook each month and users view more than 1 million photos every second during a presentation at the Velocity 2010 conference

The more popular the social network, the more effective social networks become as malware distribution platforms. KOOBFACE, the “largest Web 2.0 botnet,” controls and commands compromised machines globally. This demonstrates the scale of the threat and emphasizes the need to educate users and implement strong policies.

Trend Micro says that trying to just prevent users from accessing social networks from work could potentially increase the risk to an organization as users look for ways around computer security possibly increasing the chance of exposure to security threats. The lesson, in Cisco’s view, is that you better find the technologies–and resources–to support personal devices and applications because they will be used regardless. “The best strategic approach is to focus less on restricting usage and more on effective solutions to ensure highly secure, responsible use,” said Fred Kost, Cisco’s director of security solutions.

Call me old-school but it seems that employees have always learned to work within reasonable company boundaries. Another option for those organizations that need web 2.0 in the organization should take a look at Palo Alto Networks who have developed a firewall that can block the wasteful parts of social media and leave some parts of the web 2.0 app accessible.

Consumer technologies evolve faster than the IT department budget, and it could be a constant game of catch-up trying to accommodate the latest rogue gadgets and widgets. Ultimately, rogue IT use is not so much a failure of technology, but a failure of policy and policy enforcement.

Related articles

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.