Tag Archive for Business

Securely Shred Unnecessary Files

Securely Shred Unnecessary FilesOrganizations often hold on to files that are no longer needed. Help Net Security points out that these records take up valuable storage space and cost money that could otherwise be saved. Adhering to a retention schedule helps businesses run more efficiently to save time, money, and space.

expedite the destruction of out-dated records“While it may seem easier to keep everything, this is actually a losing strategy,” Sarah Koucky, Senior Director of Security and Compliance for Cintas Document Management told the blog. “Saving unnecessary records costs both time and money. By setting retention schedules and policies, organizations will remain compliant with government regulations and can expedite the destruction of outdated records to ensure a clutter-free system.”

The author provided the following retention schedule as a general recommended guideline for certain files and documents. Consult your legal advisor for specific retention schedules for your business and records.

  • Accounts payable – 7 years
  • Accounts receivable – 7 years
  • Audit reports – Permanent
  • Bank reconciliations – 3 years
  • Bank statements – 7 years
  • Canceled checks – 7 years
  • Electronic payment records – 7 years
  • Employee files (ex-employees) – 7 years
  • Employment applications – 3 years
  • Employment taxes – 7 years
  • Expense reports – 7 years
  • Financial statements (annual) – Permanent
  • Insurance policies– Permanent
  • Leases/Mortgages – Permanent
  • Loan payment schedules – 7 years
  • Payroll/Labor records – 7 years
  • Purchase orders– 7 years
  • Sales records – 7 years
  • Tax returns – Permanent

It is important to safely and securely dispose of all documents that are no longer needed. With identity theft and data breaches on the rise, doing so will protect confidential information from falling into the wrong hands according to the article.

use a secure shredding serviceMany organizations use a secure shredding service that destroys business documents on-site on a scheduled basis. The author says these companies place secure storage containers in an accessible and identifiable location to make it safe and convenient for all employees to properly shred documents.

In addition, Help Net Security indicates businesses that have a large volume of records with long retention rates but limited space can consider an off-site storage and imaging provider. This will free up space and make sure all electronic and physical records live in a secure environment. All documents can be retrieved on-demand and properly destroyed if required.

rb-

I had a conversation with a client the other day about electronic and physical document retention. The client was blase about a policy until we started to talk about FOIA and eDiscovery and the fact that if they had the documents they would have to produce it for the courts. While I am not a lawyer, I have been told that if there is a policy in place and enforced prior a request to produce a document, the courts will recognize the fact that a document is not available.

Now if you look at what the State of Michigan requires K-12 to keep (PDF), some documents have to be kept for 30-50 years and others have to be permanently retained. This can certainly create real-estate as well as technical challenges.

Can these required documents be stored electronically? What happens when technologies change? In case you didn’t notice the floppy drive is dead. I noted its passing here. The UK’s National Archives says (PDF) that USB drives and CD-Rs are the least reliable long-term storage media. They recommend LTO, but what versions 1, 2,3, 4, 5? This locks you into a single backup server software.

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

Apple Spoofs ‘Ghostbusters’

Apple Spoofs 'Ghostbusters'NetworkWorld posted a long-lost version of an internal Apple video, “BlueBuster.” The video is a spoof of the classic movie Ghostbusters. Chris C. Anderson at the Huffington Post explains that Apple (AAPL) spoofed “Ghostbusters” in a parody music video based on Detroit born Ray Parker’s song “Ghostbusters.” “Bluebusters” was intended as an internal promotional rallying cry in which Apple defeats the global domination aspirations of “Blue” aka IBM (IBM).

As Paul McNamara at Network World’s Buzz Blog points out, “It was clear that the metaphor of Apple as the liberator of the office worker wasn’t confined to the famous 1984 commercial.”

Steve Jobs BluesbusterAs prophetic as the theme of this video has turned out to be, we can’t help but grimace at a young Jobs decked out in a Macintosh inspired Ghostbusters Uniform. Aside from a resemblance to Harold Ramis, Apple CEO Steve Jobs doesn’t make much more of a splash in the video. And yes, Apple managed a “Bluebusters” spoof that ran the full 4:20 of the song.

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him at LinkedInFacebook and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

What Happened to the Paperless Office?

What Happened to the Paperless Society?The Economist wonders whatever happened to the “paperless office”? Thirty years ago computers were hailed as the beginning of the paperless office era. In 1980 The Economist recommended that firms trying to improve productivity “reduce the flow of paper, ultimately aiming to abolish it”.

Unfortunately not many people listened to The Economist. Since they extolled the virtue of a paperless office, global paper consumption has increased by half.

Paper consumption

The average American uses almost six 40-foot trees a year in paper. Gizmodo says don’t feel too bad. The EU bureaucracy in Brussels pushed the Belgian paper consumption to a whopping 8.5 trees per person. The equivalent to four Rockefeller Center Christmas trees.

Paperless office research says

The trend will not change. A report from ITnewsLink reports that more than half of Americans think the U.S. will never go paperless. Pollster Poll Position conducted a national survey to see if Americans think the U.S. could ever be a paperless society.

Poll Position researchPoll Position’s research found that 56% of Americans said they don’t think the U.S. would ever be a paperless society. Only 20% said yes, one day we’ll all go paperless. 24% of Americans were undecided or had no opinion on the question.

Other Poll Position finding

  • 63% of the 18-29 age group said the U.S. would never be a paperless society and 23% said we could be a paperless society.
  • 56% of men and women said we could never be a paperless society.

You can still vote in their online companion poll.

rb-

I think that in an era of computers, Amazon (AMZN) Kindle Fire and Apple (AAPL) iPad tablet computers, iPhones and Google (GOOG) Android smartphones that paper consumption would decrease. Apparently it takes more than buzzwords like “paperless” and “green” to make a difference.

Related articles
  • The Paperless Office? (Going Green) (whattheythink.com)

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him at LinkedInFacebook and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

Steve Jobs and Neil Young Planned Hi-Fi iPod

Steve Jobs and Neil Young Planned Hi-Fi iPodRock icon Neil Young took his campaign for higher-fidelity digital music to the stage of All Things D’s D: Dive Into Digital conference. The Huffington Post reports that the master of the one-note guitar solo says he was discussing a Hi-Fi iPod type device with the late Steve Jobs.

Steve Jobs didn't use his iPod at homeYoung said the Apple (AAPL) co-founder was such a fan of music that he didn’t use his iPod and its digitally compressed files at home. Instead, he used a physical format well-known to have better sound. “Steve Jobs was a pioneer of digital music. His legacy is tremendous,Young said. “But when he went home, he listened to vinyl (albums).

Rock and Roll Hall of Famer Young says that he spoke with Jobs about creating a high fidelity format that has 20 times better than files in the most current digital formats, including MP3.

Neil YoungSuch a format, he said, would contain 100 percent of the data of music as it is created in a studio, as opposed to 5 percent in compressed formats including Apple’s AAC. Each song would be huge, and a new storage and playback device might only hold 30 albums. Each song would take about 30 minutes to download, which is fine if you leave your device on overnight, he said. “Sleep well. Wake up in the morning. Play some real music and listen to the joy of 100 percent of the sound of music,” he said.

Although Young didn’t have a practical plan for developing such a format – saying it’s for “rich people” to decide – he said Jobs was on board with the idea before he died. “I talked to Steve about it. We were working on it,” Young said. “You’ve got to believe if he lived long enough he would eventually try to do what I’m trying to do.

Apple iPod NanoWalt Mossberg, a journalist with News Corp.’s All Things D website, which hosted Jobs at its conferences confirmed Young’s opinion of Jobs. Mossberg said Jobs expressed surprise that “people traded quality, to the extent they had, for convenience or price.

An Apple Inc. spokesperson declined to comment to the HuffPost.

Related articles

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

It’s Official: Google is Better Than Us

It's Official: Google is Better Than UsBusnessInsdier’s Matt Rosoff reports that Google (GOOG) Executive Chairman Eric Schmidt says that people in Silicon Valley don’t talk about the concerns of the 99% because a lot of them are immune to those concerns.

It's Official: GOOG Better Than UsCEO Schmidt told Brad Stone at BusinessWeek, “Occupy Wall Street isn’t really something that comes up in daily discussion because their issues are not our daily reality.

He also said “We live in a bubble, and I don’t mean a tech bubble or a valuation bubble. I mean a bubble as in our own little world….

rb-

Maybe GOOG should think about how statements like this look to the 99%.

Do you think Google is concerned about what the public thinks?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

 

Related articles

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.